Saturday, January 17, 2026

Isabella Tree: ‘Rewilding a garden is not about closing the gate and letting it go

 

Isabella Tree: ‘Rewilding a garden is not about closing the gate and letting it go

Rewilding doesn’t mean abandoning — it means gardeners becoming a ‘keystone species’, creating a habitat where wildlife can thrive


I’ve lost count of the number of times people have told me that they’re rewilding their garden. But what they often mean is they’ve given up weeding, planting and mowing and they’re calling it nature restoration. We all know gardens like these, where the owners are too busy, too old or simply disinterested. Perhaps you are one of those people, relieved to have found justification, at last, in hanging up the trowel and doing sweet nothing. If you are, I’m afraid I have bad news for you. 
Rewilding a garden is not about closing the gate and letting it go. As any farmer, church warden or gardener knows, if you leave a patch of land — however small — to its own devices it will scrub up, trees will seed and eventually they’ll shade out everything else. 
From a rewilding point of view, this is the last thing you would want. What provides abundance and variety of wildlife is abundance and variety of plants, particularly flowering and fruiting plants — and they need light. Walk into a plantation or ancient woodland and you’ll notice the flowers and fruits — and all the insects and other creatures to which they give life — in the glades and rides, all the places where some degree of light can fall. There may be an abundance of fungi in closed canopy woodland, but there won’t be much else. Out of the 600 or so bird species in Europe, only a handful feed and breed in dense woodland. 
In the wild, in most places in the world, what prevents the landscape from becoming nothing but trees is disturbance from large animals (though fire, storms and disease also play a part). In our rewilding project at Knepp in West Sussex, free-roaming herbivores keep the land semi-open, creating an incredibly rich variety of habitats. Longhorn cows mimic the actions of their extinct ancestor, the aurochs; herds of Exmoor ponies stand in for the extinct tarpan, and Tamworth pigs for the once-native wild boar. We have red, roe and fallow deer too and, of course, beavers. The radically different ways they graze and browse the vegetation, pulling down branches, debarking and even felling trees keeps the land dynamic, in perpetual motion. 
Their dung restores the soil. Hooves, snouts and antlers open up patches of bare soil in the thatchy grass so wild flowers and other plants can colonise. Seeds are transported around the landscape in their gut, hooves and fur. Life surfaces in their wake. In just 20 years, these animals have turned 3,500 acres of depleted, polluted farmland into one of the richest biodiversity hotspots in the country. Bird species breeding at Knepp have risen from 22 in 2007 to 51 in 2025, including some of the UK’s rarest, such as nightingales and turtle doves; benefiting from the complex scrubland habitats shaped by the grazing animals.
In many ways what a gardener does is imitate these natural animal disturbances. When you prune your roses, you’re the nibbling teeth of a wild pony or deer. Shrubs have co-evolved with this animal attention and they respond by fighting back, becoming denser, stronger and thornier, and producing more flowers in case this is their last chance. Studies show that if you apply the saliva of a large herbivore to stems you’ve cut with your secateurs, the plant reads the animal’s enzymes and responds even more vigorously. (There’s a product opportunity for Dragons’ Den here somewhere.)
Longhorn cow sticks out its tongue while browsing among sallow branches.
The tugging tongue of the Longhorn cow mimics the actions of its extinct ancestor the aurochs © Charlie Burrell
Likewise, when you’re digging out the stubborn roots of a dock or thistle, you’re the rootling snout of a wild boar; and when you’re pulling out the thuggish weeds, you’re the tugging tongue of a cow. When you apply blood and bone meal to your beds, you’re providing the effects of a rotting carcass.
Thinking like an animal when you’re gardening is immensely freeing. It allows you to behave organically, to shed obsessions with tidiness and open yourself to a new vision of beauty. As a gardener, you’re the keystone species, creating a looser habitat for living things. If you think like a cow, you’ll want a lawn that is full of nutritious wild flowers, and you’ll leave areas of longer grass providing cover for insects and small mammals. 
If you have a pond, think like a beaver. Throw in some dead branches to provide food for aquatic insects and protection for small fish. Puddle around the edges like a water buffalo, creating pockets where aquatic plants can take root and toads and frogs can spawn. 
A densely planted garden with a variety of wildflowers, leafy plants, and tall flowering stems, bordered by a brick wall and greenery.
Think like an animal when you are gardening and open yourself to a new vision of beauty
As a rewilding gardener you’re also curator, selecting plants that will provide maximum opportunities for other life. These could be plants that extend the nectar and pollen season, and give structural variety, such as the late-flowering shrubby hare’s ear (Bupleurum fruticosum) and sticky moon carrot (Seseli gummiferum) from the Mediterranean, and Thunberg lespedeza from east Asia with its arching shoots of stunning rose-purple flowers in autumn. Managing for biodiversity means working just as hard as any other gardener, only your aim is not just to create a garden that you alone can enjoy, but that wildlife can enjoy too. 
The UK is one of the most nature-depleted countries in the world. Numbers of native insects, birds and small mammals are in freefall, with one in six native British species at risk of extinction, according to the State of Nature 2023 report. Yet there are 20.6mn private gardens in the UK, covering an area three times larger than all our national parks. Imagine if all British gardeners could think like a wild boar, a beaver, an ant, a beetle or an earthworm! We’d be gardening, not just for ourselves but to save our native wildlife and our planet.
Isabella Tree is co-host of the Wilding Gardens conference, being held January 15-16 in Manchester; wildinggardens.co.uk
Find out about our latest stories first — follow@ft_houseandhome on Instagram

Friday, January 16, 2026

Obvious Lies: Former Hillsong founder Brian Houston weighs in on fatal ICE shooting

Twisting truth by Hillsong 


After the shooting of Renee Good, we see dissent can be fatal in Trump’s America – all bets are off


Why Donald Trump is telling such obvious lies on the ICE Minneapolis killing


Renee Nicole Good said ‘I’m not mad at you’ before ICE agent shot her, video shows Clip first posted by partisan outlet Alpha News shows perspective of ICE agent as Good was fatally shot


Former Hillsong founder Brian Houston weighs in on fatal ICE shooting

Hillsong Church founder Brian Houston has posted a series of controversial comments on social media about a fatal shooting by US immigration enforcement officer in Minnesota.

Hannah Farrow
January 15, 2026
Hills Shire Times


Hillsong founder Brian Houston, who has left the church, preaching at Faith Church in St Louis, Missouri in June 2024.

The founder of Hillsong Church and former pastor Brian Houston, has posted a series of controversial comments on social media about the fatal shooting of a woman by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in America.

The shooting, which happened on January 7, when mother Renee Good was shot dead while attempting to drive away during a federal immigration enforcement operation in Minnesota.

In a series of posts on X, formerly known as Twitter, the former Hills Shire resident posted a series of comments on the incident involving federal agents, asserting the woman’s intentions were “clear” and accusing political opponents of lacking intelligence.

The shooting has sparked protests across the US, and drawn criticism from state and local officials about the presence of ICE. Mr Houston, who now lives in the US, described the victim’s vehicle as a “battering ram” and a “weapon”. Brian Houston has posted a number of inflammatory comments on X. Picture: Supplied

Houston’s continued public profile has remained contentious since his departure from Hillsong, one of the world’s largest Pentecostal movements.

In separate posts around the same period, Mr Houston also engaged in personal insults directed at public figures, including referring to comedian Rosie O’Donnell as a “dweeb”.

The posts have defended the actions of ICE. Picture: Supplied

The posts remain publicly visible on X. Mr Houston, who left Hillsong’s leadership group in 2022, continues to preach regularly at Parable Church – a Hills District congregation led by his daughter, Laura Houston.




While he no longer holds a formal role within Hillsong, his preaching at Parable Church has kept him in the public eye, as well as numerous political tweets.

Parable Church responded stating: “While Pastor Brian has spoken at Parable Church and many other Australian Churches during his visits to Sydney, he now lives in the US and leads his own independent ministry.”

One of the comments on X from Brian Houston. Picture: Supplied “His personal thoughts and opinions are his own, and he did not address any political topics during his recent visit to Parable Church.”
They continued: “His social media presence is his own, and separate from that of Parable Church.” The former leader of Hillsong launched his own online ministry called JesusFollowers. TV with his wife, Bobbie Houston, in mid-2024.

Jesus Followers. TV recently advertised the latest service at Parable Church on its website as of last week.

Its YouTube account currently has 5.9k followers, with videos amassing between 50-300 views each.


The Houstons’ website states that like a church, the ministry relies on regular tithes and support from a “family of Jesus followers” to further its mission. While he no longer holds a formal role within Hillsong, his preaching at Parable has kept him in the public eye, as well as numerous conservative political tweets.
Jesus Followers. TV explicitly calls for financial support to sustain and expand its operations, and has multiple avenues on the website to promote donations and tithing from its viewer.

The faith venture model describes it­­ as a project believing that people’s partnerships and giving will help them make a difference and fund the necessary production crew and studio needs. Parable Church has not publicly commented on Houston’s remarks or clarified whether his statements represent the church’s position.

The church also has not addressed whether such language is considered appropriate for someone preaching and exercising influence within its congregation.




Brian Houston was found not guilty after being accused of covering up his father’s sexual abuse. Picture: Nikki Short

In 2019, Brian Houston was found by internal investigations to have inappropriately texted a female staff member and being in another woman’s hotel room while intoxicated after a church conference, breaching the church’s code of conduct.

The woman and Brian Houston has said there was not any sexual activity.
In 2021, Mr Houston stepped down as the director of all Hillsong boards to defend charges of concealing his father’s crimes from the police. He was found not guilty. Frank Houston, who died in 2004, is believed to have used his position as a pastor to abuse young boys in the 1970s. The Minnesota shooting remains under investigation, with legal action now underway in the US over the conduct of federal immigration agents.

Mr Houston has been contacted for comment.






Why men should really be reading more fiction

“A recurring theme is that bravery is like a muscle that must be developed and regularly exercised in order to make it second nature.“

A Time for Bravery: What Happens When Australians Are Courageous



Tiled.art: “Discover great tessellation art, understand how it works, and create your own.”


Spies, spirits and social change: 10 new books to add to your shelf


The lasting message John le Carré gave Tom Hiddleston  — Behind John le Carré's masterwork is an unexpected friendship which binds actor Tom Hiddleston to the iconic espionage

Cast an eye across the headlines, and 2026 feels like a world of obfuscation and distraction. The modern world as we see it on TV suddenly looks more like the fractious and shadowy universe of espionage writer John le Carré, populated by spies like George Smiley and Jonathan Pine.
Is this life imitating art? Or art imitating politics? At a time, when we are invoking Orwell’s famous line “the Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears – it was their final, most essential command”, there are many questions but few easy answers.
“Art has to engage with the real world, and yet the best art can exist on its own,” says actor Tom Hiddleston, who plays superspy Jonathan Pine in The Night Manager. “But if there’s a tangible connection to the real world, I think it invites the audience to bring their own experience to it.”
“One of the things I know le Carré cared deeply about was, if he’s talking about the East and West and their capacity for invention, [that] he’s coming to it from the point of view of the West, right? And I know that his work to some extent evolved out of a response to what was happening in the world.

“What fascinated him as a British writer was, ‘what does it mean to be British’?” Hiddleston says. “Douglas Hodge, who plays [high-ranking intelligence officer] Rex Mayhew, says in the first episode, a nation’s security service is the truest expression of itself. Know thyself. And the challenge is: what does this country stand for? Where is it going, and who’s driving the boat?”


Exit Stalin — reforms and repression in the postwar, pre-collapse USSR

Mark Smith’s impressive history surveys life in the Soviet Union, and its advances and failures from Khrushchev to Gorbachev



The IRS is effectively unable to audit private equity, venture capital, and real estate investment firms. Thousands of workers have been fired from the agency since DOGE and the world's richest man took an ax to it. Now audits of these giant enterprises have dropped 80 or 90%.

 Push to Audit Private Equity and Venture Capital Falters Under Trump


From New York Times Shanghai bureau chief to U.S. intelligence contractor All-Source Intelligence



My final message before I’m on an FBI watchlist: Palantir, Epstein, & The New York Times Juan Sebastian Pinto. From a former Palantir employee



Why men should really be reading more fiction 

Novels require a kind of attention that the modern world is steadily eroding

“People in 1999 using the internet as an escape from reality,” the text read, over an often-used image from a TV series of a face looking out of a car window. Below it was another face looking out of a different car window overlaid with the text: “People in 2026 using reality as an escape from the internet.” 


Trump Lays Out a Vision of Power Restrained Only by ‘My Own Morality

The New York Times Interview with President Donald Trump, January 8, 2026: “On topic after topic, President Trump made clear that he would be the arbiter of any limits to his authorities, not international law or treaties. President Trump declared on Wednesday evening that his power as commander in chief is constrained only by his “own morality,” brushing aside international law and other checks on his ability to use military might to strike, invade or coerce nations around the world


An ecologist in Wales uses tracking dogs to help track & protect the endangered wild otter population; meet The Detectorists.

Set against the serene backdrop of rural Wales, this short documentary follows wildlife ecologist Lee Jenkins and his two German Pointers — Neo and pup-in-training Cariad — as they search for elusive otters. Using scent detection to guide camera trap placement, the team gathers crucial evidence to protect these endangered animals. Shot from a dog’s-eye view with immersive cinematography, the film offers a poetic glimpse into conservation through the nose and eyes of a canine detective.

Thursday, January 15, 2026

FTC settles case with Disney over illegal collection of data from minors; to pay $10 million

 

 



FBI reports that victims lost $333 million at bitcoin ATM’s last year; double the year before 

Chinese language training manuals for crypto romance scammers found at Philippines scam call center; "A woman's IQ is zero when she is in love."
 
Small Business Administration suspends thousands of accounts in Minnesota over PPP fraud
 
Thoughts on fraud stealing government benefits.  Fraud is fraud.  Stealing money from the government simply spreads the losses among everyone, and takes money from those who have a legitimate need for those funds. Apparently 100 million people have now seen the Nick Shirley video on X.  The US Attorney’s office there says that they expect at least $9 billion in fraud against these programs.  And this is quickly expanding to many other states.  Not all of the fraud can be attributed to immigrants, of course, but anyone engaged in fraud should be prosecuted, and those in charge of these programs must do a better job of screening for fraud. 
 

Fraud Studies: Here are links to the studies I’ve written for the Better Business Bureau: puppy fraudromance fraud; BEC fraudsweepstakes/lottery fraud,  tech support fraudromance fraud money mulescrooked movers, government impostersonline vehicle sale scamsrental fraud, gift cards,  free trial offer frauds,  job scams,  online shopping fraud,  fake check fraud and crypto scams
 
Fraud News Around the worldHumorFTC and CFPBArtificial Intelligence and deep fake fraudBenefit Theft Scam CompoundsBusiness Email compromise fraud Bitcoin and Crypto FraudRansomware and data breachesATM Skimming                                                       Romance Fraud and Sextortion 

Mass surveillance, the metaverse, making America ‘great again’: the novelists who predicted our present

 

If we silence voices we don’t agree with, we’re doing the work of extremists for them 



Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Why Are So Many Writers Dropping Out

 I read the news today, oh boy

About an ICE man who made the grade
And though the news was rather sad
Well, I just had to gasp
Another brawn shirted psychopath

He blew her mind out in a car
She didn’t notice that her rights had changed
A crowd of people stood and stared
Nobody had seen his face before
Everybody recorded it as if to keep score

I saw the video today, oh boy

The occupying army had started the war
A crowd of people turned away
But I just had to look
Another life they took
I’d love to have them turn on you

Woke up, fell out of bed
Dragged a comb across my head
Found my way downstairs and drank a cup
And looking up, I noticed the hour was late
Found my voice and petted my cat
Made up new lyrics in seconds flat
Found my way upstairs and had a smoke
And somebody spoke and I went into a dream

I read the news today, oh boy
A few holes in Renee Good
And because the entry holes were rather small
They had to discount them all
Now we know nobody is going to take the fall
I’d love to have them turn on you

A Day in the Life, by the Beatles


I read the news today - by the Beatles





Smithsonian Faces New Ultimatum From Trump Administration

“After a monthslong lull in tensions, the Smithsonian is facing an ultimatum from the White House to comply next week with a demand” to produce a very long list of internal documents for “a comprehensive review of the institution’s content and plans — or risk potential cuts to its budget.” - The New York...

Why Are So Many Writers Dropping Out Of Adelaide’s Famous Writing Festival?

“Nearly 50 authors, commentators, and academics have dropped out of this year’s Adelaide Festival in Australia after the Festival announced that they were canceling an appearance by Dr. Randa Abdel-Fattah over ‘cultural sensitivity’ concerns.” - LitHub

DorkSearchPRO: Google Dorks Generator

“Advanced Passive Reconnaissance Tool for OSINT & Security Research. Generate powerful Google Dorks instantly • 100% Client-Side • Open Source. Google Dorking (also known as Google Hacking) is an OSINT technique that uses advanced search operators to uncover security vulnerabilities, exposed sensitive files, and misconfigurations in web servers and applications. 

Security researchers, penetration testers, and cybersecurity professionals use Google Dorks to perform passive reconnaissance and identify potential attack vectors before malicious actors do.

  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) – Google Dorks are advanced search operators that allow security researchers and penetration testers to discover information exposed on the internet that isn’t easily accessible through standard searches. They use special commands like filetype:inurl:site:, and intitle: to filter Google results and find sensitive files, admin panels, configuration files, and potential security vulnerabilities.
  • Google Dorks are advanced search operators that allow security researchers and penetration testers to discover information exposed on the internet that isn’t easily accessible through standard searches. They use special commands like filetype:inurl:site:, and intitle: to filter Google results and find sensitive files, admin panels, configuration files, and potential security vulnerabilities…”
  • See also 19 tips on AI for OSINT research

Dial a discussion: Today’s writers are too chummy. They should start brawling again.

 

Today’s writers are too chummy. They should start brawling again.

If we want to save literary culture, we need to return to the age of literary feuds.


Guest column by 

For as long as humans have been making capital-L Literature, people have been writing its obituary. Ten years ago, the author Kelsey McKinney catalogued 30 times in the last century when the novel was prematurely eulogized; since then, rumors of its death have only snowballed. The trouble now is how many people seem ready to accept it.


Fewer people are reading fiction, we are told, and those who do read do so only when the fiction involves murder, sex, dragons or, ideally, some combination of the three. Armchair diagnoses multiply: Decades of failed pedagogy have caused a collapse in American literacy rates. Social media and phones have obliterated attention spans. Publishers have gone the way of Hollywood, betting everything on franchises and celebrity. Media outlets have killed off book sections. Large language models based on brazen theft pump out slop in torrents. David Brooks thinks the problem is — I’m kidding. No one cares what David Brooks thinks the problem is.

While all these opinions (even, sigh,Brooks’s) have some truth, there is a larger problem we need to confront: Literature has become boring. I don’t mean the books themselves. Even as publishers conglomerate into a Borg-like hivemind, writers are still crafting transgressive, sophisticated, brilliant work. When I say boring, I mean the book world itself. The collective of writers, critics, readers, booksellers and tastemakers that we call the literary establishment has lost the one thing that every compelling narrative depends on: conflict.

 

The history of literature is, in many ways, the history of its feuds. Byron wrote “Don Juan” as an up-yours to then-poet laureate Robert Southey; Theodore Dreiser slappedSinclair Lewis over losing the Nobel Prize; Mario Vargas Llosa slugged Gabriel García Márquez in the eye over a matter involving Vargas Llosa’s wife; Lillian Hellman and Mary McCarthy fell out over Hellman’s inflexible support of Joseph Stalin (yes, really) and went on to hate each other very productively for half a century.

It’s not just that all this makes for good gossip, though gossip has its own virtues. Literary movements essentially consist of writers getting so sick of what’s being published around them that they decide to create something wholly new. Writers are by nature jealous, judgmental, insecure and very good at saying so. We call one another out for dishonesty and sloppy prose. Or at least, we used to. Looking around today, one could be forgiven for assuming that literature is as chummy and supportive as a yoga retreat. My wife compares it to chimps grooming each other, with the same delicate hierarchy. We’ve equated good literary citizenship with being cheerleaders, which for most of us takes the form of clicking a button or two on a social media app, or claiming we’re “screaming, crying, throwing up” at an acquaintance’s cover reveal. In public, we’re trained to speak like politicians, or actors on an endless press tour. The only chance most of us get to blow off steam is within the safe confines of an internet dogpile, which is not nearly as invigorating or entertaining as a feud. What we want is to be able to say, as Clive James so gloriously put it, that “the book of my enemy has been remaindered.” Instead, writers are now expected to gush over one another, on the pretense that “we’re all in this together” — even though we absolutely are not.


 The truth is that we are all competing over an ever-shrinking plot of turf and trying to pretend there’s enough room for everyone. It’s an attitude that presents the survival of literature as something we all have to fight for, when literature should be something we fight over. The great privilege of being an author — because God knows it’s not the sales — is that people might care what you think. We have got to stop being so timid about saying it. The best way to get newspapers to restore their book sections is to provide them with actual news. And nothing gets column inches like a good public slapfest.


I say “we,” but let’s be real: If I say that I’ve had it up to the teeth with writers like Ottessa Moshfegh — the kind whose fiction features a lonely, anhedonic bourgeois who slouches through life avoiding any human relationship that might dent their precious crystalline bubble of self-absorption — well, I’m nobody. If we want our feuds to be truly captivating, they have to come from the big guns. Our Kendricks and Drakes. The authors who get to go on Colbert and “Las Culturistas” to promote their books. The main reason we know McCarthy’s immortal burn of Hellman (“Every word she writes is a lie, including ‘and’ and ‘the’”) is that she unleashed it live on “The Dick Cavett Show.

Meanwhile, we are stuck with TV mouthpieces such as Isaac Fitzgerald, now a regular promoter of other people’s books on the “Today” show, who in 2013, as books editor of BuzzFeed, announced that the site would no longer publish bad reviews. “Why waste breath talking smack about something?” he said, seeming to have never considered that there is, in fact, a very good reason to talk smack about books: It is fun. It is, in fact, half the point of reading. You cannot love books if you cannot hate them, too. Hell is finding yourself trapped in conversation with someone who doesn’t have a single bad thing to say about anyone. And yet few of us are willing to write reviews at all, and when we do, there’s an incentive to pull our punches because the potential blowback isn’t worth the risk.


What’s so foolish about all this anticipatory compliance is that readers want us to get messy. We live in a moment when people don’t just enjoy artists, they want parasocial relationships with them. Readers crave access to authors. Book festivals thrive, from Brattleboro to Birmingham. People show up and sit in uncomfortable folding chairs in tents and community centers to listen to panels; they wait for hours in line to get their books signed. And what do we offer in return? Four writers passing around a microphone and compliments. We can do better. We can give readers reasons to cheer, and reasons to hiss, and in so doing, reinforce their belief that this stuff might actually matter.


It needn’t be all adultery and punching. The best fights are about substance, which is why authors must regularly write honest, even punishing reviews of one another’s work. The recent critical revolt against Ocean Vuong, kicked off by Pulitzer Prize winner and laureate of sick burns Andrea Long Chu, is a good start. But we have to push harder. Events might be better attended if anyone thought for a second that they might see the authors disagree. What if, instead of every bookstore event featuring two authors “in conversation,” we sprinkled a few debates in there?

As with any sparring match, there are rules of engagement. Established writers ought not punch down, and emerging writers punch up at their own risk. The optimal feud involves two authors of equal and preferably equally exalted stature. Roxane Gay makes frequent public reference to her “nemesis.” If she wants to be a good literary citizen, she should name the person. If the famously sweet and supportive Alexander Chee were to go on “The Daily Show” and tell us whom he hates — come on, Alex, I know you hate someone! — we would be getting somewhere. Then that person might get to come on the show and clap back, and before you know it, more people are getting drawn into the fray and taking sides and feeling invested, and everyone’s sales are going up. A rising beef lifts all boats.

“John Keats,” spat Byron, “… was kill’d off by one critique.” It seems now that we’re all afraid the same might happen to us. If we want literature to grow, we need to be willing to fight for it — with each other.


Samuel Ashworth is the author of the novel “The Death and Life of August Sweeney,” about the rise and fall of a celebrity chef, told through his autopsy. He lives in Washington.