“I am very poorly today & very stupid & I hate everybody & everything. One lives only to make blunders.”
[Charles Darwin: From a letter to biologist Charles Lyell, dated October 1st, 1861.]
Patrizia Cavalli
“When, thanks to the virtues of wine …”
When, thanks to the virtues of wine,
I let go of solid memory and a certain pleasure
seems almost real to me
having secretly picked up a scent
in the john of a friend who uses that scent
and I’m about to park,
and I say to myself: “Go on, move, drive around the city,
you won’t find anything, but maybe
you’ll see a light on. You’re in love, aren’t you?
So act like someone in love! Don’t people in love
drive up and down streets like crazy?”
But then, because I found easy parking,
I stop, and while I’m stopped, comfortably stopped,
I imagine you, in the helpless delay of my love, as mine.
—Translated from the Italian by Mark Strand with Gini Alhadeff
Trump’s Trojan Horse in Europe
The confusion over what happened in Venezuela on Saturday and what happens next will not go away. Comments from Maroc Rubio yesterday only made the situation more opaque. The New York Times, scratching its head on the issue, noted:
It's not an occupation. Pentagon officials said yesterday that there were no U.S. military personnel in the country. (Though U.S. troops will remain in the Caribbean Sea to exert “leverage” on the new leadership, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said.)
Trump’s Battle With Big Law Firms Heads Into 2026: What to Know
Bloomberg Law: “There was perhaps no bigger story last year in the world of Big Law than President Donald Trump’s attacks on several of the nation’s largest law firms through punitive executive orders due to political affiliations and adversarial hires. Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block, Susman Godfrey, WilmerHale, and Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison were hit with executive orders that sought to cut security clearances for the firms’ lawyers and directed federal agencies to review contracts with the firms’ clients.
The first four firms sued the administration over the EOs, while the last—Paul Weiss—struck a deal with the White House to rescind the EO by promising millions of dollars’ worth of free legal services. That deal became the framework for eight subsequent arrangements with other top law firms to avoid retribution from the administration.
Four judges ruled in separate cases that the administration’s actions targeting the law firms were unconstitutional. The administration appealed the decisions last summer. The cases are now in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which directed the four litigating firms to file motions addressing the duplicative nature of the cases with a move toward consolidating them.
- Given the government shutdown and other extensions granted by the court, the firms now have until Jan. 26 to file their motions. The DOJ has also introduced new lawyers to argue its side, including the former Kansas attorney general and current Deputy Associate Attorney General Abhishek Kambli. Here’s a snapshot of where the four litigating firms and the nine dealmaking firms are at as the new year begins…”
U.S. Delta Force Captures Venezuelan President Maduro During Major Assault on Caracas: Defence Minister Vows Continued Fight Military Watch Magazine
Man who failed to remove backyard cheese facility told to pay $120,000
HE’S CERTAINLY EARNED HIS RETIREMENT: A 5 million percent return in 60 years leaves Warren Buffett’s legacy unmatched. “From 1964 — the year before Buffett took control of Berkshire — to 2024, the one-of-a-kind conglomerate delivered a compounded annual gain of 19.9%, nearly double the S&P 500′s 10.4%, resulting in an overall return of more than 5.5 million percent, according to the company’s latest annual report. The shares added another 10% to that return in 2025.”
The Department of Justice May Not Survive Pam Bondi
The New Republic: “At her confirmation hearing in January, Attorney General Pam Bondi tried to reassure senators about the job she would do as the nation’s top federal law-enforcement officer. Her “overriding objective,” Bondi said, would be to “return the Department of Justice to its core mission of keeping Americans safe and vigorously enforcing the law.”
Her stated priorities were standard fare: stopping violent criminals, gangs, child predators, drug traffickers, and “terrorists and other foreign threats.” Bondi also pledged to return the Justice Department to defend the “foundational rights of all Americans” and to “make America safe again.”
“Lastly, and most importantly, if confirmed, I will work to restore confidence and integrity to the Department of Justice—and each of its components,” Bondi said. “Under my watch, the partisan weaponization of the Department of Justice will end. America must have one tier of justice for all.”
By any reasonable standard, including her own, Bondi’s tenure has been a cataclysmic failure. Her first year as attorney general has seen the Justice Department hollowed out by waves of firings and resignations.
Her political appointees have misled federal judges, botched high-profile criminal cases, and embarrassed the Trump administration on multiple occasions. Whatever reputation the department once had for competence and integrity is now in tatters…
Under Bondi’s watch, Justice Department officials have sought to coerce the nation’s top universities into submitting to legally binding “compacts.” These mafia-like offers run afoul of First Amendment protections by threatening trumped-up civil-rights investigations or the withholding of federal funds unless universities bow to Trump’s demands. This campaign mirrored other administration efforts to unconstitutionally bully law firms and media conglomerates into ideological compliance…”