Saturday, June 06, 2026

Everything and Nothing: 24 Years of Blogging, Linking, Sharing Life

"I cannot say with certainty which of my motives are the strongest, but I know which of them deserve to be followed." 
~  George Orwell: Why I Write - Why I Blog

"I am a Jedi, like my father before me." 

Terrible. 20 years ago, the internet was full of hobbyist blogs and forums. over time, these have been replaced by paywalled substacks and private discord channels, each a walled garden. google's decision to prioritize AI just makes it less likely people will create free, public info

AI will become smarter than people by making people dumber.

I lived through the death of the typewriter and the birth of the internet, yet nothing beat the time AI took my jokes on Teams about being a spy seriously …

bluesky




Why do I do this?

Why write 25,000 blog posts? Why make a video every single day? In this video, I explain what drives my work, why I have spent
Read the full article…




Human beings ache to be in each other’s company’: Why sharing stories matters
 
First I did a book and a blog to see if I could. 
Now I blog to try to make things a little better.


Twenty four (24) ago this week, I wrote and published
 my first observation  I was in luck as I chose blogger.com in 2002 as it is a site that continues to support our MEdia Dragon in 2026… in late 1990s Steve Jobs in various forums predicted that posting stories on the web will prevail … I was lucky to exchange few emails and share my article on Velvet Revolution  with Steve - However, I did not write the poem. Our different kind of crazy escape across the Iron Curtain inspired it …

Sold out “Cold River” also turns 24 this year. In getting to its exalted place on deepblog, the book had to navigate a tricky set of rapids. Though it sailed through them, a question lingers twenty years later: Would a story like this, with its communist setting and its tragic escape focus, face different challenges in today’s publishing world?

There is this sense of inescapability of the past — no matter what the present and future hold: “I am haunted by waters.”

Over those twenty four years, I’ve written well over 17,000 imperfect posts, some brief, some long, some silly, some serious, some came to attention of fraud and prevention area as allegedly I linked to articles critical of colourful mandarins. 

Even if trivial topics are covered, blogger’s unique voice, experiences, and combinations of information offer fresh value. This explains why MEdia Dragon 🐉 scored over eight (8) million views…

Amediadragon.blogspot.com receives approximately 493 visitors and 493 page impressions per day


A ripple of excitement pulsed through the crowd. Paul Ford is blogging regularly again.

Blogging has gone up and down in popularity through the years, and it seems to be on the rise again. For me it is about sharing pot pouri of stories I tend to find insightful or thoughtful or joyful.


When I think of who I was back in 2002, how much I’ve changed, how much my life has changed, how much the world has changed, how I moved from a crown employee to a biblical intel officer, I even transformed my life to Kafkaesque sanctity of two marriages, it’s all extremely surreal. 


When I wrote my first blog post, Kindles, iPhones and Bsky platform didn’t exist. 


Back in 2006 I met Malchkin and in the same year the Internet pioneer “Deep Blog” asked me to share my views on blogging:

Why I blog: Hundreds of pages could be filled or just a sentence might capture some of the depth behind blogging. Blogging is interactive and in many ways inclusive. Anyone anywhere can shed a light on this strange cosmos of ours.

The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity. - Dorothy Parker

Why do I blog?

Short Answer: To be heard. Sole survivors might often be thought of as anonymous, but we never want to be voiceless.

Life is too brief and the world is too small not to blog. Is it a way to let off steam and give your two cents? Does it satisfy a desire to climb the mountains or cross the rivers? Or is it an outlet for your various interests? Let me count the ways blogging can record anything delightful, surprising, or informative.

Blogging is part of who I am ... First of all, I blog to keep up my spirit; to stir the spirit of others; to stir my blood, my brain, and my beliefs.

I blog to meet curious people like Dan Gillmor, Jay Rosen, Shel Israel, Robert Scoble, Michael Schaefer, MJ Rose, Tim Dunhill, David Tiley and many others.

Herman Melville put it best when he said, "We cannot live for ourselves alone. Our lives are connected by a thousand invisible threads, and along these sympathetic fibers, our actions run as causes and return to us as results."

Before I was a blogger, I was a reader of samizdat magazines and a brother who recorded how his sister Aga died at the communist chemical factory and how another sister, Gitka, was sacked for going to church. As bloggers, we share the deepest emotions on a regular basis and today I read a touching story by Lenn Pryor on the death of his sister "Lori Ann Pryor April 27, 1976 - Febuary 22, 2005."

For me, jotting down facts and ideas as well as reading has always been an addiction. In the past, I used to post or email stories I thought might be of interest to friends and acquaintances. However, when the blog came along everything changed... it allowed me to cut down on the number of emails I sent. I still view blogging as emailing to everybody.

Blogging regularly brings new ideas up, ideas I would never have thought of if I hadn't read other blogs and magazines on a similar subject. The more I blog the more I get addicted to reading other bloggers. Blogging inspires me to read more because reading introduces new ideas or forces me to rethink old ideas.

If I learn something from my experiences, I hope it might be valuable to someone besides me. I have learned much about myself from reading others poems and stories; I hope that others can also learn something from my experiences and my writing. Deep down in the recesses of probably every blogger's heart is a realisation that we use each other for inspiration and motivation on our journey of self-discovery.

I like to think of blogging as something more than just expressing ideas or sharing trends. I like to think I'm part of a wide selfless community. Blogs not only help to reveal who we are; they help us to transcend who we were.

What I like about Blogging is that it is rather organic. There are no boundaries to ideas, interaction and optimism. Blogging can be as deep and wide as you make it to be ...

In many ways, a blog is a playground dreamed up by a powerless voice just like the prophetic story of 1984 was dreamed up in 1948 by a powerless voice of George Orwell (Orwell - Why I Write).George Orwell saw writing not only as a powerful tool for conveying ideas, but also as a demanding and enthralling art with a moral imperative to search for truth. In an autobiographical note sixty years ago, Orwell said, "Good prose is like a window pane." Like Orwell, Vaclav Havel trusted his audience to share his values and understanding of the world, but he also sought to increase their political awareness. Blogging helps us to think for ourselves. Blogs allow us to speak our mind and it helps us to link to concrete realities.

An individual blogger, like Winston Smith, sits down alone with courage and an optimistic belief in his own ideas to communicate his most secret thoughts to an unknown reader. Second, his dedication to truth, the product of independent thought, has the power to improve society. In our time, we desperately need Orwell's clear language, his commitment to aesthetic as well as moral responsibility.

My purpose in this blog is to shed more hope and sunlight on complex and moral issues as where there is sunlight there is less likelihood for slime and mold to grow. What you see is what you get!

To me a link like this one which I received this week from Shel and Robert is priceless: 
http://redcouch.typepad.com/weblog/2005/02/thank_you_jozef.html

Warmly,

Jozef

Jozef's Blog: Media Dragon: Top 100 Cultural and Political Blog in 2004 AD
Bloggers are like the little first amendment engine that could
Book: Cold River, by Jozef Imrich


"Isn't it the moment of most profound doubt that gives birth to new certainties? 
Perhaps hopelessness is the very soil that nourishes human hope; perhaps one could never find sense in life without first experiencing its absurdity." 
Vaclav Havel -l


KDO: 28 Years Later…

It’s getting a little ridiculous, isn’t it? 28 years of kottke.org, as of today. Older than Google. Older than The Matrix. Older than Christopher Nolan’s feature film career. Older than Elle Fanning. Older than Kurt Cobain when he died. 47,300 posts since March 14, 1998. It might outlast American democracy.

KDO retains its old school vibe but with some new tricks. Friends and readers have remarked recently that I seem to be having fun with the site again and that’s true. Still excited by the possibilities of what the site could become. I hope you’ve been enjoying it.

I’d like to once again thank KDO members for supporting the site — I never get tired of the member thanking. They each pay a few dollars a month to keep the site free to read for everyone, regardless of income, something I feel very strongly about in this era of paywalled media. As Hamilton Nolanhas noted — his site operates on the same principle — sites/newsletters like these have progressive funding structures, where people’s contributions are based on their ability to pay to help keep the site available to all. If you’d like to help support the site in this mission, you can check out your membership options here. ✌️

P.S. I hope you enjoy the birthday logo and fireworks — they’ll be around until Monday.


This is kind of amazing: World Monitor is a real-time global intelligence dashboard. Includes military activity, climate anomalies, live webcam feeds in warzones, internet outages, active fires, and even the Pentagon Pizza Index.


I am always trying to convey something that can’t be conveyed, to explain something which is inexplicable, to tell about something I have in my bones, something which can be expressed only in the bones.

~ Franz Kafka, Letters to Milena


Two trending quotes:

"Revenge, like Okroshka, is a dish best served cold."


The invisible hand of the legislative and taxing executives strikes again



Positive Love from Mark Hamill on Bsky



Just like Mark, I NEVER miss a movie that has "GROGU" in the title ...

It has been 24 years since I started blogging so to receive today “love symbols”  ❤️ from Mark Hamill on Bluesky one minute and more ❤️ symbols from him the next  … it is considered as platform priceless memory and Resistance Fortune 🗽🦋🙏🏻


Dozey Don went to the trouble of actually creating a chart to compare the length of the Reflecting Pool to the height of 3 various skyscrapers, for some reason known only to him.

Mark on Dozey Don today









It took me 24 years blogging to get 8 million views, Mark tends to get 8 million views a day so it is a huge honour as Mark and Luke are my heroes



One thing certain in MMXXVI - 2026, it is stressful being a member of the Rebel Alliance


Trying to see through younger eyes

 

  • "I have no words for you; you leave me completely speechless. Every moment spent with you feels like a dream, where time stands still and the world around us fades away."
  • "You reached into my soul and rearranged the position of my bones. You have left me speechless."
  • "Where words leave off, gesture begins. Don't we speak of a person being speechless with rage, dancing with impatience... The final motions of the soul are speechless, animal, grotesque, or of an incomparable beauty."— Charlie Chaplin [1]
  • Friday, June 05, 2026

    Finding Meaning in Suffering

     

    Finding Meaning in Suffering

    Dispatch Faith:  The World Needs to Recover True Lament. Christianity Can Teach It., by Kelly M. Kapic (Covenant College), M. Elizabeth Lewis Hall (Biola University) & Jason McMartin (Biola University) (Co-Authors, When the Journey Hurts: Finding Meaning in Suffering for Heart, Mind, and Soul(2026)):

    Benjamin Franklin famously declared that only death and taxes are certain. But he forgot one thing: Suffering is the third universal—as inescapable as mortality, as indifferent as the IRS.

    Every major religion or philosophical system in human history has addressed the problem of suffering. Buddhism teaches acceptance and detachment—the goal is to loosen the grip of craving and desire that amplify pain, ultimately freeing the self from suffering’s hold. Secular modernity largely hands suffering to experts: therapists, physicians, pharmaceuticals, and self-optimization regimens. Suffering becomes a problem to be solved, a malfunction to be corrected. Stoicism, of the ancient and current life hack varieties, encourages cultivating indifference and yielding to fate. 

    But Judaism and Christianity, at their best and growing out of their shared biblical tradition, offer something none of these does: a structured, communal practice for bringing honest anguish into relationship with a God who, the psalms insist, neither despises nor ignores the cry of the afflicted.

    That practice is called lament. In the psalms, lament is a structured form of prayer that follows a discernible pattern: crying out to God, complaining, requesting, remembering God’s works, and—perhaps most surprisingly—often ending in praise of God. And for much of contemporary American Christianity, which we know best and have been studying for years, it has quietly disappeared. But research we’ve been conducting suggests the costs are both deeper and wider than most churches recognize.

    The current season of Lent is a time for honest reckoning—40 days of sitting with mortality, limitation, and the long ache of a world not yet whole. It is, at least in theory, the one time of year when Christianity makes room for suffering rather than rushing past it. And yet for many people, Lent passes without ever touching what is actually hardest in their lives. 

    That gap between what the church’s calendar invites and what its culture permits is where our research—compiled for our forthcoming book, When the Journey Hurts—begins.

    When one of our research participants was asked what lament had done for her, she said something we’ve heard in different forms from many people we’ve interviewed: “I never gave myself permission to be honest with God. I think for a long time I really felt like I needed to put up a face for him because I wanted to give him what he wanted. But I had a wrong idea of what he wanted. He wants honesty from us.” …

     

    Bloomberg: “Biofuel Groups Push IRS for New Model to Calculate Tax Credit”

    Erin Schilling (Bloomberg): Biofuel Groups Push IRS for New Model to Calculate Tax Credit:


    Saez and Zucman: The Case for California’s Billionaire Wealth Tax

    Emmanuel Saez (Berkeley-Economics) and Gabriel Zucman (Paris School of Economics) have published a guest essay in the New York Times: “The Case for California’s Billionaire Wealth Tax.” From the article:

    On taxes and much else, California has often led the country. In 1978 the state’s voters approved Proposition 13, which strongly limited tax increases. Prop 13 was the opening salvo in Ronald Reagan’s antitax revolution, which swept the United States two years later.

    This year California’s voters could spearhead a shift in the opposite direction. A large labor union representing health care workers and advised by academic experts — including the two of us — got the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act on this November’s ballot. The proposed tax would be a one-time levy of 5 percent on billionaire wealth, spread over five years. If the measure passes, it would be the first tax targeted at the combined personal and business wealth of billionaires enacted anywhere in the world.

    California is an ideal place to test this idea. The state needs money to fill a budget hole that the Trump administration created when it cut, among other things, Medicaid, a state-federal partnership that provides health coverage to low-income people. Without more state tax revenue to fill the loss in federal funding, the fraction of uninsured Californians will increase substantially, reversing part of the progress made since Obamacare.

    More TaxProf Blog coverage on California’s billionaire wealth tax:

    KPMG and Accontinb Mob - Aussie media calls for new ATO powers in big tech news war

    Disgraced KPMG executive’s cushion: board overrules legal and HR chiefs

    The Albanese government is considering banning KPMG from public sector contracts as data reveals the embattled firm holds $27.4m in government audit deals.
    DAVID ROSS and TANSY HARCOURT
    June 5, 2026
    Demoted KPMG Australia chief operating officer Eileen Hoggett in Sydney on Thursday. 

     Albanese government is considering a freeze on KPMG after data showed the embattled firm collected millions in public sector audit contracts and as partners continue to depart.

    The Albanese government is considering a freeze on KPMG after data showed the embattled firm collected millions in public sector audit contracts and as partners continue to depart.

    Amid another bruising day of parliamentary hearings, which have focused on the firm’s links with the public service, Greens senator Barbara Pocock said it was time to ban KPMG from ­future spending. 
    The Greens have pointed to AusTender data that shows the public service has dozens of audit contracts directly with KPMG worth $27.4m. 
    The deepening scandal has claimed the scalps of the CEO Andrew Yates and head of audit Julian McPherson and led to the demotion of chief operating officer Eileen Hoggett. 
    The Australian understands KPMG chief legal counsel Louise Capon and head of people Dorothy Hisgrove had recommended a significantly tougher penalty for Ms Hoggett after the firm’s own internal investigation and a review by legal firm Ashurst, but were overruled on the basis the issue sat with the board.
    KPMG’s audit teams are facing multiple regulatory probes, amid allegations they leaked confidential documents to others in the firm to help them win work. Among the public deals is a $6.4m contract struck with the Australian National Audit Office, with KPMG supplementing the work of the agency charged with scrutinising public spending. 
    Greens senator Barbara Pocock says KPMG has abused the system for its gain. Picture: Martin Ollman / NewsWire
    Greens senator Barbara Pocock says KPMG has abused the system for its gain. Picture: Martin Ollman / NewsWire
    KPMG also holds a $2.1m audit contract with the Bureau of Meteorology, and a $1.7m audit deal with the Department of Industry, Science and Resources. 
    KPMG also has a $4.9m internal audit contract with the CSIRO. 
    The Greens said KPMG should have no role in government audits, with Senator Pocock saying the firm had shown itself unfit for government contracts after repeated scandals. 
    “It’s clear that KPMG’s rot spans far and wide in government,” she said. 
    “Labor must immediately ban KPMG and stop these corrupt firms from milking taxpayers of millions of dollars while abusing the system for their gain.”
    The warning comes as state governments mull over their dealings with KPMG, after NSW said the firm had to provide assurances about its dealings with that state’s public service and give an account of what went wrong. 
    KPMG has been under fire since whistleblower reports emerged suggesting partners at the firm had shared confidential audit documents with others in the business. 
    These were used in a bid to try to win business from the rivals of KPMG’s audit customers. 
    The regulatory response to the scandal has seen six partners at KPMG allegedly implicated in the audit misuse. Three of them have self-reported to Chartered Accountants Australia New ­Zealand, but the Australian Securities & Investments Commission only holds the power to pursue the audit partners, and not those within KPMG’s consulting division who helped misuse the documents. 
    Clockwise from top left: Martin Sheppard, chairman of KPMG Asia Pacific; interim CEO Stan Stavros and former CEO Andrew Yates
    Clockwise from top left: Martin Sheppard, chairman of KPMG Asia Pacific; interim CEO Stan Stavros and former CEO Andrew Yates
    Senator Pocock took aim at the regulation blindspot, saying the self-regulatory model for the big four consulting firms was failing. “Labor needs to put an end to their special treatment – on tax, public reporting, professional liability and whistleblower protections – and regulate the big four like other large Australian firms,” she said. 
    “The latest KPMG scandals show the big four consultancy firms making a mockery of the parliament yet again. They have made millions of dollars from government work and abused the system.”
    Rival PwC Australia faced a similar baptism of fire after that firm was alleged to have misused confidential federal government tax briefings to prepare strategies for clients, in breach of ­undertakings. 
    PwC’s government consulting arm was ultimately carved off from the firm as the scandal saw it frozen out from new commonwealth contracts. 
    Multiple KPMG partners are now understood to be actively searching for a new employer, amid concern over the future of work with the firm. 
    Finance Minister Katy Gallagher, right, alongside Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman
    Finance Minister Katy Gallagher, right, alongside Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman
    Already KPMG’s chief executive Andrew Yates has quit, replaced by Stan Stavros, while several other partners have been punted or demoted. 
    It’s chair, Martin Sheppard, is clinging on.
    Appearing at a Senate estimates hearings, Finance Minister Katy Gallagher said the government was seriously concerned about the scandal, with the Department of Finance preparing to take further action. 
    This could see KPMG banned from the Management Advisory Services Panel or an agreement sought from the firm not to tender for government contracts for some time. 
    The Department of Treasury told Senate estimates that KPMG had provided assurances to the federal government that none of its staff involved in the firm’s audit scandal was involved in contracts with it. 
    Treasury deputy secretary Katrina Demarco said KPMG had contacted the department on Wednesday “to confirm none of the matters provided to Fin­ance concern the performance of services to Treasury”. 
    Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson, however, said issues around KPMG were “very serious” and would come into consideration about how the public service responded to future contracting with it. The Queensland government is also scrutinising how it will deal with KPMG, with $85m in public service contracts now at risk.

    Aussie media calls for new ATO powers in big tech news war 

    by Sam Buckingham-Jones 

    A coalition of Australian media companies has called for robust powers to be granted to the nation’s tax chief, who could demand tech giants like Meta, Google and TikTok reveal the full extent of their local revenue amid concerns they are shifting billions overseas to minimise tax.

    Google, which owns YouTube, Gmail and its dominant search engine, and Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, transferred at least $11 billion out of the country to related entities last year as part of internal transfer pricing deals buying advertising space, which they then on-sell to Australians.

    The Albanese government’s proposed News Bargaining Incentive includes a 2.25 per cent charge on TikTok, Meta and Google’s group revenue. Michaela Pollock

    But a new law the Albanese government is seeking to pass in coming weeks will impose a levy on the three tech giants’ “consolidated revenue” – unless they negotiate commercial deals to pay Australian media companies for their news content.

    The proposed News Bargaining Incentive includes a 2.25 per cent charge on TikTok, Meta and Google’s group revenue that can be fully offset if they strike deals worth 1.5 per cent of that broad revenue figure. It adds to the News Media Bargaining Code, a 2021 law that prompted Google and Meta to strike deals worth roughly $200 million a year – until Meta pulled out.

    The problem is that it is unclear exactly how much money the tech giants make from Australia. The government has estimated the policy will raise between $200 and $250 million, suggesting it thinks those companies make between $13 and $16 billion from Australians – figures not reflected in the accounts they lodge locally.

    The competition regulator has previously estimated Meta makes more than $5 billion from Australians – it reported $1.8 billion last year. The rest is believed to come from Australians buying ads on Facebook and Instagram companies based in low-tax places overseas, like Ireland. Irish media reported Meta wrote revenue of €85 billion ($138 billion) in 2024 in the country, which has a population roughly one-quarter of Australia.

    “The tax office needs to have express powers to interrogate what revenue is generated in this territory for the purposes of this scheme”: Free TV chief executive Bridget Fair. Louie Douvis

    Now a lobby group representing Nine Entertainment, Southern Cross Media and Network Ten has called for new “robust” powers to be added to the law to allow the taxation commissioner to probe major tech platforms.

    While the incentive calls for a levy on those three companies’ “consolidated revenue attributable to Australia”, Free TV told the government it was concerned transfer pricing and other practices made it difficult to find the true figure to tax.

    “This whole scheme is trying to recognise the value these companies generate in Australia based off, to some extent, the news content of broadcasters and other news providers, and that needs to be recognised in total – not after complicated accounting treatments to minimise what that looks like,” said Free TV chief executive Bridget Fair.

    “The tax office needs to have express powers to interrogate what revenue is generated in this territory for the purposes of this scheme. Since we’re doing this, why not design it in a way to get to the bottom of how much they make?”

    Free TV has also called for the scheme’s levy rate to be far higher than 2.25 per cent. Similar rules introduced by the government, forcing streaming companies to spend money making Australian content, set the percentage at 7.5 per cent of revenue. There are “no policy reasons”, Free TV wrote in its submission, that the rate is so much lower.

    “It’s only going to end up generating about the same as we were getting five years ago,” she said, “despite massive growth in the advertising market that these people have enjoyed. It’s more companies, but the same number.”

    While the incentive has been welcomed by Australian news publishers, it has been savaged by the tech companies. On Wednesday morning, Meta published a scathing blog post describing the policy as “a discriminatory, retroactive tax targeting a handful of foreign companies”.

    It echoed aggressive comments from powerful US business lobby groups that warned it formed part of a “deteriorating tax environment” for investment in Australia. The White House criticised it as “foreign extortion”.

    Gain insights into the week’s biggest tech stories, deals and trends. Sign up to The Download newsletter.

     is the media, marketing and telecommunications reporter at The Australian Financial Review. Send tips about the media and the telco sectors via encrypted messaging platform Signal (@samebjones.18) or email. Email Sam at sam.buckinghamjones@afr.com