Tuesday, October 15, 2024

Former UK PM suggests Netanyahu planted listening device in his bathroom

 Former UK PM suggests Netanyahu planted listening device in his bathroom The Cradle 


American Water, the largest water utility in US, is targeted by a cyberattack ABC 


What did Al Jazeera’s investigation into Israeli war crimes in Gaza reveal? Al Jazeera. More on “The Ghost Unit”


‘Something is going to need to change’: Truth behind Australia’s negative gearing ‘insanity’


Who Uses Public Libraries In The US? A Look At Statistics

"One thing that doesn’t seem to drive most people to libraries? Financial hardship. In fact, the higher your income, the more regularly you avail yourself of their ... services. And while we can’t say for sure, it seems bookstores and libraries complement each other more than they compete." - The Washington Post (MSN)



Make a Molotov Cocktail’: How Europeans Are Recruited Through Telegram to Commit Sabotage, Arson, and Murder

The cases are multiplying across Europe: Young men with pro-Russian views instructed on Telegram to carry out...


Accounting firm RSM in talks to combine UK and US businesses
Rare transatlantic deal aims to remove ‘barriers’ to serving mid-market companies across borders


Snapshot

  • The first application by a court of Australia’s enhanced general anti-avoidance rule, the diverted profits tax, has led to more questions than answers and a High Court appeal is likely.
  • The judgment, as it stands, grapples with nascent tax law issues but also broader issues in complex commercial contract analysis.
  • This article analyses the implications of the divided judgment and forecasts the remaining legal questions the High Court may resolve.

The Australian Taxation Office (‘ATO’) is currently seeking special leave to appeal to the High Court on the first decision to test the scope and operation of Australia’s enhanced general anti-avoidance rule, the diverted profits tax. Current betting suggests the High Court will grant special leave because the four Federal Court judges are divided and the case involves recent, important and untested law.

The case is important as another skirmish in the ATO’s long running and high profile project to control what it sees as abuses in the treatment of payments for the use of intangibles. It also raises more general issues of contract analysis: when is something that looks like a right more properly construed as constituting an obligation, and how does a court characterise and weigh the multitude of rights and obligations arising in complex commercial contracts? Not surprisingly, the dispute is being keenly followed by local marketing and distribution entities for foreign multinationals, and by the multinationals which use related and unrelated Australian businesses to sell their products here.

The Pepsi case: did the Federal Court bottle it?


Criminal networks in Southeast Asia flourish in Telegram’s ‘underground markets’, UN says Channel News Asia


Zhang Presents Fiscal Citizenship And Taxpayer Privacy Today At Cumberland


Satyajit Das: US Presidential Politics – The More They Bicker, the More They Stay the Same

US presidential candidates promise policy choices but have little room to manoeuvre. Ergo, politics turns into a contest like American Idol


11 Communications Rules for Activists to Live By

Seeking reader reactions to recommendations on how to engage in “media activism”.