France 🇫🇷 Haaland

 "Football is a game of mistakes. Whoever makes the fewest mistakes wins." 

— Johan Cruyff

Not to brag or anything, but my Bluesky bunch have supported lucky 🍀 teams … so far 

Let’s hope these predictions come true …

So many are rooting for Belgium to go all the way so they can do the two-handed jackoff dance when they get the trophy.

Quarterfinal prediction France 2–1 Morocco Spain 2–1 Belgium England 2–1 Norway (AET) Argentina 2–1 Switzerland Predicted semifinals 🇫🇷 France vs 🇪🇸 Spain → France advances 🏴 England vs 🇦🇷 Argentina → Argentina advances Predicted Final France vs Argentina Predicted Champion 🏆 France (3–1 vs Argentina)

Bonnie Tyler Lost in France

I don't know how France received three yellows and Paraguay none when the Paraguay side was acting like old-school NHL goons. But yeah, look into that ref and see if he's into sportsbooks or "prediction markets."

Uzbek referee Ilgiz Tantashev

Erling Haaland “brings the intensity of a raiding party to the sport”. And: “Haaland can call to mind a shark circling dark waters.”

David Epstein, author of the recent Inside the Box (a book about the value of constraints), did a fascinating video on “anticipatory skill” and “chunking” and how players like Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo (who can accurately head the ball even in the dark) use them to slow down a fast, complex game.

And this is the skill that Messi, Ronaldo, and Pujols all share. They’re chunking positions of people and angles of legs and spins of balls in order to understand immediately what’s going on and what might happen next. The more patterns you absorb in any domain, the less effort it takes to read what’s happening and to predict what’s coming next.

So when Messi walks, he’s not resting. He’s chunking the entire field. Every position, every shift, every gap in the backline is feeding a pattern library that he’s been building since he was 5 years old. By the time he decides to move, the map is already drawn. And when Ronaldo heads a ball into the net in total darkness, it’s because he’s seen that angle of another player’s leg and that ball’s trajectory a hundred times over and knows the pattern it follows.

I love this kind of thing and even though I am not a world-class boxer or football player, I can see it in action as I’ve gotten better over the years downhill mountain biking (where I’m able to go faster on the bike while still being able to react to terrain in what feels like the same amount of time), playing Fortnite (which I’m still not great at, but the game seems to move at a much slower pace, allowing me to keep up), or doing the crossword puzzle (you get an instinctive feel for answers just by how questions are posed). I’m sure this shows up in my work too — I read so damn much online that sometimes it takes me only 2-3 seconds to figure out if something is worth my while — but it’s easier to observe in sports or gaming.

BTW, Epstein just started his YouTube channel a few months ago, but it’s already filled with great stuff like Why The Fastest Way To Improve Is To Subtract, Why The Smartest People I Know Set Constraints, Not Goals, and Why The Best Kids Are Rarely The Best Adults. I’ve got some catching up to do.

Clouse et al.: California’s Billionaire Tax Act Threatens Growth and Fails to Address Structural Deficits

In Tax Notes, Jim Clouse, Fabio Natalucci, Charles W. Calomiris, Kenneth Rosen, David Bank, and Maxwell Hall, have written a new piece, “California’s Billionaire Tax Act Threatens Growth and Fails to Address Structural Deficits.” From the introduction:

The dire fiscal outlook for the state of California has prompted numerous proposals for ways to increase state revenues or cut expenditures. The so-called Billionaire Tax Act, which would implement a one-time wealth tax on the wealthiest California residents, is one such proposal that has received nationwide attention. Proponents of this proposal presumably seek to address the fiscal issues in the state, specifically the shortfall in healthcare and education funding as a result of federal cuts, in a way that also helps to mitigate wealth inequality. However laudable those goals may be, the potential costs of implementing a wealth tax of the type proposed are large and should not be downplayed.

This article examines how the implementation of the Billionaire Tax Act could meet a number of responses, including tax avoidance, legal challenges, business relocation, and capital flight, and how the act could damage California’s high-tech sector and economic growth prospects. Just as important, as a solution to California’s fiscal problems, this tax is a nonstarter: Even under optimistic revenue projections, the act would be only a temporary revenue influx that would not address the fundamental factors underlying California’s persistent fiscal difficulties. In fact, the proposal could add to fiscal uncertainty and undermine the credibility of the state’s commitment to address longer-term fiscal issues.

More from TaxProf Blog:

• California Billionaire Tax Qualifies for November Ballot (June 23, 2026)
• WSJ: Rich Californians Are Finding Creative Ways to Get Ahead of the Billionaire Tax (June 22, 2026)
• NY Times: Union Behind California Billionaire Tax Offers to Reduce the Rate (June 19, 2026)
• Boll, Saez, and Zucman on California Billionaires (May 26, 2026)
• Some Actual Facts on California’s Billionaire Tax (May 4, 2026)
• The Push to Get California Billionaire Tax on the Ballot(March 3, 2026)
• California’s Wealth Tax and Billionaire Psychology (February 3, 2026)
• Solana: The Great California Wealth Exodus (January 27, 2026)
• Galle et al.: Expert Report on Valuation of Controlling Shares of Publicly Traded Companies Under the California Billionaire Tax Act (January 21, 2026)
• NYT: Newsom Vows to Stop Proposed Billionaire Tax in California (January 14, 2026)
• Galle, Gamage & Shanske: Correcting the Record: Responding to Some Legal Arguments About the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act (January 9, 2026)
• Washington Post: California Will Miss Billionaires When They’re Gone (January 2, 2026)
• WSJ: Threat of California Billionaire Tax Draws Criticism from Ultrawealthy (January 2, 2026)
• Tax Notes and Shanske on California’s Proposed Billionaire’s Tax (November 18, 2025)
• WSJ: The California Campaign to Introduce a First-of-Its-Kind Billionaire’s Tax (November 14, 2025)

‘Total Eclipse of the Heart’ - It's A Heartache

Once upon a time, there was light in my life

But now there's only love in the dark

Nothing I can say

A total eclipse of the heart

~ Bonnie Tyler, 1951-2026

 

Bonnie Tyler has gone to the angels. That welsh girl could sing even inside cold rivers. So when she sang about standing in cold rain feeling like a clown because he let her down you believed her.

It's A Heartache anthem of ww double p

Total Eclipse of the Heart went on for seven minutes, featured a pipe organ solo that sounded like it was being played by Count Dracula and was punctuated by explosions that were supposed to represent the sound of nuclear bombs being dropped: as was his wont, Steinman claimed it was heavily influenced by Wagner. 

It would have sounded completely ridiculous, were it not for the fact that Tyler’s vocal gave the impression she didn’t think it was ridiculous at all: she sang it as if her life depended on it. 

To use a modern term, she committed to the bit so completely that her voice emerged as the song’s star attraction, rather than being swallowed up by the absolute bedlam going on around it. Fast forward the song to about three and half minutes in: 

Count Dracula has just finished doing his stuff, a massed chorale of backing vocalists keep urging bright eyes to turn around, there are faux nuclear explosions going off left, right and centre, but when Tyler’s vocal reappears – “EVERY NOW AND THEN I FALL APART!” – you forget about everything other than her.

Bonnie Tyler  ‘Total Eclipse of the Heart’

Total Eclipse of the Heart singer Bonnie Tyler dies aged 75

hot trending on Bsky

Beloved Welsh singer Bonnie Tyler went viral for a candid podcast interview on the How To Fail with Elizabeth Day series. In the episode, she declared she would "not be eating kangaroo testicles any time soon" regarding the popular UK reality show I'm A Celebrity... Get Me Out of Here!.

 In 1937, the NYT ran a piece about the last living son of a Revolutionary War soldier. “Many times Constant said his father spoke of meeting George Washington…” The Great Span in action.

What Trump Has in Common with the Far Left

If the president fears communism, maybe he should stop mimicking its worst elements.

Communism is a system of government in which the ruling party controls major investment decisions while hoarding wealth for itself and suppressing all opposition.

Nevertheless, Donald Trump professes to dislike it.

The president is trying to whip the nation into an anti-communist frenzy. His two speeches over the Fourth of July speeches denounced Marxism-Leninism and presented Trump as the main obstacle standing between America and a dystopian future in which capitalism no longer exists and grim-faced soldiers march down Pennsylvania Avenue on May Day.

Trump is correct that the Democratic Socialists of America, whose leadership is at least half communist, has gained a toehold in the Democratic Party. And Trump’s hatred of communism is consistent with some of his most important beliefs. Communists demonize both billionaires and American nationalism, two things Trump adores, and they pursue a more egalitarian distribution of wealth, whereas he has done the opposite.

On closer inspection, however, Trump has more in common with Communists than his hostile rhetoric lets on. He has probably done more to expand public ownership of the means of production than any president in history. Trump has seized a stake in nearly two dozen private firms so far, for little reason other than the fact that he can. Recently, he wrote on Truth Social that gasoline retailers “must” lower prices or “big problems lie ahead.” And although he has no power to do so, the distinction between public and private has eroded during his presidency to the degree that oil companies, or any large companies, have reason to believe that defying Trump’s wishes could expose them to government retaliation.

Trump’s admiration for Communist political methods is even more pronounced than his respect for its economic system. Trump has praised Communist dictators in terms unlike those used by any American president outside the context of a wartime alliance. In 1990, Trump told Playboy that the Chinese Communist Party “almost blew it” before showing “the power of strength” by crushing demonstrations in Tiananmen Square, thus avoiding the fate of the Soviet regimes that fell the same year.

He has praised Communist dictators—not in the vein of, say, congratulating Cuba for its education policy, but specifically for crushing all opposition. “He’s a brilliant guy,” Trump gushed of China’s leader, Xi Jinping, in 2024. “He controls 1.4 billion people with an iron fist. I mean, he’s a brilliant guy, whether you like it or not.” Trump once claimed that he and Kim Jong Un “fell in love,” explaining: “He’s the head of a country. And, I mean, he is the strong head. Don’t let anyone think anything different. He speaks and his people sit up at attention. I want my people to do the same.”

Pete Recommends Weekly highlights on cyber security issues, July 4, 2026 – Privacy and cybersecurity issues impact every aspect of our lives – home, work, travel, education, finance, health and medical records – to name but a few. On a weekly basis Pete Weiss highlights articles and information that focus on the increasingly complex and wide ranging ways technology is used to compromise and diminish our privacy and online security, often without our situational awareness. 

Five highlights from this week: Cybersecurity firms targeted by fraudulent OpenAI organization invites; Polestar says Commerce Department is banning US sales of its cars; Google Loses Final Appeal Over €4.1B EU Android Fine; US tech dependence: A risk report for European businesses; PrivacyHawk Enterprise helps organizations find shadow IT and minimize third-party cyber risk; and FBI Seizes NetNut Proxy Platform, PopaBotnet

“PowerOutage.us collects, records, and aggregates live power outage data from utilities all over the United States, with the goal to create the single most reliable and complete source of power outage information available. Most states have multiple electric utilities, many small, some big. With these large numbers of companies, it can be hard to get a true overall status of the power grid in a particular area. 

This project collects information from over 800 Utilities into one place, with more being added all the time: Making this site the most complete source of power outage information currently available. Most utilities put few resources behind their publicly facing OMSs (Outage Management Systems). They are focused on getting their customers reconnected, as they should be. However, this means that during big outage events where many people want to know the status of the power in a particular area, the utility’s OMS can be overwhelmed if not completely unresponsive.

 Meanwhile PowerOutage.us stands up to heavy web traffic without faltering, allowing people directly affected by an outage event and onlookers to stay informed and up to date. In addition, no utility releases detailed historical power outage information, so we store all the information we collect; Making this project the only source of detailed historical power outage information. While this historical data is not available directly on the site, you can contact us for more information…”

404 Media – “What Happened Next Is a ‘Dire’ Warning – “AI chatbots that were prompted to impersonate public figures produced responses that people perceived to be more authentic, coherent, and relevant than the real thing, a finding that underscores “a dire need to inform the general public of the potential harm this can have on society,” according to a study published on Wednesday in PLOS One. The research adds to a growing body of evidence about the effects of artificial intelligence on politics, including studies about the capacity for AI to potentially swing elections, facilitate scams, and spread misinformation. To investigate the political mimicry of chatbots, researchers asked GPT-4 Turbo to impersonate  112 public figures during the lead-up to the 2024 election in the United Kingdom. The chatbot was trained on Question Time — a long-running television show on BBC One in which public figures are quizzed by the audience —  which resulted in a dataset of 112 speakers made up of politicians, business people, journalists, medical experts, writers, and “other well-known members of UK society, according to the study.” Generative AI has the potential to pollute the public information sphere with made-up content, posing a significant threat to the cohesion of societies at large. This paper offers the first large-scale and systematic study of how authentic, relevant and coherent impersonated content from Large Language Models (LLMs) is perceived by the general public. Based on a cross-section of British society, we show that LLM-generated responses to questions drawn from a broadcast political debate programme in the UK are judged to be more authentic and relevant than the original responses given by the panel members who were impersonated. We also show that stylistic differences do not influence these judgments, meaning that the distinction of original and generated content is challenging for the general public. Taken together, this means that LLMs can be made to deceive the public regarding the nature of statements in the political domain, with the consequence that there is a dire need to inform the general public of the potential harm this can have on society.”

Source – Herbold S, Trautsch A, Kikteva Z, Hautli-Janisz A (2026) LLM-impersonated debate contributions are more authentic, relevant and coherent than their original: A representative study using BBC1’s Question Time. PLoS One 21(7): e0347757. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0347757 

 Jean Nassif Godfather IV - The Tax Adviser: IRS outlines AI risks, Circular 230 duties for tax practitioners

KPMG removed tax partner after UniSuper complaint

Lucas Baird and Edmund Tadros

Updated Jul 9, 2026 

KPMG allegedly replaced a tax partner working on its lucrative UniSuper account after fund executives complained when he told the board that a proposed complex intercompany transaction would draw tax authority scrutiny and should not be allowed.

The proposed arrangement, suggested by executives at the fund, would have generated UniSuper a tax credit in the tens of millions of dollars. However, the KPMG partner told the board in 2024 the strategy was high-risk and unlikely to be accepted by the Australian Taxation Office, according to sources close to the matter, who requested anonymity to discuss confidential internal affairs.

KPMG has been engulfed in a scandal after a whistleblower alleged that the firm’s auditors misused client data from some of the country’s biggest companies. Harry Afentoglou

Aggressive manoeuvring on tax is unusual for the major superannuation funds, which are largely risk-averse and, for industry-aligned funds such as UniSuper, run on a not-for-profit basis. UniSuper is one of the country’s biggest retirement funds, managing $150 billion for more than 720,000 members.

The allegation that KPMG replaced a partner who had given conservative tax advice raises questions about the way the firm might adjust its advice to suit client needs rather than regulatory requirements.

KPMG has been engulfed in a scandal after a whistleblower alleged that the firm’s auditors misused client data from some of the country’s biggest companies, including Lendlease, Dexus and Optus, and had used insider information to win auditing work.

The scandal has already claimed the scalps of many senior executives, including chief executive Andrew Yates, chairman Martin Sheppard and three senior auditors – Eileen Hoggett, Paul Rogers and Julian McPherson – after the whistleblower’s concerns were made public after being read into federal parliament by Labor senator Deborah O’Neill in March.

Former KPMG CEO Andrew Yates, former head of audit Julian McPherson, former chief operating officer Eileen Hoggett and former chairman Martin Sheppard.  

Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino has raised potentially moving regulation of the big four firms to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, rather than the current mix of federal and state-based bodies, to toughen up policing of the sector.

The issue last week spread to the Westpac board when director Peter Nash, a former KPMG chairman, quit because his connection to the under-fire firm created a “perception of bias”.

Former SBS boss and Telstra executive Michael Ebeid has been appointed the new independent chair of KPMG Australia, but he is now facing scrutiny over a chain of emails in which he accused O’Neill of making false statements..

The UniSuper transaction is understood to have revolved around one of the fund’s flagship retail property investments: the Karrinyup Shopping Centre in the western suburbs of Perth.

UniSuper has owned a portion of the mall since the early 2000s, and steadily ratcheted up its control before taking full ownership of the centre in 2013 following a High Court battle with its co-owner Westfield.

Former KPMG chairman Peter Nash.  Daniel Munoz

Because of this move, the fund’s ownership of Karrinyup was held across many structures. The intercompany deal – dubbed internally as the “Highlander transaction” after one of the entities – would have consolidated the ownership, and generated an artificial loss to create the controversial tax credit.

UniSuper disclosed the proposed transaction to the ATO during one of the regulator’s combined assurance reviews – a regular assessment of the nation’s top 1000 taxpayers to ensure they are paying the right amount of tax.

The KPMG partner had advised the fund’s board, led by chairman Greg Armour, against the transaction in an August 2024 board meeting.

It’s alleged the partner was removed from the UniSuper account following complaints from executives the next month, sources said, although it is understood the fund had other issues with the partner in question. The partner has since left KPMG and declined to comment when approached. The Australian Financial Review has chosen not to name him.

UniSuper said this was a matter for the ATO and that it was “not appropriate for us to comment further”. The ATO’s review was completed in March 2025.

“KPMG has been and remains UniSuper’s registered tax agent for over 10 years, and it’s not uncommon for partners to change over time,” a UniSuper spokesman said.

KPMG declined to comment.

More on the KPMG audit leaks

• Macquarie to face investor scrutiny at AGM over KPMG audit win
• Rear Window | KPMG looks for an ethical saviour (on a budget)
• Regulator upgrades KPMG investigation amid bias concerns
• Rear Window | KPMG’s deputy chair has her Euro-summer
• KPMG’s crisis circuit-breaker triggers a fresh disaster

Jean Nassif Godfather IV - The Tax Adviser: IRS outlines AI risks, Circular 230 duties for tax practitioners

This allegation that “Strathfield Councillors Sharangan Maheswaran and/or Karen Pensabene” tried to blackmail the mayor is just one of the explosive allegations that the Independent Commission Against Corruption will examine at its forthcoming inquiry, codenamed Operation Rosny.

This, however, was not Maheswaran’s only link to the dark arts of political persuasion which ICAC will examine. Not only did the former Strathfield councillor have links to fugitive property developer Jean Nassif, he was also close to several of the Liberal powerbrokers who allegedly did Nassif’s bidding by branch-stacking the Hills Shire Council to install people who would be more amenable to approving Nassif’s questionable developments.

Private eyes, shakedowns and Godfather IV: The council allegations at the heart of ICAC inquiry

DOJ Tax is Hiring

Trevor Sikes, “DOJ Seeks More Tax Attorneys as Caseload Increases” (Tax Notes, June 29, 2026):

The Justice Department’s Tax Litigation Branch of the Civil Division is looking to bolster its workforce following a significant exodus of attorneys and an increased caseload, according to a government official.

“During the last couple of years, we’ve lost some significant amount of staff,” Joshua Wu, deputy assistant attorney general for the Tax Litigation Branch, said June 26 at a conference sponsored by the New York University School of Professional Studies.

Staffing has decreased about 30 to 40 percent since last year, while the Tax Litigation Branch caseload has continued to increase, according to Wu. The Civil Division has 4,413 pending tax trial matters — an increase of 138 from last year — and 373 appellate tax cases, which is 56 more than last year, he said.

 

The Tax Adviser: IRS outlines AI risks, Circular 230 duties for tax practitioners

Martha Waggoner (The Tax Adviser): IRS outlines AI risks, Circular 230 duties for tax practitioners:

The IRS Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) issued guidance outlining how existing Treasury Circular 230 rules apply to tax practitioners’ use of artificial intelligence (AI), emphasizing that long-standing duties such as due diligence, competence, and confidentiality remain unchanged.

The overarching message, the agency said in a bulletin posted Wednesday, is that AI should augment — not replace — professional judgment.

“Technology serves as a powerful tool, not a substitute for professional judgment,” the OPR bulletin said. “Final decisions must always rest with qualified professionals who understand the complexities of tax law and ethical standards.”

 

CNN’s uncertain future claims its first major on-air talent

Paula Reid is leaving for MS NOW after reportedly raising concerns about Paramount Skydance's pending takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery

Redesign of US government websites stokes surveillance fears

The Guardian: “The National Design Studio, staffed by Doge veterans, installed visitor-tracking software on vital federal website. An opaque White House office staffed largely by veterans of Elon Musk’s “department of government efficiency” (Doge) has quietly rebuilt some of the federal government’s most sensitive websites – for passport applications, voter registration, prescription-drug pricing and children’s savings – in ways critics say appear to violate federal law. 

The National Design Studio (NDS) was established by a Donald Trump executive order last August, and is led by Trump-aligned Airbnb co-founder Joe Gebbia and staffed by Doge veterans. 

A Guardian investigation has found the office has apparently been developing or redeveloping sensitive federal websites, including those connecting Americans with prescription drugs, children’s savings accounts, passports and voter registration. The investigation corroborates and advances earlier reporting by the Drey Dossier, a YouTube investigative outlet. The NDS built and now operates four public federal websites: ndstudio.gov, trumprx.gov, realfood.gov and trumpaccounts.gov. All four ran commercial visitor-tracking software, configured to evade the privacy tools many web users install, and none carry the public filings federal privacy law requires under laws including the Privacy Act of 1974 and the E-Government Act of 2002. 

Separately, none of the NDS’s spending or its arrangements with outside vendors appears in USAspending, the federal contracting database, raising questions about how it is funded and overseen. Separately, the NDS has also built and runs White House-controlled versions of services the US Congress assigned to other federal agencies, including a passport-application portal that bypasses the state department’s existing site, and a copy of voter-registration site vote.gov. 

Combined, the sites route sensitive interactions Americans have with their government through infrastructure the White House apparently controls, and outside the reporting and accountability systems that normally cover federal agencies…”

Trove of Never-Before-Seen Records Reveal How the Wealthiest Avoid Income Tax

ProPublica – The Secret IRS Files: “In 2007, Jeff Bezos, then a multibillionaire and now the world’s richest man, did not pay a penny in federal income taxes. He achieved the feat again in 2011. In 2018, Tesla founder Elon Musk, the second-richest person in the world, also paid no federal income taxes. 

Michael Bloomberg managed to do the same in recent years. Billionaire investor Carl Icahn did it twice. George Soros paid no federal income tax three years in a row. ProPublica has obtained a vast trove of Internal Revenue Service data on the tax returns of thousands of the nation’s wealthiest people, covering more than 15 years. 

The data provides an unprecedented look inside the financial lives of America’s titans, including Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch and Mark Zuckerberg. It shows not just their income and taxes, but also their investments, stock trades, gambling winnings and even the results of audits. 

Taken together, it demolishes the cornerstone myth of the American tax system: that everyone pays their fair share and the richest Americans pay the most. 

The IRS records show that the wealthiest can — perfectly legally — pay income taxes that are only a tiny fraction of the hundreds of millions, if not billions, their fortunes grow each year. Many Americans live paycheck to paycheck, amassing little wealth and paying the federal government a percentage of their income that rises if they earn more. 

In recent years, the median American household earned about $70,000 annually and paid 14% in federal taxes. The highest income tax rate, 37%, kicked in this year, for couples, on earnings above $628,300. The confidential tax records obtained by ProPublica show that the ultrarich effectively sidestep this system…”

Supreme Court Denies Cert in Murrin on Issue of Whether Taxpayer's Fraud is Required for § 6501(c)(1) Unlimited Statute of Limitations 

›

 Today, the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari in Murrin v. Commissioner (Sup. Ct. No. 25-988), docket here . See Order List ...

Saturday, June 20, 2026

Justice Thomas' Misleading Statement in Solo Dissent about Maximum Exposure Considered in a Plea Agreement 

›

In Hunter v. United States , 608 U. S. ____ (2026), SC here and GS  here [to come], the Court held (from syllabus): An agreement [plea ag...

Sunday, June 14, 2026

Fourth Circuit Affirms Convictions of Bullshit Tax Scam Promoters

›

In United States v. Chollet , ___ F.4th ___ (4th Cir. 2026), CA4 here and GS here , the 4 th Circuit panel (Judges Niemeyer, Thacker, and ...

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

Failure to Pay Employer's Share of FICA Is Not Included in Tax Loss for § 7202 Convictions for Failure to Withhold and Pay Over Employee's Share

›

In United States v. Fecondo (3rd Cir. No. 24-1618 5/26/26) (NonPrecedential), CA3 here  and GS here  the court held that Fecondo’s crimes o...

Thursday, May 7, 2026

District Judge Dismisses Wire Fraud Counts with Overlapping Facts for Tax Counts Because the Lesser Burden of Proof for Wire Fraud Violates Due Process 

›

In United States v. Garza (N.D. TX 3:22-CR-0390-8), Memo and Order dated 5/6/26, CL here  and GS here , the Court dismissed certain counts ...