Tens of thousands of immigrants have received letters to pay up or leave, as the government enlists debt collectors and seizes tax refunds.
The Trump administration is aggressively deploying a potent tool to pressure undocumented immigrants into self-deporting — civil fines that can total as much as $1.8 million.
More than 100,000 people have received letters from the Homeland Security Department informing them that they owe $998 for each day that they have stayed in the United States after an immigration judge has ruled they have no legal right to remain in the country.
Fines for failing to heed a “removal” order have been permitted since the passage of immigration legislation in 1996. Until President Trump, however, no commander in chief had imposed such penalties. The effort to do so in his first term ran into logistical obstacles and never gained traction.
But after returning to the White House last year and starting his mass deportation campaign, Mr. Trump ordered “all appropriate action to ensure the assessment and collection of all fines and penalties” from people unlawfully in the country.
Now, with the administration seeking to increase financial pressure on undocumented immigrants, the pace of fines has been accelerating, according to immigration lawyers.
For immigrants who receive one, the notices amount to an agonizing ultimatum: abandon the lives they have built, or face the threat of financial ruin if the government moves to collect on the debt. Even under a five-year statutory limit, the accumulated penalties can reach a $1.8 million per person.
Vivi Vasquez, a Mexican immigrant, has lived in the United States for 17 years and has an active humanitarian visa application. With a work permit, she has legally worked at a convenience store and cared for seniors.
Expecting an update on her visa application, Ms. Vasquez opened an envelope that arrived in April bearing a D.H.S. logo. Instead of news about her visa, she found a form letter in which the government had checked a box next to a statement that she had “willfully” failed to depart the United States.
She owed the government $1,820,352, according to the document, which was reviewed by The New York Times. Tucked in the same envelope was a flier titled, “Self-Deport with CBP Home and Leave on Your Own Terms,” referring to an app run by Customs and Border Protection. It offered “forgiveness” for all fines to those who used the app to self deport.
“I couldn’t sleep, and I was nervous every morning I left home for work,” said Ms. Vasquez, who has three U.S.-born children, ages 10, 12 and 14.
Legal aid organizations and lawyers representing individual clients have filed several federal lawsuits seeking to block the policy, contending that the financial penalties violate due process and the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on excessive fines.
In court filings opposing the motion to pause the policy, the government has argued that the fact that a person remained in the country to pursue other forms of immigration relief “is not a defense under the statutes and does not change the underlying determination that one willfully or voluntarily violated” the removal order.
Vast sweeps by federal agents in Los Angeles, Chicago and Minneapolis have been the most visible and volatile fronts in Mr. Trump’s crackdown. But the fines are part of a parallel effort by the administration to squeeze undocumented immigrants and make it harder for them to live in the United States.
The letter to Ms. Vasquez gave her 15 days, from the date it had been mailed, to contest the penalty. With barely a week to go before that deadline, her lawyer appealed. A month later, while awaiting a decision, Ms. Vasquez received a second, more menacing letter.
Unless she promptly paid, it said, the government would refer her debt to a private collection agency; initiate federal collection litigation; report her to credit bureaus, “which could adversely affect your credit rating”; and consider the debt in her future immigration proceedings.
We started seeing this a couple months ago, and it’s become a big trend,“ said John Leschak, an immigration lawyer in New Jersey who represented Ms. Vasquez and was able to have the fines canceled.
“These are people who have homes, cars, businesses in their names,” he said. “The government says they stand to have all that confiscated.”
Prevailing, as Ms. Vasquez did, is not typical, according to a dozen lawyers interviewed by The Times. In case after case, they say, appeals have been denied, including for a 68-year-old man who is the primary caregiver for his wife, a U.S. citizen who has cancer.
The man was ordered removed in 2012 but allowed to remain in the United States after homeland security paused his removal. A few months ago, he received the form letter, saying that he had willfully failed to depart and owed the government $579,838.
“You can’t allow people to stay here and then turn around and just fine them for it,” said the man’s lawyer, Reem Khraizat, who practices in Detroit.
Ms. Khraizat filed an appeal that included letters of support from health providers attesting to his wife’s condition and her reliance on him.
“ICE reaffirmed the decision without even addressing the facts presented on appeal,” Ms. Khraizat said.
The Homeland Security Department said that between Jan. 20, 2025, and mid-July of this year, ICE had issued more than 103,000 fines to noncitizens who remained in the United States past a deportation order, seeking a combined total of more than $84 billion.
As of July 16, it had collected more than $1.2 million, according to the agency.
Desperate to protect their life savings, some immigrants have removed their names from property deeds or transferred their modest assets into trusts, according to two lawyers who assist immigrants with estate planning.
“This administration is just churning out as many fines as it can to intimidate and harass people into leaving the country,” said Charles Moore, a senior attorney with Public Justice, a nonprofit legal organization, who is representing immigrants in a Massachusetts lawsuit to block the practice.
The Homeland Security Department did not respond to questions about how many immigrants had chosen to self-deport to avoid the penalties and how many cases had been referred to debt collection agencies.
Even as the policy faces legal challenges, government enforcement continues to move forcefully. Mr. Moore, who is seeking class-action certification for the Massachusetts lawsuit, said D.H.S. has referred some debts to private collection agencies, seized tax refunds and garnished wages, and that the Justice Department has taken dozens of immigrants to court to compel them to pay.
Afissetou Tchedre, a Togo national married to an American service member, was sued by the Justice Department this year in its effort to collect more than $1.3 million. According to a counterclaim filed in federal court in New York in May, the government seized the full amount of the couple’s last tax refund, $10,662.
Ms. Tchedre has lived in the United States since 2011. After her asylum claim was denied, her husband, with whom she has four U.S.-born children, filed a petition to sponsor her for a green card.
Her lawyer, Hasan Shafiqullah, said that he believed D.H.S. had not even reviewed her case before assessing the fine, otherwise agency officials would have realized that Ms. Tchedre had the right to remain in the country.
“The government had knowledge that she was taking steps to obtain status,” said Mr. Shafiqullah, a lawyer at the Legal Aid Society in New York.
Ms. Tchedre lost her employment authorization as a result of the fine, and her lawyer is fighting to recover the seized funds.
During the first Trump administration, the notices were sent by certified mail, which obligates the recipient to sign for delivery — a requirement that led to many of the notices being returned to D.H.S. as undeliverable.
President Joseph R. Biden Jr. rescinded the policy upon taking office, but Mr. Trump resurrected it on the first day of his second term through an executive order and a swiftly enacted policy that carried steeper fines.
And this time, the letters were sent by ordinary mail.
Seamus Hughes contributed research.
reports from a grass roots perspective on immigrants and their impact on the demographics, society and economy of the United States.
Our Coverage of U.S. Immigration
Attacked on Federal Building: An Army veteran set a fire, ignited fireworks and waved an air rifle at passers-by outside a building in Lower Manhattan in an attack targeting federal immigration authorities, law enforcement officials said. He was taken into custody.
Minnesota Immigration Laws: A judge in Minnesota said the state and local laws challenged by the administration did not impinge on federal authority, as the Justice Department had argued.
Immigrant Caregivers Forced Out: Retirement communities already grappling with labor shortages are being forced to terminate caregivers at a time when more Americans are living longer.
Failed Immigration Cases: Prosecutors have fled the U.S. attorney’s office in Chicago, angry about the cases they’ve been told to bring against protesters and immigrants.
Agent Defends Shooting Migrant in Maine: The ICE agent, whose identity has not been confirmed by officials, has a history of abusive behavior, according to an ex-wife and others who knew him. He told her the fatal shooting was justified.
Houston Mourns: After a federal agent killed Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, the grief and anger in Magnolia Park has been less visible than it has in other cities, but no less intense.
