It is never until one realizes that one means something to others that one feels
there is any point or purpose in one's own existence
~ Stefan Zweig, who died around this date in 1942:
Professor Johnston often said that if you didn't know history, you didn't know anything. You were a leaf that didn't know it was part of a tree. ~Michael Crichton, Timeline
“To hell with dreams. We are done with it. This is true.” #ColdRiver is the worst seller on the Amazon 😇
Hadas: Statistical tricks are easy and dangerous Reuters
Oxford University Press Blog: “…A presidential library is actually two things,” Giller [Melissa Giller, Chief Marketing Officer for the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Institute in Simi Valley, California] describes. “It’s a museum that anyone can come and visit and tour through…and it is a library.” The library is, more often than not, the private side of the establishment, where the archives are held. The curation is for the actual museum. The museum covers the president’s life before becoming president, his time during office, post-administration, and if the president is deceased, then any history related to him after his death. At the Abraham Lincoln Library and Museum, one might be so lucky to catch a glimpse of certain famous historical artifacts, such as a handwritten copy of the Gettysburg address in Lincoln’s handwriting, an original printing of the Emancipation Proclamation signed by Lincoln, a copy of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, the bloody gloves Lincoln wore the night he was assassinated, and the stove pipe hat he wore, “where you can still see the thumb print on it from when he would tip his hat to people,” Lowe informs me. “So in terms of what goes into our library versus a private library…you can’t compare,” Giller says of the Ronald Reagan President Library. “We don’t have books on display.” At Lincoln, they have a permanent exhibit and special exhibit, and it takes time to determine which artifacts to show in each section. Since many of their pieces no longer contain information that could be a threat to national security, their primary concern with these items is conservation and the ability to streamline the research process for those using these artifacts as evidential or study materials. “My main goal since I got here,” Lowe declared, “is making sure we have the right research rooms set up to help researchers and educators to get the most out of their time here…”
UC San Diego Students Protest Visit by ‘Oppressive and Offensive’ Dalai Lama. They’re Chinese students spouting the Chinese government’s line, wrapped in college diversity-speak. To be fair, college diversity-speak lends itself to communist propaganda
World Economic Forum: “Should your driverless car value your life over a pedestrian’s? Should your Fitbit activity be used against you in a court case? Should we allow drones to become the new paparazzi? Can one patent a human gene? Scientists are already struggling with such dilemmas. As we enter the new machine age, we need a new set of codified morals to become the global norm. We should put as much emphasis on ethics as we put on fashionable terms like disruption. This is starting to happen. Last year, America’s Carnegie Mellon University announced a new centre studying the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence; under President Obama, the White House published a paper on the same topic; and tech giants including Facebook and Google have announced a partnership to draw up an ethical framework for AI. Both the risks and the opportunities are vast: Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk and other experts signed an open letter calling for efforts to ensure AI is beneficial to society…”
~ Stefan Zweig, who died around this date in 1942:
Professor Johnston often said that if you didn't know history, you didn't know anything. You were a leaf that didn't know it was part of a tree. ~Michael Crichton, Timeline
“To hell with dreams. We are done with it. This is true.” #ColdRiver is the worst seller on the Amazon 😇
Oh, irony of ironies: Gov.UK's transparency report reveals... nothing
When the IMF Evaluates the IMF. A recap of where the IMF admits that it screwed up. Also points out how the IMF overlooked a core methodology prone to errors and gaming...
Go to washingtonpost.com and look under the
masthead.
"Democracy Dies in
Darkness," it says, as of Wednesday.
"This is actually
something we've said internally for a long time in speaking about our
mission," said a spokeswoman. "We thought it would be a good, concise
value statement that conveys who we are to the many millions of readers who
have come to us for the first time over the last year."
I initially thought it was
a wee bit precious, even pretentious and overly reactive to the Trump-inspired
outrage in many journalism quarters. There's a circling of wagons. Some people
can't watch the news. Others binge on "The West Wing." Folks ask
whether Trump will be impeached in the next few months. They inquire,
imploringly, if we're not already witnessing the sequel to Watergate.
So "Democracy Dies in
Darkness" could be seen to fit a preachy, overweening industry self-regard
of the moment. A plea for attention and respect when simple, unexplained daily
action will have to do, if not necessarily suffice. But it works.
At minimum, it might just
be a masterstroke when it comes to branding. Straightforward, succinct, a
phrase that captures purpose. We'll see.
Obviously, it's about
democracy, which one would hope remains a nonpartisan value. It sets a high bar
for the paper, especially in a world increasingly filled with deceit and
commentary passing as reporting.
This is a period of time
that can seem a bit off-kilter and unhinged on some days, with the president
attacking a free press, then rattling off falsehoods in front of reporters.
There's the possibility of dismantling a host of government safeguards on
various matters. The defenseless may be even more so in a year or two.
If Trump read books or
plays — which he seems not to, and proudly so — I'd send a copy of "Night
and Day," a 1978 play by Stoppard, the brilliant British playwright.
It’s all about honorable
foreign correspondents and includes one George
Guthrie, an old-hand and knowing photographer. He tells a young
reporter, “People do awful things to each other. But it’s worse in places where
everybody is kept in the dark.”
“Information is light.
Information, in itself, about anything, is light.”
Baron is not a great
playwright or novelist. He's a smart newspaper guy, now adroitly using the vast
resources of a wealthy boss in transforming an institution.
And he's keeping a set of
values that include trying to avoid his readers being kept in the dark. As the
opening night audience would declare at the end of many Stoppard plays, bravo
The Increasingly Unhinged Russia Rhetoric Comes From a Long-Standing U.S. Playbook Intercept. Glenn Greenwald’s latest.Why We Must Oppose the Kremlin-Baiting Against Trump Stephen Cohen weighs in on the New McCarthyism.
In An Era Of Endless Choice, It’s The Massive Blockbusters That More And More Dominate
“As a business, entertainment has in some ways become less democratic, not more. Technology is making the rich richer, skewing people’s consumption of entertainment towards the biggest hits and the most powerful platforms. This world is dominated by an oligarchy of giants, including Facebook, Google, Amazon, Netflix and Disney (as well as Alibaba and Tencent within China’s walled ecosystem). Those lacking sufficient scale barely get noticed. Paradoxically, enabling every individual and product on the planet to find a market has made it next to impossible for the market to find them. Consumers generally favour whatever they find on their mobile screens or at the top of their search results. The tail is indeed long, but it is very skinny.”
An Accidental Activist By Nell Freudenberger
HM government transparency report 2017: disruptive and investigatory powers Ref: ISBN9781474140942 Cm9420 PDF 1.2MB, 110 pages, “Information on the use, regulation and oversight of a wide range of disruptive and investigatory powers. Annual transparency report on the work of our intelligence, security and law enforcement agencies.
This report covers:
- the range of powers used to combat threats to national security
- the extent of their use
- the safeguards and oversight in place to guard against their abuse.”
Struggling single mum's Facebook tax return message goes viral
UC San Diego Students Protest Visit by ‘Oppressive and Offensive’ Dalai Lama. They’re Chinese students spouting the Chinese government’s line, wrapped in college diversity-speak. To be fair, college diversity-speak lends itself to communist propaganda
World Economic Forum: “Should your driverless car value your life over a pedestrian’s? Should your Fitbit activity be used against you in a court case? Should we allow drones to become the new paparazzi? Can one patent a human gene? Scientists are already struggling with such dilemmas. As we enter the new machine age, we need a new set of codified morals to become the global norm. We should put as much emphasis on ethics as we put on fashionable terms like disruption. This is starting to happen. Last year, America’s Carnegie Mellon University announced a new centre studying the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence; under President Obama, the White House published a paper on the same topic; and tech giants including Facebook and Google have announced a partnership to draw up an ethical framework for AI. Both the risks and the opportunities are vast: Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk and other experts signed an open letter calling for efforts to ensure AI is beneficial to society…”
