Sunday, October 11, 2026

Meet the modern-day Woodlanders

Compost cheat sheet: how to make the most of waste 


From Hügelkultur to habitat piles — and a bin called Johanna

 

 
As one of life’s great hoarders, I’ll go to great lengths to avoid a bin. Take tea. I recently switched from bags to loose leaf, not for the taste but so I could add them to my home compost (tea bags are only compostable in industrial composters). Why would I give those valuable nutrients to the council? Then there’s broken crockery — useful substrate for the gravel garden. Cuttings and twigs? Insect homes and fodder.  As autumn begins to unfold, attention often turns to the nitty-gritty of a garden in preparation for winter; soil health, mulching — and what to do with piles of plant detritus that have gathered over the summer. 

 

When I was a child, bonfires at the bottom of the garden dealt with most of its unsightly waste.

 

Now, we are more mindful of hedgehogs and our neighbours, and more of us understand the benefits waste adds to a microhabitat. Garden waste in particular is integral to good soil and therefore flourishing plants.  My front garden at home barely noticed the summer droughts, its loamy soil having been nurtured with mulch and compost. We’re reaping the benefits of good waste management and soil improvement.  . .


Meet the modern-day Woodlanders A trip to Thomas Hardy’s Wessex – and the crafts he loved

About a decade ago, I traded in a shiny life as a magazine editor to make baskets in a one-woman supply chain, from plant to product. My previous work reached millions of people; now it reaches just one at a time – and I find that more satisfying. To try to understand why, I began studying regional craft cultures around the world. I came to see that one can find an entire world of knowledge, intelligence and history hidden in a single object, especially an object that is grounded in the landscape. “Beauty lay not so much in the thing,” writes Thomas Hardy in Tess of the d’Urbervilles, “but in what the thing symbolised.”
A view from Eggardon Hill, Dorset
A view from Eggardon Hill, Dorset © Dave Watts
Hardy’s novels, particularly those he later classified as “Novels of Character and Environment”, are rooted in the largely forgotten rural patterns of life in England’s West Country. He was, as he wrote in the poem “Afterwards”, “someone who used to notice such things”. Born in the tiny hamlet of Higher Bockhampton before the arrival of the locomotive in nearby Dorchester, Hardy was still writing at the interwar peak of 20th-century modernism. He was intimate with both the rhythm-bound woodland communities he grew up in and the urbane world of literary London that overlooked them. Novels such as The Return of the Native, Tess of the d’Urbervilles and Far From the Madding Crowd are each set in a distinct landscape within Hardy’s imaginary Wessex, loosely draped over the actual map of the South West, where the natural world exerts a powerful, even deterministic, force in human lives. Each mourns a culture of craft he saw disappearing amid encroaching change. 
But it is The Woodlanders to which I return most often. Set at the edge of a forest in a fictionalised version of Dorset in the 1850s it is, at its core, about the intimacy between people and trees. The village’s livelihood and survival are bound to its sylvan neighbours. The novel is also a literary lodestar on old woodland crafts, such as coppicing, spar-splitting, hurdle-making and cider-pressing. The characters’ relationships to these trades form the narrative backdrop for a tragic triangular love story. Or maybe it’s the other way around.
Bolts of withies – the raw material for basket-making – in Malcolm Seal’s workshop in Nettlecombe, west Dorset
Bolts of withies – the raw material for basket-making – in Malcolm Seal’s workshop in Nettlecombe, west Dorset © Dave Watts


It tells the story of Grace Melbury who, after being sent away to be educated, returns feeling superior to her promised lover Giles Winterborne – a supremely decent copse-worker and cider-maker – and Marty South, a plain, impoverished girl as keenly attuned to the ways of the woods as Winterborne, and hopelessly in love with him.
Hardy’s heroes, like Winterborne and South, are those most in sympathy with the natural world, able to “read its hieroglyphs as ordinary writing”. Indeed, they seem hardly separable from it; Winterborne is described during cider-pressing season as “autumn’s very brother”. But while Hardy’s moral heroes are society’s losers, left behind as a blinkered world steam-powers into the future, their ways of life are, even now, not entirely extinct. There are some holdouts in Wessex’s woods, orchards and fields refusing to let traditional practices, and the knowledge that informs them, die. 

Orchard

Seal with his sons, Ned and Alfred, tasting cider in a barn on the farm
Seal with his sons, Ned and Alfred, tasting cider in a barn on the farm © Dave Watts
For centuries, cider-making has been an integral part of West Country life. Malcolm Seal, a legendary basket-maker and gardener, is also a keen “ciderist”. In Hardy’s day, every large farm had its own cider shed, and each village had a communal shed and orchard. But when Seal moved to Nettlecombe in west Dorset 26 years ago, its village press was gathering dust. He and a few friends got it running again, and they now press in various sheds each autumn. They make cider the way Giles Winterborne does in The Woodlanders: using a scratter to crush the apples into a pomace that is then set into straw and built up in layers called a “cheese”. The main difference today is that these “anarchist ciderists” have a WhatsApp group to let people know where to gather. “Whoever feels like it turns up, maybe helps press a barrel, catches up with mates and drinks,” says Seal. Evenings often end up as a multigenerational party, with music and singing around a fire.  

Celebrating the cyclical nature of agrarian life has bound rural communities together for millennia. At Seal’s farm on the eastern edge of the Powerstock Hills, the days follow the rhythm of the seasons. There is the willow harvest in the early months of the year, followed by sheep shearing and lambing in the spring, hay cutting in summer, the autumn apple harvest followed by cider-making, and basket-making in the short dark days of winter. “I made a deliberate choice to live a small life,” he tells me. “Sometimes it can be a pain in the arse being tied down by the sheep” – he laughs – “but to get to see the sun rise over Eggardon Hill every morning…” This echoes something Hardy wrote in Tess: “The magnitude of lives is not as to their external displacements but as to their subjective experiences.” Seal’s is a life of hard, satisfying work attuned to beauty and the agricultural traditions he loves.

Woodland

Neil Parsons at his workshop in Alderbury
Neil Parsons at his workshop in Alderbury © Dave Watts
Neil Parsons is the lone and final practitioner of a five-generation family of local hurdle-makers in Alderbury, near Salisbury. In a workshop behind his house, he splits hazel rods with a billhook and weaves them into panels traditionally used to pen sheep. When I visited, he – like Hardy’s Giles Winterborne – “was in the act of making a hurdle, the stakes being driven firmly into the ground in a row, over which he bent and wove the twigs”. Beside him lay “a square, compact pile” of finished hurdles.
This craft, practised for at least 7,000 years in Britain, began to die out in the 1950s and ’60s with the arrival of metal and plastic fencing. When Parsons, now 63, was learning the trade at the age of 11, he was one of a dozen struggling to carry on. But the death knell for the local industry was the arrival of cheap eastern European versions in the 1990s. He kept at it, his business eventually saved by the internet, which allowed new customers, mostly garden designers, to find him. 
The Living Classroom, managed by the Dorset Coppice Group, Bonsley Wood near Durweston
The Living Classroom, managed by the Dorset Coppice Group, Bonsley Wood near Durweston © Dave Watts
The demise of the wattle hurdle is not merely the loss of an old craft. It signals the demise of Britain’s woodlands themselves. Coppice products such as hurdles, spars, charcoal and many others sustain an ancient – and elegantly circular – system of forest management. In a coppiced wood, hardwoods such as oak, ash and hazel are selectively cut back close to the ground on a rotation of between five and 20 years, depending on the species. The remaining “stool” resprouts, replenishing the wood supply, while simultaneously extending the trees’ lives, often by centuries. 
Parsons weaving willows strips in his workshop
Parsons weaving willows strips in his workshop © Dave Watts
We drive to an estate where, on one side of a dirt road, is an abandoned copse. Its dense oak canopy starves the understory, leaving the forest floor dark and bereft of life. Across the road, where Parsons has been culling, birds flit in the filigreed light. “This gentle, cyclical thinning allows all kinds of wildlife, birds, insects and flowers such as wood anemones, primroses and bluebells to return at different stages in the cycle,” he explains. The ancient practice is almost too good to be true: a symbiotic relationship of craftsman and woodland that enhances both. 

Forest

Jim Bettle likes to quote a study that claims one in three people don’t know that charcoal is wood. The material for making it is the last refuse left on the ground in a coppiced wood, after every other more desirable stick has gone to be used elsewhere. Nothing is wasted. Bettle has been making charcoal for 30 years in the same manner as in Hardy’s day: in a steel kiln, filled and fitted carefully, which he takes to woodland across the county of Dorset. While most modern charcoal production does enormous damage to the environment, Bettle is driven to do the very opposite. 
Bonsley Wood near Durweston, Dorset
Bonsley Wood near Durweston, Dorset © Dave Watts
Jim Bettle with his charcoal kiln in Bonsley Woods
Jim Bettle with his charcoal kiln in Bonsley Woods © Dave Watts
Bettle with charcoal for his kiln
Bettle with charcoal for his kiln © Dave Watts
Charcoal is that rare product whose means of production can actually benefit the environment. It sequesters carbon, and can be used for biochar, which improves soil health (while keeping the carbon locked in the ground for centuries); in pet food and animal feed, where it helps digestion and filters toxins; in cosmetics and soaps as an exfoliant; and many other uses that Bettle continues to learn about. It is only by burning charcoal, as we do on barbecues, that it releases carbon. Bettle points out that this is offset, because otherwise you would be using your gas or electric stove. But to reap the benefits of British charcoal, which includes not just carbon sequestration but all the biodiversity that thrives in a managed woodland, there has to be a market for it. Alas, almost no one in Britain uses British charcoal. Most is imported, and the commercial production of that charcoal is one of the most damaging practices in the world, ranked fourth after palm oil. The raw material comes from large-scale deforestation, rife with corruption and harmful labour practices, which is killing rainforests in the Amazon, and desertifying southern Africa. But it is cheaper. Humans have been making and using charcoal for more than 4,000 years, Bettle tells me. “But we’re having to relearn what we once knew.”

Farmland 

Dave and Scott Symonds on their farm, Chideock
Dave and Scott Symonds on their farm, Chideock © Dave Watts
Dave Symonds comes from a centuries-long line of local farmers in Dorset that ended when he was 12. He lived part of the time with his grandfather on an estate that, in a Hardyesque turn, had no tenancy succession. When his grandfather died, he had to find a job outside farming and, at 15, found himself apprenticed to a thatcher.
Today there are 700 or so British thatchers; Symonds is one of around 24 who still grow their own material. When he started out on his own, 50 years ago, he wanted to return to the old methods. He knew how to make thatching spars – the cleaved sticks of coppiced hazel twisted into a hairpin shape to secure thatch – from watching his great-grandfather and “the old cider boys” cut them as they drank and talked in the estate’s cider 

COMES THE DAWN

“And once the storm is over, you won’t remember how you made it through, how you managed to survive. You won’t even be sure whether the storm is really over. But one thing is certain. When you come out of the storm, you won’t be the same person who walked in. That’s what this storm’s all about.” 

 ~Haruki Murakami


 “Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted”

-The maxim was coined by sociologist William Bruce Cameron in his 1963 book Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking


We are all Children of Coincidence

Why are you reading this? Do you believe in chance, probability, conspiracy, serendipity or synchronicity? Theories on coincidence range from “Show me the numbers!” to blind faith in “God’s wink.” As the world gets smaller, the questions around coincidence are getter bigger. And there’s advantage in answering them. As Steve Jobs says “creativity is just connecting things.”  Here’s some current context:


You Are No Longer Invited to Dinner Derek Thompson


COMES THE DAWN

After a while you learn the subtle difference
Between holding a hand and chaining a soul,

And you learn that love doesn’t mean leaning
And company doesn’t mean security,

And you begin to understand that kisses aren’t contracts
And presents aren’t promises.

And you begin to accept your defeats
With your head held high and your eyes open,

With the grace of a woman, not the grief of a child.
You learn to build your roads

On today because tomorrow’s ground
Is too uncertain for plans, and futures have
A way of falling down in midflight.

After a while you learn that even sunshine
Burns if you get too much.

So you plant your own garden and decorate
Your own soul, instead of waiting

For someone to bring you flowers.
And you learn that you can really endure,

That you really are strong
And you really do have worth

And you learn and learn … and you learn
With every goodbye you learn.

~Veronica A. Shoftstall


Like something out of a Wes Anderson movie.

Ukrainian Railroad Ladies is a series of portraits of women who work as traffic controllers and safety officers at railroad crossings in Ukraine. The women spend their long shifts in the little houses built specifically for them along the tracks … They are a symbol of certain things in this country that don’t change, standing firm in the present as a defiant nod to the past. They endure, unfazed by the passing of trains and time. 

Photographed by Sasha Maslov, his project was discovered through the LensCulture Exposure Awards 2020.

Saturday, October 10, 2026

Inside the Nobel Prize in literature

Garden Al Freso


Inside the Nobel Prize in literature

As the Swedish Academy chooses the winner of the book world’s most prestigious award, Simon Kuper looks back at an august ideal often marred by politics and bias


Alfred Nobel was a keen but mediocre writer. The Swedish dynamite tycoon wrote unpublished poems and a play featuring a 40-minute torture scene. To the dismay of relatives keen to inherit his fortune, his handwritten will of 1895 endowed five awards, including a prize for literature. Nobel instructed “the Academy in Stockholm” to give it to the writer of “the most outstanding work in an ideal [idealisk] direction”. The Swedish Academy spent decades puzzling over what “ideal” meant, before quietly dropping the criterion.

Next Thursday, a door will open in a gilded hall in Stockholm and the Academy’s formally dressed permanent secretary will step forward to announce, in Swedish and English, the winner of this year’s literature Nobel. A year ago it was Hungarian modernist László Krasznahorkai, for his “compelling and visionary oeuvre that in the midst of apocalyptic terror reaffirms the power of art”. 
Now prediction markets favour Indian writer Amitav Ghosh, the Chinese avant-garde author Can Xue or the American novelist Thomas Pynchon to win the SKr12mn (£910,000) in prize money — though nobody really knows, as today’s Academy is less leaky than it was before a #MeToo scandal prompted a sweeping overhaul. And the pundits usually guess wrong. 
The prize is ritually mocked. The Nigerian poet Chinweizu Ibekwe once marvelled at “the conceit that a gaggle of Swedes . . . should pronounce on intellectual excellence for the whole wide world”. British writer Tim Parks asks, unanswerably, how “Swedish professors” can compare an Indonesian poet with a Cameroonian novelist, both perhaps read in translation.
And yet, says Daniel Medin, professor of comparative literature at the American University of Paris: “The Nobel is the big one for international fiction. There is no comparison.” He itemises its three distinctive features: “It’s a prize for a body of work, by an international writer, that has more than a century of tradition behind it.” The Nobel shapes the global canon — even if the globe can push back. The award’s history also charts the evolution of literary taste. 
There has always been a comic discrepancy between the weight of the prize and the parochialism of the judges. The Academy’s 18 life members — known as “The Eighteen” — are Swedish writers, literary historians, linguists and a jurist, some of them obscure even in Sweden. There were barely any female members until this century.
Michael Sohlman, a former longtime executive director of the Nobel Foundation, whose grandfather was instrumental in ensuring the prizes were created, notes the perennial risk of “Nobelitis” that leads some in the prize’s orbit who confuse its importance with their own.
Yet Sohlman argues that Stockholm is a good place from which to judge world literature. The city is small but outward-looking. Its upper classes traditionally read English, French and German, and don’t kid themselves that their national literature is world-beating. Even so, the Academy has awarded Sweden eight Nobels — more than each of Asia, Africa, or Latin America.
The very first award, in 1901, made international news. Somehow nobody nominated Leo Tolstoy, whereas 17 members of the Académie Française endorsed the French poet Sully Prudhomme, and he won. The prize in its early years was treated as a competition between nations like the Olympics, says Sohlman.
But he thinks that “productive scandals” have helped make the award great. The literature prize has never been as controversial as the frankly political Peace Prize; but because greatness in literature is more subjective than in the sciences, the Academy’s choice reliably angers critics. They delight in drawing up lists of overlooked greats — James Joyce, Franz Kafka, Virginia Woolf, Marcel Proust, Constantine Cavafy, et cetera — though some of these achieved renown only after death.
The Academy’s permanent secretary when the prize began, Carl David af Wirsén, saw the job as crowning “the great men of continental [ie European] literature”. Women and non-Europeans couldn’t express universal truths. Admittedly, the Bengali Rabindranath Tagore won in 1913, but for his English translations of his Gitanjali prose poems.
WB Yeats, winner in 1923, wrote an account of his Nobel experience, “The Bounty of Sweden”, which captures the bewilderment that afflicts many laureates. When The Irish Times phones to say he has won, Yeats and his wife celebrate by cooking sausages. Heading to Stockholm for the ceremony with the Swedish king, Yeats sees faces staring in through the train window. He wonders what they are looking at, until someone explains they are looking at him. Fifty-five years later, the Yiddish writer Isaac Bashevis Singer strikes exactly the same tone: after a breakfast of eggs and bagels at his local drugstore on Miami Beach, he returns home to an unexpected phone call.
The prize soon acquired the prestige to certify entire “new” national literatures. The exotic beneficiary in 1930 was the US, when Sinclair Lewis became the first American laureate. The American winner of 1938, Pearl Buck, is remembered only as the prize’s chief dud. She faded into obscurity soon after writing her bestselling account of Chinese peasant life, The Good Earth. Buck was a first-time nominee, and that mis-step generated the unwritten rule that first-time nominees can’t win. 
The Academy tries to make choices that will look good decades later. It often fails. Many laureates, such as the German Rudolf Eucken (1908) and Paul von Heyse (1910) have vanished, along with Buck. But Medin doesn’t blame the Academy. Almost all writers fade away, he says. 
The Academician Kjell Espmark drew up an influential division of the award’s history into distinct periods. From 1946 through 1949, the Academy had a happy run of anointing literary pioneers: Hermann Hesse, André Gide, TS Eliot and the hitherto under-appreciated William Faulkner (who complained that the ceremony “was as long as a Mississippi funeral”).
One uncrowned pioneer was the American poet Ezra Pound. His applauding of the Holocaust on Italian Fascist radio had been “a ‘subhuman’ reaction”, said Academician and future UN secretary-general Dag Hammarskjöld. Where to draw the political line was a tricky judgment: Luigi Pirandello, who supported Fascism, won in 1934.
The prize was at its most politicised during the cold war, when the Academy chose the unreliable Soviet writer Boris Pasternak (1958) and dissidents Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1970) and Joseph Brodsky (1987). Pasternak initially accepted the nobelevka, as the award is popularly known in Russia — but then, under pressure from the regime, rejected “this undeserved prize which has been presented to me”. 
Jean-Paul Sartre, who refused the Nobel in 1964, noted among his reasons that the prize was “reserved for the writers of the West or the rebels of the East.” (Sartre also felt “tortured” by the “enormous sum” of prize money, “a very heavy burden”.)
Before the Academy crowned Solzhenitsyn, Sweden’s ambassador to Moscow warned that this “would lead to difficulties for our relations with the Soviet Union”. The Academy replied: “Yes, that could well be so, but we are agreed that Solzhenitsyn is the most deserving candidate.”
With the global decline of reading, the prize may never be so political again. Whereas Solzhenitsyn’s The Gulag Archipelago sold tens of millions of copies worldwide, today’s autocracies worry more about TikTok influencers.
From the late 1970s the Academy used the prize to draw attention to lesser-known talents such as Elias Canetti and Jaroslav Seifert. Medin says: “I know this from being on juries: there is always a pleasure if you can shape literary history.”
By the 1980s, the Academy — earlier than most of the western literary establishment — began looking beyond the west. This helped spur it into a more professional process. This starts with “qualified nominators” — members of literary institutions and academies, literature professors and previous laureates — who can propose winners. Some proposals consist of one word: “Sartre”, “Malraux”. Others are persuasive essays that push writers into contention. Certain writers such as Philip Roth (who never won) and Günter Grass (crowned in 1999) become semi-permanent candidates, considered year after year. 
Since 2021, a group of designated outside experts writes annual reports on their fields of expertise. Nobody can nominate themselves, though there’s a tradition of writers lobbying for the prize by giving talks in Gothenburg or Stockholm and then flirting with Academy members over drinks. 
A “Nobel Committee” of four or five academicians whittles down the nominations to a shortlist of five, which the Eighteen spend the summer reading. They decide in early October. 

Notable Nobels

Laureates in pictures
  • Sully Prudhomme (1901)

    Sully Prudhomme sits in a donkey-drawn cart on a cobblestone street, accompanied by a nun and two men.
    The French poet became the first winner of the prize after being endorsed by 17 members of the Académie Française
  • Rabindrath Tagore (1913)

    Rabindranath Tagore stands at the centre of a group of men and women, holding a bouquet.
    At a time when women and non-Europeans were largely ignored by the Academy, the Bengali Rabindranath Tagore won the prize — but for his English translations of his Gitanjali prose poems
  • Sinclair Lewis (1930) 

    Sinclair Lewis stands on a city street in Berlin, posing for a photographer operating a large camera on a tripod.
    By 1930 the prize had acquired the prestige to certify entire “new” national literatures, with Lewis becoming the first American laureate
  • Pearl Buck (1938) 

    Pearl Buck smiles while holding a bouquet of roses as she is greeted at Stockholm central station.
    The American winner is remembered only as the prize’s chief dud. She faded into obscurity soon after writing her bestselling account of Chinese peasant life, “The Good Earth”
  • Samuel Beckett (1969) 

    Samuel Beckett in a close-up black and white portrait, wearing round glasses and looking directly at the camera.
    Beckett was on holiday in Tunisia with his wife Suzanne when a telegram from his French publisher arrived: “In spite of everything, they have given you the Nobel Prize. I advise you to go into hiding”
  • Alexander Solzhenitsyn (1970)

    Alexander Solzhenitsyn is presented with the Nobel Prize for Literature, with an audience in formal attire.
    Sweden’s ambassador to Moscow warned the Academy that awarding the prize to Solzhenitsyn “would lead to difficulties for our relations with the Soviet Union”
  • Elfriede Jelinek (2004)

    Elfriede Jelinek sits with arms folded in front of a large abstract painting in her home outside Vienna.
    At the time of her Nobel win, Jelinek wasn't even a bestselling author in her native Austria. She despaired at being cast into the public eye
  • Doris Lessing (2007)

    Doris Lessing sits on a doorstep holding bouquets of flowers and cards after winning the Nobel Literature Prize.
    When Lessing won the Nobel, she was unpleasantly surprised to find reporters camped in her front garden and on hearing the news she replied: “Oh, Christ”
  • Bob Dylan (2016)

    Bob Dylan performs on stage, smiling and wearing a wide-brimmed hat and dark suit, with a drummer in the background.
    Dylan ignored the Academy’s phone calls and didn’t acknowledge the prize for over a fortnight. While his award was ridiculed, it also sparked a global debate on what constitutes literature
Yet now that they have to consider the entire world, where to start? Helpfully, many African and Asian candidates write in English, the language of 13 of the 31 laureates from 1991 (South Africa’s Nadine Gordimer) to 2021 (Abdulrazak Gurnah of Tanzania). 
And some academicians are influenced by two proofs of quality: a record of winning other major prizes, and being amply translated. A “universal” writer is someone whose work transcends their own language, says Medin.
Translation has become central to the award. A new book, Literary Translation and the Nobel Prize, edited by Paul Tenngart and Karl Ågerup, argues that translators can help make laureates. The translators of German-Jewish poet Nelly Sachs (winner in 1966), Pablo Neruda (1971) and Mo Yan (2012) all sat in the Swedish Academy. 
The Nobel has helped make the international canon more inclusive. After going global, the prize has recently become gender-equal. This followed a #MeToo scandal in 2017, when 18 women accused the French husband of Academician Katarina Frostenson of sexual assault and rape. He was later jailed. In a year of global scandals, this one was little noticed outside Sweden, but it remade the Academy. Several members quit — although the body’s rules forbid resignation — and the post-scandal “Eighteen” included many more women. They awarded the 2018 prize, a year late, to Polish writer Olga Tokarczuk, and there have been three female laureates since 2018. In fact, notes Kaj Schueler, author of a Swedish book on the prize, there’s been a precise pattern: male and female victories alternate. If that continues, then after Krasznahorkai’s win in 2025, this year’s laureate would be a woman, perhaps it will be Xue’s year? 
The winners’ reactions are part of the award’s lore. John Steinbeck in 1962, when asked whether he deserved the Nobel, replied, “Frankly, no”. (Many critics agreed.) Samuel Beckett (1969) was on holiday in Tunisia with his wife Suzanne when a telegram from his French publisher arrived: “In spite of everything, they have given you the Nobel Prize. I advise you to go into hiding.” Suzanne, when told the news, exclaimed, “Quelle catastrophe.” Beckett dubbed December 10, the annual date of the award ceremony, “Nobloodybeldamday”.
In 2007 Doris Lessing, clambering out of a taxi laden with groceries, was unpleasantly surprised to see reporters camped in her front garden. Told she had won, she exclaimed, “Oh, Christ.” Asked to elaborate, she said, “Well, it’s been going on now for thirty years. One can’t get more excited than one gets, you know.” 
In 2014, Peter Handke said, “They should finally abolish the Nobel Prize,” and then won it, controversially given his support for Serbian nationalism, in 2019. Bob Dylan, winner in 2016, ignored the Academy’s phone calls and didn’t acknowledge the prize for over a fortnight. 
Yet easy as it is to dismiss the prize, and its inevitable element of randomness, it matters. Dylan’s award was ridiculed but sparked a global debate on what constitutes literature. Gloriously, too, the prize is only concerned with a writer’s supposed quality, not their popularity: laureates Elfriede Jelinek (Austria, 2004) and Herta Müller (Germany and Romania, 2009) weren’t bestsellers even in their own countries.
The Nobelpreis-Effekt, as the Germans call it, can turbocharge sales. The month after short-story writer Alice Munro won in 2013, her sales jumped 4,424 per cent in her native Canada and 4,213 per cent (probably from a low base) in Italy. The beneficiaries are often small presses that are nowadays the most likely to publish literature in translation. In the English-language world, Fitzcarraldo in south-east London, with only six full-time employees, had four authors, Svetlana Alexievich, Tokarczuk, Annie Ernaux and Jon Fosse crowned from 2015 through 2023. If Ernaux’s books reach one kid in a faraway country who hadn’t heard of her before, the prize matters, says Medin. 
And it matters more in a world where book reviews and reading itself are in decline. Only the Nobel announcement can get a poet’s name trending on social media. Next Thursday’s announcement, with all its attendant scorn and outrage, is an ancient ritual that may be good for literature. 
Join our online book group on Facebook at FT Books Café and follow FT Weekend on Instagram, Blueskyand X

US book bans in public schools reach record annual high of 12,000

The Guardian – Texas tops list with 8,100 bans while Stephen King is again most banned author, PEN America finds: “The US saw almost 12,000 book bans in public schools during the 2025-2026 school year, the highest number in a single year, according to the free-expression non-profit PEN America. 

In a report released on Monday, PEN America said that there had been 34,000 instances of book bans since the organization started tallying the increasing “book censorship crisis” across US schools in 2021. PEN said that new state-level censorship laws fueled much of this increase, in conjunction with the implementation of artificial intelligence tools that remove an expansive number of titles. 

Texas saw the greatest number of book bans in the 2025-2026 school year – more than 8,100. PEN America’s report said this surge in Texas stemmed from the Texas law SB13, which bars extensive categories of books in schools. 

Florida had previously ranked No 1 in school book bans for the three previous years. The bans involved a “record number of unique titles” – exceeding 7,000 – involving more than 4,000 authors, illustrators and translators. Analysts found 114 school districts that banned books during the school year, “the highest number ever for a single year”…”