Read White House Correspondents’ Dinner gunman Cole Allen’s full anti-Trump manifestoNew York Post
The Wayback Machine Has Been the Best Archive for Preserving Our Digital Lives
CounterSpin interview with Lia Holland on the Internet Archive. “Janine Jackson: A recent report by Wired‘s Kate Knibbs leads with the contradiction: USA Today published a storyrecently on how ICE is misinforming about its detainment policies, a case that the paper built on data from the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, a nonprofit digital library that preserves webpages.
At the same time, USA Today bars the Wayback Machine from archiving its work. Along with outlets like the New York Times, the paper is trying to block the Internet Archive project from doing their job of preserving reporting. So what’s going on here? Here to catch us up is Lia Holland, a social artist, writer and activist, and campaigns and communications director at the group Fight for the Future.
- JJ: Please fill out our understanding a little more of what the Wayback Machine is and does. It seems like, particularly in these times, a critical information resource.
- LH: Absolutely. And that’s why my organization is so engaged with this issue. The Wayback Machine, for 30 years this year, has been the best and most reliable archive for preserving our digital lives, culture, recording and history. They archive nearly 5 million links on Wikipedia to news articles, and are a trusted resource for journalists all around the globe to investigate everything from corruption, to report on culture, to really do their jobs. And, unfortunately, that is under threat now.
- JJ: Let’s talk about what’s happening now. What is the crisis, if you will, and why is it of particular concern? You’ve tipped it, but why is it of particular concern for what I have seen called “accountability journalism,” but I think is just journalism?
- LH: Yeah. Most journalists do work to hold the powerful to account. And I think that that is a part of the factor in what’s happening in this moment.
- So since February, the Wayback Machine has not been able to archive the New York Times. And there are other major publications like this that have told them to stop preserving all of their journalism. And this is happening for reasons that I can only speculate on, but it seems that many of these major media outlets are very interested in packaging up their content to sell for AI training, and they’re concerned that sharing it with the Internet Archive somehow weakens their product, or weakens their stance on whether or not AI training is a copyright violation in various lawsuits…”
Trump DOJ Limits Efforts to Safeguard States From Election Crimes
BloombergLaw: “The Justice Department is curtailing election year coordination aimed at protecting state-run voting processes, increasing risks of the Trump administration interfering in the November midterms or unwittingly exposing precincts to threats, said multiple state officials and former DOJ election crime lawyers. Ahead of an election that will determine whether Republicans retain control of Congress, DOJ leaders have eliminated a centralized command post, discontinued mandatory election law training for prosecutors, and restricted access to threat briefings for state officials, said people briefed on the situation. To attorneys steeped in federal-state election law enforcement norms, DOJ’s information-sharing pullback is a subtler form of undermining the election integrity principles that this administration touts as a priority.
It coincides with the department’s escalating push to seize state voting records and FBI Director Kash Patel’s promise of imminent arrests tied to the 2020 presidential election. President Donald Trump has also hinted at stripping states’ constitutional authority over election administration. The disbanded rapid response operation that had been run out of FBI headquarters, fielding calls 24 hours a day on election week, is a particular concern to law enforcement veterans.
For decades, this structure supported prosecutors, agents, and police departments dealing with bomb threats, website hackings, power grid failures, and other potential wrongdoing at polling places. Rather than career officials, US attorneys appointed by Trump now oversee election security issues that arise in their districts. Last year, DOJ removed most of the attorneys and authority of a public corruption unit that traditionally spearheaded the command post, while other Main Justice offices that used to lend a hand have also lost considerable experience.
The plan to disperse response teams to the 93 US attorneys—a group including Trump allies who’ve supported his unproven claims that Democrats plotted to steal the 2020 election—alarmed former DOJ attorneys who said the lack of nationwide consistency can make states more vulnerable to partisan intrusion. “That is now a significant risk—that the political ideology of US attorneys may stymie election enforcement in a way that department guidelines have tried to avoid,” said Mark Blumberg, who left the department in February after spending the last 20 years leading the centralized election response on civil rights threats..”







