Outline, new AI tool to help you write better and faster. And “Introducing Embra, a fast ChatGPT-like assistant that lives on your Mac desktop & integrates into your apps!” “Use it to: – Access ChatGPT-like conversations instantly – Query documents or websites (even PDFs!) – Write context-rich docs, code, and emails” And BioGPTLarge.
The Most Important Job Skill of This Century The The Atlantic: “A product race is under way in the world of artificial intelligence. Just this week, Google announced plans to releaseBard, a search chatbot based on its proprietary large language model; yesterday, Microsoft held an event unveiling a next-generation web browser with a supercharged Bing interface powered by ChatGPT. Though most big tech companies have been quietly developing their own generative-AI tools for years, these giants are scrambling to demonstrate their chops after the public release and runaway adoption of OpenAI’s ChatGPT, which has accumulated more than 30 million users in two months.
OpenAI’s success is an apparent signal to tech leaders that deep-learning networks are the next frontier of the commercial internet. AI evangelists will similarly tell you that generative AI is destined to become the overlay for not only search engines, but also creative work, busywork, memo writing, research, homework, sketching, outlining, storyboarding, and teaching. It will, in this telling, remake and reimagine the world…”
DeepL: “Perfect your writing in seconds. Write clearly, precisely, and with ease. This tool allows you to correct mistakes, rephrase your sentences and improve your writing. The green highlight on the right indicates a change. Click on a word to see suggestions or rewrite the entire sentence.” Translate text [31 languages], Translate files [PDF, Word (.docx), or PowerPoint]. Free and fee versions.
- Improve your writing in just one click
- Fix grammar and punctuation mistakes
- Choose your tone of voice
- Be creative and rephrase entire sentences
- Express nuances through
- Write suggestions
ChatGPT Is a Blurry JPEG of the Web The New Yorker – OpenAI’s chatbot offers paraphrases, whereas Google offers quotes. Which do we prefer? By Ted Chiang: “…The resemblance between a photocopier and a large-language model might not be immediately apparent—but consider the following scenario. Imagine that you’re about to lose your access to the Internet forever. In preparation, you plan to create a compressed copy of all the text on the Web, so that you can store it on a private server. Unfortunately, your private server has only one per cent of the space needed; you can’t use a lossless compression algorithm if you want everything to fit. Instead, you write a lossy algorithm that identifies statistical regularities in the text and stores them in a specialized file format. Because you have virtually unlimited computational power to throw at this task, your algorithm can identify extraordinarily nuanced statistical regularities, and this allows you to achieve the desired compression ratio of a hundred to one.
Now, losing your Internet access isn’t quite so terrible; you’ve got all the information on the Web stored on your server. The only catch is that, because the text has been so highly compressed, you can’t look for information by searching for an exact quote; you’ll never get an exact match, because the words aren’t what’s being stored. To solve this problem, you create an interface that accepts queries in the form of questions and responds with answers that convey the gist of what you have on your server.
What I’ve described sounds a lot like ChatGPT, or most any other large-language model. Think of ChatGPT as a blurry JPEG of all the text on the Web. It retains much of the information on the Web, in the same way that a JPEG retains much of the information of a higher-resolution image, but, if you’re looking for an exact sequence of bits, you won’t find it; all you will ever get is an approximation.
But, because the approximation is presented in the form of grammatical text, which ChatGPT excels at creating, it’s usually acceptable. You’re still looking at a blurry JPEG, but the blurriness occurs in a way that doesn’t make the picture as a whole look less sharp…”
