Tuesday, August 04, 2026

Want to Find Inner Peace? Be Quiet

 What Training My Chaotic Dog Taught Me About Power, Control — and Human Beings. “As any parent of a toddler knows, being morally liable for something that is incapable of moral liability is a fraught and stressful business.”




This video from Kurzgesagt is a great little primer on how the human brain stores memories.

Memory is one of the strangest abilities you possess. Your brain uses an incredibly complex biological system to preserve moments from your past that no longer exist, allowing you to revisit experiences from years ago. But memories are not always recordings of reality. In fact, every time a memory comes under the spotlight of your attention, it can melt and change a tiny bit.

What exactly is a memory, how is a moment in time stored inside your brain, and why does remembering something slowly rewrite the story of your life?


A List of 59 Sexually and Physically Abusive ICE and Border Agents

 “But we have no way of knowing the full extent of the problem, because the agency doesn’t even look at family court records. What we do know is that ICE and Border Patrol agents have a disturbing track record of sexually and violently abusing women and children, including members of their own families. These are not people who should be given guns and free rein to roam U.S. communities. Their job is to enforce civil laws, but they act like they live in the wild west, and are killing people in our streets. 

Congress has to stop writing blank checks to these agencies and start enforcing order and accountability.” The report documents 59 cases of violent and/or sexual criminal acts by DHS employees, primarily carried out against women and children. It puts the criminal behavior of these agents in context with the agencies’ cultures, as well as recent policy changes that bode dangerously for public safety. DHS has further loosened agent vetting, hiring, and training standards, eliminated accountability, and expanded the types of dangerous tactics agents are authorized to use in the enforcement of civil immigration laws. 

“The exponential growth of immigrant deaths in detention — and the opening up of a new killing field, deaths of civilians on U.S. streets — is directly related to all of these factors,” said Tramonte. The OIA report calls on Congress to freeze the ICE and Border Patrol budgets; legislate real vetting and accountability measures; and create an immigration enforcement system that operates civilly, rather than chaotically, quasi-criminally, and with deadly outcomes…” 


Want to Find Inner Peace? Be Quiet

As happens for many people, my 30s were a decade of belated culminations: marriage, children, professional achievement (for me, the publication of novels and a teaching job). However, it all refused to settle into place. My wife and I struggled to get along. Parenthood was sometimes “all joy and no fun.” The novels received critical praise but sold modestly, and the teaching job was 1,500 miles from where my wife wanted, and continued, to live.

I didn’t know what would help, but I knew what wouldn’t: talking about it.

I had spent two decades in and out of therapy, to some insight but little transformation. Ditto for the couples therapy my wife and I had undertaken. I also felt like I’d been talking nonstop since immigrating as a child from the Soviet Union. In America, English became a dangerous tool to persuade elite institutions to give me the things that my elders had said mattered: approval, access, funding, employment. My Soviet-child shyness turned into garrulousness, then logorrhea. I chattered, people clapped, the doors to opportunity opened. I rarely felt at home on the inside but I enjoyed a superficial sense of arrival.

Then there was the noise of just being American. (There was virtually no commercial advertising in the Soviet Union. Think about that for a minute.) Social media exists to terrify us of quiet and solitude. My phone had become a postmodern crack pipe: I knew it was killing me, yet I couldn’t put it down. I felt ill from talking and noise. But that’s all I knew how to do.

So when, two years ago, an acquaintance mentioned to me an annual visit she made to a silent retreat, I cautiously probed for details. Was it a wellness-type thing? Was there yoga? It was the antithesis of luxury, she said: an ecumenical contemplative Christian community in the middle of Georgia, with monastic quarters, silent meals and daily prayer, for $60 a night. It didn’t even have a website.


I’m not a Christian, but I was desperate. I wrote to Oliver Ferrari, a monastic brother in the community, and we settled on several days that December. As the date approached, my thrill at the prospect of unspecified liberation turned to terror. I had never been alone with myself for that long.

The retreat had been started in 1987 by two friends: Fay Key, a civil-rights advocate who longed to enact Jesus’ command to “come away to a lonely place and pray,” and Steve Bullington, a Methodist pastor. I arrived to find a chapel and several modest residences bordered by fields for soybeans and hay. It’s the kind of place where the shower doesn’t shoot straight and the communal jar of almond butter has marks from every spoon that has used it, a sanctuary as plain as its setting. “No majestic mountains, no roaring sea,” as Fay once wrote in a memoir. “I sometimes say there is nothing here but God.”

I was placed in a one-room cottage flanked by a statue of St. Francis and a lowland of sweet gums and broomsedge. It had a twin bed, a wall-mounted propane heater and a compost toilet. The only sound came from pecans thumping the roof. I handed over my laptop and phone and, suddenly, there was nothing to do. I decided to go outside and, Georgia weather being generous even in winter, walk the soybean field. After I circled it, I kept going. I wanted to feel more of the soil and the sun, so I took off my shoes and shirt. Perhaps because I had finally stopped talking, I heard the call of birds. At one point, I stood on an oak uprooted by Hurricane Helene, its bark like the scales of a prehistoric animal, and just surveyed existence.

I was rediscovering the physical world — so this is what all those people meant by being present. No object was too humble to convey the glory of its existence. Passing an ancient Toyota Corolla, I thought, “That steering wheel is solid and true.” The last time I thought such a thing, I was a very stoned undergraduate — that is, more open to the essence of things. I remembered why I was always telling my students that concreteness was sacred in fiction. That week, I sat with myself, in silence, far longer than I imagined I could. “The law of growth is rest,” as the British ecclesiastical artist Caryll Houselander once wrote.

Out in the world, I was always focused on the next move. Here, so little was necessary to feel not only content but ecstatic: simple meals that concluded with prayer and readings; fields to walk in the quiet and warmth; sincerity in the way I was asked after; acceptance when I dared to answer honestly. (At the retreat, meals are largely silent — quiet is the default — but communication isn’t forbidden.) Between the sometimes transactional nature of my professional life and how busy we all seem to be, it had been a long time since anyone had looked me directly in the eyes, as Fay, Steve and Oliver did.

What E
lse Do We Lose When People Give Up Booze?

In the desert of the self created by monastic silence, electronic detachment, and genuine fellowship, it suddenly seemed very clear that the main purpose of existence was love. I wanted to rush home to show love to my children, to my wife, to the parents who gave me everything except what they couldn’t. No matter how many places of worship I’ve visited, that’s the only definition of God that’s ever made sense to me.

I came home with ecstatic intentions of renewal. But I couldn’t make the retreat’s lessons work outside the retreat, where I was again overwhelmed by technology, parental duty and marital discord. My relationship deteriorated. A new novel, which I considered my best, failed, even critically. It was, like all my novels, about the irreconcilability of the multiple identities some of us carry within us. The retreat had shown me that these identities might be reconcilable, after all; perhaps the reading public was waiting for me to catch up to the lesson. Either way, I felt as if my speaking superpower had left me. The imaginary judges I’d long strained to dazzle were no longer impressed, if they’d ever been.
I attended the retreat for a second time last December. I was grateful for the respite even if the effect wasn’t as psychedelic. One afternoon, Oliver and I took a walk around the soybean field. It was a colder winter, the sunlight harsher. Again, I was there during Advent, “a season of waiting,” as Steve had put it. After a day of silence, speaking felt like communicating through the voice of another.

“You know, they’re not fancy, the people in there,” Oliver said, seemingly out of nowhere, gesturing toward the 1920s tenant farmhouse where everyone on retreat took their meals. “But they’re good people.” He meant that very few of the people who came on retreat were in pursuit of public acclaim. They were hardly free of struggles and questions. But they were gifted people, often in ways few others were, and sought to make a better world.

When I returned to my cottage, I reread parts of a memoir that Oliver had written, lines about “the relief of not having to be anybody special” and instruction “in the art of being myself.” The question had bewildered me from the moment I had encountered, as an immigrant child, the very non-Soviet maxim “Be yourself.” How can you be yourself when this country was made for reinvention and reaching, and people you cared about seemed to want you only if you became someone different?

The answer has taken time — things happen instantaneously only in the make-believe world of tech — but it began to take shape that afternoon. I had to find the courage to give up on an immigrant’s false dream of belonging. No one should have to work that hard to find community. I was so good at faking the fellowship that it took me a long time to realize it was fake. I would never belong among most of the people I’d been trying to impress all these years. My adopted home was elsewhere, even if I had yet to find out where.

I returned from the retreat with knit hats for the kids, a gift from Fay. When they are older, I will read to them from her book: “The soul-sized task of every small monastic community is to stand in the rubble and dream.” If they ever feel lost, I hope I am around to tell them that it may take time, but if their hearts are good, and their companions true, it might mean they are finally on their way to finding their way. They just need to fall silent, so they can hear themselves better.

Yes, Trump Will Attempt a Coup

 ‘I Would Never Do This To You:’ Protesting Flock, Arizona Man Presents Plan to Surveil Government Officials 404 Media


Why are American ambulances so expensive? In part because Medicare pays only a fraction of the actual cost of an ambulance ride and the uninsured often don’t pay at all, so the privately insured get bills of $13,000 for a $2600 ride.




An intimate yet globally-minded documentary following filmmaker Kane Guglielmi as he questions the economic and political systems that have come to shape modern life.

Raised within a conservative, capitalist-minded family, Guglielmi travels across eight countries, including Australia, to learn alternative models that prioritise compassion, community and shared prosperity.

Common Wealth

Yes, Trump Will Attempt a Coup

The American Prospect: “…On January 6, 2021, Trump attempted to stage a coup and he will surely try again. Last time, only the integrity of a handful of Republican officials spared the Republic that fate. Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, rebuffed Trump’s demand to find exactly 11,780 votes, and Vice President Mike Pence refused to go along with Trump’s scheme, laid out in detail by John Eastman, to refuse to certify the results. This time, Trump is relying on four possible strategies to steal the election. The survival of our democracy depends on whether each of them can be foiled, and how.

  • The first is to use executive orders and directives to gain control of voter rolls, which will then be purged using commercial databases that are rife with errors.  These demands were spelled out in detail in Trump’s executive order of March 31. The order also required the U.S. Postal Service to deny mail balloting to states that did not comply with Trump directives.
  • Trump’s second strategy is to somehow get Congress to pass his SAVE America Act, which could require proof of citizenship and photo ID for people to register and vote, and otherwise turn control of elections over to the federal executive.
  • In the run-up to the November elections, the focus will shift to strategy number three: voter suppression, intimidation, and election disruption, both before and on Election Day. Democratic state attorneys generalhave been having regular “tabletop” exercises to anticipate Trump tactics and counter them.
  • The most alarming Trump tactic would be an echo of January 6, 2021: an effort to stage a coup by overturning the results. The Constitution provides in Article I, Section 5 that each house of Congress is the sole judge of its membership. But actual election results are certified by the states. Courts have repeatedly held that such certification is mandatory.


The American People Need the Truth About the Iran War

The Atlantic – Gift Article: “For nearly five months, Donald Trump and his Cabinet have been misleading the American people about the war in Iran. When the president makes statements about the war, they are full of wishful thinking, hyperbole, and outright lies. He has devoted a full address to the topic only once—a rambling prime-time speech nearly four months ago that contained little substance. 

At this point, after more than 20 weeks of hostilities and at least 18 Americans dead and hundreds wounded, the people of the United States do not—cannot—entirely know what is happening, what progress U.S. forces are making, or what the president’s goals are. 

This opacity seems to be by design: The president and his lieutenants appear unwilling to admit that they started, and are now losing, a war with one of America’s most dedicated enemies, and obfuscating probably seems less damaging than admitting this painful truth. Of course, some of their statements are merely mistakes. Some are spin. Others are exaggerations. But many of them are flat lies that Trump and his appointees dump into the public square seemingly without hesitation.

 Consider the number of times Trump has said that the war is over or almost over, such as his April 17 declaration to USA Today that the fight to reopen the Strait of Hormuz is “over, it’s a great victory.” (He has made other claims of imminent victory at least 30 times, by one count.) He has insisted for months that the Iranian military is finished and that it has nothing left, as he did in the first week of the war when he said: “We’ve decimated their whole evil empire.” (He made similar claims at least half a dozen times in the first month of the war alone.) 

He has said that Iranian nuclear materials must be handed over, then said that the same materials are worthless and can stay where they are, and now has gone back to arguing that ending the Iranian nuclear program is the most important goal of the war. All of these claims are dominoes that were set up to fall, one after another, by the single most egregious mistake that Trump made when choosing to go to war: He bet on quick regime change in a terrorist dictatorship and had no other plan should his long shot fall short. 

Perhaps Trump, after talking with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, believed the optimistic scenarios of a rapid regime collapse that Netanyahu and others floated. Trump’s own secretary of state reportedly warned the president that he was being sold “bullshit.” Nonetheless, despite Trump’s statement on the first night of the war offering a jumble of rationalizations, he at least made clear that he intended to topple the regime…”

Hockey defends Lee family : The annual tax time crackdown and the myth of enforcement

 


Hockey defends Lee family, saying ATO chases ‘every wealthy person’


Former treasurer Joe Hockey said it was normal for wealthy people to be embroiled in disputes with the Australian Taxation Office as the businessman defended his role as chairman of the Lee family office, which had been pursued by authorities over $273 million in unpaid taxes.

Hockey, who launched his own consulting firm Bondi Partners after a long political and diplomatic career, suggested criticism of the Lee family office, and in particular its chief executive Felix Lee, could be fuelled by racism.

Former Treasurer Joe Hockey has come to the defence of Felix Lee, following reports that Anthony Albanese attended a fundraising dinner with the Lee family. Michaela Pollock

The family first came to prominence after it was revealed that Phillip Dong Fang Lee had gambled more than $2.2 billion through Star Entertainment’s Sydney casino over 15 years. Attention returned to the family this year after The Australian Financial Review’s Rear Window column revealed that Felix Lee had hosted a fundraiser for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

Guests at the fundraiser, held in the Lee family’s Point Piper mansion in July, included Commonwealth Bank boss Matt Comyn, the bank’s former boss David Murray and HSBC’s former Australian CEO, Antony Shaw.

On the sidelines of the Diggers & Dealers Conference in Kalgoorlie, where he was a keynote speaker, Hockey said he was not concerned about the source of the Lee family’s wealth. “I wouldn’t have been part of it [if he was]. It’s totally above board. I know it’s totally above board,” he said.


“Just be very careful about racism here,” he added. “[Felix Lee] is Australian-born, an Australian citizen, he has one passport. I and others wouldn’t be involved in this process if we weren’t absolutely sure that, you know, [the source of Lee’s wealth] is very genuine, very real.”

“His family made money out of infrastructure in China. So what? What’s wrong with that? Everyone over here is making money out of China. It’s getting a bit out of control. I’m worried that there’s a sort of racism that’s driving things, and that’s really regrettable.”

Albanese has repeatedly refused to answer direct questions about the fundraiser hosted by Felix Lee, 25, or how much money had been donated to the Labor Party. Last month, asked on the ABC’s Insiders program whether he had dined at the Lee family’s house, Albanese said: “I attend lots of dinners in lots of places, and I don’t talk about private dinners.”

When asked about the donation and whether it had been paid to the Labor Party, Hockey said: “Oh, I don’t know anything about that.”

The donation and the dinner have been controversial because the Lee family has been embroiled not only in the Bell review into money laundering at Star Sydney, but in a long dispute with the ATO over $273 million. A settlement was secured in 2022, although the ATO appeared on the deed of security for the Point Piper home, known as Mandalay, one year later.

“Every wealthy person in Australia seems to have had a disagreement with the ATO. So what?” Hockey said in Kalgoorlie on Monday.

The former treasurer made a number of other remarks at the conference, a major event for the mining industry in Western Australia, suggesting that the Coalition should learn from the rise of populist politicians in the United States and the United Kingdom on how to deal with One Nation.

“Governing a country is very different to being, you know, a popular movie. I’ve had this conversation with Nigel Farage as well. Donald Trump learnt it in his first term. It’s easy to get elected. It’s hard to govern,” he said.

“If the Coalition needs to have a partnership with One Nation to change the government ... they’ve got to respond to that.”

 covers resource companies for The Australian Financial Review, based in Perth. He formerly worked for the Financial Times in London and Hong Kong. Connect with Mark on Twitter. Email Mark at mark.wembridge@nine.com.au
 covers private companies and family offices from the AFR’s Sydney newsroom. Primrose was previously a correspondent for the Financial Times and worked in Canberra. Message Primrose on Signal: Primrose.55 or https://tinyurl.com/PrimroseSignalConnect with Primrose on Twitter. Email Primrose at primrose.riordan@afr.com


The annual tax time crackdown and the myth of enforcement


A former ATO insider says the usual crackdown on expenses is just a nod to protecting revenue, as the agency’s epic enforcement powers are wasted in the fight against multinational tax offenders.
Liam Malone

August 2, 2026 
The ATO has a serious lack of field presence in the tax non-compliance space. Picture: NewsWire / Josie Hayden
The ATO has a serious lack of field presence in the tax non-compliance space. Picture: NewsWire / Josie Hayden
    We are in tax time now and the ATO is busy spruiking the message to the salary and wage taxpayers in particular. They are the bread and butter, the low hanging fruit. The base and easier revenue must be collected as going after the non-compliant taxpayers, who pay no or too low tax, is hard work. Tax agents and accountants are willing participants in the annual scare campaign as there is an opportunity to increase their own revenue. 
    It is interesting to read the feedback comments when such tax time articles are published with the theme of the ATO cracking down on some particular expense. The average punter is rightfully cynical and commonly refer to multinational tax avoidance and evasion and others ripping off the system.
    The ATO rarely uses its formal access powers. These legislative powers enable the ATO to access taxpayer’s premises to inspect documentation, records – paper based and electronic. The ATO annual reports state the number of occasions that access powers were exercised: In the 2024-25: 32. In 2023-24: 58. In 2022-23: 52.
    So in Australia with a population of 28 million, the ATO is basically using its formal access powers a few dozen times a year. This indicates a serious lack of ATO field presence in the tax non-compliance space. Auditors are conducting mainly desk based audits. There are thousands of ATO formal information notices issued each year but most of these are bank information notices. 
    The property, building and construction industry has the worse tax compliance record and the most dodgy practices. In recent years, there have been numerous cases of phoenix behaviour and phony labour hire companies. The revenue loss relating to income tax, GST and PAYGW (employee tax withheld) has been substantial. 
    Such widespread tax evasion is frequently planned meticulously in advance in the way the numerous entities are structured. There is a network of dodgy accountants, lawyers and insolvency practitioners to facilitate such practices. Frequently, the ATO has been very overdue in taking any enforcement action. The ATO is not effective at using proactive intelligence actions to cut off the evasion. The debts are allowed to build without appropriate ATO action. 
    If taxpayer self-reported tax obligations and ATO audit related obligations cannot be collected then they are just entries on a page. It’s reported as revenue, but if it is not collected it is useless. Effective debt collection is paramount. 
    The Australian Taxation Office (ATO), Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) and Australian Border Force (ABF) acting together.
    The Australian Taxation Office (ATO), Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) and Australian Border Force (ABF) acting together.
    In May 2026 the Tax Ombudsman released a report that complaints against the ATO are up 127 per cent compared to the same period in the previous financial year. This particular extract from the report caught my attention: “We continue to engage with the ATO to encourage them to differentiate between those who won’t pay from those who can’t pay their debts.”
    This analysis is consistent with my own experience working in the ATO bureaucracy. The ATO fails at this basic stuff that is not rocket science. It involves the proper use of judgement. 
    It is entirely reasonable to expect the ATO to be able to decide whether a taxpayer is genuinely engaging with the system or not. In the rare cases where it may be line ball, then give the taxpayer the benefit of the doubt. 
    The ATO has several thousand staff who work entirely in the debt collection area. This is adequate staffing, however the outcomes are not there. Debt owed to the ATO continues to escalate out of control. The ATO annual report for 2024-25 puts collectable debt owed to the ATO at $54.6bn. This figure had more than doubled over the previous 6 years. 
    ATO debt collection practices mean that the majority of cases are not individually allocated to a debt collection officer. This is unfortunate as case allocation means more personal accountability for outcomes. In a system where many necessary case actions are just streamed to the next available debt officer, then frequently the result is a less effective and efficient operation. 
    The ATO’s own compliance model, a pyramid model, provides for firmer compliance strategies to deal with poorer taxpayer behaviours and attitudes to compliance. At the apex of the pyramid are the taxpayers that have decided not to comply. The model states that the ATO should use the full force of the law in these cases. 
    In practice, the ATO makes scant use of the “full force of the law”. The ATO compliance model is a good document but there needs to be more enforcement action at the top of the pyramid.
    The public expects the ATO to collect the tax that is due and to go after those who are doing the wrong thing. The ATO’s main goal is to protect the revenue. It needs to get better at doing that and lift its game. 
    Liam Malone was an ATO auditor for 19 years across two periods of service. He led audits and reviews of multinational company groups and serious non-compliance audit cases, including a secondment to the AFP investigating tax schemes