Friday, April 24, 2026

KPMG and EY demote partners in end of job-for-life model

KPMG and EY demote partners in end of job-for-life model 

 Move is a departure from the practice of simply asking underperforming senior partners to retire

KPMG and EY are said to have removed members of their equity partnership and instead offered them ‘salaried partner’ roles © Mike Kemp/In Pictures via Getty Images

Winning promotion to the partnership of a Big Four firm was once a golden ticket to a lucrative job for life. But accountancy firms have begun quietly demoting partners in the UK as they move to concentrate profits among top performers. 
KPMG and EY have removed members of their equity partnership — the senior practitioners who own the firm and share its profits — and instead offered them “salaried partner” roles, several people with knowledge of the matter told the FT. 
Equity partners have traditionally lost their status only when they leave the firms, often when they reached a mandatory retirement age. But pressure is increasing to tightly control which professionals share in the firms’ profits, leading to the introduction in recent years of a “salaried partner” rank. 
The salaried rung was intended as a way of retaining senior staff by offering the status of the “partner” title while restricting access to the profit pool shared by their top echelons, prompting claims of “title inflation”. 
KPMG — where average equity partner pay last year was £880,000 — told some partners in recent years they would be “retired” from the equity partnership and instead made a salaried partner, according to six people with knowledge of the matter.
The move is a departure from the practice of simply asking underperforming senior partners to retire, which has become more widespread in the sector in recent years. 
Some KPMG partners had been “called into rooms for what would be positioned as career conversations . . . but ultimately they needed to get the number of equity partners down”, said one of the people with knowledge of the matter. 
The person added that some of the partners chose to leave rather than be relegated to a salaried role, saying they felt blindsided after receiving positive feedback and being given no opportunity to improve their performance.
Rival firm EY has also demoted a small number of equity partners to salaried roles since introducing the salaried-partner rung in 2022, according to three people familiar with the matter.
Pushing partners out, or “departnering”, is not unique to accountancies. Partnerships in other sectors, such as Goldman Sachs, carefully manage membership of their top ranks. Law firms also de-equitise underperforming partners to protect profitability, particularly in mid-tier firms. 
The Big Four — Deloitte, EY, KPMG and PwC — are under increasing pressure to keep partner profits high as they combat slowing demand for consulting services. 
The size of individual KPMG equity partners’ share of profits is determined by reference to the number of “units” they are allocated. Under current boss Jon Holt, the firm has reallocated units, placing less weight on tenure and more on rewarding partners who bring in business, said several people familiar with the changes. 
Some partners had grown “slightly arrogant” and come to expect annual increases in their allocation, said one of the people, describing a “shock” when some were told their units could be reduced. 
Some people at the firm have used the term “Huncs”, or high-units-no-clients, to describe partners who hold significant equity stakes but do not generate fees.
“There is a sort of clearing of house,” said a person at the firm. “There are a lot of senior partners . . . holding on to significant units but they’re not actually working with any particular clients,” the person said, adding that some of these partners “have been let go recently”. 
Since Holt’s appointment in 2021, KPMG has increased profit per partner, outperforming both PwC and EY for the first time in more than a decade last year.
Equity partner promotions across the Big Four hit a five-year low in 2025. KPMG also boosted profit per partner by promoting almost no one to its equity ranks between 2021 and 2023, contributing to its partnership shrinking to its smallest in more than two decades.
“Over a two-year period we will have created more than 200 new roles in our partnership,” said KPMG UK, referring to both new salaried and equity partners. It added: “We look forward to more partner promotions during our next financial year . . . In a dynamic business like ours, all partners are performance managed.” 
EY declined to comment. 
Additional reporting by Suzi Ring

The vanishing of the first globalized world

Palantir’s Manifesto Is the Agenda of the New Class Reconfiguring the System’s Power Structure

Palantir’s manifesto is the stated agenda of a new class within the system’s power structure, driven by a binary worldview of 0 and 1


Historian Eric Cline, author of 1177 BC, explains how the collapse of several civilizations circa 1200 BC was the result of an “overly interdependent system that had no way to absorb multiple shocks at once”

THE RISE OF THE “FIFTH BRANCH:”  “a self-perpetuating elite network of bureaucracy, permanent political class, academia, and cultural institutions that operates with increasing independence from the citizenry it was meant to serve.”


Monty Python’s John Cleese nails the core principle of a free society in this conversation on comedy, cancel culture, and letting humor breathe


This reminds me of that episode of the Simpsons when Homer buys a gun and uses it around the house for everything, like changing the TV channel and opening beer cans. Nuclear - If the only tool you have is a hammer


What life is like when you have an unfortunate surname


Exposing a Global Surveillance Empire

In a major investigation, a young reporter uncovers a powerful technology used to spy on thousands of people across the world.

The executive, Guenther Rudolph, was seated at a booth at ISS World in Prague, a secretive trade fair for police and intelligence agencies and advanced surveillance technology companies.


A Whistleblower’s Account of How the Trump Administration Shredded USAID

The Handbasket:” Whistleblower says Trump officials thought USAID did ‘just abortions,’ asked for ‘Barney-style’ slides before gutting agency, per new book. One of the first acts by the second Trump administration was the complete gutting of the US Agency for International Development, a workforce of more than 10,000 people that had administered humanitarian aid and public health support to nations around the world since 1961. 

Thousands of jobs were immediately slashed by Elon Musk’s para-governmental Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and political appointees took over posts previously held by career civil servants. 

An agency once charged with fighting poverty, curbing the spread of infectious diseases, and promoting education and democracy abroad had been effectively thrown in the woodchipper. 

It was during those critical early days that Nicholas Enrich, then-USAID’s acting assistant administrator for global health (GH), witnessed firsthand the carelessness and callousness with which the Trump administration destroyed the agency, ultimately leading to him becoming a government whistleblower

As a result, he was placed on administrative leave for sharing Trump officials’ decision to deny the continuation of life-saving aid, and the lies they told to justify it.  Enrich’s new book “Into the Wood Chipper: A Whistleblower’s Account of How the Trump Administration Shredded USAID” [published on April 14, 2026], and The Handbasket is proud to share an exclusive excerpt. 

It shows the scary lack of public health expertise among the Trump team—which included Ken Jackson, who was part of the US Institute of Peace raid—their fundamental ignorance to USAID’s mission—”I assumed it was just, you know, abortions”—and the life or death decisions they forced people like Enrich to make in the name of supposed efficiency. 

This excerpt details a meeting that took place on February 5, 2025, during which Enrich and his colleagues Nida Parks and Ramona Godbole met with newly-installed Trump officials at the former USAID headquarters to explain their bureau’s critical functions…”

The Posting Will Continue Until Morale Improves

Everybody knows that the dice are loaded 
 Everybody rolls with their fingers crossed 
Everybody knows the war is over 
Everybody knows the good guys lost 
Everybody knows the fight was fixed 
The poor stay poor, the rich get rich 
That's how it goes 
Everybody knows 
~ Leonard Cohen - Everybody Knows

 
Here's how badly Trump screwed up the strikes on Iran: He kills their Supreme Leader, whom they replace w that guy's son. Son's leg and face are maimed & he's still under treatment for those wounds.

 

Son's father, wife, & son have been killed.

 

Do the math. Son will hate America till the day he dies.
 

 

Trump’s Iran messaging seems desperate.


On Monday morning, CNN reported that the United States and Iran had been on the verge of striking a deal to end the war when Donald Trump made a series of comments to reporters and on social media that undermined the talks. “The Iranians didn’t appreciate POTUS negotiating through social media and making it appear as if they had signed off on issues they hadn’t yet agreed to, and ones that aren’t popular with their people back home,” complained one source, who apparently pleaded with his boss to stop.


This was Trump’s signal to begin binge-posting about the Iran negotiations. The Iranians may not have appreciated Trump’s stream-of-consciousness messaging, and apparently their American counterparts did not either. But one very important person did.

Trump can’t seem to refrain from touting his genius, especially when the subject is dealmaking, his professed speciality. And so, in a torrent of commentary, the president made the case that he is winning very greatly.

Already, despite the president’s surface bravado, an undercurrent of nervousness had emerged. Trump was favorably comparing his prospective deal with the Obama administration’s in 2015. “The DEAL that we are making with Iran will be FAR BETTER than the JCPOA, commonly referred to as ‘The Iran Nuclear Deal,’ penned by Barack Hussein Obama and Sleepy Joe Biden, one of the Worst Deals ever made having to do with the Security of our Country,” he wrote on Monday. Simultaneously touting your prospective deal while comparing it to the worst deal ever is a bit like saying, I’m a fantastic basketball player, much better than my late grandmother, who never played the game.

In a follow-up post, five minutes later, Trump addressed concerns that the war had gone beyond his promised six-week deadline. His technique, once again, was to reframe expectations. “Despite World War I lasting 4 years, 3 months, and 14 days, World War II lasting 6 years and 1 day, the Korean War lasting 3 years, 1 month, and 2 days, the Vietnam War lasting 19 years, 5 months, and 29 days, and Iraq lasting 8 years, 8 months, and 28 days, they like to say that I promised 6 weeks to defeat Iran, and actually, from the Military standpoint, it was far faster than that, but I’m not going to let them rush the United States into making a Deal that is not as good as it could have been.” (Luckily, he seems unfamiliar with the Hundred Years’ War.)

In the same post, he proceeded to assert, “I read the Fake News saying that I am under ‘pressure’ to make a Deal. THIS IS NOT TRUE! I am under no pressure whatsoever, although, it will all happen, relatively quickly!”

Generally speaking, people who are notunder pressure rarely have to (1) issue frantic, all-caps claims that they are not under pressure, or (2) promise that they will quickly deliver a deal that will cause them tremendous embarrassment if it fails.

Thirty-six minutes later, the president posted again. “I’m winning a War, BY A LOT, things are going very well,” he wrote, before attacking the “Fake News” for suggesting otherwise. The president also claimed that the American naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is costing Iran $500 million a day. He would repeat this point three more times over the course of several hours, as if pleading with his counterparties to see fiscal reason. (Religious fanatics, alas, do not always respond to the same incentives as New York developers.)


The next morning, Trump posted, “Iran has Violated the Cease Fire numerous times!” By afternoon, however, all was forgiven: The president announced, non-desperately, that he was extending the cease-fire despite Iran’s repeated violations, “based on the fact that the Government of Iran is seriously fractured.”

Iran’s internal fractures, which are very real and deepened by the decapitation strikes by the U.S. and Israel, have indeed made negotiations complex. By yesterday, the administration had decided to give the country through the weekend to resolve its regime schism. “Trump is willing to give another three to five days of ceasefire to allow the Iranians to get their shit together,” a source told Axios.


It is hard to believe that the Iranians could quickly resolve their deep-seated divisions even under optimal conditions. It is even harder to believe that a vague deadline of three to five days would meaningfully accelerate the timeline in which they could do so, given that Trump has relaxed his previous deadline despite Iran flouting the truce terms.

Yesterday, The Washington Post reported that Trump “has authorized U.S. negotiators to consider a bargain that involves many of the same trade-offs one of his predecessors confronted.” Somehow, the great dealmaker, operating under no pressure whatsoever, might end up striking a pact similar to one of history’s worst deals ever. Can the terms be improved with a few more social-media posts?

Trump returned to Truth Social this morning to narrate the war. “Iran is having a very hard time figuring out who their leader is!” he wrote. However, he continued, the strait “is ‘Sealed up Tight,’ until such time as Iran is able to make a DEAL!!!”


According to the president, we are holding the world economy hostage until such time as Iran can resolve its internal struggle. Perhaps the problem here is not just Trump’s live commentary about his negotiating strategy, but the strategy itself.



Thursday, April 23, 2026

Billionaire Blues

 The White House Correspondents’ Dinner has always been a cringefest. Trump just makes it obvious. Poynter


Palantir manifesto described as ‘ramblings of a supervillain’ amid UK contract fears


Billionaire Blues Thomas Frank, Harper’s

 

New York doctor admits exploiting the Covid pandemic to steal at least $24 million from insurers Syracuse.com

 

SEC charges Bitcoin Latinum founder over alleged $16M investor fraud Crypto Briefing


Trump’s new budget signals the demise of ‘liberation day’ The Hill


New York Times Magazine (Gift Article): The View From Inside Trump’s D.H.S. “Dozens of agents and officials share their stories about working in the Department of Homeland Security during the harsh crackdown on illegal immigration…The government’s own records complicate that picture. Only about 5 percent of people booked into ICE custody in the last year have been convicted of a violent crime. The number of arrests of people with violent convictions has increased by 37 percent under Trump, while the number of arrests of those with no conviction of any kind has risen by 770 percent, according to ICE data. Many agents and officials we spoke to say the relentless pursuit of deportations is unsustainable and has compromised the department.”


They See Your Photos

“Your photos reveal a lot of private information. In this experiment, we use the Google Vision API to see how much can be inferred about you from a single photo. See what they see…”



INDIAN MED STUDENT DOING IT FOR THE MONEY:  Top MAGA influencer revealed to be AI — created by a guy in India who made a mint off lonely men online