Trump FBI and IRS Team Up to Probe US Nonprofit Groups for ‘Domestic Terrorism’ Links
Trump had threatened independent voices via revoking IRS non-for-profit status. He is upping the ante with FBI and terrorism probes
“In today’s new Gilded Age, the 900-plus billionaires in the US have far too much influence over our elections, our economy, our government policies and our news media, and it’s urgent for Americans to create a movement to curb their power…”
The ongoing migration of Kiwis
FBI is buying location data to track US citizens, director confirms TechCrunch
Government Registers Aliens.Gov Domain 404 Media
Palantir Faces Growing Backlash in UK Following Mandelson-gate Scandal
But is it already too late to reverse course?
Joe Kent says he was told ‘you need to stop’ investigating Charlie Kirk assassinationWashington Examiner
Donald Trump’s Racism Mirrors Jeffrey Epstein’sTomDispatch
But is it already too late to reverse course?
Joe Kent says he was told ‘you need to stop’ investigating Charlie Kirk assassinationWashington Examiner
Donald Trump’s Racism Mirrors Jeffrey Epstein’sTomDispatch
Trump says Iran is ‘based on disinformation.’ Experts say its influence operations go far beyond that.
Experts say Trump’s framing understates a broader system of propaganda, covert influence and censorship
Freedom Path v. IRS Amicus Brief
Professor Donald Tobin (Maryland) just filed an amicus brief in Freedom Path, Inc. v. IRS, where the D.C. district court determined that the IRS regulation regarding 501(c)(4) and the primary purpose standard are unconstitutionally vague. From the brief’s summary of argument
War in the Age of the Online “Information Bomb”
The New Yorker – no paywall – “Memes such as “monitoring the situation” reflect a deluded belief that we can be more than just passive, confused bystanders to a spray of digital shrapnel.
On TikTok, the war against Iran began with a series of videos from influencer types in Dubai, Doha, and elsewhere in the Middle East. They sat on restaurant patios or on hotel-room balconies and pointed their phone cameras skyward to document missiles flying through the air of their respective cities, then disappearing into puffs of smoke as they were shot down. Once you’d watched one video—say, a poolside clip from the British fitness influencer Will Bailey, narrating a nearby explosion over the beat of house music—more followed in an algorithmic deluge.
After footage of the airborne violence came video diaries of travellers scrambling to exit various countries and recording frustrated monologues at jammed airports amid cancelled flights. Next, the lucky ones who got out posted relieved dispatches from the air en route elsewhere. This is war as professionalized social content: well-lit selfie videos, shot skillfully while casually driving a car or riding a horse, recounting pilates classes, matcha in hand—only this time in the middle of air-strike zones.
Global conflict has played out over social media for many years now, dating back to the Twitter-based organizing of the Arab Spring, but the current warfare in the Middle East marks a new level of saturation. Personal footage mingles with official releases from state militaries that are now proficient in the language of the internet. Any clear hierarchy of trustworthy information remains elusive as on-the-ground videos come from all directions, and government agencies are as likely to post memes as anonymous online trolls. The White House X account posts a montage that splices video-game simulations of warfare with seemingly unclassified footage of real-life missile strikes in Iran. The Israel Defense Forces X account publishes a clip of fighter jets in the air with the caption “On our way to make history
” set to strains of “Fortunate Son,” by Creedence Clearwater Revival. (Never mind that the song was an anthem of opposition to the Vietnam War.) It took days for footage from more traditional news outlets to emerge, showing black rain falling from the sky in the aftermath of strikes on oil depots. Even that looked bizarre and surreal—a nightmare generated by A.I.? Each new video encountered online requires a moment’s scanning for signs of fakery.
Many of the fragments spreading through the digital panopticon comprise real footage of real events, but their cumulative effect is far from a cogent portrait. Instead, it’s something like what the French philosopher Paul Virilio, in his 1998 book “The Information Bomb,” labelled a coming “visual crash”: a “real-time globalization of telecommunications” in which any significant event in the world is live-streamed and broadcast, and the overflow of detail causes a “defeat of facts” and a “disorientation of our relation to reality.”
Virilio was writing at the turn of the century, when the globalization of financial markets had created a risk of sudden, worldwide economic collapse. Witnessing the Asian financial crisis of 1997, during which sinking Thai currency prices kicked off a contagious decline in economic confidence across the continent, Virilio foresaw a similar phenomenon in globalized media—a bankrupting of our trust in the information we receive. Virilio was making observations during the era of television and the early internet, before social media, MAGA lies, and A.I. further undermined the authority of the media ecosystem.
The current feeling of incoherence is intensified by President Donald Trump’s unwillingness to explain his military campaign, and Republicans’ mealy-mouthed acquiescence: “We’re not at war right now,” House Speaker Mike Johnsonsaid. This week, Trump has both proclaimed that the war is “very complete” and declared that “important targets” remain. (A post on Xon March 9th from the Department of War promised “no mercy.”) We can find the conflict everywhere on the internet, but no accompanying theory of the case…”
