Thursday, January 26, 2023

How Policymakers Can Thwart the Rise of Fake Reviews

Australia Day: Why young Aussies are shunning their national holiday BBC on the world Down Under 


Some people really thought they could believe this guy

US January 26, 1998 – Lewinsky scandal: On American television, U.S. President Bill Clinton denies having had "sexual relations" with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky


How Policymakers Can Thwart the Rise of Fake Reviews Center for Data Innovation: As businesses compete for customers in the digital economy, some use deceptive tactics to manipulate consumer reviews about their goods or services, or those of their competitors, including by posting fake reviews.

 These fake reviews can damage honest companies’ reputation and deceive consumers into purchasing goods or services of substandard quality. 

To address this problem, federal and state policymakers should significantly strengthen enforcement actions against the perpetrators of fake reviews, work with the private sector to develop best practices to prevent and detect fake reviews, and enact legislation to protect honest reviewers.”

Read the report.



Pete Recommends – Weekly highlights on cyber security issues, January 14, 2022 – Privacy and cybersecurity issues impact every aspect of our lives – home, work, travel, education, health and medical records – to name but a few. On a weekly basis Pete Weiss highlights articles and information that focus on the increasingly complex and wide ranging ways technology is used to compromise and diminish our privacy and online security, often without our situational awareness.

 Four highlights from this week: A college student made an app to detect AI-written text; Identity Thieves Bypassed Experian Security to View Credit Reports; Adobe Uses Your Content to Train AI; Millions of Vehicles at Risk: and API Vulnerabilities Uncovered in 16 Major Car Brands.



PHYS.org: “USC researchers may have found the biggest influencer in the spread of fake news: social platforms’ structure of rewarding users for habitually sharing information. The team’s findings, published Tuesday by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, upend popular misconceptions that misinformation spreads because users lack the critical thinking skills necessary for discerning truth from falsehood or because their strong political beliefs skew their judgment. Just 15% of the most habitual news sharers in the research were responsible for spreading about 30% to 40% of the fake news.” [h/t @Jeff]

Source – Gizem Ceylan et al, Sharing of misinformation is habitual, not just lazy or biasedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2023)


A stampede to Substack? The platform provides the best answers to some of journalism’s perennial problems ... more »


New Books

Kafka the diarist reveals a tormented man with a robust appetite for living... more »


Essays & Opinions

How to win a poetry prize: Get a B.A. from Harvard, an M.F.A. from Iowa, and befriend Carl Phillips and Robert Pinsky... more »