Thursday, April 30, 2026

Newly appointed USyd professor Anna Funder knows fascism when she sees it.

“The secret of the demagogue is to make himself as stupid as his audience so they believe they are clever as he.” — Karl Kraus




Newly appointed USyd professor Anna Funder knows fascism when she sees it. 

And she sees it in the White House Jacqueline Maley April 30, 2026

 For someone who literally wrote the book on the state-sponsored surveillance of citizens, Anna Funder is surprisingly optimistic about the perils of artificial intelligence.

“My calculator is more intelligent than I am, but it doesn’t pose an existential threat to my humanity,” says the acclaimed author of Stasiland, about the secret police of communist East Germany, and resistance to that regime.
“I think AI will settle and find a place in our world.”
Anna Funder’s new role is Professor of Practice in Creative Writing at Sydney University.PHOTO: STEVEN SIEWERT
Funder, who has just been appointed as a Professor of Practice in Creative Writing at Sydney University, is certainly alive to the threats of AI models and social media, and the tech companies that use them to harvest our personal data.
Her new role will constitute a small act of resistance against the dehumanising influence of those technologies.
“I think I have, sadly, a shorter attention span than I would like to have now,” she admits.
“But I have a suspicion that in the age of AI, real writing, and particularly creative writing made by humans and read by humans, as an act of human connection, is going to become more important, not less.”
Sydney University poached Funder from the University of Technology, where she has studied and worked part-time for about 20 years, and where she conceived and wrote much of her second book, 2012 Miles Franklin-winning novel All That I Am, about Jewish resistance to the Nazis.
Funder’s appointment is a huge coup for Sydney University, and represents a vote of confidence in the humanistic power of liberal arts education in the age of technology.

FROM OUR PARTNERS

“This appointment reflects the University’s commitment to the humanities and to writing as a vital public practice,” says Vice Chancellor Mark Scott.
“Anna has a rare ability to take complex historical and political material and render it deeply human. That combination of intellectual seriousness and creative brilliance is exactly what we want students to encounter as they learn to think, write and engage with the world.”
The newly created role could also be interpreted as a riposte to the Trump-inspired demonisation, by some, of the humanities as a discipline.
“You can see in the reverse view, how Trump and other fascists I have studied have gone for universities because they are the places where the new, important and challenging thinking is happening,” Funder says.
“We are lucky to have extremely good universities in this country … I am so buoyed by the academics I know in all kinds of areas, that it blinds me to any sense of doom.”
Funder’s job will encompass some supervision of higher-degree creative writing students, and some representation of the university at major national and international events.
She will also contribute to the curriculum and speaker programs.
Since publishing Stasiland, her first book, in 2003, Funder has written two further books dealing with the subjects of fascism and authoritarianism.
‘I am so buoyed by the academics I know in all kinds of areas, that it blinds me to any sense of doom.’
Anna Funder
Her most recent book, 2023’s prize-winning Wifedom, was a genre-breaking account of the life of Eileen O’Shaughnessy, wife of the great anti-fascist George Orwell.
There is debate about whether it is appropriate to use the “f” word – fascist – to describe the US president, but for Funder the evidence is too strong to ignore.
“This is a version of fascism, and you have to call it by its name,” she says of the Trump administration. “That doesn’t mean you can’t examine its particularities.”
Drawing on the work of American philosopher Jason Stanley and the Russian political exile and journalist M. Gessen, Funder says history shows fascist movements begin with asserting an extreme version of patriarchy.
“The first move is against women, to make men central and powerful, and put women back behind a white picket fence, imaginary 1950s life,” she says.
Then there is a centralisation of power, through co-opting the legal system, control of the media and book bannings, she says, followed by the strip-back of legal protections and the state-sponsored violence of militia groups.
Funder points to the brutality of US ICE agents policing immigrants, and detention of people without habeas corpus.
“Trump is a lot more personally corrupt than many other fascist leaders,” she says.
“It is capitalism with fascistic characteristics.”
A feature of authoritarianism is the state-sponsored, Stasi-like watching of ordinary people.
But in the contemporary age, this is done by tech companies, with the consent of the people being watched. “It is very interesting and a very dangerous time,” Funder says.
“Governments are entering into contracts with these companies, as well as being raided by them. They need to work with them, but they also need to regulate them.”
Anna Funder will also represent the university at major national and international events as well as contribute to the curriculum and speaker programs.STEVEN SIEWERT
As part of her professorship, Funder will also continue work on a new novel.
It is set in contemporary Sydney, but beyond that, she can’t say what it’s about.
“If I say what it’s about, I’ll hold myself to that, and my subconscious will think, ‘You said that is what it’s about, you have to do that’, and then I will rebel against that,” she explains, with the impeccable logic of a mid-draft novelist.
Funder worries about AI models breaching copyright and destroying artists’ income streams.
But she doesn’t believe that AI will ever replace the novel, or that it will become an irrelevant form in the fast-twitch age of social media.
“People read a novel because they want to feel something deeply about someone else’s life, and also their own life,” she says.
“That depends on that work being made by a human.”
When Funder was herself an undergraduate, she read a lot from the post-structuralist French theorist Roland Barthes, who declared the (metaphorical) death of the author.
“But the author is very much alive,” she says.
“We understand the ‘I’ on the page is not the same as the author, but we want the two to be in communication with each other.
“That’s the human in humanities.”


The Donald has all the traits of his political forebears, and he'll present all the same dangers.
A few hours after Donald Trump won last week’s Nevada caucuses, I woke up in the middle of the night with a bad feeling that, as a country, we were now just a Super Tuesday landslide away from putting Trump on the path to the Republican presidential nomination and, potentially, turning over governance of our republic to a man who fits the textbook four-part definition of a demagogue.
Like others I’ve discussed in “Demagogue: The Fight to Save Democracy from Its Worst Enemies,” Trump’s rise has been one of sheer hubris, overblown promises and an almost effortless seduction that can sweep up even the toughest critics. Consider the normally hard-nosed Republican pollster Frank Luntz, who reported “my legs are shaking” after talking Trump with focus group participants last August.

Last month, Trump boasted that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan and still not lose votes. Saturday, Trump was apparently tricked into retweeting a Benito Mussolini quote from Twitter account “@ilduce2016”— set up, apparently, by the website Gawker — and brushed it off by saying of his demagogue forbear that “Mussolini was Mussolini” and that it was a “very good quote.”

Demagogues know they’re getting away with something so shameless that even they sometimes experience it in the third person: Think of Louisiana governor and U.S. senator Huey Long telling an interviewer: “There are all kinds of demagogues. … Some of them deceive the people in their own interests.” Or the ancient Athenian demagogue Cleon, who berated an audience for being “victims of your own pleasure in listening” before telling them, “I am trying to stop you behaving like this.”


Indeed. When it comes to Trump, my worry is too many voters won’t realize, until it’s too late to stop him, the four specific and very real dangers posed when someone like him comes to power.

Trump wasn’t a textbook demagogue. Until now.

First, a demagogue imperils his country in the international arena. During the Peloponnesian War, the brutal but charismatic Cleon proposed slaughtering all the male inhabitants of the rebellious island of Mytilene — and it was initially adopted. His plan was reversed at the last minute by a vote of the Athenian assembly, but its consideration meant the end of moderate politics in, and the ultimate decline of, Athens.

In the years after World War I, Mussolini translated his populist nationalism into the belligerent foreign policy of spazio vitale, which claimed that Italy had the right and duty to seize territory across the Mediterranean region and presaged Italy’s World War II invasions of France, Greece and Albania.

Compare that to Trump’s 2011 call for America to impose regime change in Libya, saying, “we should go in, we should stop this guy, which would be very easy and very quick.” He has assured us that “torture works.” He has promised to use targeted assassination against Islamic State fighters, saying, “you have to take out their families.” He advocated a “total and complete” ban on Muslims entering the United States for an unspecified period of time, doing his best to wipe out years of goodwill built with countries like Jordan and Egypt while painting a bigger terrorist bulls-eye on Americans’ backs.

He’s even bragged that he’d “get along very well with” Russian President Vladimir Putin, the autocrat who took Crimea by force and continues to prop up Syria’s despotic President Bashar al-Assad.

A President Trump seems likely to escalate tensions abroad and to create unnecessary and dangerous hostilities, while hollowing out our values so that we are no longer the beacon of the free world. Earlier this month he endorsed torture “much worse” than waterboarding, prompting former CIA director Michael Hayden last week to suggest that military and intelligence officers might “refuse to act” on Trump’s orders. A recipe for chaos.

The second danger is that the demagogue will surround himself with incompetent and dangerous advisers. Huey Long famously recruited political operative Gerald L.K. Smith to help run his populist “Share Our Wealth” campaign. After Long’s assassination, Smith became known as one of America’s most notorious anti-Semites.

President Richard Nixon, who tried his best to qualify as a demagogue with his Checkers speech and Southern strategy, was aided in his decision-making — en route to resigning in disgrace — with his reliance on incompetent and unscrupulous senior White House aides like H.R. Haldeman and Dwight Chapin, whose primary experience was in advertising rather than policy and government.

Trump has been the GOP frontrunner for months, yet he equivocates on questions about advisers he’d choose. Two weeks ago, on foreign policy, he promised, “I’m going to be announcing a team in about a week that is really a good team.” That’s a promise he’s made, and broken, going back to last fall.


Last year, Trump announced the hiring of Iowa activist Sam Clovis as a “senior policy adviser,” promising that he would “tap into [Clovis’s] expansive expertise in economics, national security and international relations.” And while Clovis was an Air Force colonel and is an economics professor, he’s light on proven policy expertise. In an October CNN interview, Clovis balked at questions about Trump’s assorted inconsistencies on policy. Meanwhile, Trump’s national spokeswoman, Katrina Pierson, wore a bullet necklace during CNN appearance, suggesting provocation will be a staple of a Trump administration.

The third danger is that the demagogue, who ascends to power by manipulating the passions of his followers, will fall prey to passions of his own. Take former Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi, a demagogue who built his television empire peddling sexist representations of women and brought those same values into his administration. He became notorious for his “bunga bunga” parties with teenage prostitutes and was convicted on corruption charges.

Donald Trump is America’s Silvio Berlusconi

Trump’s Achilles heel is his narcissism. He bristles at any slight, no matter how small, and is determined to make anyone who threatens his self-regard pay. Just imagine how he’d behave with strong-willed congressional opponents who attack him publicly and challenge his administration’s policy agenda.


Fourth, demagogues like Trump threaten dissenters in an effort to silence them. Sen. Joseph McCarthy (R-Wis.) used the subpoena powers of an obscure U.S. Senate subcommittee to terrorize Americans he deemed enemies of the state. In “The Origins of Totalitarianism,” Hannah Arendt described how, in both Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia, demagogue-led thug regimes tolerated only state-approved groupthink while suffocating individual voices and ideas.

Trump regularly encourages his six million-plus Twitter followers to harass his critics. And of a protester at one of his recent rallies, Trump said: “I’d like to punch him in the face.” He wants to “open up” libel law to make it easier to cow journalists unfriendly to his cause.

Here’s how Trump avoids hard questions on TV

It all bodes ill for our representative democracy and deeply-rooted faith in constitutional principles. Alexander Hamilton warned us, in The Federalist No. 85, of his worry about the rise of a “military despotism of a victorious demagogue.”


Trump isn’t winning based on experience or ideology. Polls show that voters gravitate toward him because he’s convinced them he’s the candidate who “tells it like is,” when, in fact, he’s done just the opposite. On the most important questions about he’d govern, he’s managed to sidestep voters’ and journalists’ questions. He’s said little that suggests he’d hew to constitutional norms. And he’s conducted himself in a manner not befitting a leader of the free world. In a vacuum, we’re left to assume that he’d govern much like demagogues who’ve come before.




Lime Bike: Hacker who allegedly carried out cyberattacks for China is extradited to US


A Lime Bike delivered by a friendly tattooed neighbour at 4:44ish



Hacker who allegedly carried out cyberattacks for China is extradited to US



Countries around the world join forces to take down a group responsible for denial of service attacks in which computers are directed to flood a target organization with phone or internet traffic to crash their systems and request funds to stop attack; servers seized, warning letters issued, and 4 arrested
 
New Jersey: Man from Germany who was a long time fugitive gets 70 months prison for mass-mailings supposedly coming from psychics; scheme that took in $14 million
 
WSJ: How Cambodia became Scambodia

  • Scam compounds estimated to be 40% of GDP
  • Estimates that they bring in $19 billion per year

 India busts 52 bank workers across the country for assisting in cyber fraud; many of them set up fraudulent or mule accounts
 
SIM farms in the US, Europe, and elsewhere are rented out to send scam text messages
 
Scam messages claiming to offer safe passage through the Straits of Hormuz collect bitcoin from ships
 

Fraud Studies: Here are links to the studies I’ve written for the Better Business Bureau: puppy fraud, romance fraud; BEC fraud, sweepstakes/lottery fraud tech support fraud, romance fraud money mules, crooked movers, government imposters, online vehicle sale scams, rental fraud, gift cards,  free trial offer frauds,  job scams,  online shopping fraud,  fake check fraud and crypto scams
 
Fraud News Around the world

Humor

FTC and CFPB

Artificial Intelligence and deep fake fraud

Benefit Theft

Scam Compounds

Business Email compromise fraud 

IRS and tax fraud

Bitcoin and Crypto Fraud

Ransomware and data breaches

ATM Skimming                                                       

Romance Fraud and Sextortion 



Spoofed Tankers Are Flooding the Strait of Hormuz. These Analysts Are Tracking Them

Wired – no paywall: “Marine insurers and oil traders want to know what’s going on in one of the world’s most critical waterways. As the volume of disappearing ships in the area increases, analysts are getting creative…Tracking disappearing ships makes use of several technologies, some of them newer than others. Samir Madani, the cofounder of TankerTrackers.com, has for years relied on satellite imagery from both commercial and public sources to give paying clients a better sense of when and where oil and other goods are moving in and out of the strait. But in April, US satellite firms announced they would limit high-resolution imagery of the region. “We are dusting off all the old sources and tweaking them to perfection,” Madani told WIRED in a message.

 “We are buying [information] from other Western sources as well.” The firm’s data is valuable to other companies, he says, because two-thirds of tanker traffic moving through the Strait of Hormuz is by vessels with histories of violating sanctions. Bockmann says her firm relies on several other sources to get a good idea of what’s going on in the strait. Electro-optical imagery uses electronic sensors to detect visible and near-infrared light data. Synthetic-aperture radar uses microwaves to create images even through clouds, rain, or darkness. 

Radio-frequency signals are used to transit data wirelessly (used in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and GPS). Stitch those together with databases that include ship registry information and even “human presence signals” from mobile devices onboard vessels, and the firm can get a better sense of what is going where. Generally, satellite imagery used to be very expensive to obtain, but prices are coming down, she says…”