Friday, November 14, 2025

Does more choice give us more freedom?


We live in a world built on the idea that freedom equals choice — and choice equals freedom. We get to choose what to buy, what to believe, who to love, where to live. 

We can go onto the internet and be overwhelmed with options, we can swipe right or left on a dating app to choose a potential life partner, we go to a restaurant and are given a menu of choices. Every day, we're told that the more options we have, the freer we are.

But what if the very thing we thought defined our freedom — our ability to choose — was actually overwhelming us?

A new history explains how choice has evolved to dominate modern life.

 Does more choice give us more freedom?


What Mamdani Learned from His Mother’s Films. “How the ethics of the acclaimed filmmaker Mira Nair echo in her son’s politics.”


ROAD ATLAS To Rome:  Massive New Map Reveals 300,000 Km of Ancient Roman Roads.



 Georgi Gospodinov Q & A

       At the Literary Hub translator Angela Rodel has a Q & A with the Death and the Gardener-author, in Georgi Gospodinov on the Loss of His Father and Writing About Death


  New Swedish Book Review


       The 2025:2 issue of the Swedish Book Review is now online -- lots of material, including excerpts and reviews.
       Among the excerpts: a bit from Hjalmar Söderberg's Astray



Why is it that the rich always seem to win?

Thomas Piketty called it the most important formula in economics: it’s R > G , which means that the rate of return on capital (R)
Read the full article…


EU agrees to open Horizon research fund to defence projects Euractiv


She’s 93 and still job searching. Why older Americans work, even if they’re sick. Business Insider 


Germany set to boost Ukraine aid by 3 billion euros in 2026 Reuters

 

The European Court of Human Rights: judges above politics Thomas Fazi

 

Former EU Justice Chief Charged in Belgian Laundering Case EuroWeekly. What is going on in Belgium?

 

Emergency security meeting after drones disrupt Brussels Airport and military bases Brussels Times

 

Belgian Minister Tells Russia to ‘Calm Down’ — Using Selena Gomez Song in a Nuclear FeudInternational Business Times


Thursday, November 13, 2025

Australia finds that AI can clone voices from just a photo

 


Google says its new AI powered defenses block 10 billion scam calls and texts on Android each month
 
China sentences five to death for operating scam compounds
 
Europol takes down three large credit card fraud operations; 18 arrested; used stolen card numbers to launder fraud money; over €300 million in losses
 
Digital Arrest Scams.  There is much angst in India about this type of fraud. But from reading articles about this, I’m not sure there is agreement about just what this consists of. It does seem to begin with a call from a law enforcement impersonator, claiming that the victim has been involved and threatening arrest. Beyond that I’m not sure if this is actually a different pitch than the scams we see that tell victims that they need to move their money to the caller to keep it “safe.”  So it may be just a new term for a fraud that we already see. But I’m be interested in hearing from anyone that knows more than I.
 
Need an expert witness for consumer protection or fraud issues?  Let me know.
Fraud Studies: Here are links to the studies I’ve written for the Better Business Bureau: puppy fraudromance fraud; BEC fraudsweepstakes/lottery fraud,  tech support fraudromance fraud money mulescrooked movers, government impostersonline vehicle sale scamsrental fraud, gift cards,  free trial offer frauds,  job scams,  online shopping fraud,  fake check fraud and crypto scams
 
Fraud News Around the world Humor Artificial Intelligence and deep fake fraudBenefit Theft Scam CompoundsBitcoin and Crypto FraudRansomware and data breachesRomance Fraud and Sextortion 

Lottery markets in everything.

 Lottery markets in everything.


There’s a Right To Record ICE Raids–and There’s No Blanket Immunity for Raiders

Cato Institute – “One of the striking features of the present administration is the regularity with which its leaders, from President Donald Trump on down, confidently describe the state of the law in ways entirely contrary to what had been seen as settled, on topics that range from flag burning to Congress’s TikTok ban to whether civil servants can be removed on a partisan basis. 

Sometimes, these proclamations may herald an effort to persuade courts to change prevailing doctrine, but at least as often they look more like an attempt to alter reality by establishing new legal facts on the ground. On October 24, influential White House adviser Stephen Miller appeared on Fox News when the issue of whether authorities in Illinois could prosecute misbehaving federal immigration agents under state law arose. 

Miller responded, “To all ICE officers: you have federal immunity in the conduct of your duties. And anybody who lays a hand on you or tries to stop or obstruct you is committing a felony.” Whatever that is, it is not an accurate description of the state of the law. As Professor Steve Vladeck explains in this brief write-up, the actual rules are more complicated. 

There is indeed a zone of so-called Supremacy Clause immunity that will apply when “(1) the federal officer was performing an act that he was authorized to do by federal law; and (2) in performing the authorized act, the federal officer did no more than what was necessary and proper.” When either condition is not satisfied—when the agent is taking an unauthorized action or is acting under authorization but in a manner that exceeds what is necessary and proper—the immunity based on federal supremacy ends. 

As Vladeck notes, the prevailing rule in this category of immunity was formulated by Judge Michael McConnell, a conservative hero, and it does indeed allow state prosecutors to use state law to pursue instances of misbehavior by ICE agents.

Here’s another instance: in a piece at The Dispatch earlier this month, I tell how high administration officials, including Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and department spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin, have repeatedly spoken as if citizens have no right to photograph or video record ICE raids or identify the officers by name. 

McLaughlin said, “Videotaping ICE law enforcement and posting photos and videos of them online is doxing our agents,” and added, “We will prosecute those who illegally harass ICE agents to the fullest extent of the law.” Noem went even further, describing “violence” against DHS agents as “anything that threatens them and their safety, so it is doxing them. It is videotaping them where they’re at.” In point of fact, however, the courts

aren’t on board with that sort of nonsense. While the Supreme Court itself hasn’t yet faced the issue squarely, the seven federal circuits that have done so—the 1st3rd5th7th9th10th, and 11th—all agree that the First Amendment protects the right to record police performing their duties in public.* Those circuits cover such populous states as California, Texas, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, Georgia, and Pennsylvania…”

Rethinking Risks - ATO SES high-flyers - Epstein files on archive FBI Tries to Unmask Owner of Infamous Archive.is Site

ATO SES high-flyers collect another year of $60,000+ bonuses

ATO second commissioners have banked big “at-risk” bonuses while the agency faces a gaping revenue gap.
Julian Bajkowski NOV 13, 2025


ATO second commissioner David Allen. (Image: Accountant Daily)
Three of the Australian Taxation Office’s second commissioners have again collected hefty performance bonus payments of more than $60,000 each, despite a yawning revenue collection gap and wholesale collapse in tobacco excise.
Revealed in the ATO’s latest annual report, the persistently controversial bonuses are awarded only to second commissioners at the ATO and are cemented in place by way of conditions and entitlements set by the Remuneration Tribunal.
Second commissioners of the ATO, David Allen, Kirsten Fish, and Jeremy Hirschhorn, are all recorded as collecting five-figure performance bonuses for the 2024-2025 financial year.


Second commissioners of the ATO, David Allen, Kirsten Fish, and Jeremy Hirschhorn, are all recorded as collecting five-figure performance bonuses for the 2024-2025 financial year.

Allen scored a $64,290 bonus while Fish and Hirschhorn both collected $68,166 each in bonus payments.

Known as the “Principal Executive Office (PEO) Structure”, the bonus payments are essentially baked into second commissioner appointment contracts for the life of their seven-year terms, although the granting of the bonuses is understood to be formally approved by the commissioner of taxation, conditional on satisfactory executive performance.

What’s less publicly discussed is what’s required to achieve the meaty ‘at risk’ performance bonus or the definition of a “principal executive officer” as set out above, and who makes the PEO call.

Essentially, it’s a minister’s call to make a declaration that a position is a PEO as set out in the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973, according to the most recent PEO guidelines that date back to 2020.

The designation of PEOs dates back to 1988, following reforms for government business enterprises. The positions are, almost entirely, the top executive positions at enterprises that range from the National Gallery of Australia to the Australia Strategic Policy Institute.

The exceptions to the ‘number one-boss’ convention are the ATO’s second commissioners and deputy governors of the Reserve Bank of Australia, both of which attract Tier 1 travel entitlements.

That said, no bonuses were paid to executives at the RBA according to its latest annual report.

It was a different story over at Australia Post, where “at-risk variable remuneration” was just under half (47.8%) of chief postie Paul Graham’s $3.3 million FY2025 payday.

The ATO pointed back to the Remuneration Tribunal regarding its bonus structure.

“As principal executive office holders (PEOs), ATO second commissioners are entitled to receive performance pay in accordance with the Remuneration Tribunal’s (Principal Executive Offices—Classification Structure and Terms and Conditions) Determination and the Remuneration Tribunal’s Guide to the PEO Structure,” an ATO spokesperson told The Mandarin.

“Performance pay for second commissioners is an ‘at-risk’ payment subject to the achievement of agreed performance outcomes, which are set annually and include:

  • achievement of organisational and individual group strategic objectives and deliverables identified in the ATO corporate plan;
  • consistent role modelling and championing of the ATO Leadership Strategy key attributes; and
  • delivery of government programs and initiatives.”

What’s less clear is where the mindset of the treasurer and prime minister is on the retention of the distinctly neoliberal construct of performance bonuses and at-risk pay in the Australian Public Service.

On that front, the ATO is, quite firmly, not speculating.


*Rethinking Risk: the regulator’s perspective (and some musings on risk watermelons)


Primary Source of Epstein Emails: Oversight Committee Releases Additional Epstein Estate Documents


For folks (and journalists) who want to search the Oversight Committee email texts, I made a database for searching the 20k text files


House passes bill to reopen government as new Epstein revelations roil US politics – live


More Articles Are Now Created by AI Than Humans


FBI Tries to Unmask Owner of Infamous Archive.is Site

404 Media: “The FBI is attempting to unmask the owner behind archive.today, a popular archiving site that is also regularly used to bypass paywalls on the internet and to avoid sending traffic to the original publishers of web content, according to a subpoena posted by the website. The FBI subpoena says it is part of a criminal investigation, though it does not provide any details about what alleged crime is being investigated. 

Think ICE Is Bad Now? Today the Border Patrol Is Taking It Over

How Gregory Bovino Proudly Became Trump’s #1 Immigration Stormtrooper – “A big part of this newsletter, amid the onrushing tide of news and never-ending flurry of scandal, is to mark when something major changes in our national fabric.

 Last night, something did — and you probably haven’t even heard about it yet. In a sweeping purge that affected cities from Denver to Philadelphia, the ICE leadership across about half of the country was removed — making room to replace them with leaders from the Border Patrol and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). 

“The mentality is CBP does what they’re told, and the administration thinks ICE isn’t getting the job done,” a DHS official told NBC News, one of the few outlets to report on the purge as it happened last evening. “So CBP will do it.”

  • NBC reported that the move was led by Corey Lewandowski, the mastermind behind much of DHS’s enforcement operations, and Greg Bovino, a Border Patrol executive who has been the literal face of much of the agency’s most aggressive (and illegal!) tactics.
  • It’s an important recognition of a nuanced point: There are really two separate armed gangs rampaging on America’s streets — while ICE has been primarily leading the way on detentions across the country, ambushing people in places like the hallways outside immigration courts in New York City, it’s really been CBP’s Border Patrol that is terrorizing the residents of places of Chicago, Portland, and Los Angeles. (The two are now so blob-like that The Atlantic even used a photo of CBP officers to illustrate its article on how badly ICE’s hiring surge is going.) In the race to become America’s secret police and Trump’s goon-squad-of-choice, CBP’s military-style tactics on our streets appears to be winning — laws be damned…”

How Gregory Bovino Proudly Became Trump’s #1 Immigration Stormtrooper – “A big part of this newsletter, amid the onrushing tide of news and never-ending flurry of scandal, is to mark when something major changes in our national fabric. Last night, something did — and you probably haven’t even heard about it yet. 

In a sweeping purge that affected cities from Denver to Philadelphia, the ICE leadership across about half of the country was removed — making room to replace them with leaders from the Border Patrol and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). “The mentality is CBP does what they’re told, and the administration thinks ICE isn’t getting the job done,” a DHS official told NBC News, one of the few outlets to report on the purge as it happened last evening. “So CBP will do it.”

  • NBC reported that the move was led by Corey Lewandowski, the mastermind behind much of DHS’s enforcement operations, and Greg Bovino, a Border Patrol executive who has been the literal face of much of the agency’s most aggressive (and illegal!) tactics.
  • It’s an important recognition of a nuanced point: There are really two separate armed gangs rampaging on America’s streets — while ICE has been primarily leading the way on detentions across the country, ambushing people in places like the hallways outside immigration courts in New York City, it’s really been CBP’s Border Patrol that is terrorizing the residents of places of Chicago, Portland, and Los Angeles. (The two are now so blob-like that The Atlantic even used a photo of CBP officers to illustrate its article on how badly ICE’s hiring surge is going.) In the race to become America’s secret police and Trump’s goon-squad-of-choice, CBP’s military-style tactics on our streets appears to be winning — laws be damned…”

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Is spyware hiding on your phone? How to find and remove it – fast

 


Are We Losing Our Democracy?

Opinion, The Editorial Board, The New York Times, October 31, 2025. Gift Article – Countries that slide from democracy toward autocracy tend to follow similar patterns. To measure what is happening in the United States, the Times editorial board has compiled a list of 12 markers of democratic erosion, with help from scholars who have studied this phenomenon. 

The sobering reality is that the United States has regressed, to different degrees, on all 12. Our country is still not close to being a true autocracy, in the mold of Russia or China. But once countries begin taking steps away from democracy, the march often continues. We offer these 12 markers as a warning of how much Americans have already lost and how much more we still could lose.

No. 1: Authoritarian takeovers in the modern era often do not start with a military coup. They instead involve an elected leader who uses the powers of the office to consolidate authority and make political opposition more difficult, if not impossible. Think of Vladimir Putin in Russia, Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela and, to lesser degrees, Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Turkey, Viktor Orban in Hungary and Narendra Modi in India. These leaders have repressed dissent and speech in heavy-handed ways. Over the past year, President Trump and his allies have impinged on free speech to a degree that the federal government has not since perhaps the Red Scare of the 1940s and 1950s. His administration pressuredtelevision stations to stop airing Jimmy Kimmel’s talk show when Mr. Kimmel criticized Trump supporters after the murder of Charlie Kirk; revoked the visas of foreign students for their views on the war in Gaza; and ordered investigations of liberal nonprofit groups. Mr. Trump so harshly criticizes people who disagree with him, including federal judges, that they become targets of harassment from his supporters…


Is spyware hiding on your phone? How to find and remove it – fast

ZDNet:

  • Spyware can secretly track, record, and steal data from your phone.
  • Watch for strange behavior, data spikes, or unknown apps as signs.
  • Use antivirus tools, update often, and avoid untrusted app sources.

Spyware is a threat to your personal security and privacy that you may not know is on your smartphone. 

But what is spyware? It’s a form of malware, often packaged as a legitimate mobile application, that may steal your information, track your location, record your conversations, monitor your social media activity, screenshot your actions, and more. 

It may land on your handset through phishing, as a fake mobile application, or via a once-trustworthy app updated over the air to become an information stealer…”


Private rooms in a nursing home do not seem to help individuals


 “We find that the height of Americans began to decline among those born around or before the early 1980s in parallel with the diminution in the rate of increase of life expectancy. The decline in adult height ranged from 0·68 ± 0.36 cm among white women to 1·97 ± 0.50 cm among Hispanic men and is statistically significant across all six demographic groups considered.”  Link here.


Du Bois on economics.


 Is there momentum in prediction markets?


Cluny Institute looking for a new partner


 Sam Altman on the role of government in AI


Further discussion of Kosmos, the “AI scientist.” And from Tony Kulesa