Thursday, April 16, 2026

There’s a silent epidemic in our workplaces, and WFH is to blame

 There’s a silent epidemic in our workplaces, and WFH is to blame

There’s a silent undercurrent running through our workplaces, and it’s even harder to spot than burnout or bullying. Both of those have visible signs you can at least notice, but there’s another concern that’s quietly eating away at workers from the inside.

Working from home can have its benefits, but it’s leaving some workers feeling lonelier than before.GETTY IMAGES

Loneliness at work is a serious and growing problem. In the latest 2026 State of the Global Workplace report released last week by Gallup, it confirmed that one in five workers said they experienced loneliness at work the previous day, rising to almost one in three managers.

Despite being surrounded by colleagues, in constant meetings and drowning in emails, too many of us still feel the sad reality of loneliness creeping in while we’re trying to work.


Gretchen Rubin is an expert on happiness and the flipside of it. Her books have sold over 3.5 million copies, beginning with The Happiness Project that spent two years on The New York Times bestseller list and helped spark popular interest in the science behind how anyone can learn to be happier.

“Ancient philosophers and contemporary scientists agree that the key to happiness is relationships,” she says. “Loneliness is the feeling like your relationships are not what they need to be. In evolution, it was very dangerous to be alone and isolated, and it has all kinds of detrimental effects to your physical, emotional and mental health.”

We still need some flexibility in how we work, but it shouldn’t come at the high cost of our relationships.

There’s an important distinction to be made here between being lonely and being alone. Each of them are very different, defined by their intention and causes. “Being alone can feel very restorative. It can feel energising, it can feel free,” says Rubin

“With loneliness, you start to feel isolated and prickly.” One of the biggest paradoxes when you start feeling this way – in a workplace or outside it – is that instead of it making you eager to connect with others, it can breed defensiveness and the desire to retreat further away.


There are many complicated and layered reasons that help explain the growing loneliness epidemic, but one of them is the fast adoption of WFH and remote-first policies without enough thought given to filling the gaps in its drawbacks.

“There are many advantages to work from home,” she says, “but there is a huge downside – which we took for granted – that you were just physically with these people and hanging out with them … and this is creating a huge vacuum.”

To build trust, and encourage our ability to confide and share vulnerabilities to form genuine connections, we need to spend quality time with our colleagues.

This was once a natural by-product of working in the same location for 5 days a week, and now needs to be consciously co-ordinated by workplaces and employees or the bonds will never strengthen.


Much of the research on this topic has concluded that having at least one person that you consider a good friend at work has an oversized impact on your happiness levels.

“This is not just like somebody that I casually enjoy talking to,” says Rubin, “but somebody who has my back, who I could confide an important secret to. And that’s very difficult to do if you’re not spending time with people.”

We often measure good workplaces by how productive they are, or how long people stay, but we need to shift the focus to how connected we feel to each other. As we retool our workplaces in a post-COVID and AI-focused world, this is more important now than ever.

Of course, we still need some flexibility in how we work, but it shouldn’t come at the high cost of our relationships.

Tim Duggan is author of Work Backwards: The Revolutionary Method to Work Smarter and Live Better. He writes a regular newsletter at timduggan.substack.com.



Epstein files reveal shoddy spelling and ghastly grammar

  “Freedom of the press, if it means anything at all, means the freedom to criticize and oppose.”

 — George Orwell, author


The United States is destroying itself

The Guardian: “The daily news can’t adequately convey the administration’s sabotaging of our government, economy, alliances and environment The United States is being murdered, and it’s an inside job. 





How to Tax Billionaires Step one: Abolish the estate tax. No, really.

If you made money last year, you will almost certainly owe taxes by April 15. And if you made a lot, you will probably owe a lot. That’s true for most Americans—just not the richest ones.

And if that makes you angry, you’re justified in feeling that way. But the solution you’re hearing from a lot of politicians at the state and federal levels—wealth taxes—isn’t the answer. Instead of introducing a new, difficult-to-administer, and potentially unconstitutional tax, we should do something simpler: Bring billionaires back into the income-tax system. Believe it or not, the way to do this starts with abolishing the estate tax. …

Artificial Intelligence in the Operating Room Leads to Occasional Botches

William Yurcik
 My Self-driving Car Crash
Raffi Krikorian in The Atlantic
 A Possible U.S. Government iPhone-Hacking Toolkit Is Now in the Hands of Foreign Spies and Criminals
WiReD
 Canada orders OpenAI safety review after grilling Sam Altman over security lapses
Politico
 Armed Robots Take to the Battlefield in Ukraine
Vitaly Shevchenko
 Tennessee grandmother jailed after AI facial recognition error links her to fraud
The Guardian
 Google Translate logs expose plot
OC-media
 Anthropic Sues Trump Administration for Targeting Company
WSJ
 Epstein files reveal shoddy spelling and ghastly grammar
Town and Country Magazine
 AI chatbot kids' toys
BBC
 ChatGPT, Other Chatbots Approved for Official Use in the Senate
NYTimes
 To avoid accusations of AI cheating, college students are turning to AI
via Steven Bacher
 Grammarly Disables AI ‘Expert Review’ After Backlash From Authors and Journalists
Decrypt
 AI is getting scary good at finding hidden software bugs—even in decades-old code
ZDNET
 Meta and TikTok let harmful content rise after evidence outrage drove engagement, say whistleblowers
BBC
 Americans Recognize AI as a Wealth Inequality Machine, Pollster Finds
Gizmodo
 Russia is sharing satellite imagery and drone tech with Iran
L.Weinstein
 Negative Light' Used to Send Secret Messages Inside Heatn
Alan Bradley
 Trump funding solicitation offers donors private national security briefings
News
 AI as nukes
Lauren Weinstein
 The Register and Unrecognized Risks
Cliff Kilby
 District denies enrollment to child based on license plate
Bob Gezelter
 Online scams and AI reader data
The Register via Rob Slade
 On Moltbook
from Bruce Schneier
 Info on RISKS (comp.risks)

Democracy Is Not a Ballot Box: It Is Control Over What We Produce and Who Owns It

"It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for something you are not." 

— André Gide


The road to justice is long, we won’t stop until we get there …


Democracy Is Not a Ballot Box: It Is Control Over What We Produce and Who Owns It William Murphy




Amanda Ungaro: From sharing soirées with the Trumps to being deported by ICE El Pais


First Friends: How the First Couple’s Consigliere Went From Modeling Mogul to Special EnvoyUnlimited Hangout. From August, a real deep dive investigation on Ungaro’s ex-husband Paolo Zampoli.


Fact-Check Database

Image Whisperer: Search debunked images from Reuters, Snopes, PolitiFact, AFP, BOOM Live, Lead Stories, Full Fact and 100+ fact-checkers worldwide. Covering 2025-04 to 2026-04, updated daily.

Search by Description, Person, Place, Event. Choose to distinguish between Fake Image, AI Generated, Maipulated, False Context, Satire or 


Visualizing all books of the world in ISBN-Space

Phiresky: “Libraries have been trying to collect humanity’s knowledge almost since the invention of writing. In the digital age, it might actually be possible to create a comprehensive collection of all human writing that meets certain criteria. That’s what shadow librariesdo – collect and share as many books as possible. One shadow library, Anna’s Archive (which I will not link here directly due to copyright concerns), recently posed a question: How could we effectively visualize 100,000,000 books or more at once? There’s lots of data to view: Titles, authors, which countries the books come from, which publishers, how old they are, how many libraries hold them, whether they are available digitally, etc. International Standard Book Numbers (ISBNs) are 13-digit numbers that are assigned to almost all published books. Since the first three digits are fixed (currently only 978- and 979-) and the last digit is a checksum, this means the total ISBN13-Space only has two billion slots. Here is my interactive visualization of that space: Click here to view the visualization in full screen (esp. on mobile)…”



 

The Internet’s Most Powerful Archiving Tool Is in Peril

Wired – “This month, USA Today published an excellent report that revealed how US Immigrations and Customs Enforcementdelayed disclosing key information about the impacts of its detainment policies. The authors used the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine to compile and analyze detention statistics from ICE and track how the agency had changed under the Trump administration. 

The story is one of countless examples of how the Wayback Machine, which crawls and preserves web pages, has helped preserve information for the public good. It was also, Wayback Machine director Mark Graham says, “a little ironic.” USA Today Co., the publishing conglomerate formerly known as Gannet that runs both its namesake paper and over 200 additional media outlets, bars the Wayback Machine from archiving its work. “They’re able to pull together their story research because the Wayback Machine exists. At the same time, they’re blocking access,” Graham says. 

A number of other major journalism organizations have also recently moved to restrict the Wayback Machine from archiving their stories, including The New York Times. According to analysis by the artificial-intelligence-detection startup Originality AI, 23 major news sites are currently blocking ia_archiverbot, the web crawler commonly used by the Internet Archive for the Wayback project. The social platform Reddit is too. Other outlets are limiting the project in different ways: 

The Guardian does not block the crawler, but it excludes its content from the Internet Archive API and filters out articles from the Wayback Machine interface, which makes it harder for regular people to access archived versions of its articles. USA Today Co. spokesperson Lark-Marie Anton emphasized that “this effort is not about specifically blocking the Internet Archive” but instead part of the company’s broader efforts to block all scraping bots…”


Wednesday, April 15, 2026

Hidden Power: AI and the Future of Journalism

 Why you never forget how to ride a bike: The brain stores skills differently than facts, making them harder to forget.


Oliver Kornetzke - Behold. The festering carcass of American rot shoved into an ill-fitting suit

Behold. The festering carcass of American rot shoved into an ill-fitting suit: the sleaze of a conman, the cowardice of a draft dodger, the gluttony of a parasite, the racism of a Klansman, the sexism of a back-alley creep, the ignorance of a bar-stool drunk, and the greed of a hedge-fund ghoul — all spray-painted orange and paraded like a prize hog at a county fair. Not a president. Not even a man.

Just the diseased distillation of everything this country swears it isn't but has always been-arrogance dressed up as exceptionalism, stupidity passed off as common sense, cruelty sold as toughness, greed exalted as ambition, and corruption worshiped like gospel. It is America's shadow made flesh, a rotting pumpkin idol proving that when a nation kneels before money, power, and spite, it doesn't just lose its soul— it sh*ts out this bloated obscenity and calls it a leader.



NYT investigation names Adam Back as Bitcoin's Satoshi Nakamoto



AI and the Future of Journalism

  • The Wrap – McClatchy Journalists Revolt Against AI: ‘It’s a Betrayal’ Sacramento Bee staffers refuse bylines over a new AI tool as colleagues at the Miami Herald and Charlotte Observer harbor concerns..
  • Axios – The New York Times’ editorial union leaders on Tuesday sent a letter to management arguing its artificial intelligence standards are “woefully inadequate” and too vague, which has led to editorial problems and trust issues. 
  • Digiday – CNN builds in-house agent infrastructure as it prepares for AI-driven media trading. CNN is developing an agentic infrastructure as part of a broader roadmap that will see it begin transacting media by the first quarter of 2027.
  • Semafor – Joanna Stern on how AI told her to quit The Wall Street Journal.Joanna Stern, longtime tech columnist for The Wall Street Journal, spent the last year working on I Am Not a Robot, a book about AI — and in the process, used agents and bots in “as many parts of my life as possible.” So when she started considering quitting her newspaper job and striking out on her own, she bounced the idea off of people but then, naturally, turned to ChatGPT. “I sat with you as a human, and you definitely did not give me that advice,” Stern told Semafor’s Ben Smith on the Mixed Signals podcast. “People give you ideas, but they do not tell you what to do. Humans do not tell you what to do, because if you did tell me what to do and it really went wrong, you’d feel really bad, right? But ChatGPT just fully told me … to quit.” “It felt like the one big decision where I actually did trust AI,” she added. “Every human kept being like, trust your gut, trust your gut, you know what to do. And it’s like, no, … my gut just wants a burrito. My gut doesn’t know what to do right now. I’m too overridden with anxiety. But [AI] doesn’t have anxiety.” Stern gave Semafor a preview of what her new tech media venture, called New Things, will bring: “Stunts,” along the lines of her experiments with a Claude-powered vending machine, but also a newsletter, video, events, and potentially more. The idea is to “cover the latest and greatest of consumer tech, but do it through the lens [of] humans — humans that like to have 


How Iran’s Information War Machine Operates Online

The New York Times: “In late March, Iran circulated a shaky video supposedly showing an American F/A-18 under attack. Iranian officials claimed they had destroyed the jet, though the Pentagon denied that. The video quickly earned millions of views online, demonstrating how Iran has exploited the global media ecosystem to propagate an image of military prowess. 

The New York Times reconstructed how Iran was able to use overt and covert global networks alongside unwitting participants to spread its message through social media, state-affiliated news organizations and American influencers. Here is how the claim went from a single post to a global audience of millions in 69 minutes


Stolen Logins Are Fueling Everything From Ransomware to Nation-State Cyberattacks

Security Week: “Like an inverted pyramid, the range of different attack modes are now built on top of the single point of identity abuse. Stolen credentials are a major threat. Legitimate credentials illegitimately acquired provide legitimate access to illegitimate actors. Once inside the network, these bad actors have greater ability to move and act in stealth. The continuing rise in ransomware attacks bears testament. The theft and resale of credentials operates on an industrial scale. Fueled by the rise of increasingly more sophisticated infostealers, stolen credentials are packaged into ‘logs’ and sold to criminals on the black market. Ontinue reports, “Listings tied to LummaC2 alone surged by 72%, with high-privilege cloud console credentials selling for $1,000–$15,000+.” Ransomware has been one of the primary beneficiaries of stolen credentials. More than 7,000 incidents and 129 active groups were tracked through 2025. At the same time, ransom payments decreased slightly from $892M in 2024 to $820M in 2025. This apparent contradiction is actually logical. “Larger targets, with larger payout potential, will have seen the most aggressive corporate investment (process and technology) mitigating exposure to this attack pattern,” explains Trey Ford, chief strategy and trust officer at Bugcrowd. These larger targets are also more susceptible to government pressure to not pay ransoms, and ransomware income has consequently declined. The ransomware groups have responded with more attacks demanding smaller payments from more but smaller companies.  These bad actors have simultaneously increased the pain threshold. Theft of data for blackmail has been growing for several years but is now often supplemented with operational disruption. “Beyond encrypting endpoints, attackers disrupt the ability to operate by wiping systems, deleting backups, sabotaging virtualization, attacking OT/ICS-adjacent services, or breaking identity/administration planes.”…

America’s income tax is progressive

 When you have something to say, silence is a lie.


Top tax frustrations for Americans: Feeling that some wealthy people, corporations don’t pay fair share

With the annual IRS filing deadline approaching, majorities of Americans continue to be bothered by the feeling that some wealthy people and corporations do not pay their fair share in federal taxes.



Billionaires get paid in stock worth billions.

They use that stock as collateral to borrow billions. They use those borrowed billions to buy everything, including media outlets which then pump bullshit like this to keep you in the dark about the tax loopholes designed just for them


America’s income tax is progressive

The rich already pay more than their fair share.


Supporters of progressive income taxation should be happier than they seem to be every April 15.

Despite whining from politicians and activists that the rich don’t pay their “fair share,” the United States federal income tax is extremely progressive.

Consider: There were 30,382 tax filers with incomes of $10 million or more in 2023, the latest year IRS data is available. That includes all sources of income. This tiny group of people, less than 0.02 percent of all tax filers and 10,000 fewer than fit into Nationals Park, made 5.9 percent of all income — and paid 10.9 percent of all income taxes.


The 101,509,107 tax filers who made under $75,000 together made 21.9 percent of all income and paid 7.3 percent of all income taxes.

Income is unevenly spread across the population, and the income tax burden is even more skewed — toward the top.


Zoom out from the extremely rich to just the well-off, and it becomes more apparent how much higher earners are shielding lower earners from a greater income tax burden.

Just 25.6 percent of tax filers had incomes of $100,000 or more. They paid almost $9 out of every $10 (87.4 percent) that the federal government collected from income tax.


People making under $100,000 are not freeloaders. They pay federal payroll taxes and state sales taxes. If they own a home, they pay property taxes directly. If they rent, they pay them indirectly. They also indirectly bear the burdens created by tariffs and corporate taxes.

If the federal government wanted to raise more money from income taxes, lower earners shouldn’t bear the additional burden, but the very highest wouldn’t be good targets either.

The upper-middle class is where more of the less-taxed money is located. Filers with incomes between $100,000 and $500,000 make 49.7 percent of taxable income, yet they pay just 43 percent of all income taxes.

This fact is tremendously inconvenient for revenue-hungry politicians in a country where tens of millions of people are upper-middle class, and even more people want to become upper-middle class. Republicans promise not to raise income taxes on anyone, and Democrats promise not to raise income taxes on anyone making less than $400,000 — which is almost everyone.


The IRS uses $500,000 as a cutoff rather than $400,000, but the basic point stands. Filers with incomes of $500,000 or more had $3.4 trillion of taxable income in 2023. Filers with incomes between $100,000 and $499,999 had $5.8 trillion. There’s more juice to squeeze there.

But squeezing it would make the income tax less progressive than it is right now and reverse the long-term trend of the income tax’s increasing reliance on the very highest earners. That’s politically untenable.

In 1980, the top 1 percent of income earners paid 17 percent of federal income taxes. In 2022, they paid 40 percent, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

High earners shoulder an income tax burden far in excess of their proportion of the national income, while the bottom half of earners pay very little. Any conversation on changing the tax code has to start with this fundamental truth, rather than the misbegotten notion that high earners get off scot-free. Expect a lot of the 2028 presidential candidates to pretend otherwise.