How SpaceX is blocking astronomers’ view of spaceMusk Watch
No 10 warned against gagging officials from speaking in public
Sir Keir Starmer is facing growing demands to ditch a new government edict that bans senior health officials, military leaders and even the head of the civil service from speaking openly in public.
In a letter in today’s Times the leaders of more than a dozen think tanks, including the Royal Society, the Nuffield Trust and the Institute for Government, warned the prime minister that the new rule was having a “chilling effect on public discussion” with some events already being cancelled.
In private, several former cabinet secretaries are understood to have made their concerns clear to Downing Street.
The new rules have even been condemned by Alastair Campbell, Tony Blair’s former head of communications, who was himself not shy about controlling the messaging of No 10
The edict, issued across Whitehall by Downing Street last month, orders public sector officials not to talk at open events where their comments have not been vetted in advance. They have also been barred from taking part in any public question and answer sessions even if they are part of an industry event.
The rules apply to media briefings on issues such as public health, carried out by senior figures such as the chief medical and scientific officers. While these can go ahead they must be cleared in advance by Downing Street and have a minister or special adviser in attendance.
Those affected include public sector officials working for arm’s-length bodies such as Ofcom, the media regulator, and Ofsted, the education inspectorate, which have operational independence from the government. The rules also apply to senior health leaders, diplomats and military officers.
The edict has already led to cancellation or curtailment of public events where senior government officials were due to speak.
In their letter the think tanks describe the new rules as a “mistake”, saying that “effective government” relies on public servants hearing directly from businesses, charities and citizens to help them make better policy. They warned: “They should be able to explain government activity to those same groups. It [the guidance] is causing confusion and a chilling effect on public discussion. The government should withdraw it.”
Baron Robin Butler of Brockwell who served as cabinet secretary under the Thatcher, Major and Blair administrations told The Times it was “an important part of the job of senior civil servants and public sector leaders to inspire people and set a direction for the organisations that they run.
“It is ridiculous to suggest that these people should not be allowed to answer questions and take responsibility for what they say,” he added.
A government source said that Butler’s concerns were shared by other former cabinet secretaries including Lord Simon Case, who held the job until last year. They are understood to have made their concerns clear to Chris Wormald, the current incumbent.
But Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent, the Lords minister, said the rules were not about gagging civil servants. “As the civil service management code released in 2016 makes clear, civil servants must clear in advance material for publication, broadcast or other public discussion which draws on official information or experience,” she said. “The government continues to approve public activity by civil servants on a case-by-case basis, and civil servants, such as permanent secretaries, continue to be accountable to parliamentary select committees in the usual way.”
The cabinet office said it had been a “core principle, under successive governments, that ministers are publicly accountable for government decisions. This is why ministers answer for the government in the media and parliament.”
They said they were tweaking the new rules to give more flexibility to departments. “If the department feels there is a strong case for them to proceed with the activity fronted by civil servants, then they should be gridded through the usual process.”
No 10 warned against gagging officials from speaking in public
Who Goes MAGA? “His Substack has 10,000 subscribers and a name like ‘Uncomfortable Truths’ or ‘Against the Grain.’ He has an advanced degree & a career in academia or journalism. He positions himself as a truth-teller willing to say what others won’t.”