Jozef Imrich, name worthy of Kafka, has his finger on the pulse of any irony of interest and shares his findings to keep you in-the-know with the savviest trend setters and infomaniacs.
''I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center.''
-Kurt Vonnegut
“This is a century of ideas, this is a time when
Australia’s growth, when our living standards, when our
incomes will be determined by the human capital, the
intellectual capital that all of us have. By unleashing our
innovation, unleashing our imagination, being prepared to
embrace change, we usher in the ideas boom.”
~ Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, 7 December 2015
In an immensely insightful piece titled “Two Modes of Thought,” Bruner writes:
There are two modes of cognitive functioning, two modes
of thought, each providing distinctive ways of ordering experience, of
constructing reality. The two (though complementary) are irreducible to
one another. Efforts to reduce one mode to the other or to ignore one at
the expense of the other inevitably fail to capture the rich diversity
of thought.
Each of the ways of knowing, moreover, has operating principles of
its own and its own criteria of well-formedness. They differ radically
in their procedures for verification. A good story and a well-formed
argument are different natural kinds. Both can be used as means for
convincing another. Yet what they convince of is fundamentally
different: arguments convince one of their truth, stories of their
lifelikeness. The one verifies by eventual appeal to procedures for
establishing formal and empirical proof. The other establishes not truth
but verisimilitude.
[…]
A story (allegedly true or allegedly fictional) is judged for its
goodness as a story by criteria that are of a different kind from those
used to judge a logical argument as adequate or correct.