Monday, October 05, 2026

Putin Regime: Nearly 200 People Under Observation After Irkutsk Lab Worker Dies From Plague

The Unbearable Lightness of Being. I think somebody has already written that. I did! But I was wrong about the title then. That title was supposed to belong to the novel I'm writing right now.
 - Milan Kundera

 UNWANTED MEMORIES OF AGA'S GRAVE


Russia Hides Potential Pneumonic Plague Outbreak After Fatal Lab Breach

The head of neighboring Buryatia, Alexey Tsydenov, initially said Shipilova had died from plague, only to later soften his statement to say she “may have died from plague.”

This strain might have been responsible for Black Death in 14th century which killed half of Europe.


Woman Dies of Suspected Plague Infection, Nearly 200 People Who Had Contact with Her Placed Under Medical Observation

Daria Shipilova, a lab technician in her late 20s, died of a suspected pneumonic plague infection in Russia on Oct. 2

  • Daria Shipilova, a lab technician in her late 20s, died of a suspected pneumonic plague infection in Russia on Oct. 2
  • Nearly 200 people who had contact with the woman, who worked at the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute in Siberia, were placed under medical observation
  • Russian authorities said anti-epidemic measures are underway

A woman has died of a suspected plague infection in Russia — and nearly 200 people who had contact with her were placed under medical observation.

The deceased woman was identified as Daria Shipilova, a lab technician in her late 20s who was employed at the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute in Siberia, according to The Moscow Times, regional Russian news outlet People of Baikal and 1news.az.


Pneumonic plague can infect the lungs and can be transmitted from person to person via respiratory droplets. Pneumonic plague is considered fatal unless treated early, per WHO.


Nearly 200 People Under Observation After Irkutsk Lab Worker Dies From Plague


Kirill Zykov / Moskva News Agency

Health authorities in Siberia’s Irkutsk region have placed nearly 200 people under medical observation after a laboratory worker died from plague, according to media reports and a statement by a regional leader Friday.

Alexei Tsydenov, head of the neighboring republic of Buryatia, confirmed that the woman had died from an unspecified form of plague. Irkutsk officials had previously described the illness only as a “particularly dangerous infection.”

Citing information from Russia’s consumer safety watchdog Rospotrebnadzor and Buryatia’s government, Tsydenov said the woman had not visited his republic and that her infection was unrelated to the region.

“There are no plague outbreaks in the republic, including in areas bordering Mongolia,” he wrote on social media.

The woman was identified as Daria Sh., a 27- or 28-year-old employee of the Irkutsk anti-plague institute, by the exiled news outlet Lyudi Baikala (People of Baikal) and pro-Kremlin broadcaster REN TV.

She reportedly told medical staff that she had accidentally broken a test tube containing live bacteria while collecting samples for testing.

She was hospitalized Tuesday with symptoms of severe pneumonia in Shelekhov, a town near the regional capital of Irkutsk. She was placed on a ventilator and died Thursday, according to the reports.

The Shelekhov district hospital was placed under quarantine pending an assessment by a special commission.

At least 197 people who may have had contact with her were reportedly placed under medical isolation, including more than 100 in hospital wards.

Authorities canceled planned public events in Irkutsk, while law enforcement reportedly opened a criminal investigation into potential health safety violations resulting in death.

Irkutsk region Governor Igor Kobzev urged the public to remain calm after meeting with Rospotrebnadzor chief Anna Popova to coordinate emergency containment measures.

“All identified contact persons have been placed under medical observation. As of today, the contacts show no signs of illness, and their laboratory test results are negative,” Kobzev wrote on Telegram on Friday. He did not mention the reports of the laboratory worker’s death.

Media reports have described the suspected infection as pneumonic plague, which affects the lungs and can spread between humans through respiratory droplets. Tsydenov’s statement did not specify the form of plague.



From jailbird to billionaire — the incredible story of Oliver Curtis and the company he is about to float

Never stop fighting until the fight is done. The arc of the moral universe is long but it bends towards Justice


Memorable Presidential Quotes In History From FDR: "The only thing we have to fear... is fear itself." From JFK: "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." From our Trump Vulgarian-In-Chief:

TRUMP BEGS BUCKEYE STATE 'SHOVE IT UP THEIR ASS'

From jailbird to billionaire — the incredible story of Oliver Curtis and the company he is about to float


Man forced to foot bill to save neighbour’s ‘stressed’ tree


‘Not good enough’: Only eight super funds pass muster on retirement

Just eight superannuation funds out of 45 assessed have passed a test based on how well they support members when they reach retirement.

The 2026 Epic Retirement Tick test, designed by super research house Chant West and the Epic Retirement Institute, was based on an expanded checklist of 20 criteria (up from 18 last year) of factors considered important to pre-retirees and retirees.

To be awarded the tick in 2026, funds must have met 14 out of the 20 criteria. Bethany Rae

Despite the additional criteria, the number of funds awarded the tick rose from six in 2025, but Epic Retirement Institute founder Bec Wilson said the low number “isn’t good enough”.

“Australians should be able to expect this level of retirement support from far more of the superannuation industry,” said Wilson.

“Super funds are paid to support their members through retirement, not just while they’re accumulating super.”


In its inaugural year, six funds – Hostplus, Aware Super, Brighter Super, UniSuper, Telstra Super (which has since merged with Aware Super) and Australian Retirement Trust’s Super Savings account option – passed, and all retained the accreditation this year.

The three additional funds that passed the 2026 test were retail funds AMP and Colonial First State’s FirstChoice offering, and industry fund Vision Super.

To be awarded the tick in 2026, funds must have met 14 of the 20 criteria (up from 12 of 18 last year) grouped broadly under the categories of product design and investments, education, guidance and advice, and service delivery.

Funds must also not have any enforceable undertakings or additional licence conditions currently imposed upon them by APRA or ASIC – a new requirement for 2026.

AMP, Aware Super, Brighter Super, UniSuper and Colonial First State FirstChoice were assessed to have met 15 criteria, while Australian Retirement Trust Super Savings, Hostplus and Vision Super were found to have met 14 criteria.

Five criteria were added to the 2026 test while three were removed, said Wilson.

Cybersecurity and fraud protection, complaints handling, the variety of retirement solutions offered and the extent to which customers could make changes to their account online were among the new hurdles on which funds were assessed.

They sit alongside more traditional criteria such as investment performance, fees, drawdown strategies, advice, retirement planning assistance, contact centre service and efficiency of pension payments.

Chant West general manager Ian Fryer said retail super funds were among the most improved in 2026.

“We’ve seen considerable development from funds over the past year, particularly in the help they provide to members as they approach and enter retirement,” said Fryer.

“There’s been strong development from retail providers in particular across advice – both digital and over the phone – member engagement and retirement income tools.”

But more widely, superannuation funds continue to attract criticism for being ill-prepared to help members navigate the transition to retirement.

With more than 2.5 million people forecast to retire over the next decade, regulators and policymakers say many super funds are lacking. 

This year, the country’s biggest super fund, Australian Super, bolstered its advice offering in an attempt to stem an outflow of funds to other super funds and small and medium super funds (SMSFs), while the handling of death benefits payments remains a pain point.

 is deputy wealth editor at The Australian Financial Review. She has been a business journalist for 25 years and is the author of Money Queens: Rule your Money, an award-winning personal finance book for teenage girls. Email Michelle at michelle.bowes@afr.com


Sunday, October 04, 2026

Every Marriage Needs Annoying Habits


My husband can’t stop rearranging 
furniture, with or without my permission.

 

My husband loves moving furniture. He typically does it when I’m not around. Like when I attended a writer’s retreat for a week. While I was focusing on structure, rhythm and my voice, he was back home rearranging the living room.

He rotated the art on the walls, swapped the chairs and added a rug. In the library, the round table was now in the corner, replaced by a low Japanese table. He also moved our “bar,” a giant Chinese cabinet that stores liquor, bills, stamps, envelopes, pens and a gift-wrapped water pitcher (a present for my sister-in-law that I keep forgetting to give her). Instead of seeing it when I first walked in — the pop of red, always a happy sight — it was tucked in against the opposite wall.

All told, in this moving marathon, he changed five rooms. He never asked how I might feel about the matter. He never told me he was going to be moving the furniture. He just did it.

I can’t imagine moving furniture (or buying furniture) without his input. We have been married for 34 years and together for 37. We’re a team. We have the same aesthetic. We spend our free time perusing antique shops, flea markets and auctions. We even met while working at an auction house, Butterfield & Butterfield in San Francisco. He was a painting expert, and I, naturally, worked in the furniture department.

I can deal with some change, but not five rooms at once. After that writer’s retreat, I walked in, tired from the long flight home but exhilarated from the week. I dropped my bag in the mudroom. Seeing me, my husband called out “Buggy!” (our nickname for each other) and ran toward me for the biggest hug.

After our embrace, he said, “I can’t wait to show you something.” He grabbed my hand, pulling me toward the library. As we moved through the house, my eyes darting around, nothing looked the same. Where was I?

And then I felt that old, yucky feeling of “Oh my god, he’s done it again. He’s moved the furniture without checking with me.” The anger crept up my body, gaining ferocity until I yelled, “I can’t believe you! How many times do I have to tell you?”

All this transpired, unfortunately, while our adult daughter was visiting. She took his side because I was the one yelling. “He worked so hard,” she said, and “he did something thoughtful and beautiful, wanting to make you happy.”

“You have no idea what goes on in a marriage,” I said. “This is a theme. Every time he does it, I ask him to please consult me first. It makes me feel invisible and disrespected.” Now I was furious with my husband andmy daughter.

The truth is that my husband can’t help it. Try as I might, I’ve concluded he will never change. His father also loved to move furniture. When my husband was a young boy, he used to give his father “gift cards” worth several hours of help moving furniture for his birthday or Christmas. Stumped while trying to write his father’s eulogy a few years back, he paused and moved some furniture, which got the words flowing.

His parents ended up in marriage counseling because of furniture.

His mother, an artist, decided to clean some dirt off an old piece, admiring her handiwork and the chest’s shiny new self. My father-in-law lost his cool and said she had ruined its patina.

I guess I should be grateful that my husband is at least good at moving furniture. There’s never a scratch on the floor or a mark on the wall. I once saw him move our dining room table, made from a heavy piece of burl wood, by getting on all fours, crawling under the table, arching his back like a cat, and inching this giant object, turtle-like, to its destination two rooms over.

He somehow managed to move a heavy treadmill (a Covid purchase) from the curb to our basement by tipping it onto a skateboard and rolling it to the stairwell, where he tied it with a garden hose, slid some cardboard under it, and slowly lowered it down the steps. He told me this method works for moving things upstairs, too — he once hauled a large antique chest up two steep, tight flights by himself, tilted onto a furniture mat.

“Furniture mats are key,” he says.

When I asked him why he moves furniture when I’m away, he said, “Because you’d get mad at me.”

“But I get mad at you when I get home.”

His response? “No committees. I want the freedom to move things where I want to.”

You can see why I get angry.

When I am around during a furniture-moving session, like when he moves tables and chairs to make more space for Thanksgiving, I sometimes offer to help. Though I never want to. I hate moving furniture — I hate the physical act, and I like the security of things being where I expect them.

The bottom line is he’s best doing it on his own. There’s no friction.

I learned recently that my husband is not alone in his compulsion. I read that Rick Steves, the travel writer and TV personality, sometimes rearranges the furniture in his hotel rooms. My husband does that regularly, including once in a rental in Vermont. That time, he didn’t move the sofa and chairs back because he claimed he had “improved the flow of the room.”

He thought he was doing the owners, whose rental was part of a venerable historic-preservation organization, a favor. They disagreed. They sent us a letter of complaint, admonishing us not to do that again. Now he always moves the furniture back.

Another thing that has always irked me about my husband’s shifty shiftings is that after my yelling, he calmly says, “Just try it for a week or two; I can always move it back.”

I grew up in a military family, moving all the time, and can adjust to just about anything. He knows that my number one skill, according to an assessment I took a few years back, is adaptability. Once he says that, I know it’s over; the stuff will never be moved back. And because I’m so adaptable, I usually do get used to it.


And there are times I’ve been glad. One Mother’s Day, I was out for several hours, and my husband, this time with the help of our son, decided to make me an office. As a mother of two, I’d been craving a room of my own. A space that was just mine with a door that I could shut.

In a small room under the eaves, the two of them removed the guest bed, chest of drawers and table, and replaced them with a “desk” (an old door resting on two filing cabinets), a light, a small bookshelf and a comfy chair for reading in the corner. The office chair came later. That time, there was no yelling, just shrieks of delight. Ten years later, that little room is still my oasis.

I hate to admit this to him, because I will always believe he should consult with me first, but I have noticed over the years that moving things around changes the energy. I see things differently. The light shifts, shadows emerge. It keeps our old house from feeling stagnant or boring.

Maybe it does the same for our marriage. Stephen Mitchell, in his book “Can Love Last?,” suggests that relationships thrive in the tension between security and adventure, familiarity and novelty, predictability and passion. Maybe our daughter was partially right that day. Maybe we both were.

Recently, at the summer house we share with my husband’s two brothers, my husband rearranged the furniture on a weekend I wasn’t there.

By himself, he moved a daybed downstairs and set it up against a window facing the cove. He constructed a shelf to bridge the small gap between the bed and the window, creating a space for a coffee cup, a glass of water or a book. He arranged three pillows on either side. He found an old vessel filled with household stuff, which he emptied and placed on a table nearby. He discovered that if he tapped it with his finger, it chimes, the sound resonating for four minutes. (Yes, we timed it.)


He said he made the spot with me in mind. Every time we visit, I head straight for it.


Sarah Baker is a freelance writer in Cambridge, Mass.
Modern Love can be reached at modernlove@nytimes.com.
To find previous Modern Love essays, Tiny Love Stories and podcast episodes, visit our archive.
Want more Modern Love? Watch the TV series, sign up for the newsletter and listen to the podcast on iTunes or Spotify. We also have two books, “Modern Love: True Stories of Love, Loss, and Redemption” and “Tiny Love Stories: True Tales of Love in 100 Words or Less.”