PwC tax leak‘once-in-a-lifetime’ chance for crackdown: former ATO exec
Edmund
Tadros and Neil Chenoweth
Jan 30, 2023 – 5.00am
The man who led the Tax Office’s crackdown on multinational profit shifting
says revelations about the PwC tax leak offer a “once-in-a-lifetime”
opportunity for the agency to “get rid of the drivers of tax planning” by
targeting accounting firms that provide aggressive taxation advice.
As the former longtime Australian Tax Office deputy commissioner charged
with dealing with multinational companies, Mark Konza was on the front line of the battle to stop
aggressive tax advice by big four firms that was costing the
taxpayer billions in lost revenue.
Former ATO deputy commissioner Mark Konza says the big four accounting firms
must prove they are trustworthy partners.
He said the major accounting firms needed to win back the ATO’s trust by helping
officials identify loopholes rather than advising clients on how to exploit
these gaps.
The revelation last week that some PwC partners and staff had leaked
confidential information obtained while advising the government on measures to
combat tax avoidance has sent shockwaves across the government and within the
big four accounting firms.
A furious Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers accused PwC of a “shocking breach of trust” and
vowed to beef up the powers of the body that polices tax advisers, the Tax
Practitioners Board (TPB), and put at risk the established practice of
government consulting business experts when developing policy.
The TPB terminated the registration of PwC’s
former head of international tax, Peter Collins, as a tax agent for
sharing secret information about the government’s tax plans to other staff at
PwC, and ordered the firm to run additional training after it failed to
regulate other partners and staff who knew the confidential information was
going to be used to help clients sidestep new tax laws.
Firms must rebuild
trust
“The TPB report and its findings will likely result in even more scrutiny of
the tax advice provided by the big four. It’s up to the big four to rebuild
trust by showing the ATO how their business models for tax advice work in the
absence of edgy tax planning,” Mr Konza said.
“The big four have framed themselves as ‘partners’ in the tax system. The
Tax Commissioner, Chris Jordan, can only be sure that the big four have changed
when he sees them acting like true partners; that is, working with the ATO to
close the loopholes they identify, not marketing them for commercial gain.”
The activity came to light only because the ATO used special powers to
obtain emails sent between PwC advisers. Mr Konza, who now consults to law firm
MinterEllison on tax issues after more than four decades at the Tax Office,
said advisers would now probably avoid using emails to discuss aggressive
schemes.
“This is probably a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity – now tax planners are on
notice to be more careful in the communications channels they use,” he said.
“It’s clear to the ATO that they need to get rid of the drivers of tax
planning, not just the symptoms.”
When the multinational anti-avoidance laws were introduced in 2016, Mr Konza
accused some tax advisers and their clients of “gaming the system” to sidestep
the new rules.
Last week, he told The
Australian Financial Review that consultation with industry experts
on tax policy should continue but said the ATO and Treasury would be “more
selective as to who they involve in sensitive discussions”.
“We’re seeing the implications of this crackdown on the ground. Even
ordinary arrangements are now being subjected to extraordinary levels of
scrutiny by the ATO,” he said.
PwC clients
targeted
PwC CEO Tom Seymour, the firm’s former tax leader, apologised last week and
said the firm had updated its policies to “protect against this happening
again”.
The firm argues the investigation did not find that any client arrangements
or structures were affected in connection with the leak. However, PwC leaders
know they will struggle to win back the trust of the ATO and the government.
The TPB investigation is a new low point in the relationship between
Australia’s largest accounting firm and the ATO, and raises extra risks for
clients who use the firm for tax advice.
Multiple sources have told the Financial
Review that it appears the Tax Office has continued with its tough
approach to PwC, targeting the firm’s tax clients with reviews even when the
arrangements are considered standard by multinational corporations.
For more than a decade, tax officials have scrutinised the firm over its
advice to multinational companies including miner Rio Tinto, meat giant JBS, energy company Chevron and explosives maker Orica.
In 2018, the Tax Office also targeted clients who had
used the firm for advice on the research and development incentive application.
Read more about the
PwC tax leak
- PwC partner leaked government tax
plans to clients The former head of international tax for PwC
Australia, Peter Collins, has been deregistered by the Tax Practitioners
Board for dishonesty and for sharing confidential government briefings.
- Government puts tax professionals
‘on notice’ after PwC breach Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones
said the government may rethink its approach to consulting tax
professionals after PwC and its former head of international tax were
sanctioned for breaching confidentiality rules.
- Sukkar dismisses calls to sanction
PwC over leaking scandal The former assistant treasurer and PwC
alumni cemented the big four firm’s position as the dominant supplier of
government tax advice.
- Treasurer slams PwC tax leak as
‘shocking breach of trust’ A furious federal Treasurer Jim
Chalmers said the nation’s largest accounting firm had put economic
decision-making and policymaking at risk.
- How a paper tiger mauled PwC
Shock revelations by the Tax Practitioners Board offer the government a
major reset of how it takes advice on tax policy from the big four
accounting firms.