Thursday, May 28, 2026

Whistleblower Krisis: Community farms and veggie gardens are adding value to new housing developments

Sinclair Lewis’s It Can’t Happen Here

If the US presidential campaign conveys a flavour of unreality, that may be because it is rooted in fiction. In 1935, Sinclair Lewis sat down to write a novel about political radicalisation and social upheaval in the depression-ravaged US. What emerged after four months of feverish work was It Can’t Happen Here, a runaway bestseller that quickly sold more than 300,000 copiesOne Nation’s banning of the ABC and abuse of journalists is shameful. It’s time other media took a stand

 

KPMG’s whistleblower crisis 

KPMG Australia has prepared a document summarising its latest investigation into wide-ranging allegations about the misuse of client data by a whistleblower. 

The document describes dozens of the allegations and concludes they are unsubstantiated, while noting the two partners were punished for what it describes as minor infractions. 

In one case, KPMG penalised a partner over an unattended laptop containing sensitive Dexus data, despite insisting the breach did not compromise a separate bid for the client’s audit. 

The firm’s investigators also failed to interview several members of KPMG’s Dexus audit bid team or anyone from Dexus itself. The risk for the firm now is that, like the PwC tax leaks scandal, which involved the misuse of confidential government data to win work, KPMG’s response to the matter becomes the focus of parliament and regulators. 

Aspects of the allegations are being examined by a parliamentary committee, corporate regulator the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, the Tax Practitioners Board, and professional body Chartered Accountants ANZ.


Sydney couple fleeced bank of more than $40m, police allege

A former National Australia Bank and Commonwealth Bank employee and his mortgage broker wife have been arrested and charged with facilitating more than $40 million worth of fraud for a financial crime syndicate accused of fleecing Australia’s major banks of hundreds of millions of dollars.
Huy Tin Nguyen, 34, and his wife, Thu Huong Nguyen, 35, are accused of helping the Penthouse Syndicate – alleged to be one of the biggest fraud and money laundering syndicates in Australian history – build a luxury property empire across Sydney and defraud the country’s finance giants with the help of a network of corrupt bankers, mortgage brokers, solicitors, real estate agents and property developers.


Four Corners reporter sacked over external podcast Calum Jaspan Calum Jaspan May 28, 2026 

The ABC has sacked Four Corners reporter Mahmood Fazal after an internal investigation into an unauthorised podcast appearance with a former underworld figure last year


How Palantir is becoming embedded in major newsroom operations Middle East Eye


LOVE IN THE BRAIN: Fatherhood Dramatically Rewires Your Brain, Scans Reveal


Community farms and veggie gardens are adding value to new housing developments


Joy of flowers and music

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

The Chicago Pope is not having any of that tech bros bullsh*t


In his first encyclical, Pope Leo XIV draws on a broad range of cultural and philosophical figures for inspiration.


Pope Leo warns AI revolution driven by ‘idolatry of profit’ 
 Pontiff says it is ‘not permissible’ to entrust lethal decisions to artificial systems 


  Leo XIV quotes Gandalf’s famous speech to the hobbit Merry: 
 “It is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set, uprooting the evil in the fields that we know, so that those who live after may have clean earth to till.”

The Chicago Pope is not having any of that tech bros bullsh*t


Tolkien, Beethoven, MLK Jr., and Hannah Arendt: The Voices That Resonate in ‘Magnifica Humanitas’



The co-founder of a prominent A.I. company was nearby as the pope implored A.I. leaders to slow down and consider the technology’s possible perils.


Pope Leo XIV has been a major global critic of immigration crackdowns and war, staking out a moral agenda that has at times challenged the political leadership of his home country.

Now Leo, the first pope from the United States, has added to that list artificial intelligence, taking on American power brokers of another kind — this time in Silicon Valley.

Leo’s papal document, titled “Magnifica Humanitas,” or “Magnificent Humanity,” and made public on Monday, is the defining theological statement so far of his young papacy, and the most significant moral intervention on A.I. to date from a religious leader. It also is an effort to inject Catholic moral values into a famously secular, and significantly American, industry that is transforming the world at lightning speed.

“Crucial questions impose themselves on our conscience and can no longer be avoided: Where are we going? Toward what goal do we wish to orient ourselves? What direction should we choose as a people and as a human community?” Leo wrote.

Leo specifically called for A.I. to be “disarmed,” similar to the church’s support for nuclear disarmament, meaning “freed from logics that turn it into an instrument of domination, exclusion and death,” he explained in a speech at the Vatican.

The document’s release in the synod hall was styled as a branded launch event, with bright yellow banners and a splashy introductory video, produced with EWTN, an American Catholic network with global reach.

Seated three seats away from the pope on the dais was a high-powered A.I. pioneer, Christopher Olah, a co-founder of the American company Anthropic. The Vatican’s invitation to such a business executive was a rarity. It signaled an attempt to expand Leo’s influence, and his priority on dialogue even among unlikely partners, presenting a friendly posture alongside an ostensible adversary.

For Leo, the way forward must involve collaboration, said Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago, Leo’s hometown, who sat in the front row.

Image
A man holding a copy of “Magnifica Humanitas.”
Leo’s declaration, an open letter to “all people of good will,” ran to roughly 42,300 words in its English version.Credit...Alberto Pizzoli/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

“I think that openness on the part of Mr. Olah, as well as the Holy Father, can be the bridge by which all that can happen,” he said in an interview on his way out of the synod hall. “There is a need for the wisdom that the church’s tradition can bring to this discussion of how to use A.I. in a way that preserves human dignity.”

But Mr. Olah’s presence also underscored that significant power lies not only with governments, but “with major economic and technological actors,” as Leo noted, and that the Vatican is prioritizing these relationships in an almost official diplomatic capacity.

Leo opened his remarks with a special thank you to Mr. Olah, almost as if he were a head of state. “In turn, in the name of the church I accept your invitation to walk together to listen and to speak and together to find the way for humanity in this time of artificial intelligence,” Leo said.

The Vatican is acutely aware of technology’s power to upend existing political and religious order. The invention of the printing press in the 15th century famously preceded the rise of nation-states and the Protestant Reformation, remaking the power of the Catholic church.

The Vatican has been an instrumental force over the last decade in generating a global conversation about the value of the human in the A.I. age.

Church leaders under Pope Francis regularly held meetings called the “Minerva Dialogues” with technology leaders to discuss A.I. developments. Pope Francis met with the Group of 7 leaders in 2024 and urged regulation, and also called for the banning of lethal, autonomous weapons.

Leo’s document, called an encyclical, is in many ways a culmination of that effort.

“At key moments in history, the Church is called to decipher the ‘new things’ in the light of the Gospel and the dignity of the human being,” Leo said on Monday. “Today we find ourselves facing a transformation of similar magnitude, with perhaps even greater consequences. “

A moral critique of A.I. has been growing within some religious communities in the past few years. The effort to elevate a broader discussion has grown more urgent as the technology’s impact for war and on children becomes more pressing. Powerful companies including Anthropic are on a path to becoming trillion-dollar ones.

“When such power is concentrated in the hands of a few, it tends to become opaque and evade public oversight, increasing the risk of distorted forms of development that give rise to new dependencies, exclusions, manipulations and inequalities,” Leo wrote.

With this document, Leo is offering a way for efforts to congeal into a united movement to defend what he describes as human flourishing.

Catholic universities in the U.S., including Georgetown and Santa Clara, have taken significant steps to advance the conversation about A.I. and Catholic moral values in academic and public circles.

The University of Notre Dame received a $50 million grant from the Lilly Endowment in December to develop faith-based ethical frameworks for A.I. through its Institute for Ethics and the Common Good.

Meghan Sullivan, the director of that institute, said she often hears a concerning view when she meets with A.I. developers in Silicon Valley — “that only a few hundred people on earth actually matter right now: the ones building frontier models and the politicians powerful enough to regulate them.”

“This encyclical is a direct rebuttal to that worldview,” she said. “The Church is insisting, as it has for 2,000 years, that the people of Wichita and South Bend and Nairobi and Manila are not bit players in someone else’s technological revolution.

“I think that we are seeing with Pope Leo in this encyclical, finally an institution that’s powerful enough to stand up for those ideas.”


The document has a particularly American appeal. Leo specifically references the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops — the only national conference to get a callout — in a section about caring for young people facing job insecurity. He quotes J. R. R. Tolkien’s “The Return of the King,” a novel beloved by many in America, particularly young men.

How effective Leo’s efforts will be, and how much impact a papal treatise can have even in Catholic circles, remains to be seen.

Societies like the United States once held constitutional conventions to have robust public conversations about such critical topics, noted Ron Ivey, a longtime writer and research fellow with Harvard University’s Human Flourishing Program.

Too often the prevailing narrative is that humans have no choice but to accept the widespread required use of A.I., he said.

“We need to have a public conversation, in our libraries, in our civil society, whatever is still strong in that area,” he said. “Why are we building this thing, and who is it for, and how do we make it work for our flourishing?”

Elizabeth Dias is The Times’s national religion correspondent, covering faith, politics and values.

Safeguarding the Human Person in the Time of Artificial Intelligence

Pope Leo XIV released his first encyclical letter yesterday; it’s entitled Magnifica Humanitas Of His Holiness Pope Leo XIV On Safeguarding the Human Person In the Time of Artificial Intelligence. It is very long and I haven’t been able to read the whole thing; here’s a taste:


Safeguarding the Human Person in the Time of Artificial Intelligence

Pope Leo XIV released his first encyclical letter yesterday; it’s entitled Magnifica Humanitas Of His Holiness Pope Leo XIV On Safeguarding the Human Person In the Time of Artificial Intelligence. It is very long and I haven’t been able to read the whole thing; here’s a taste:

It is not possible to provide a single, comprehensive definition of AI. What can be stated, however, is that we must avoid the misconception of equating this type of “intelligence” with that of human beings. These systems merely imitate certain functions of human intelligence. In doing so, they often surpass human intelligence in speed and computational capacity, offering tangible benefits across many fields. Yet this power remains entirely tied to data processing. So-called artificial intelligences do not undergo experiences, do not possess a body, do not feel joy or pain, do not mature through relationships and do not know from within what love, work, friendship or responsibility mean. Nor do they have a moral conscience, since they do not judge good and evil, grasp the ultimate meaning of situations, or bear responsibility for consequences. They may imitate language, behavior and analytical skills, or even simulate empathy and understanding, but they do not understand what they produce, for they lack the affective, relational and spiritual perspective through which human beings grow in wisdom. Even when these tools are described as capable of “learning,” their way of doing so is different from that of a human person. It is not the experience of those who allow themselves to be shaped by life and grow over time through choices, mistakes, forgiveness and fidelity. Rather, it is a form of statistical adaptation based on data and feedback, which can be very effective, but does not imply inner growth.

You can replace “AI”, “tools”, and “systems” in that paragraph with “a certain sort of amoral tech billionaire like Musk, Andreessen, and Thiel” or “a data-driven business focused solely on maximizing shareholder value” and it’s no less true. (“It’s just business.”)

Simon Willison’s notes on the encyclical are interesting; he calls it “some of the clearest writing I’ve seen on the ethics of integrating AI into modern society”. I noted this part as well while skimming through:

For individuals as well as for nations, development is both a duty and a right. Minimum conditions are required for enabling every person and people to flourish in accord with their dignity, without being kept in a state of dependence or excluded from access to necessary goods. Development is truly human when it places people at the center instead of the accumulation of wealth, and when it concerns peoples as well as individuals. Justice demands the recognition of the rights of society and the rights of peoples, and includes a responsibility toward future generations. Development is not truly human if it increases consumption for some while shifting costs and burdens onto others, or relegates entire regions to subordinate roles, preventing them from realizing their full potential.

And:

The use of AI is never a purely technical matter: when it enters processes that affect people’s lives, it touches on rights, opportunities, status and freedom. Important and sensitive decisions — concerning employment, credit, access to public services or even a person’s reputation — risk being fully delegated to automated systems that do not know “compassion, mercy, forgiveness, and above all, the hope that people are able to change,” and can therefore give rise to new forms of exclusion.

The Catholic Church is the Catholic Church, but plain language with some real thought and tradition behind it is welcome in the AI discussion. As Tim Carmody says:

I’ve said it before but it’s something else to watch a gifted author (with a team of talented researchers) discuss AI with the weight of a 2000-year intellectual and moral tradition behind them, both reckoning with that tradition and trying to project far into the future. Very different from “how will this affect Nvidia’s stock price”.

And Chris Xu:

Skimmed the encyclical and was repeatedly struck by how shocking (good) it feels to read a coherent institutional vision / strategy for how to maneuver through These Times rooted in common sense and firm principles. We have been intellectually failed and starved by so many other institutions.

You can read the whole thing in English (and nine other languages) on the Holy See’s website or read a summary.



One of the country’s top intelligence officials, Kathy Klugman, has warned the world is entering a more dangerous and disorderly period, with transnational crime, terrorism and rising geopolitical tensions converging to create increasingly complex threats closer to home.
“A lot of this [geopolitical competition] is playing out in our region, that is, across the Indo-Pacific,” Klugman, the head of the Office of National Intelligence, told Senate estimates on Monday evening.

Klugman sad (sic) Australia was facing accelerating technological change and intensifying geopolitical competition.

Crime, terror and conflict converging, spy chief warns


GOOD NEWS! Researchers at Stanford University have developed a UNIVERSAL vaccine known as GLA-3M-052-LS+OVA


Emma Thompson among voices supporting anti-ageism campaign, which has uncovered striking findings in top-grossing UK films over past three years


AVOID SEED OIL:  Scientists Warn: America’s Most Popular Cooking Oil May Be Harming Your Intestines


Eating beef every day may not be as bad for your health as first thought