‘Hope is a good thing, maybe even the best of things, and good things never die.’
– Stephen King
ABC pulls Australian Story episode on NAB at last minute due to fact-checking
A highly publicised episode about a pensioner’s battle against NAB was mysteriously pulled by Australian Story at the last minute. Margin Call understands it was due to ongoing fact-checking.
Loyal viewers of Australian Story, one of the ABC’s most popular programs, were left scratching their heads on Monday night after a heavily publicised episode was suddenly pulled at the last minute.
Met police using AI tools supplied by Palantir to flag officer misconduct The Guardian
Government upgrades drones, deploys joystick tweakers to catch illegal dumpers The Register
Jury convicts former NFL player in $328M Medicare fraud scheme: DOJ WJAR
Jury convicts former NFL player in $328M Medicare fraud scheme: DOJ WJAR
ICE and the IRS: Inadvertent Disclosures Edition
In court filings on February 11, 2026, the IRS revealed additional details about its response to a June 2025 ICE request for 1.3 million taxpayers’ last known addresses—data that the Code expressly protects as part of “taxpayer identity.” Under the terms of an April 2025 information-sharing agreement, the IRS provided this information to ICE for 47,000 individuals.
The principal revelation from last week: a small but material percentage of ICE’s requests were fulfilled by the IRS in error—the information requests from ICE were incomplete. This inadvertent disclosure may have violated both the terms of the ICE-IRS information-sharing agreement and the statutory confidentiality rules in § 6103. Plaintiffs challenging this information-sharing agreement are seeking additional discovery after this revelation.
Details and commentary, below the fold.
In court filings on February 11, 2026, the IRS revealed additional details about its response to a June 2025 ICE request for 1.3 million taxpayers’ last known addresses—data that the Code expressly protects as part of “taxpayer identity.” Under the terms of an April 2025 information-sharing agreement, the IRS provided this information to ICE for 47,000 individuals.
The principal revelation from last week: a small but material percentage of ICE’s requests were fulfilled by the IRS in error—the information requests from ICE were incomplete. This inadvertent disclosure may have violated both the terms of the ICE-IRS information-sharing agreement and the statutory confidentiality rules in § 6103. Plaintiffs challenging this information-sharing agreement are seeking additional discovery after this revelation.
Details and commentary, below the fold.
Palantir surveils everybody but its own misleading accounts
While Palantir is busy poking its nose in everyone’s business, it doesn’t want us looking into its own, having failed to lodge audited financial statements
Berlin Court Orders Foreign Election Interference — And Calls It Democracy Islander Reports
Arms Trade Corruption Tracker exposes NATO’s ‘highest-profile corruption scandal’ The Canary
Palantir’s Departure from Colorado is a Hard-Earned Community Victory Ziggurat
Epstein offered chance to buy Pentagon and FBI buildings ITV News
Goldman Lawyer, Epstein Conferred on Secret Service Prostitution Scandal Bloomberg
A Federal Tool to Check Voter Citizenship Keeps Making Mistakes
ProPublica: “…The source of the bad data was a Department of Homeland Security tool called the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE.
Some government initiatives are so crude as to be nothing more than the political equivalent of a blunt instrument. Take the Trump administration’s freedom.gov, a portal to allow Europeans (and, by extension, anyone) to “circumvent content bans”. But make no mistake, this is not a crusade for freedom of expression; it’s a statement: if the world tries to regulate “our truths,” we build shortcuts.
In doing so, the White House is turning a discussion that in Europe is about protecting fundamental rights, democracy, security and the rule of law, into a culture war where the United States is arbiter, victim and savior at the same time.
The Guardian describes in detail the change from the internet freedom programs the United States has funded for decades: open, auditable tools designed to resist censorship in authoritarian regimes. Here the shift is total: from supporting decentralized and privacy-preserving technologies, the idea now is to channel traffic into a centralized, opaque system under the umbrella of a federal agency and via a .gov domain. This is no technical nuance: it is precisely the point. If control shifts from the user to the state that offers “the solution,” the word “freedom” begins to look more like a trademark than a right.
And then there is the context: freedom.gov is not trying to “avoid” the internet…