Tuesday, March 31, 2026

Rasputin. Roy Cohn. Jeffrey Epstein. Every Elite Has a ‘Dark Connector.’

Epstein Fury of Operation: The world is facing a 'ticking time bomb' from its supply of oil, according to a briefing note from JP Morgan. Physical scarcity of oil is about to unfold across the globe, spreading sequentially through April from east to west, causing major economic disruption worldwide.


Rasputin. Roy Cohn. Jeffrey Epstein. Every Elite Has a ‘Dark Connector.’

By Jacob Weisberg

Mr. Weisberg is the former editor of Slate and a founder of the podcast company Pushkin Industries.

It’s tempting to think of Jeffrey Epstein as an isolated aberration — a depraved man who was protected for too long by his wealth and privilege. In fact, he represents a recurring type. You might call this type the dark connector.

The dark connector is not necessarily a criminal, though he (or occasionally she) is inevitably a kind of predator. Sitting outside ordinary morality is part of what makes him valuable. The dark connector’s role is to make it easier for people of standing to move between their public obligations and their private desires without too much friction.

The dark connector is useful because he offers solutions that do not officially exist, ways of arranging things that institutions cannot sanction but that rich and successful people still want. The power he acquires by providing assistance is informal. It depends on personal trust, mutual compromise and the unspoken understanding that everyone involved has something to hide as well as something to gain.

The best way to understand how Mr. Epstein functioned as a dark connector is through Jmail, a simulation of his email inbox that lets users experience his slimy, typo-filled workflow. This searchable database — created by Riley Walz, a software engineer, and Luke Igel, an A.I. developer — performs the civic service of turning the Justice Department’s abridged and chaotic release of its investigatory files into a navigable archive. It’s illuminating and unsettling to contemplate the world from the dead creep’s perspective.

For those looking for proof that Mr. Epstein was a blackmailer or a financial crook or the operator of a pedophile ring, the emails are disappointing. They don’t quite prove him to have been any of those things. He was a sexual abuser who used his wealth to victimize women and girls on an industrial scale.

But the more subtle picture that emerges after some time trawling through his inbox — and once you start dipping in, it’s hard to stop — is that of a social broker. A college dropout with a gift for bullshiting on many topics, he made himself into a gateway between important people and the many kinds of better-kept-quiet help they wanted — with their tax bills, their sleazy romantic adventures, jobs for their kids and their social ambitions.

The closest thing to a professional role Mr. Epstein played was financial guru. Leon Black, a private equity billionaire with access to every reputable lawyer money can buy, nonetheless paid Mr. Epstein $170 million for what was described as estate and tax advice and that may have also covered helping Mr. Black intimidate and buy off former mistresses. (Mr. Black’s lawyers have said that Mr. Black was not aware of Mr. Epstein’s sex trafficking or of his paying any women on Mr. Black’s behalf.)

As a financial adviser, Mr. Epstein purported to know tricks unavailable to ordinary professionals. Mr. Black, for his part, seemed to relish the idea of a financial life conducted through a private channel unavailable to lesser mortals. Mr. Epstein not only helped him maximize the wealth of his descendants but also created the gratifying illusion of access to a special set of rules, administered by an outlaw savant with no compliance department.

Mr. Epstein’s second and more notorious role was that of wingman and sex scout. Whether in his townhouse or on visits to M.I.T., he surrounded himself with young Russian and Eastern European women who either were models or looked like models. There are at least five women named Dasha referred to in his messages, and at one point his executive assistant had to ask which Dasha he had invited to stay in his Paris apartment.

To powerful but socially awkward men, the Dashas were dazzling. They adorned his parties and dinners, and perhaps they might be interested in Jeff’s intellectually very impressive friends? To these men, Mr. Epstein was the roguish pickup artist living in a transactional world where everything was for sale. That wasn’t their normal world. But with him, you could temporarily drop the exhausting pretense of virtue.

For some of his friends and associates, Mr. Epstein’s taste for younger women was an inside joke. As Donald Trump told New York magazine in 2002: “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”
A third role he played was all-purpose benefactor. Jeff was the guy who invited you to a small dinner with the former Israeli prime minister. Jeff could get your son a job on Woody Allen’s next film. Jeff could help get your daughter into Bard (though how hard is that?). Jeff could get Leon Black and Bill Gates to make seven-figure donations to your academic institution. Jeff might give you the money to buy a rare, $56,000 Patek Philippe watch. Jeff invited you to his Caribbean island. Jeff gave you a ride on his plane.

Ah, the plane. Somewhere, a cultural anthropologist must be studying private air travel as a signifier among the tribes of the globalized elite. To bring someone aboard a private flight is a recognition of his status and an invitation for him to admire yours. It confers a feeling of belonging to a class whose members are too important to wait in lines, fasten seatbelts or proceed through customs. Even in this rarefied world, there are distinctions. Jeff’s plane was no ordinary C.E.O.’s jet, a Gulfstream or a Bombardier. It was a Boeing 727, outfitted for an outer-borough sultan, with velour sofas, a bar, a theater and a stateroom.

Ultimately, the email messages suggest that Mr. Epstein performed a social function that went beyond being a mere favor bank. Mr. Epstein was the host with the fascinating circle of friends, whose dinner parties crossed the Harvard faculty lounge with Page Six. Steven Pinker, meet Soon-Yi Previn. Steve Bannon, meet Noam Chomsky. Steve Tisch, meet Dasha … ? You had to be highly secure in your own status — Tina Brown and others who refused his invitations stand out in this respect — to recognize Mr. Epstein’s mingles as disgusting rather than enticing.

Every society that sustains a sharp divide between its professed standards and its lived arrangements will produce people whose business is managing it.

An obvious analogue to Mr. Epstein as dark connector is Roy Cohn. Mr. Cohn’s daily commerce during the Cold War era was in menace and gossip rather than flattery and philanthropy, but he played a similar role in high society, and in New York society in particular. He too had a “secret” that was widely known: He was gay. (Mr. Cohn would later die of AIDS, but claimed to have liver cancer.) He, too, held court at his Upper East Side townhouse, where you both did and didn’t want to sneak upstairs and peek behind the closed doors — Mr. Cohn always surrounded himself with young men. And like Mr. Epstein, Mr. Cohn turned his proximity to power into a kind of theater, relishing the performance of being the man who could make his friends’ problems magically disappear.

What was hard to understand about Mr. Cohn wasn’t his viciousness, but the range of friends who basked in his notoriety. His circle mixed politicians, mob figures and famous journalists. At his parties you might meet Barbara Walters, Andy Warhol, S.I. Newhouse and Anthony (Fat Tony) Salerno. The presence of establishment names alongside nightclub impresarios and thuggish clients reflected not just the attraction of the gutter but also the sense of election into a celebrity elite unconcerned with morality. Mr. Trump was clearly desperate for a way into it. The 2024 film “The Apprentice” brilliantly imagines the young Mr. Trump’s fascination with Mr. Cohn’s world, in which power was everything, the system was eminently corruptible, and the truth was an irrelevancy. That was Mr. Epstein’s vision as well.

Both men were opportunistic students of others’ weaknesses. Working as chief counsel for Senator Joseph McCarthy during the Red Scare, Mr. Cohn learned that ambition and fear create levers. In post-Cold War America, Mr. Epstein understood that money, vanity and sexual desire do the same. Each built networks around his understanding of human vulnerability. That’s what distinguishes them from ordinary fixers or social climbers. The dark connector thrives on the illusion that he is the only one who knows how things really work, and he uses that illusion to bring powerful people into his confidence.

Finding examples of this type in literature and history makes for a slightly morbid parlor game. Meyer Wolfsheim, the bootlegger who bridges high society and organized crime in “The Great Gatsby”? Mr. Tulkinghorn, the coldhearted keeper of aristocratic secrets in “Bleak House”? Anthony Trollope’s work is filled with dark connectors like Mr. Slope, the manipulative chaplain in “Barchester Towers.” “Game of Thrones” fans say that Littlefinger fits the role to a T. Such figures often prosper by managing the reputations and vulnerabilities of their social superiors. Access to other people’s secrets gives them power and makes them indispensable.

Grigori Rasputin belongs to the same lineage. A Siberian peasant turned mystic hanger-on to the Russian imperial court, Rasputin insinuated himself into the Romanovs’ inner circle by presenting himself as a healer of the young Prince Alexei’s hemophilia. Whether through coincidence, hypnosis or the simple effect of forbidding medical treatment that did more harm than good (namely aspirin, which inhibits blood clotting), Rasputin had a unique ability to relieve the boy’s suffering. That put Czarina Alexandra in his thrall and delivered him unbounded political power.

Every society has its obsessions. Rasputin, the mad monk who walked barefoot through the snow, spoke to the Russian court’s fascination with spiritual extremism. Mr. Cohn had an analogous kind of tainted allure in an era that saw Communism as its greatest threat. You might say that Mr. Epstein had a similar kind of appeal for an elite culture preoccupied with money and sex.

The dark connector cultivates an aura of special access. He thrives on impatience with process and on the perennial belief of the powerful that their problems are too singular to be handled by ordinary means. He thrives as long as he is useful but is discarded quickly once he turns into a liability. At that point, networks built over a lifetime of flattery and manipulation evaporate overnight. None of Mr. Epstein’s friends tried to visit him in the Metropolitan Correctional Center, the jail in Manhattan where he spent his last days. After his death, it turned out that he had no actual friends at all.

If you want to find other dark connectors, consider elites that proclaim one set of values while living by another, such as in Restoration France or Hollywood during its golden age. The dark-connector type is always found around royal courts and late-stage empires. Talleyrand, the exquisitely adaptable survivor of the French Revolution and the Napoleonic era, perfected the art of being invaluable to successive regimes by knowing everyone’s secrets. His image was that of the great diplomat and statesman. His reality was that of a corrupt politician who grew immensely rich on foreign bribes.

In Hollywood, the studio system’s press agents and gossip columnists professionalized the role, bridging the gap between the carefully curated public personas of stars and the private lives that might have ruined them. The powerful columnists Louella Parsons, Hedda Hopper and Walter Winchell buried inconvenient truths for those who cooperated with them. The secrets were most often sexual — closeted homosexuality, abortions and affairs. But like Mr. Cohn, the gossips had the power to destroy careers with accusations of left-wing sympathy.

Dark connectors naturally attract their own networking sycophants. Steve Bannon and Michael Wolff both won Mr. Epstein’s trust by representing themselves as traitors to the global elite. As fellow insider/outsiders, they could help him navigate the treacherous path to full social acceptance. It’s notable that both now claim the same defense: They were double agents for the morality police, seducing a villain to eventually expose him.

What ultimately makes Mr. Epstein a significant figure is not his personal pathology but what his career says about the culture that found him useful. The philanthropists of the Gilded Age, the Rockefellers and Carnegies, were institution builders who sought immortality by endowing universities and libraries that would survive them. Some of the philanthro-capitalists who turn up in the Epstein emails evince less concern for their posthumous legacies than for living like gods.

Mr. Epstein flourished as an enabler for the men in his orbit, a master of the informal workaround who could help reconcile their private desires with public appearances. (To date, none of these men have been accused of any crimes.) He embodied their fantasies of hedonism without concern for respectability. As Mr. Gates, who visited Mr. Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse in 2011, wrote to his colleagues: “His lifestyle is very different and kind of intriguing, although it would not work for me.” A spokesman said he was referring to the décor.

Jacob Weisberg is the former editor of Slate and a founder of the podcast company Pushkin Industries. His book on the failure of institutions during President Trump’s second term will be published in September.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.
Follow the New York Times Opinion section on FacebookInstagramTikTokBlueskyWhatsApp and Threads
Murder trial involving Freemasons, French secret agents opens in Paris court France24

Monday, March 30, 2026

Strength training is hot right now. Here’s how to do it properly.

Strength training is hot right now.

Five experts weigh in on exercise form, how much and how often to lift, whom to ask for help and how to do a pull-up correctly. 
March 17, 2026 

 Strengthmaxxing, like spring, is in the air right now. Everywhere you look, someone’s lifting. Celebrities, influencers, scientists, aging, shirtless rock stars and Cabinet secretaries all seem to be touting and demonstrating push-ups, pull-ups, pull-downs, leg presses and other resistance exercises.

Which is worthy and aspirational, because weight training is undeniably good for us. Plenty of recent science equates robust strength and muscle mass with youthful brainsdenser bones, longer lifespans and happier moods. In a comprehensive new position stand about the science of resistance exercise published this month by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), more than a dozen academic authors bluntly conclude, “Healthy adults should perform progressive resistance training.”

But how? Gonzo social videos, though impressive, don’t necessarily provide the most effective or safe weight training guidance, especially for someone new to lifting.

So I contacted five experts, established scientists and clinicians who have extensively studied — and practiced — weight training for decades. I asked about exercise form, how much and often to lift, whom to ask for help and why my pull-ups seem so puny, even though I’ve been working on them for months.

What follows is a starter’s guide to getting stronger, aimed primarily at the lifting-curious. It’s about fundamentals, the basic intel many of us need to begin or maintain an appropriate training routine and, if you’re like me, finally get your chin above the pull-up bar, the right way.


What follows is a starter’s guide to getting stronger, aimed primarily at the lifting-curious. It’s about fundamentals, the basic intel many of us need to begin or maintain an appropriate training routine and, if you’re like me, finally get your chin above the pull-up bar, the right way. 

1. Check with an expert.
First, if it’s at all feasible financially and logistically, consult a qualified trainer before you start or update a training routine, said Pamela Peeke, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Maryland and founder of the Peeke Performance Center for Healthy Living. “Ask if they’re certified and by whom.” The ACSM, as well as the American Council on Exercise (ACE), the National Academy of Sports Medicine (NASM) and the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA) offer widely recognized certifications in strength and conditioning.

Dive deeper
Alternatively, turn to the internet, with caveats. Some weight-training influencers and trainers there know what they’re doing, said Brad Schoenfeld, a professor of exercise science at Lehman College in the Bronx, who has long studied weight training. But consult trainers’ bios and look for certifications, he said.

 2. Start with nothing. 

Often, the smartest weight training begins with no weight.
“When you’re just beginning, the only thing you should be worried about is getting a feel for the movement pattern,” Schoenfeld said.


This is because, in the earliest stages of resistance exercise, whether with free weights, machines or body weight, you’re mostly altering your neuromuscular system, meaning the messages flowing between your brain and muscles, and not the muscles themselves. In effect, you’re imprinting new ways of moving onto your central nervous system. Best to make these movements effective and safe.


So, Schoenfeld said, set the resistance on exercise machines at the lowest possible option to start, which usually means zero. If you’re using a barbell for your first dead lift, leave it empty. Opting for calisthenics? One careful push-up can be an adequate — and auspicious — beginning.


3. Range of motion matters.


“I would have beginners aim for full or near-full range of motion,” said Stuart Phillips, a professor of kinesiology at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, and senior author of the new ACSM position stand.


Full range of motion (ROM), one of the key elements of good lifting form, means you’re moving “from the point where the target muscle is most stretched to the point where it’s most contracted” and back, Peeke said. In practice this means that, for instance, in a leg press, you’d start with your legs drawn up close to your chest with “a meaningful bend at the hip and knee,” Phillips said, before you “press back toward extension” until your legs are nearly straight. Slowly return to the starting position. You’ve just done a full rep (repetition).


Or, in a pull-up, start with what’s known as a “dead hang,” arms straight as you grasp the pull-up bar, feet off the ground. Pull yourself up until your eyes are at least at bar height, lower back down to another dead hang and repeat. No bouncing. No lowering yourself partway.
In general, the greater the ROM of your exercises, the more you’ll get from them, but (sorry) the tougher they’ll feel. “A pull-up is much harder when you go from a true dead hang” than from a short bounce, Phillips said, “because the muscles are doing more work. And that’s largely the point.”


4. Find your best resistance.


Ready to progress from no weight? “A good starter load is one that allows roughly six to 12 solid reps, sometimes up to 20,” Phillips said.
Lighter weights and more reps can be especially practical and enjoyable for beginners or people with joint issues. But for all of us, the idea is to approach what the experts call “failure” by your final rep. You should feel as if “you could have managed perhaps two or three more,” Peeke said, but only “if your life depended on it.” Challenging your muscles in this way builds the greatest strength and mass, she said.
Once you easily can manage 12 (or 20) reps, increase the weight.


5. Stay in control.


Influencers often fly through reps in social videos. But speed risks injury or sloppy form.
“Start at a cadence that’s under control,” said Jeremy Loenneke, an exercise scientist at the University of Mississippi who researches resistance training. Phillips agreed. “The key word,” he said, “is controlled.”
There’s no magic number for the best pace, Peeke added, but, as a general rule, two seconds or so to lift a weight and about the same to return it to starting position is a good beginning.
Beware of momentum. “Make sure your muscles are lowering the weight,” Schoenfeld said, “not gravity.”


6. Try for twice a week.


How often to lift? “Anything is better than nothing,” said Spencer Nadolsky, a physician specializing in obesity and lifestyle medicine and co-host (with brother Karl) of the podcast, Docs Who Lift. Heft a gallon milk carton a few times before you put it in the fridge. Full, it weighs about nine pounds. That’s resistance.


But better to lift at least twice a week if you can, Nadolsky said, at home or at the gym, working your upper and lower body. You may feel sore in the days immediately following a new workout. But unless the pain is sharp, sudden and localized — which might signal an injury — it will soon fade, as your muscles adapt and strengthen.


7. Everybody benefits.

Men, women, young, old — studies show that almost everyone gains significant muscle strength and size when they start lifting. “Biologically, there is no difference in how men’s and women’s muscles respond to resistance training,” Peeke said. 
Men often add slightly more muscle mass in absolute terms, she said, but relative to their respective sizes, women can gain just as much mass and often more strength, she said. 

 Age also needn’t be an obstacle. Men and women in their 80s and 90s are capable of adding strength and mass. If you’re older and want to start, check for strength training programs at a gym or local senior center. Trainers should have standard certifications and a senior fitness specialty certification. Similarly, people with disabilities should check that trainers have inclusive or adaptive fitness certifications from the ACSM or other organizations.

 8. Stick with it. 
“Consistency is key,” Schoenfeld said. It takes time, often months, to start seeing obvious results. In fact, the initial benefits won’t be visible at all, Nadolsky said, because strength increases first, well before muscles swell. You may remain unaware of this newfound vigor, until suddenly you can heft your carry-on into the overhead bin with no assistance. (I speak from experience.) So, if you can, start and keep lifting. 
Don’t worry if your weights seem paltry. They will increase. Your form and confidence will improve. I know. Until recently, my pull-ups were pathetic. I never returned to a full dead hang after a rep but simply pogoed up and down an inch or two.
 (These shallow “cheat reps” are common on Instagram.) Now I’m trying for full ROM — and barely eking out one rep on a good day. But each time, I feel more muscles ripple in my shoulders as I grip the bar, take a breath and try again. 

 Do you have a fitness question? Email YourMove@washpost.com and we may answer your question in a future column.

Building your butt muscles will help you stay injury free and independent in midlife and beyond.

America has had a long obsession with gluteus muscles. From the “Buns of Steel” workout in the late 1980s to Connor Storrie in “Heated Rivalry,” our culture has spent decades fixated on firm and prominent backsides.

However, experts are increasingly findingthat having a powerful posterior isn’t just about looking good in jeans. The glutes are the largest muscles in our body and are closely tied to stability, balance and aging well. They act like shock absorbers when we walk or climb stairs, and building a strong butt can help prevent and manage back pain at any age and reduce the risk of falling for older adults.

“Glutes are so important” for independent living, said Theresa Marko, a physical therapist in New York and adjunct professor of physical therapy at Touro University. “Do you want to get off the subway? Do you want to get off the toilet?”


Here is an argument for paying more attention to your butt.

If your glutes are weak, your body can overuse your hamstrings and back muscles, which can lead to strains and joint pain or cause you to arch your back while walking or running. Perhaps less obviously, weak glutes can affect how confidently you move, one of the reasons they can lead to more falls, said Constanza Cortes, an assistant professor at the USC Leonard Davis School of Gerontology.

While fear of falling is a complex issue that involves our vision, balance and power, Dr. Dorgo said you need to have good lower body strength to stay upright.

ImageAn elderly woman bends over and places her hands on her knees. She wears a bright blue workout top and multicolored workout pants.
Credit...Nicholas Sansone for The New York Times

The size of your glutes is not necessarily an indicator of their strength. The way you move, and how you feel while doing it, is often a better guide, experts said. For instance, if your hips sway side-to-side or you waddle as you walk, that can be a sign of a weak gluteus medius, Dr. Marko said. Slouching, or pain in the hips, knees or lower back can also indicate weak glute muscles.

SKIP ADVERTISEMEN

Weak glutes can make it difficult to get out of a chair without using your arms, squat to the floor or walk up or down stairs, Dr. Cortes said. People with weak glutes will often lean slightly forward while climbing stairs, and they may also rely on the handrail. 

Tight hamstrings or calves can also be warning signs as they take over the job of your glutes when you’re walking, running or squatting. Weak glutes can even cause pain as far away as your feet or heels. Discomfort in your hamstring when doing a bridge exercise is a dead giveaway, Dr. Marko said.

The key to building powerful glutes for strength and stability is finding exercises that require them to work alongside the hamstrings, quads, lower back in a natural way, Dr. Dorgo said.

“What they need to do is mimic movement patterns that we would see in everyday life,” he said.

Glute bridges, hip thrusts, squats and deadlifts are particularly useful, experts said. If you already strength train regularly and want to isolate your glutes, clamshells, glute kickbacks, donkey kicks or the hip abduction machine are also good options.

To strengthen your gluteus medius, try monster walks, either with a band or without. Step-ups — which can be performed on a box, bench or stair — are another excellent way to target your glutes, hamstrings and quads. Walking backward, especially up a hill, also works the glutes more than walking on a level surface.

“Glute work is so important,” Dr. Marko said, adding that it doesn’t even have to be hard. “When you’re standing at the stove, try some side leg kicks and some back leg kicks — or just stand on one leg.”

A correction was made on 
March 25, 2026

An earlier version of this article misspelled the given name of an assistant professor of gerontology who studies fitness and aging. It is Constanza Cortes, not Costanza.