Hegseth expands National Guard presence in DC

Politico: “Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has authorized the National Guard to begin using boats, several dozen marked police cars, humvees and light medium tactical vehicles in the nation’s capital — an escalation of the troops’ presence that could further blur the line between their military and law enforcement role. It’s not clear why the Trump administration is making the move now. The Oct. 29 memo obtained by POLITICO detailing the expansion doesn’t provide any further details beyond doubling down on Trump’s plan to use the National Guard to crack down on what he’s called a “crime emergency”in the nation’s capital. 

The beefed-up presence, which will be in place through the end of the year, would see members of the National Guard driving vehicles typically used by U.S. troops on battlefields like Iraq and Afghanistan on city streets to support law enforcement officers making drug busts, though they are not allowed to pursue suspects or make arrests. The boats will conduct “perimeter security” for police conducting operations against suspected gang leaders and drug traffickers in Anacostia, the southeastern corner of the nation’s capital, the memo stated, but will not conduct surveillance on U.S. citizens. Hegseth stated that federal officers “must always be on board” Guard vessels “to help arrest a criminal suspect,” including those who might try to evade law enforcement by jumping into the river…”

The Czech government’s new culture war shows the Maga spirit is still alive in Europe

Jan Bělíček

The country’s wealthy elite is aligning itself with the far-right politics of the Motorists party to stifle dissent

 I don't want to give you my phone number when I buy something. I don't want to give you my e-mail address to read something. And I don't want refrigerators connected to the Internet.

A Week let alone a year is a long long time at the NSW Parliamentary Dining Room 

‘Nail in the coffin’: Court hears Herald journalist’s call about Alan Jones 

Michaela Whitbourn and Clare Sibthorpe 

November 4, 2026

Alan Jones and his legal team, Bryan Wrench (left) and Chris Murphy (right) outside the Downing Centre Local Court on Wednesday.KATE GERAGHTY

The MPs who hosted Alan Jones for lunch in NSW Parliament House

October 24, 2025 

Former broadcaster Alan Jones is known for his “pick and stick” club – friends he supports through thick and thin. The favour is returned, it seems, with long-time friend Mark Latham and his former One Nation colleague Rod Roberts last week hosting Jones for lunch at NSW Parliament House.

Jones joined Latham and Roberts for a meal in one of the members’ dining rooms in Macquarie Street last Thursday, a month after new revelations emerged that Jones has been accused of indecently touching nine alleged victims at public locations including the Opera House.

Alan Jones and Mark Latham enjoy a chat in a kitchen.

Jones joined Latham and Roberts for a meal in one of the members’ dining rooms in Macquarie Street last Thursday, a month after new revelations emerged that Jones has been accused of indecently touching nine alleged victims at public locations including the Opera House.

Alan Jones and Mark Latham enjoy a chat in a kitchen.

Other locations named in updated court documents tendered in Jones’ indecent assault and sexual touching case include a lower north shore restaurant, inside a lift at the 84-year-old’s former workplace as well as in his homes across Sydney and NSW.

Details of the allegations were outlined last month as it was revealed the matter will not be heard before a jury and two complainants will no longer be involved in the case.

Several sources confirmed Jones was seen in the foyer of Parliament House just before 1pm on Thursday, October 16, before joining Latham and Roberts for a meal in one of the dining rooms.

Asked about the purpose of the lunch, Roberts, a former detective who is now an independent MP after quitting One Nation, said it was a “private matter”. Latham was also contacted for comment.

Latham is a long-time friend and supporter of Jones. In 2018, the pair released a cookbook called Conversations in the Kitchen, billed as simple family-friendly recipes and no-frills food photography interspersed with “conversations” between Jones and Latham.

In 2019, Jones confirmed that he donated $10,000 to One Nation, saying he was “supporting a mate”, the party’s NSW leader Latham.

“We are indeed very happy that someone of Alan Jones’s standing and experience in public policy in Australia is supporting us,” Latham said at the time.

However, Jones’ standing was dealt a blow when Strike Force Bonnefin was established to investigate the former teacher and Wallabies coach following a major investigation by The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age

Jones was initially charged with dozens of offences and now faces 27 counts, as the number of complainants dropped from 11 to nine. He faces 25 counts of indecent assault and two counts of sexual touching.

Earlier court documents seen by this masthead showed the allegations of indecent assault at that time included fondling penises, stroking thighs and squeezing bottoms.

Jones was accused of committing the crimes at his former Newtown home, his harbourside apartment, his farm at Fitzroy Falls in the Southern Highlands, Tamworth in northern NSW and other Sydney spots.

Jones was arrested at his luxury harbourside apartment in Circular Quay in November and has vigorously denied all allegations.

Speaking outside court after his first appearance, he said the allegations were “baseless”.

Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newslettero

Bluesky was right all 🦋 along and will accept your apology any time - Is This a New Era of Class Warfare?

"The best revenge is not to be like your enemy.” -Marcus Aurelius "Meditations"

Bluesky was right all along and will accept your apology any time

Many savvy pundits on X framed the 2024 election as a massive political realignment and Bluesky as a “copium” den for progressives in a bubble. Boy, were they wrong.

"After World War II, regular increases in the minimum wage, the expansion of health insurance and pensions, tax policies that reduced extreme inequality and public investment in higher education all added up to an economy more responsive to the needs of working-class people."

Is This a New Era of Class Warfare?

‘Six unelected people now control the Western world’: Analyst sounds the alarm on data centres

 I don't want to give you my phone number when I buy something. I don't want to give you my e-mail address to read something. And I don't want refrigerators connected to the Internet.

Australia nears 'point of no return' as council cameras plan to track millions of people

Increased monitoring has sparked concern among privacy experts who say the rapidly advancing technology is 'deeply concerning'.

It’s Hard To Be A Rich Radical. “It was disappointing how easily money turned a lot of them into sudden conservatives, full of right-wing doctrine about bootstraps and the fantasy of a black capitalist utopia…”

 I made a small tweak to Prometheus (gift link discovery site) that kinda kicks ass: NYT Cooking is now a separate source (which you can filter by). The Rigatoni With White Bolognese recipe is a favorite of mine. 🤌

Trump and MAGA expect mercy 

 FIRST ELON, THEN YOU: “If the Democrats are willing to pick this type of fight with someone like Musk, why would they show mercy to any of the rest of us?”

Sniffing out the link between odor and disease. So we’ll have machines to do it.

My old doctor, now retired, complained that most people now take a pulse with a pulse oximeter, which just gives you a number for beats per minute. Taking a pulse manually gave you a lot more than a number: Was it bounding, thready, steady or irregular, etc. Useful information was lost in exchange for the convenience of sticking a small gadget on someone’s finger.

Star Wars: The Radio Drama

 The function of a friend is not to have a function. 

~Detlef Cordes

Star Wars: The Radio Drama

Somehow I’d never heard of this before: NPR produced and aired radio dramatizations of the films in the original Star Wars trilogy. The first program was particularly popular, garnering NPR hundreds of thousands of new listeners. The original versions are available in full on The Internet Archive:

• Star Wars: A New Hope (1981)
• Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back(1983)
• Star Wars: The Return of the Jedi (1996)

Or get all three parts ripped from the CD.

All three programs contain elements of John Williams’ original soundtrack. Mark Hamill and Anthony Daniels reprised their movie roles for the first two radio programs and some other bold-faced names made appearances throughout: Billy Dee Williams as Lando Calrissian, John Lithgow as Yoda (??), Ed Begley Jr. as Boba Fett (???), David Alan Grier as a nameless X-wing fighter pilot, and Nia Vardalos.

The radio programs were based on the original film scripts with some added scenes; from Open Culture:

With science-fiction novelist Brian Daley brought on to add or restore scenes to the script of the original dialogue-light feature film, the story stretches out to thirteen episodes for a total runtime of six hours. The series thus stands as an early example of the expansion of the Star Wars universe that, in all kinds of media, has continued apace ever since.

And from Wikipedia:

Daley adapted the script partly using material from earlier drafts of Lucas’s scripts, and restored several scenes cut from the final edit of the film, as well as adding original new scenes created specially for the audio version. The narrative of the first two episodes takes place entirely before the opening scene of the 1977 film, and expands the background to events leading up to the capture of the Tantive IV spacecraft above the planet Tatooine. Episode 1, largely based on cut scenes from the original, explores the life of Luke Skywalker on Tatooine. During the story, Luke’s skyhopper (a vehicle seen in the background in Luke’s garage during the film) is damaged during a desert race; Luke sees the distant Star Destroyer battle in the sky; and he is reunited with his childhood friend, Biggs Darklighter. Episode 2, made up of material written entirely by Daley, provides backstory to Princess Leia’s acquisition of the Death Star plans from agents of the Rebel Alliance on the planet Toprawa. In scenes set on the planet Alderaan, Leia discusses the plans with her father, Prestor Organa, and determines to go in search of Obi-Wan Kenobi.

There are recut fan versions of the three programs as well, including Nigel’s Edits (Hope, Empire, Jedi); he added some of Ben Burtt’s sound effects into the mix:

These versions, boldly called The Definitive Editions (Hope, Empire, Jedi), include opening scrolls and images taken from Star Wars comic books and trading cards:

Yes, that’s a script turned into a movie turned into an audio drama turned into a, uh, quasi-cinematic Powerpoint? (via open culture)

Dylan in his monastic habit - Uber to pay $81 million in payroll tax to NSW tax office, High Court rules

Dylan in his monastic habit

Pope Leo receives Bob Dylan at the Vatican

Uber to pay $81 million in payroll tax to NSW tax office, High Court rules

The states are set to receive a payroll tax windfall worth hundreds of millions of dollars after the High Court ruled Uber is liable for an $81m bill levied against it by the NSW government, in a decision likely to send shockwaves through gig economy platforms.

The High Court found there was a contract between Uber and its drivers, and that driver fares were considered "wages", making it liable to pay payroll tax.

Uber warned the court decision could have "significant unintended consequences" for other businesses.

The Transport Workers' Union said the decision was a "critical reality check to companies seeking to skirt our laws".

High Court hits Uber with $81m payroll tax in blow to gig economy

Uber must pay the state of NSW at least $81 million in payroll tax, almost 10 times its local profits last year, after the ride-share giant lost a final appeal to the High Court, in a decision that could dramatically increase the tax burden on gig economy companies.

The High Court ruled on Wednesday that the fares Uber collects on its drivers’ behalf are in fact “wages” under NSW tax law, meaning payroll tax applies. Uber is therefore on the hook for the full $81.5 million in payroll tax that NSW authorities have ordered it to pay, on fares the company collected between 2015 and 2020.

Uber has lost a landmark legal battle over payroll tax in Australia. AP

That figure is almost 10 times the $8.7 million Uber posted in net Australian profits for 2025, and dwarfs even the record $21.2 million profitthe company recorded in 2024. Uber’s total tax bill is likely to grow, once NSW assesses what the company owes for more recent years.

NSW Finance Minister Courtney Houssos said the government welcomed the ruling and would consider it carefully.

“Payroll tax is a key part of the state’s tax base,” Houssos said. “Only around 5 per cent of NSW businesses pay payroll tax – the majority of which comes from big businesses – and it helps fund essential services that families and households rely on.

“Local businesses pay their fair share. Uber should pay their fair share too.”

Because similar laws exist in every state and territory except Western Australia, it is possible that Uber and “gig worker” businesses like it will face a deluge of tax assessments, with revenue authorities newly empowered by the High Court ruling.

A spokeswoman for Uber said the company would respect the High Court’s decision, although it disagreed. “We do not believe digital marketplaces like Uber should be captured by payroll tax legislation designed for traditional employment and contracting arrangements.”

The company said the ruling could have “unintended consequences” and called on governments to consider whether payroll tax laws “remain fit for purpose in an economy where technology platforms connect independent service providers directly with customers”.

The legal fight leading to Wednesday’s loss began in 2021, when Uber objected to the $81.5 million in payroll tax NSW’s tax commissioner had ordered it to pay for 2015 to 2020.

Companies normally pay payroll tax on employees’ wages, but there are some sections of the law that extend payroll tax to contractors, the category that Uber drivers fall into. The NSW tax commissioner argued Uber drivers fell within these so-called “contractor provisions”, which apply where a company agrees to pay a contractor in exchange for “services” (as opposed to goods).

Uber objected to the assessment, claiming it was merely a “payment collection agent” for its drivers, and arguing that drivers were performing services to passengers, and not to Uber. It also argued that the contractor provisions were designed only for cases of true “sham contracting”, where a contractor is really an employee in disguise.

After losing in NSW’s top court, Uber made a last-ditch appeal to the High Court, which was heard in March this year.

On Wednesday, six of the seven High Court judges found that the “contractor provisions” could apply to the “gig economy”, even though they were enacted decades before ride-sharing and other gig-based business models were invented.

The provisions were “always speaking in the present to participants in the gig economy”, Chief Justice Stephen Gageler ruled.

The majority also found that drivers provide “driving services” to Uber directly, under a standard contract. The court concluded that Uber has “substantial control” over how drivers work – for example, it sets minimum standards, and can block drivers from its app – and also controls the fares it remits to drivers, making it more than a mere “payment collector”.

Mimi Zou, a UNSW professor and barrister who specialises in tax, said the judgment was “likely to affect other intermediaries operating under comparable legislation and contractual arrangements”.

“However, the decision did not decide that Uber drivers are employees generally or automatically establish entitlements under labour laws.”

RELATED

• Whistleblowers

ATO claim could change everything for whistleblowers

• Legal profession

A tiny AI law firm beat the taxman – and may have shrunk your tax bill

Follow the legal world’s biggest news, firms, cases, and personalities. Sign up to The Legal Brief newsletter.

Janek Drevikovsky is the Financial Review’s legal affairs reporter. Email Janek at jdrevikovsky@nine.com.

Westpac to exit Palantir partnership

The bank will end its Palantir deal and review its sourcing safeguards as shareholder activists turn up pressure on the surveillance tech and big data company.

The Remarkable Serbian Election

I’ve been reading a bit about the recent election in Serbia and some of the details are fascinating. A student-led coalition toppled the 12-year corrupt reign of “the increasingly authoritarian leader” Aleksandar Vučić in recent elections. But in order to ensure voters and allies that this wasn’t a grab for power on the part of the students, the students ruled themselves out.

Supporters had the votes, but they needed the losing side to stay. The strict rules were a promise: to those who had opposed running, that it would not turn the movement into a party; to voters, that the list was no party in disguise.

No student may run: anyone enrolled in 2024/25, or with studies on hold, is excluded. The drafters wanted no suggestion that students were building political careers. Former members of the ruling coalition’s 20 parties are barred, and so are former officials of parliamentary opposition parties. That leaves doctors, academics, artists, former athletes and activists. Ordinary members of opposition parties were not barred, but almost none with a party past. The list is led by Ilija Srdanović, a cardiologist and professor in Novi Sad.

The result is the Student List. From a pre-election piece in the NY Times: Something Astonishing Is Happening in My Country. The World Should Take Note.

The students’ list of 250 candidates is remarkable in itself. Comprising professors, scientists, doctors, workers, actors and activists, the candidates — most of whom had been unknown to the public — were selected through a lengthy sequence of scrutiny and interviews. University faculties proposed candidates, then reviewed nominees from across the country. After discussing the options, student assemblies made their choices. Thousands participated in this decision-making process — an extraordinary experiment in bringing direct democracy into mainstream politics.

The established opposition, meanwhile, has been pushed aside, with many of its parties backing the student list. The student movement has turned the election into something like a referendum on the regime, captured in its slogan: “Serbia or the mafia.” Many assumed the students were too inexperienced or naïve for electoral politics. But with some polls putting support for the student list above 40 percent, the race appears to be tight.

The students are coming for the machine. And, astonishingly, they might win.

Super interesting, right? US electoral politics don’t work the same as Serbia’s, but I wonder if there’s a way to inject some aspect of the Student List into US elections?

See also How to Give Away a Fortune, which resonates with the Serbian movement IMO.