Sunday, December 31, 2023

Why I don’t miss alcohol Financial Times Lex writer Nathalie Thomas decided to give up drinking

 Why I don’t miss alcohol Financial Times Lex writer Nathalie Thomas decided to give up drinking four years ago. She’s never looked back


I probably live in the world’s worst city to avoid alcohol. Within a 15-minute walk of my home in Edinburgh, I can count at least eight pubs or bars. In one direction. It brings a whole new meaning to 15-minute cities – and not exactly the one urban planners might endorse.
At this time of year especially, when Scotland’s streets shine with wintry rain, there would be nothing better than returning warmth to soaked toes with a dram. Except I have given up alcohol. For me, January, December and every month in between in 2024 will be dry.
This admission is not one I make lightly in print for all the world to judge. I can already hear the shouts of “killjoy!” and “what a bore!” Some people barely bother to mask eye-rolls. Grown men have even performed an inelegant moonwalk away when, upon rejecting a glass of wine, I have explained I am teetotal. Some have simply not believed it. At a business lunch in London, one entrepreneur still poured me a glass of red “in case you change your mind”. He may as well have thrown £25 out of the window.
FT Lex author Nathalie Thomas
FT Lex author Nathalie Thomas
My decision to give up was purely a lifestyle choice. After having my son, I found drinking became less and less pleasurable. Even wine with dinner would leave me with a migraine – and days of remorseless anxiety. Many parents will know the wretchedness of running around a playground after small children while nursing a hangover.
Initially I aimed to cut down. Then I simply stopped bothering. One glass no longer seemed worth the after-effects.
In the UK, where alcohol is still the lifeblood of so much social interaction, choosing a life without alcohol in my age group – I have now hurdled 40 – is still relatively uncommon. Generation Z are more comfortable with it. In the last NHS health survey on drinking, 77 per cent of women aged 35-44 said they had consumed alcohol in the previous 12 months. For 16-24 year old females, the percentage was 58 per cent. Corresponding numbers for men were higher, but still, the generational difference is clear.
It is difficult to pinpoint exactly why younger Britons are more comfortable with a non-drinking culture, says Andrew Misell, a director at Alcohol Change UK, the charity behind the Dry January campaign. Factors may include Gen Z socialising more online and a greater awareness of physical and social health. Some may be rejecting their parents’ habits. How very rebellious of them. 
By contrast, older generations can feel peer pressure to drink socially. The Eurosport and TNT Sports presenter Orla Chennaoui, who has discussed giving up alcohol on Instagram, told me that when she stopped eight and a half years ago, “peer pressure, and that embarrassment almost at explaining that I wasn’t drinking any more, was definitely one of the biggest challenges initially. I remember hiding in a toilet for most of the night once when I found myself next to a man I’d never met before who kept insisting I must be pregnant, an alcoholic or both!” Now, she says, “I’d have a witty retort to hand or a better way of dealing with it, but some people can be incredibly rude.”
Sometimes it is easier not to have the conversation. Non-drinkers always worry they will be thought of as less fun. Thankfully, when I told a colleague this week that I was teetotal, I was heartened when he joked: “Really? But you are still funny.”
My close friends and family have been largely supportive, although my dear mum still offers me champagne at Christmas and on birthdays. Then again, a lot of them also have small children or are runners like me, so periods of sobriety were not uncommon anyway. In wider friendship circles I have, though, been missed off invitations for cocktails.
Has life improved? Immeasurably. Fewer migraines, far less anxiety. I have now become one of those annoying early-morning runners who manages to run five or 10km before the rest of my family stirs. Although I always ran, I would often need a couple of hours – or even a whole day – to psych myself up. My skin, which has never been brilliant, is less blemished.
Another pleasant side effect has been an ability to stay out socialising for longer. I once feared weddings, as the free-flowing pre-dinner fizz would cause me to flake out early. This summer I danced energetically at a dear friend’s celebration until the wee small hours. 
As for those atmospheric Edinburgh taverns, all is not lost. Some have started to stock good non-alcoholic takes on gin, once my preferred tipple. There may be some hope for my rain-soaked toes after all.

Chinese Spy Agency Rising to Challenge the C.I.A.

 Chinese Spy Agency Rising to Challenge the C.I.A. The ambitious Ministry of State Security is deploying A.I. and other advanced technology to go toe-to-toe with the United States, even as the two nations try to pilfer each other’s scientific secrets.


The Chinese spies wanted more. In meetings during the pandemic with Chinese technology contractors, they complained that surveillance cameras tracking foreign diplomats, military officers and intelligence operatives in Beijing’s embassy district fell short of their needs.

The spies asked for an artificial intelligence program that would create instant dossiers on every person of interest in the area and analyze their behavior patterns. They proposed feeding the A.I. program information from databases and scores of cameras that would include car license plates, cellphone data, contacts and more. 

The A.I.-generated profiles would allow the Chinese spies to select targets and pinpoint their networks and vulnerabilities, according to internal meeting memos obtained by The New York Times.. 

The spies’ interest in the technology, disclosed here for the first time, reveals some of the vast ambitions of the Ministry of State Security, China’s main intelligence agency. In recent years, it has built itself up through wider recruitment, including of American citizens. 

The agency has also sharpened itself through better training, a bigger budget and the use of advanced technologies to try to fulfill the goal of Xi Jinping, China’s leader, for the nation to rival the United States as the world’s pre-eminent economic and military power.

The Chinese agency, known as the M.S.S., once rife with agents whose main source of information was gossip at embassy dinner parties, is now going toe-to-toe with the  Central Intelligence Agency in collection and subterfuge around the world.

Today the Chinese agents in Beijing have what they asked for: an A.I. system that tracks American spies and others, said U.S. officials and a person with knowledge of the transaction, who shared the information on the condition that The Times not disclose the names of the contracting firms involved. 

At the same time, as spending on China at the C.I.A. has doubled since the start of the Biden administration, the United States has sharply stepped up its spying on Chinese companies and their technological advances. This article is based on interviews with more than two dozen current and former American officials, most of whom spoke on condition of anonymity, and a review of internal Chinese corporate documents and public M.S.S. documents. ImageTwo workers standing on an elevated platform installing a camera near a streetlight in front of three large apartment buildings. 



Workers installing a traffic surveillance camera near a residential complex in Beijing. Credit...Ng Han Guan/Associated Press A Game of Ghosts The competition between the American and Chinese spy agencies harks back to the K.G.B.-versus-C.I.A. rivalry of the Cold War. In that era, the Soviets built an agency that could pilfer America’s most closely held secrets and run covert operations while also producing formidable political leaders, including Vladimir V. Putin, the president of Russia. 

But there is a notable difference. Because of China’s economic boom and industrial policies, the M.S.S. is able to use emerging technologies like A.I. to challenge American spymasters in a way the Soviets could not. And those technologies are top prizes in espionage efforts by China and the United States. “For China in particular, exploiting the existing technology or trade secrets of others has become a popular shortcut encouraged by the government,” said Yun Sun, director of the China program at the Stimson Center, a Washington-based research institute.

 “The urgency and intensity of technological espionage have increased significantly.” The M.S.S. has intensified its intelligence collection on American companies developing technology with both military and civilian uses, while the C.I.A., in a change from even a few years ago, is pouring resources into collecting data on Chinese companies developing A.I., quantum computing and other such tools. Though the U.S. intelligence community has long collected economic intelligence, gathering detailed information on commercial technological advances outside of defense companies was once the kind of espionage the United States avoided. Relations Between China and the U.S. Electric Cars: 

The Biden administration has proposed new rules aimed at shifting more production of electric vehicle batteries and the materials that power them to the United States, in an attempt to build up a strategic industry dominated by China. Student Exchanges: The flow of students between China and the United States has been a mainstay of their relationship, even when ties have soured. Now these exchanges, too, are under threat. Artificial Intelligence: 

The White House has been trying to blunt China’s ambitions to gain supremacy in the world’s cutting-edge technologies. An Emirati A.I. is at the center of that effort. Biden-Xi Meeting: China’s leader, Xi Jinping, met with President Biden for the first time in a year. The meeting, which took place in San Francisco ahead of an Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation conference, highlighted a subtle shift in the power dynamic between their two countries. But information about China’s development of emerging technologies is now considered as important as divining its conventional military might or the machinations of its leaders. David Cohen, the agency’s deputy director, said that under President Biden, the C.I.A. was making investments and reorganizing to meet the challenge of collecting on Chinese advances. The agency has started both a China mission center and a technology intelligence center.

 “We’ve been counting tanks and understanding the capability of missiles for longer than we have been as sharply focused on the capability of semiconductors or A.I. algorithms or biotech equipment,” Mr. Cohen said in an interview. Image A green sheet with many small squares is seen in a machine with a red light. Semiconductors, or chips, being packaged at a Promex facility in Santa Clara, Calif.Credit...Jim Wilson/The New York Times 

 But some policymakers say privately that the effort is still falling short, and that Chinese companies and the military are surprising the U.S. government with their advances.

 In China, the status of the Ministry of State Security has only grown under Mr. Xi, who prizes bold intelligence action and a powerful security state. In October 2022, the Communist Party promoted the ministry’s head, Chen Wenqing, to be the party’s top security official and a member of the 24-member Politburo, the first spy chief in decades to ascend to that body. 

His replacement, Chen Yixin, a longtime aide to Mr. Xi, has raised the public profile of the M.S.S. He has also been given a broad mandate, which encompasses leading a crackdown on American and other foreign companies that conduct corporate investigations of Chinese firms, including for military ties and human rights violations. 

The ministry has the foreign responsibilities of the C.I.A. and the domestic mandate of the F.B.I., combined with an authoritarian edge. The M.S.S. is charged with carrying out intelligence collection and operations overseas, as well as limiting foreign influence within China and clamping down on so-called subversive activities. Its mission is avowedly political: to defend the Communist Party against all perceived threats. The current minister, Mr. Chen, has repeatedly emphasized loyalty to Mr. Xi. In June, he told officers to “wholeheartedly embrace” Mr. Xi’s “core” status. Under Mr. Chen, the ministry is embracing social media to spread messages about threats. “The United States’ multifaceted obstruction, containment and suppression will only make China more battle hardened and self-reliant,” it said on a new WeChat account. Image President Xi Jinping wearing a suit, standing at a wooden long table while other men in suits stand around him. Some are clapping. 

President Xi Jinping of China prizes bold intelligence action and a powerful security state.Credit...Greg Baker/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images In August, the ministry made separate announcements asserting that it had caught two Chinese citizens spying for the C.I.A., one recruited by an American agent in Japan and the other in Italy. 

In October, the ministry and Chinese state television announced a case in which a researcher at a defense industry institute had been recruited by a U.S. agent while he was a visiting scholar at an American university. He then transferred copies of secret documents to the Americans after he returned to China, before being detained in 2021. The announcements suggested the C.I.A. had been rebuilding a network within China that Chinese counterintelligence officers decimated more than a decade ago. The C.I.A. does not say whether people detained overseas on espionage charges are spies for the United States. 

But at least some of the Chinese citizens detained were working for the United States, according to people briefed on American intelligence reports. There is no evidence, however, that the M.S.S. has cracked the network, they said, and the Italy case is more than a year old. The M.S.S. is making its own aggressive moves abroad, including recruiting a far-right Belgian politician and harassing ethnic Chinese critics of the party. One agent hired a local private investigator to physically attack a Chinese American candidate for U.S. Congress on Long Island, according to a Justice Department indictment. Another man is accused of helping to set up an organization in New York that lured in dissidents. A Chinese Agency on the Offense The central government in Beijing established the Ministry of State Security in 1983 during a reshuffling of security units. For decades, the agency struggled to win favor with party leaders. Its Chinese rival, the intelligence services of the People’s Liberation Army, had greater resources and better tradecraft, especially in cyberespionage.

 The Ministry of State Security gradually improved its tactics, got bigger budgets and even built business expertise. Some M.S.S. officers who would be working under cover as business people were sent to private sector offices for training, said Peter Mattis, a former C.I.A. analyst and co-author of a book on Chinese espionage. Chinese agents also expanded their foreign recruitment targets, including among U.S. citizens. U.S. intelligence agencies were alarmed after discovering that the Shanghai M.S.S. had recruited an American student in China, Glenn Duffie Shriver, and got him to apply to the C.I.A. and State Department. Mr. Shriver was sentenced in 2011 to four years in prison. 

“It was a big sign of improved tradecraft from M.S.S., for the first time targeting non-Chinese Americans and attempting penetration of the U.S. intelligence community,” said John Culver, a former U.S. intelligence analyst. Image Glenn Duffie Shriver wearing a khaki-colored prison uniform sitting in a room with white brick walls. Glenn Duffie Shriver was recruited by the M.S.S. while studying in China.Credit...F.B.I. The case has had far-reaching consequences. It made U.S. counterintelligence officers more suspicious of applicants for U.S. government jobs who had studied in China or had contacts there, and it turned their attention to M.S.S. provincial bureaus. The bureaus are their own fiefs, based outside of the agency’s national headquarters, which is in the secretive Xiyuan compound of northwest Beijing. 

Under Mr. Xi, they have become more aggressive in operations overseas, with some specializing in recruiting and running informants in the United States. The bureau in Jiangsu Province, next to Shanghai, is another one focused on getting American secrets, and particularly defense technologies, U.S. officials said. Its officers recruited Ji Chaoqun shortly before he went to the United States in 2013 to study engineering at the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago, according to the Justice Department and court documents. His M.S.S. handler, Xu Yanjun, got him to provide the names of at least nine people in the United States for the Chinese spy agency to try to recruit to get aerospace and satellite technologies. Mr. Ji eventually joined the U.S. Army Reserves, where he aimed to get a security clearance so he could eventually apply to work in the C.I.A., F.B.I. or N.A.S.A. He was arrested in Chicago in 2018 and sentenced this year to eight years in prison. 

Mr. Xu, his handler, was arrested in Brussels in 2018, in a related operation run by the F.B.I., becoming the first M.S.S. agent to be extradited to the United States. Unlike Russian operatives, M.S.S. case officers generally avoid working undercover in the United States, preferring instead to run agents or assets from outside and recruit online, including using jobs ads with no apparent ties to China, U.S. officials said. Around 2018, a Singaporean agent for the M.S.S. “created a fake consulting company that used the same name as a prominent U.S. consulting firm and posted online job ads under that company name,” said Michael C. Casey, director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center. 

The Scramble for Tech The M.S.S. often directly hires from universities, especially for core positions, according to a review of more than 30 online job ads from the agency. In recent years, it has sought technology experts, including hackers, according to two people with knowledge of the recruiting efforts. Beijing’s most acute worry is that the United States and its allies could choke China off from technological know-how vital for economic and military growth. Mr. Xi has stressed that risk. 

Image President Biden looking at a large machine with gold wiring. President Biden looking at IBM’s System One quantum computer during a tour of a facility in Poughkeepsie, N.Y.Credit...Erin Schaff/The New York Times Mr. Chen, the minister of state security, wrote in an article in September that “core technologies” remained under the control of other nations, and that reaching “technological self-reliance” was an urgent task. Chinese government experts openly admire the collection capabilities of American spy agencies and their technology. Chinese intelligence journals often carry studies examining U.S. operations. A recent study of U.S. national security services by the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, the main M.S.S. research institute, said, “Drawing on an in-depth assessment of the relevant methods of the United States, China should choose what works and dispense with what does not.” 

The M.S.S. has also been elevating experts on the United States. Early this year, one such analyst, Yuan Peng, president of the main research institute, appeared under a new name, Yuan Yikun, as a vice minister of the ministry itself. 

Earlier in his career, Mr. Yuan often mixed with American scholars, some of whom saw him as a coolheaded observer of Washington. While president of the research institute, Mr. Yuan became a champion of Mr. Xi’s sweeping concept of “overall national security,” which casts the United States as the main threat to China’s ascent. “Biden said ‘America is back,’ but the world is not the same as it was, and if it can’t keep up with massive global changes, then this changing world will inevitably slip from U.S. control,” Mr. Yuan wrote in an international strategy assessment published in early 2022. “In judging current American grand strategy a few decades from now, its biggest mistake may be seen as choosing China as an enemy.” ‘Think Like a Wall Street Analyst’ One of the first major decisions by William J. Burns, the C.I.A. director, was to create the China Mission Center. The idea was to ensure that stations all over the world, not just in Asia, focused on collecting intelligence on China. Mr. Burns took the step after a strategic review that was led by Michael Collins, a career intelligence officer. Under Mr. Burns, Mr. Collins was appointed director of strategy, with a mandate to help improve the agency’s work on China. Image William J. Burns wearing a suit seated in a congressional hearing room.

 One of the first major decisions by William J. Burns, the C.I.A. director, was to create the China Mission Center.Credit...Haiyun Jiang /The New York Times The China challenge requires the United States “to be smart on critical domains like biotechnology and semiconductors,” said Mr. Collins, who now leads the National Intelligence Council, a coordinating body across spy agencies.

 “We have to be better.’’ To get a sharper understanding of which technologies China is targeting, the C.I.A. has begun asking American executives and scholars for insights about what Chinese companies are trying to develop. American universities and companies, often approached by Chinese investors and researchers, have knowledge of the specific technologies, U.S. officials said. But officials said it was important to bring in people with deeper knowledge of China’s commercial and technological ambitions. For now the spy agencies are struggling to get information to policymakers as quickly as they want it. 

Last year, a Canadian firm, TechInsights, revealed that China’s leading chip maker, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, had developed a seven-nanometer chip. The U.S. government was unaware of the advance and was surprised that the Chinese firm had made the leap so quickly, said Jimmy Goodrich, an expert on Chinese technology who advises the RAND Corporation. “The intelligence community is just not set up institutionally to be adept at understanding China’s commercial and tech issues,” he said “It’s hard to do. And more important, you really have to think like a Wall Street analyst, market researcher, talking to everyone up and down the supply chain.” 

(A U.S. official said American intelligence agencies had assessed that the company had at least the capability to produce the smaller chip before the Canadian report.) Part of the problem is that U.S. intelligence agencies favor information from satellites, intercept programs and human spies. One senior U.S. official said analysts were overlooking valuable insight from nonclassified sources in China. “The U.S. intelligence community can do amazing things on focused targets,” said Mr. Mattis, the former C.I.A. analyst. “But it sometimes can struggle with broad-based awareness like understanding China’s technology prowess.”

 Image An aerial view of Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, which has many industrial buildings, with Shanghai’s skyline in the distance. China’s leading chip maker, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, developed a seven-nanometer chip.Credit...Qilai Shen for The New York Times 

 Edward Wong is a diplomatic correspondent who has reported for The Times for more than 24 years from New York, Baghdad, Beijing and Washington. He was on a team of Pulitzer Prize finalists for Iraq War coverage. More about Edward Wong 

Julian E. Barnes covers the U.S. intelligence agencies and international security matters for The Times. He has written about security issues for more than two decades. More about Julian E. 

Barnes Muyi Xiao is reporter on the Visual Investigations team, which combines traditional reporting with advanced digital forensics. 

She has been covering China for the past decade. More about Muyi Xiao Chris Buckley, the chief China correspondent for The Times, reports on China and Taiwan from Taipei, focused on politics, social change and security and military issues. More about Chris Buckley

Stop and Watch the Bees

 With some flight attendants on welfare, Alaska Airlines faces contract fight Seattle Times


Pizza Huts in California, including Sacramento, laying off drivers rather than pay $20 minimum wage Sacramento Bee

 

Hooters: An Employment Law Nightmare On Labor

 


Measuring income inequality: A primer on the debate Brookings Institution

 

Oligarchy and Democracy The American Interest

 

Stop and Watch the Bees The Free Press



How to sell a book


Milton Friedman


Do nudges work?


Girls' night


Campus fiction


Attention wars


Best books of 2023


Why Cass Sunstein is a liberal


A.S. Byatt, R.I.P.


Journalistic independence


Higher gossip


End of money


Muscovy colony


Book romance


First folio


How life works


Anger online


Clock museum


Black horror


King of chills


Andrew Wylie


Artforum editor out


Greg Lukianoff


Teju Cole


Yugoslavia’s digital twin


Animal rights


'Decolonization'


Barnes & Noble


Evolution of cuteness


NYRB turns 60


Literary hats


Mystery of dizziness


Katalin Karikó


WSJ revamp


Jon Fosse


Nobel odds


Never ending book club


Climate predictions


Publishers and scholars, unite!


Manet's Olympia


Academic inertia


Joys of bookbinding


Lost and found


Noah Feldman and Julia Allison


Oscars preview


Art of smoking


Radical Wolfe


National Book Awards longlist


Musk's man

Stories have to be told

  

Stories have to be told or they die, and when they die, we can't remember who we are or why we're here.” 

Sue Monk Kidd




Could taking cod liver oil every day actually make me a happier person? Salon

       Whiting Creative Nonfiction Grants 

       They've announced the ten winners of this year's Whiting Creative Nonfiction Grants, awarded to: "writers in the process of completing a book of deeply researched and imaginatively composed nonfiction" -- and paying out a healthy US$40,000 apiece. 
       Some intriguing-sounding projects, I suppose. 



How Do You Even Sell a Book Anymore?

As sales slump, the labour of trying to bottle hype is largely left to writers


Winners of the 2023 International Landscape Photographer of the Year Atlantic 



Punch: The Forefather Of Cocktails Madras Courier


Why the universe might be a hologram Universe Today


2023, the year of the incompetent fraud Standards among the crooked are slipping. How can they do better?

Cheats, frauds, and liars everywhere need to take a long, hard look in the mirror as the year comes to a close. Dishonesty, which one must say has had a pretty good run over the past few decades, has had a terrible 2023, as reflected in a string of what should have been avoidable convictions and exposures. 
Where to begin? Rudy Giuliani, who embellished his comprehensively futile attempts to overturn the results of a presidential election by telling transparent untruths about a pair of poll workers, has been ordered to pay them $148mn for defamation. George Santos, who assumed made-up racial, familial and professional identities while running for Congress, was expelled from that body by his colleagues, who have been known to put up with quite a lot. Sam Bankman-Fried was convicted on all seven counts of fraud and money laundering after the jury deliberated just long enough to collect their full $40 per diem for their last day of work. Just last week, serial, er, entrepreneur Trevor Milton, founder of the truckmaker Nikola, was given four years for lying to investors about his company’s technology, and there was a little bit of trouble about real estate valuations over at the Vatican.
Professional standards among the crooked are clearly in decline. Here, then, are some recommendations for those who plan on fabricating their way to success in 2024:
Have lots of friends. This is important for vocational liars not only because it gives you someone to flip on when the authorities come around, but because it spreads responsibility widely. The safest way to turn indifference to truth and decency into money and power is to be a part of a whole class of people like yourself, not a single big shot. A whole class of financial executives walked away clean from the 2008 crisis because so many other people were acting out the same greed-driven fantasy. Giuliani’s downfall was not in pushing Trump’s nonsense so much as in pushing himself to the front, where all the cameras were. Similarly, did Santos believe he was to succeed as a solo fraud in an institution as collegial as Congress? Come on.
Social media is, surprisingly, not that great a place to lie. The judge in Milton’s case singled out his use of the internet for propagating his falsehoods. Bankman-Fried’s famous “FTX is fine” tweet played a big role at his trial. Once the internet was a magical wonderland where everything was true and no one was accountable. Now it is just a place where your lies are indelibly recorded, usually in language a jury finds it very easy to understand. If you want to turn the truth on its head, for goodness’ sake use long words and jargon, and if you must write it down, put it somewhere harmless, like your company’s annual report. 
Lying is a tool, not a lifestyle. One of the odd things about lying is that it is habit forming. In the middle of his sentencing hearing for defaming the poll workers, Giuliani walked out of the courtroom, found some reporters, and repeated his lies. Rudy, no one expects you to tell the truth at this point but you might, you know, shut up once in a while? 
Dress for success. Elizabeth Holmes of Theranos invented corporate fraud as a fancy-dress activity, with her deeply creepy Steve Jobs cosplay. After her conviction, you’d think the strategy might have been abandoned. But along comes Bankman-Fried, sticking your billions in the pockets of his cargo shorts. Pro tip: if you don’t plan on wearing it at the trial, don’t wear it while committing the crime. 
Keep it general. Wherever possible lies should be told about classes of people (Republicans, elites, big business, the media, et al) not specific individuals. You start naming specific people and you are well into the territory of the provably untrue and, more to the point, concrete individuals are much more likely to sue your ass into the ground than are theoretical groups. Giuliani was doing fine at the level of abstract conspiracy. But then he went after two particular citizens, and now he is finished. Santos lied about the most specific person of all: himself. 
Admittedly, following rules such as these takes a lot of the fun out of dishonesty. But the unfortunate truth is that professional lying is a lot like professional gambling: it may sound like an adventure at first but, done properly, it’s just a lot of work.

Robert Armstrong is the FT’s US financial commentator and writes the Unhedged newsletter

Luke Sayers had millions of reasons to hire Mathias Cormann

Mathias Cormann - OECD boss in PwC scandal



Luke Sayers had millions of reasons to hire Mathias Cormann Under Mathias Cormann’s oversight, government spending on consultancies swelled nearly four-fold.


Myriam RobinRear Window editor


When the OECD tapped Mathias Cormann to become its secretary-general in 2021, the nimble Luke Sayersdodged yet another bullet. Not that we knew it before Sayers’ answers to Senate questions on notice last week, revealing how close his firm, Sayers Group, came to hiring Cormann as a partner.

Sayers has spent much of the year repeatedly emphasising how little he knew about the tax leaks scandal, which occurred while he led PwC but came to light only after he left.
But he would have become an even bigger target if such a claim had been made while his eponymous consulting firm possessed in its ranks a man under whose watch the federal government’s spending on consultants ballooned.
Mathias Cormann is Secretary-General of the OECD, but he came close to working for Luke Sayers’ epynomous consultancy. Nathan Laine
After all, what better symbol could there have been of the revolving door between the government and those whose revenues rely on staying in its good graces? Sayers would never have heard the end of it!
Clearly, his talks with Cormann were far from idle. The politician came close enough to working for Sayers Group that he was given (since-relinquished) equity in the business.
If Cormann had been announced, few would have been shocked. It’s hard to imagine a more perfect coda for a man whose parliamentary career coincided with a nearly a four-fold increase in outsourcing to the big four consultancies, including the one that was, until 2020, led by Sayers.
When the Coalition came to power in 2013, government spending with Deloitte, PwC, KPMG and EY stood at less than $400 million a year. By the time the Coalition lost power, it stood at $1.4 billion a year, with most of that increase coming before Cormann bowed out of politics at the end of 2020.
As the minister in charge of the powerful Finance Department, which sets the rules for government contracting, Cormann bears no small amount of responsibility for this.
Looking specifically at management advisory services tendered by the Commonwealth, these jumped from $44 million in FY13 to $606 million in FY22, according to an analysis of AusTender data conducted by non-profit organisation The Centre for Public Integrity. That’s an annualised increase of about 30 per cent in key strategy work increasingly done by those outside the public service.

Furious unions

Another analysis, conducted by The Canberra Times in 2018, found that labour contracting of all types at the 18 largest federal government departments grew from $318 million to more than $730 million in the five years to 2018.
Figures such as these enraged public sector unions and integrity advocates (who point out that consultants are far less accountable for their advice and decision-making than bureaucrats).
However, Cormann never saw the growth of outsourcing as a problem. As he argued in response to repeated Labor attacks on the issue, outsourcing was cost-efficient, and when coupled with the government’s public service efficiency dividends, redundancy rounds, staffing caps and similar initiatives, ultimately beneficial for taxpayers, despite external consultants billing far more than public servants.
It’s also exceedingly enriching for said consultants, naturally – though that part is usually left unsaid.
As it was, Cormann was a politician of uncommon competence whose post-parliamentary ambitions extended far higher than ending up as a mere Australian consulting partner. But if the OECD role hadn’t worked out, how seamlessly he would have slotted into his plan B.
After years of articulating the consultant’s value proposition when he wasn’t being paid to do so, imagine how well he would have done it if he was.