'Sydney is angry': Protesters march to demand urgent action on climate change
Around 20,000 protesters marched from Town Hall to Hyde Park on Wednesday evening to demand stronger climate action as bushfires continue to rage across the state.
Speakers called on the state and federal governments to increase funding to the Rural Fire Service, and provide P2 masks and Hepa air filters to firefighters, hospitals, aged care facilities and schools.
Leighton Drury, the NSW secretary of the Fire Brigades Employees Union, said that firefighters were “spread thin”.
Thousands of protesters gathered at Town Hall on Wednesday.WOLTER PEETERS
“I am well-qualified to say that these are the worst fires we’ve had in decades, and they’re not going to get better unless we take action,” he said.
Firefighter’s open letter to Scott Morrison over bushfire crisis - NEWS.com
New South Wales Environment Minister Matt Kean plans to introduce targets for a 35 per cent cut in emissions by 2030, breaking ranks with Liberal Party colleagues on the link between bushfires and climate change. After a climate rally in Sydney attracted thousands on Tuesday, The Sydney Morning Herald reports the target has been signed off by state cabinet
Firefighter’s open letter to Scott Morrison over bushfire crisis - NEWS.com
New South Wales Environment Minister Matt Kean plans to introduce targets for a 35 per cent cut in emissions by 2030, breaking ranks with Liberal Party colleagues on the link between bushfires and climate change. After a climate rally in Sydney attracted thousands on Tuesday, The Sydney Morning Herald reports the target has been signed off by state cabinet
Sydney Holding A Massive Climate Change Rally Today In ...
Climate of Extremes
More than 720 homes lost in NSW fires as Sydney told to brace for huge losses
Ex-fire chief Greg Mullins says Sydney will likely experience devastation greater than 1994, when hundreds of suburban homes were lost.
NSW Liberals mutiny over climate policy
Let’s get something straight.
Time magazine’s Person of the Year is just an honorary
title. Other than publicity, the “winner” doesn’t actually get anything. Those
who don’t “win” don’t miss out on some big trophy or cash prize.
It’s just something for fun — like a list of the top 10 movies
or TV shows of the year.
It’s also the perfect topic for debate, and there’s plenty of
that following Time’s
announcement Wednesday that Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg is its
“Person of the Year.” At 16, she is the youngest person to be recognized.
Time editor-in-chief Edward Felsenthal wrote, “Thunberg has
become the biggest voice on the biggest issue facing the planet — and the avatar
of a broader generational shift in our culture that is playing out everywhere
from the campuses of Hong Kong to the halls of Congress in Washington.”
The person of the year is supposed to go to “the person or
persons who most affected the news and our lives, for good or ill, and embodied
what was important about the year, for better or for worse.” Today — on Dec.
12, 2019 — you might look at the choice of Thunberg as a flawed, but safe
selection. Not because she isn’t deserving, but because there are others who
feel more important and newsworthy at this very moment.
Specifically: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, President Donald Trump
and most of all, someone known simply by a vague name — The Whistleblower.
For just the fourth time in the history of our country, a
U.S. president is undergoing impeachment proceedings. That has
dominated the news for months and will end up being, by far, the biggest news
story of the year.
At first glance, it might feel as if choosing Thunberg is Time’s
way of staying out of the fierce political fray. The impeachment is splitting
the country in two and choosing anyone directly involved likely will draw ire
from at least half of Time’s audience.
Choose Pelosi or the whistleblower and it looks like Time is
favoring the president’s removal from office. Choose Trump and it looks like
the magazine is siding with the president. By choosing Thunberg, Time can avoid
the political mess and potential backlash.
When we look back years from now, might it seem ridiculous that
the impeachment process had nothing to do with the person Time chose as the
most newsworthy person of 2019? Perhaps, although you could easily argue that
the President of the United States, whoever that is, will always be the most
newsworthy person of the year. For the record, Time’s
readers chose Hong Kong protesters in an online poll as their 2019
Person of the Year.
I see all these points, but I will make the argument that
choosing someone like Thunberg is long overdue. When we look back years from
now, it would have been preposterous to NOT choose someone who is a leading
voice in the most important issue facing our planet.
Detractors ask what Thunberg has actually accomplished. The
Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin wrote, “I find it preposterous to assert
that Thunberg had a unique, transformative impact on public opinion in a way no
other person has.”
Yet Thunberg’s
defiant, how-dare-you speech to world leaders at the UN Climate Action
Summit was a game-changer, the most relevant and far-reaching speech on climate
in recent memory. It revitalized and greatly publicized a topic that needed to
be revitalized and publicized. Thunberg’s age and influence on others her age
make her the perfect figure to lead future generations who will be most
impacted by the cause she is speaking out about.
Thunberg
shared her honor with climate activists from around the globe. Her
selection is a boost for them, as well.
So go ahead and have your debates about whether Thunberg was the
right choice. Whether you agree or not, it’s notable that we are talking about
Thunberg today. Most of all, we’re talking about her cause.
Hmm, maybe the title
of Time Person of the Year means something after all.
