Friday, July 19, 2019

Truth Decay Part 2: News in a Digital Age

“WE LIVE IN AN AGE IN WHICH IT IS NO LONGER POSSIBLE TO BE FUNNY. THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN IMAGINE, NO MATTER HOW LUDICROUS, THAT WILL NOT PROMPTLY BE ENACTED BEFORE YOUR VERY EYES, PROBABLY BY SOMEONE WELL KNOWN,” Tom Wolfe wrote in 1989. He might have added, or by a very well known institution

Former council boss forced to hand over 'misplaced' phone, iPad

The sacked chief executive of Parramatta Council says he 'misplaced' a mobile phone and tablet device he failed to return to his former employer.



Orwellian High-tech cameras to nab motorists catches eye of Privacy Commissioner

A trial of 'world-first technology' that snapped photos of every single driver who passed cameras on several Sydney roads was carried out early this year.



Epstein's wealth afforded him a sentence full of perks

A deputy assigned to be with Epstein at all times while on daily work release was required to wear a suit and drive an unmarked car, records show.


Federal Court paves way for taxpayer to argue ATO owes duty of care

AccountantsDaily‎ 
Last week, in Farah Custodians Pty Limited v Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) FCA 1076, the Federal ...

AccountantsDaily


Christian family who argued taxes 'against God's will' ordered to pay ...

A Tasmanian family has been ordered to pay more than $2 million to theAustralian Taxation Office ...




WhoWhatWhy – “Eighteen months ago, WhoWhatWhy talked with political scientist Jennifer Kavanagh — a researcher at RAND Corporation — about the think tank’s report titled “Truth Decay.” The report details a set of very specific trends that has reshaped the media landscape. It looks at how, amidst the cacophony of 24/7 news and information that pours in at us every day, we seem to have lost sight of what constitutes truth, facts, and actual information. The signal-to-noise ratio has shifted overwhelmingly toward noise. In this week’s WhoWhatWhy Podcast, Jennifer Kavanagh returns to talk about Part 2 of the report, titled “News in a Digital Age.” In this second report, she explains how, using computer programs and artificial intelligence, RAND analyzed thirty years of news data to find empirical evidence of what she describes as the diminishing role of facts and data in digital political discourse…”

Youth in, families out: 6 charts on the inner cities of Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne

Pete Recommends – Weekly highlights on cyber security issues July 13, 2019

Mad Magazine is finished, but its ethos matters more than ever before

Jonathan R. Cohen (Florida), Lawyers Serving Gods, Visible and Invisible, 53 Gonz. L. Rev. 187 (2017):
Abstract. A critique of the American legal profession can be framed through the metaphor of idolatry, specifically the proclivity of lawyers to serve visible rather than invisible interests in their work. This proclivity has ramifications ranging from broad matters like lawyers' responses to deeply embedded social injustices to specific matters such as the excessive focus on pecuniary interests in ordinary legal representation and the high level of dissatisfaction that many lawyers experience in their careers. Using as a lens biblical teaching concerning idolatry, this article begins by describing "visible" as opposed to "invisible" interests in the context of legal practice. It then argues that lawyers, clients, and ultimately society could benefit from lawyers paying greater attention to invisible interests.