Monday, July 21, 2025

Wyden says Trump admin sitting on Epstein bank records: ‘They’re refusing to investigate’

This week, Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) detonated a political bomb under the floorboards of Trump’s house of cards with a damning New York Times exposé. Wyden, who’s been quietly following the money trail behind Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking empire for three years, just confirmed what many suspected: Big banks knowingly moved Epstein’s dirty money, and the Feds—under both Trump and Biden—are still sitting on explosive documents that could connect the dots between Epstein’s global abuse network and the elites who enabled him

Wyden says Trump admin sitting on Epstein bank records: ‘They’re refusing to investigate’


 House Passes CLARITY Act Defining Crypto Regulation Coin World. Gives the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) more regulatory oversight over crypto, and wait for it…


 Tanya Plibersek says she cried the day Mark Latham became federal Labor leader



The IRS is building a vast system to share millions of taxpayers’ data with ICE

ProPublica has obtained the blueprint for the Trump administration’s unprecedented plan to turn over IRS records



WSJ Publishes Article on Epstein as Wyden seeks release of FINCEN and SARS documents

Read Free via archived articles by WSJ – “Dozens of Jeffrey Epstein’s friends sent him bawdy letters for a 50th birthday album. One was from Donald Trump. 

The letter bearing Trump’s name, which was reviewed by WSJ, contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman. Pages from the album—collected by Ghislaine Maxwell in 2003, before Epstein was first arrested in 2006—are among the documents examined by Justice Department officials who investigated Epstein and Maxwell years ago, according to people who have reviewed the pages. 

It’s unclear if any of the pages are part of the Trump administration’s recent review. In an interview, Trump denied writing the letter or drawing the picture. “This is not me. This is a fake thing,” he said. Earlier, the president’s top spokeswoman said he won’t recommend a special prosecutor in the case…The “President and his administration have been criticized for backtracking on promises for more transparency in the case…”

  • See also Impact Statements” made by some of the victims of convicted sex offender Giuslaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein – Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 674 Filed 06/24/22 – 29 pages, PDF.
  • See also The New York Times – no paywall – “..Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, the top Democrat on the powerful Senate Finance Committee, has been digging into Mr. Epstein’s financial network for the past three years. Some members of his staff have viewed confidential files that shed light on the immense sums of money that, they say, Mr. Epstein moved through the banking system to fuel his vast sex-trafficking network. In particular, filings by four big banks flagged more than $1.5 billion in transactions — including thousands of wire transfers for the purchase and sale of artwork for rich friends, fees paid to Mr. Epstein by wealthy individuals, and payments to numerous women, the senator’s office found. The filings came after Mr. Epstein was arrested in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges. Large money transfers to individuals, foreign countries or obscure companies are the kind of things banks are supposed to be examining as potentially suspicious. Some of the Epstein money transfers disclosed in a report from JPMorgan Chase involved accounts at two Russian banks before those institutions were subject to U.S. sanctions. A few transactions red-flagged were for as much as $100 million…The bank records reviewed by Mr. Wyden’s staff — called suspicious activity reports or SARs — are meant to be an early warning system for law enforcement about signs of illegal activity. As dictated by federal law, the reports are so confidential that banks can’t even acknowledge filing them, and people who have seen the documents are under great constraint as to what they can say about them…”
  • See also Following New Epstein Revelations, Wyden Renews Demand for Trump Administration to Produce Epstein Files. Treasury Department is Refusing to Produce Key FinCEN Epstein Files in its Possession, Hampering Further Investigation of Epstein’s Financial Backers and Complicit Banks. Following new revelations about Jeffrey Epstein’s financial ties to a prominent Trump donor and accusations regarding the president himself, Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) today renewed his demand that the Trump administration produce key Epstein documents in the possession of the Department of Justice and the U.S. Treasury. “This Administration began with reassuring promises that the Epstein case would receive the attention and diligence it deserves … Fast forward to the present, where the released section of the Epstein files contains little relevant or groundbreaking information, with some pages entirely redacted,” Senator Wyden wrote in a letter to the attorney general, FBI director and Treasury secretary. “This reversal of commitments to investigate those who facilitated Epstein’s criminal activities comes as President Trump and his advisors’ own ties to Epstein are being exposed.”
  • See also Via Politico Playbook – What is in the files that aren’t being released? ABC’s James Hill and Peter Charalambous write that the earlier “phase one” disclosure of the Epstein files contained a little-noticed “three-page catalog of evidence” that “offers a roadmap to the remaining trove of records that President Donald Trump’s administration has declined to release, including logs of who potentially visited Epstein’s private island and the records of a wiretap of [Ghislaine] Maxwell’s phone”

The APS's march towards $1 million salaries

The APS's march towards $1 million salaries  


By Miriam Webber Updated July 18 2025

Already some of the world's best-paid senior public servants, Australia's departmental secretaries are on the brink of earning million-dollar pay packets in the coming years.


Successive pay rises have pushed Prime Minister and Cabinet secretary Steven Kennedy and Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson past the $1 million mark for the 2025-26 financial year, and their colleagues are not far behind.

Dr Kennedy, who is the country's most senior bureaucrat, earns nearly triple the highest rate for United States departmental secretaries, set at $250,600 USD as of January, or about $386,237 AUD.

How did we get here?

The march towards million-dollar pay began just over a decade ago, when new legislation returned the power to set senior public service salaries to the Remuneration Tribunal.
While Dr Kennedy plays a role in deciding pay for some of his colleagues, the greatest influence is exerted by the tribunal.
Former Prime Minister and Cabinet secretary Glyn Davis, left, with Steven Kennedy, right. Picture by Keegan Carroll
Former Prime Minister and Cabinet secretary Glyn Davis, left, with Steven Kennedy, right. Picture by Keegan Carroll
It recommends secretaries be placed in either an upper or lower level of remuneration, and also considers annual pay rises. The figures it decides on include salary, allowances, benefits and superannuation.
In 2011, the tribunal had been concerned for some time that secretary salaries were well below what they should be, and had not kept pace with the rising earnings of their subordinates in the Senior Executive Service.
It recommended an overhaul of the structure used to determine pay for APS bosses, rebasing the uppermost point - the salary of the Prime Minister and Cabinet secretary - to more than $800,000 by mid-2014.
Ten pay rises since 2011 have brought secretary salaries to where they are today.

How secretaries salaries have grown since 2012

If the tribunal decides on a 2 per cent pay rise in 2026, without changing the current structure, four more secretaries will rise above the $1 million mark.
This will include the heads of Defence, Foreign Affairs and Trade, Health and Infrastructure.
Two per cent is the lowest pay rise the tribunal has approved since 2011, and public service employees will receive a 3.4 per cent hike in 2026.

Secretary salaries by year

While this appears likely given the tribunal's past decisions, it could also decide to hold off.
The tribunal must look at annual wage decisions and also weighs up APS wage increases, consumer price index and wage price index.
In 2020, as the Australian economy faced the COVID-19 pandemic and public sector wages were frozen, the tribunal announced it would not offer a pay rise.
"The Tribunal's primary focus is to provide competitive and equitable remuneration that is appropriate to the responsibilities and experience required of the roles, and that is sufficient to attract and retain people of calibre," it said at the time.
"However, this does not happen in a vacuum. The context of the broader jobs market and the economy are also considered."
Start the conversation
Have your say.Leave a comment below and let us know what you think.
The body can also dock a secretary's pay, based on Machinery of Government changes that shrink the scope of their responsibilities, but incumbents are protected from having pay go backwards.

Tribunal increases compared to minimum wage

Health secretary Blair Comley has meanwhile received an extra promotion, taking his salary from $910,270 to $983,910, after his department gained oversight of the National Disability Insurance Scheme.
While Labor maintains that secretaries' pay is an independent decision, there is room for political intervention.
The tribunal noted in 2020 that it had received a request from then finance minister Mathias Cormann and assistant public service minister Greg Hunt to freeze pay for APS bosses, and opted to comply.

Will there be another overhaul?

The steady increase has caused concern among some politicians, who earn considerably less than their senior bureacrats. 
"They earn more than me," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said when asked about the issue earlier in the year, in reference to his salary of about $622,000.
Tasmanian senator Jacqui Lambie last year called on Parliament to radically reduce the earnings of senior public servants, capping remuneration at about $430,000 unless otherwise approved by the relevant ministers.
"Departmental secretaries have important responsibilities, and their pay should be appropriate to ensure those positions are competitively filled by capable people," Senator Lambie said at the time.
"But the present levels of pay at the top of the bureaucratic and academic trees don't pass the pub test."
Meanwhile, independent senator David Pocock wants to see the tribunal consider performance in its decisions. The current system is based on the size of departments and the scope and complexity of the portfolio.
"Senior public servants in Australia are paid well above those in most comparable OECD countries, including in Europe, the UK and US," Senator Pocock said.
"We want to be able to attract the best and brightest to lead our public service, but at the same time, we need to ensure remuneration is tied to performance and that is lacking in our current system.
"I would like to see reform in this space as we continue to value and build the capacity of the APS more broadly into the future."
Public Service Minister Katy Gallagher told The Canberra Times in March that while she was sympathetic to the public's concerns, "it's hard to unwind a system that's been put in place over many years".
"I get people's concerns with that, I do," Senator Gallagher said at the time.
"I understand it when they see it in isolation, or relate it back to their own experience of work, but I also know how hard [secretaries work].
"These are serious jobs, and we need the best and brightest, and we need to retain them in the public service."