Thursday, March 26, 2026

KPMG’s alleged dirty deeds at odds with CEO’s sermon

KPMG allegedly misused Lendlease data to win audit work 
Edmund Tadros and Hannah Wootton 
Updated Mar 25, 2026 – 7.52pm

 KPMG Australia has been accused of misusing confidential information from its client Lendlease to win external audit work for Westpac and Dexus, while allegedly failing to act on a whistleblower complaint.

The claims, raised under parliamentary privilege by Labor senator Deborah O’Neill on behalf of an unnamed former KPMG executive, include allegations that the firm used inside information to win the external audit contracts for Macquarie Group and Westpac and improperly used internal Telstra data.

Labor senator Deborah O’Neill raised the KPMG allegations in the Senate on Tuesday night. Alex Ellinghausen

The firm failed to act on the unnamed whistleblower’s detailed May 2024 complaint, O’Neill told the Senate on Tuesday night. KPMG instead took action against the whistleblower and “the disclosure was re-characterised as a workplace grievance”.

“The whistleblower goes on to detail their efforts to escalate their disclosure, including [to] KPMG executives, KPMG International ... and eventually, ASIC, before making this disclosure to me, a parliamentarian, in the public interest,” O’Neill said.

A spokeswoman for the corporate regulator said that “strict confidentially requirements” meant that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission couldn’t comment nor confirm the existence of whistleblower reports.


She told parliament she had “taken great care to verify, via documentation, the authenticity of the matters I am putting on record here in the Senate of the Australian Parliament tonight” but did not provide details of this evidence.

KPMG Australia’s leaders said the firm had already commissioned two separate law firms to investigate the claims but were “unable to substantiate any claims of wrongdoing” and the complainant had failed on 20 occasions to provide further evidence to back up the allegations.

Five major allegations

Senator O’Neill outlined five major whistleblower allegations under parliamentary privilege. No dates were provided for the allegations.

The first involved “confidential Lendlease board papers” being “taken and circulated internally within KPMG and used to support pursuit of major audit tenders including Westpac and Dexus,” O’Neill said.

The whistleblower alleged that the documents were taken by senior executives and secured in one partner’s locker. KPMG has audited Lendlease since 1958, well beyond what is considered good corporate practice.

The second allegation claimed “improper access” to Telstra information.

“KPMG personnel offered access to restricted documents from Telstra’s IT environment, via a Telstra-issued laptop,” O’Neil quoted the whistleblower as alleging. “These documents related to Telstra AI governance policies and internal practices during a live external audit tender ...”

The third allegation relates to the way the firm won the Macquarie Group audit, the most coveted and valuable auditing contract in the country. The allegation related to the role of KPMG partner-turned-Macquarie director Michelle Hinchliffe in the tender process.

Macquarie’s chairman Glenn Stevens has previously called these allegations “silly talk” and said Hinchliffe was a “highly credentialled, highly esteemed” former partner.

Similar concerns about conflicts of interest in the tender process for Westpac’s $30 million audit contract in 2024 were at the heart of the fourth allegation.

“Throughout the tender, KPMG received feedback of position intelligence not available to competitors. This included that the tender was KPMG’s to lose, commentary undermining EY’s proposed lead partner, guidance to reduce KPMG’s fee by approximately 25 per cent and advice on managing perception optics.”

Rear Window has previously noted the number of ex-KPMG personnel within Westpac, including audit committee chair Peter Nash, chief financial officer Michael Rowland and director Michael Ullmer. There is no suggestion they provided KPMG with any private information, only that the allegation was raised in parliament.

The final allegation referred to KPMG’s late 2024 win of the Dexus external audit from PwC.

“On the sixth of November 2023 a meeting was held at KPMG Barangaroo’s office,” O’Neill, quoting the whistleblower said, “During that meeting ... an arrangement was proposed where one of the people present would leave his laptop open with Dexus internal audit documents visible while he went for lunch, allowing external audit personnel to view them.”

‘No evidence’: KPMG Australia

In a joint statement, KPMG Australia chairman Martin Sheppard and KPMG Australia chief executive Andrew Yates denied the firm was involved in any wrongdoing.

“Almost two years ago, a former employee of KPMG Australia made serious allegations and claims relating to their time at the firm,” they said.

“While there was no evidence provided at the time to support the allegations, we have treated the matter seriously. We commissioned two separate law firms: one to review our firm’s investigation into the claims and one to conduct its own external investigation. On the basis of what we have been provided, we have been unable to substantiate any claims of wrongdoing raised with us.”

The men called the five allegations “new and unsubstantiated” and said that the firm had “requested evidence from the former employee to support the claims on more than 20 occasions and offered multiple pathways for providing information, including via external legal counsel, a whistleblower service, and direct access to KPMG non-executive directors.”

They said KPMG has asked O’Neill to share the evidence relating to allegations she possesses and again invited “the former employee to provide evidence” through the firm’s existing whistleblowing channels.

The firm has also contacted “the clients named in the Senate” and that ASIC was aware of the allegations. 

Find out the inside scoop about Accenture, Deloitte, EY, KPMG, PwC and McKinsey. Sign up to our weekly Professional Life newsletter.

 leads our coverage of the professional services sector. He is based in our Sydney newsroom.Email Edmund at edmundtadros@afr.com.au
 is a Rear Window columnist, based in Melbourne. Connect with Hannah on Twitter. Email Hannah at hannah.wootton@afr.com

KPMG’s alleged dirty deeds at odds with CEO’s sermons

 Perhaps Andrew Yates can use these latest claims as an “opportunity to learn” how to walk the talk on ethical standards. 
Hannah Wootton Mar 25, 2026 – 7.38pm

Late on Tuesday night, when the nation’s chief financial officers were edging towards sleep, Labor’s Deborah O’Neill launched into a speech in the Senate that would make them sit bolt upright.
She used parliamentary privilege to air a laundry list of claims by a former KPMG executive, alleging the firm misused confidential client information and capitalised on conflicted networks of contacts to get work with other companies. Those name-dropped as the victims (or targets) of the alleged misconduct include Lendlease, Westpac, Dexus, Telstra and Macquarie.
Senator Deborah O’Neill isn’t afraid of taking the big four consulting firms to task. Alex Ellinghausen
It creates an awkward situation for KPMG chief executive Andrew Yates. He’s been out in force since the PwC tax leaks saga, positioning his firm as the most ethical of the majors. A bigger rival being engulfed by an existential scandal isn’t a business opportunity that comes along every day!
“We can no longer sit by and watch our profession be tarnished by the unethical actions of a few,” he and the firm’s then-chair Alison Kitchen wrote in an all-staff email following the scandal in 2023.
It was “a privilege to support our clients” and be “trusted with confidential information”, they continued. “We committed to exhibiting the highest standards of personal and professional integrity in everything we do”.

That same year, he labelled PwC’s conduct as “disturbing” and “clearly unethical and unacceptable” in a Senate hearing. “There would have been strong action taken by our chairman and board” had it occurred at KPMG. Which it wouldn’t, he suggested, given the firm’s ethical superiority.
The positioning has worked, too. KPMG’s had a stellar runof securing lucrative audit contracts lately, including taking both Macquarie’s (worth $75 million) and Brambles’ ($9 million) off PwC. The government didn’t cut off KPMG from consulting work post-tax leaks to the same extent it did the others either. It pulled in at least 30 per cent more in public sector fees than Deloitte and EY in 2023 and 2024.
Of course, O’Neill’s claims are just allegations. According to a joint statement from Yates and KPMG chair Martin Sheppard on Wednesday, the firm had looked into the whistleblower’s complaints but had not been able to substantiate any. But O’Neill isn’t the type to use parliamentary privilege to air claims she doesn’t think are true. She’s been a thorn in the side of the big four for several years and has been bang on in many of her concerns.
KPMG hasn’t been scandal-free during Yates’ publicity campaign either. There have been accusations it overcharged defence, revelations staff used AI to cheat in tests, and concerns about conflicts in its NSW government work. Even then, Yates either tried to Jedi mind-trick awayany evidence of issues (the powermapping), or waved his hand slowly and pitched them as “opportunities to improve” and “share our learnings” with less holy businesses.
What was raised during Late Night with Deb is next level, though. Allegations range from KPMG partners using confidential Lendlease board papers to support the firm’s bids for other audit tenders, to staff working out how to sneakily share information from its internal audit work for Dexus to get the external audit contract. Then, separate to the allegations about misusing client information, O’Neill turned to claims about how KPMG may leverage conflicted networks to get work. She canvassed concerns raised in this column about KPMG partner-turned-Macquarie director Michelle Hinchliffe’s involvement in selecting the silver doughnut’s next auditor, and suggested the firm capitalise even more on similar conflicts to get Westpac’s audit.
Any client of KPMG’s must be asking how safe the confidential information they give the firm is, and how it manages (or dare we say, celebrates and leverages) conflicts of interest.
“KPMG maintains the highest standards of professional conduct,” the pair said. “We are confident in the integrity of our processes and our people.”
It’s almost a copy-and-paste job from Yates’ all-staff email in 2023. Except it’s his own firm, not PwC, in the headlights now.
The country’s most expert opinion and analysis. Sign up to our weekly Opinion newsletter.
 is a Rear Window columnist, based in Melbourne. Connect with Hannah on Twitter. Email Hannah at hannah.wootton@afr.com