Jozef Imrich, name worthy of Kafka, has his finger on the pulse of any irony of interest and shares his findings to keep you in-the-know with the savviest trend setters and infomaniacs.
''I want to stay as close to the edge as I can without going over. Out on the edge you see all kinds of things you can't see from the center.''
-Kurt Vonnegut
Former Treasurer Mike Egan would be less charitable to his labour federal colleagues and the Commonwealth Grants Commission than Chris … Mike was a real fighter for the Shire, Sydney, and for the people of New South Wales
Premier Chris Minns has slammed the GST distribution system as being “past its use-by date” after the latest carve-up revealed NSW will receive $1.7 billion less than Victoria from the national GST pool, despite having about 1.5 million more people.
The Commonwealth Grants Commission, which oversees how the $103 billion national GST pot is allocated, said the NSW share of GST will fall to just 25.5 per cent of the national pool, even though the state has about 31 per cent of the Australian population.
A key reason for NSW’s lower share was its “above-average growth in land values” which gave the state more capacity to raise more land tax revenue relative to others, the commission said. NSW also spent less on natural disaster relief than it had previously estimated.
Western Australia is a big winner from the latest distribution; its share of GST will rise from 8.3 per cent to 9.1 per cent, even though it is the strongest state financially.
Queensland will receive the largest dollar increase in GST distribution of $1.7 billion.
Victoria’s overall GST share fell slightly, but it will still receive $1.5 billion more in 2026-27 than the previous year. NSW will receive an extra $316 million – the lowest increase of the mainland states.
GST allocation by state/territory
Table with 5 columns and 8 rows. (column headers with buttons are sortable)
NSW
$26.12b
$26.12b
$26.12b
$2,990
$2,990
$2,990
25.5%
31%
Victoria
$27.87b
$27.87b
$27.87b
$3,858
$3,858
$3,858
27.2%
25.7%
Queensland
$18.44b
$18.44b
$18.44b
$3,183
$3,183
$3,183
18%
20.6%
Western Australia
$9.34b
$9.34b
$9.34b
$2,990
$2,990
$2,990
9.1%
11.1%
South Australia
$9.55b
$9.55b
$9.55b
$4,959
$4,959
$4,959
9.3%
6.8%
Tasmania
$3.97b
$3.97b
$3.97b
$6,869
$6,869
$6,869
3.9%
2.1%
ACT
$2.1b
$2.1b
$2.1b
$4,239
$4,239
$4,239
2%
1.8%
Northern Territory
$5.14b
$5.14b
$5.14b
$19,122
$19,122
$19,122
5%
1%
Source: Commonwealth Grants Commission
Premier Chris Minns called for urgent reform to the way the GST is distributed.
Chris Minnshas slammed the national GST distribution system as "past its use-by date" following a 2026-27 review that left NSW with a historically low share of funds. Minns argues the current formula is unfair, withNSW receiving only 82 cents for every dollar it contributes, losing out by $1.4 billion compared to Victoria, despite having a much larger population.
Key Complaint: Minns claims NSW is receiving disproportionately less funding compared to other states, specifically noting NSW will receive $1.7 billion less than Victoria, despite hosting a significantly larger population.
The 82-Cent Deal: According to reports, for every dollar in GST revenue generated in NSW, the state is expected to receive just 82 cents in return in the 2026-27 financial year.
Call for Reform: The Premier has called for a "fairer" system, advocating for a model that places population size at the center of the distribution method rather than the existing formula.
Context: These comments follow the latest Commonwealth Grants Commission findings, which maintain that Western Australia will continue to get a high share of GST revenue, leading to significant "no worse off" top-up payments for other states from the federal budget.
Minns' government is struggling with persistent budget deficits and has criticized the current structure as leaving the state's budget under intense pressure
Forty-eight states and the District of Columbia will reset their clocks Sunday and spring forward into daylight saving time, giving us an extra hour of sunlight in the evenings but eliminating an hour of early-morning sun.
Morning sun is key to maintaining our circadian rhythms, sleep-wake cycles and overall health, experts say.
andMost Recommended Books – We are Richard and Anurag. Since 2020, we’ve worked with a community that has grown to hundreds of thousands of monthly visitors (including librarians, bookworms, and late-night insomniacs from all walks of life) to keep every page accurate and up to date. Our goal is simple: help you find what books to read next – Browse or Search:PeopleLists, Series; Summaries
Spending time with a difficult person can impact your mood in the moment. But over time, these challenging social interactions might also have a detrimental effect on your physical health, possibly making you age faster, new research suggests.
The study, which was funded by the National Institute on Aging and published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, looked at the health impacts of “hasslers” — people the researchers defined as those “who create problems or make life more difficult.”
While positive relationships have long been linked to healthier, longer lives, hasslers seem to have the opposite effect, increasing chronic stress and elevating epigenetic biomarkers associated with aging. The study also found that some people are more likely to report knowing hasslers, including women and those in poorer health.
We asked experts to explain the phenomenon — and share what you can do to prevent these types of relationships from chipping away at your health.
How social ties affect aging
Having a strong social network is known to offer protective benefits as you age, including lowering risk ofcognitive impairmentand mortality.Friendships may even help slow aging on a cellular level, someresearchhas shown.“But not all social ties are supportive,” saidByungkyu Lee, an assistant professor of sociology at New York University and lead author of the study.