| 
   
    | 
     
      | 
Quote of the week"I’m very rarely required to fact-check anything, because who cares
      about the truth when the headline is so good? Online traffic, if it
      wasn’t already obvious, is the only thing measured in this job. The fact
      we share stories without paying much attention explains why I get away
      with regurgitating stories while adding nothing.” — A viral news writer explains his craft in Wired magazine
 
  European Commission moves on fake news The recently appointed European Commissioner in charge of Digital Economy
      and Society will be launching a public consultation on fake news and
      setting up an expert group, per Euractiv. "It’s premature to
      talk about legislation," the Commissioner said.
 
Apply by the end of today
 The International Fact-Checking Network's fellowships are an opportunity
      to go and learn something practical from another fact-checking
      organization. Hurry up and get yourself one.
 
 Nordics share fact-checking format
 Norwegian state broadcaster NRK imported the Danish TV's fact-checking
      format "Detektor" ahead of
      the upcoming elections. It features politicians rating their own
      claims on a colorful dial.
 
  
 What he said
 A journalist explains accountability journalism to people who don’t
      like journalism. Or accountability. Here are Chicago Tribune columnist
      Rex Huppke's thoughts.
 
 'Lying for Jesus' is not OK
 Fact-checking begins at church, says Christian Today writer Martin
      Saunders. Using an unchecked story from the Internet to supplement your
      Sunday sermon is a practice that preachers should "commit to
      eradicate."
 
 All those Harvey fakes
 Hurricane Harvey, like other breaking news stories before it, has spawned
      a flood of social media fakes. Here's a great round-up by Abby Ohlheiser at
      The Washington Post. Yup, the fakes include that fake shark photo that
      has been faked before. The user who tweeted it says he doesn't care it's fake. (GIF by @aliszewski in this 2016 piece)
 
  
 Snapchat wants you to know it's different
 Snap vice president of content Nick Bell told the BBC that Snapchat employs
      journalists to fact-check Snaps they're re-sharing with their audience.
      This adds editorial foresight that other social networks have resisted,
      but "Mr Bell did not refer to Facebook by name," the BBC
      article helpfully adds.
 
The how and the why
 Full Fact does a nice job explaining not only that some reported numbers
      about student migrants are wrong, but how they were misunderstood in the first
      place.
 
 The freedom to be wrong
 What is the fight against fake news doing to our fundamental right to be
      as contrarian, idiotic and oafish as we want to be? Here's The Economist's take.
 
Some fact-checking
      funThe San Diego Free Press passes along this "operetta" about fake news,
      Gilbert & Sullivan style.
 
 12 quick fact-checking links
 (1) Scroll.in investigates whether the Indian
      government really advocates privacy as a fundamental human right. (2) A
      West Virginia newspaper debunks the campus "brothel law."  (3) No,
      Angela Merkel did not recycle an East German slogan.
      (4) Old but relevant again: Why do people share rumors during breaking news?
      (5) The Financial Times has decreed the end of the post-truth era, apparently. (6) An Italian minister
      doubts The Guardian's take on prosecco and tweets "fake news." (7)
      PolitiFact is starting its Knight-funded Facts Matter outreach
      campaign with an event in Alabama. (8) People
      in 1865 were just as gullible as they are now.
       (9) The dictionary is checking President Trump's tweets, and
      they're busy. (10) Entertainment Weekly pays tribute to fact-checker Jenny
      Boeth. (11) This Vox video explains why our brains resist facts. (12) Where did the
      word “fake” come from? (And can someone take
      it back?)
 |  |  |