Tuesday, January 13, 2026

The Story of Czech Graphic Design

 Identity — The Story of Czech Graphic Design is a seven-part series available on YouTube.

In seven parts, the Identita series introduces viewers to the history of Czech graphic design. We will not only explore together the development of the visual face of the Czechoslovak Republic, we will also reveal what is hidden behind the symbols, signs and colors that represent 



Satyajit Das: Much Ado About Nothing – Why President Trump’s ‘Big Deals” Are No Big Deals

A clinical look at Trump’s deal hucksterism versus his typical modest-at-best results.



Former CIA director William Burns: ‘Imitating autocrats is not a winning formula’ Financial Times

 

The Empire Strikes Back: Trump, Netanyahu, and the Death of International Law Council Estate Media 

 

Is America on Step 1? 11 To Go? Corbin Trent 

 

The Long 20th Century Is Over. A New World Is Being Built Through Self-Determination Russia in Global Affairs


 

First the Shooting. Then the Lies

 

Telco Services Australia generated more than $185m in revenue in 2024-25 and $130m the year before but paid zero tax



The Trump administration has perfected the smear campaign



Federal agents shoot two people in Portland, police say Oregon Capital Chronicle


Woman killed by ICE agent in Minneapolis was a mother of 3, poet and new to the city MPR


Feds oust Minnesota investigators from ICE shooting probe Minnesota Reformer


Threatening Prosecutions, JD Vance Blames ‘Left-Wing’ Network—Including Media—for ICE KillingCommon Dreams


ICE AGENT WHO SHOT RENEE NICOLE GOOD IDENTIFIED AS JONATHAN ROSS The Intercept. Reportedly an Iraq War vet.


Inside ICE’s Tool to Monitor Phones in Entire Neighborhoods 404 Media


SCOOP: Senate Negotiators Eye Another ICE Funding Increase Migrant Insider



FROM DAVID BREITENBECK:  The Wisdom of Walt Disney: The Themes, Ethics, and Ideas of His Greatest Films


Cold War 2.0 or World War Three: What’s the Difference? Karl Sanchez


Mafia Increases Activities Moon of Alabama.  And More Ideas On How To Counter The Mafia’s Increasing Activities Moon of Alabama


ICE Is Going on a Surveillance Shopping Spree

Follow on to ICE boosts weapons spending 600% Via EFF: “U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has a new budget under the current administration, and they are going on a surveillance tech shopping spree. Standing at $28.7 billion dollars for the year 2025 (nearly triple their 2024 budget) and at least another $56.25 billion over the next three years, ICE’s budget would be the envy of many national militaries around the world. 

Indeed, this budget would put ICE as the 14th most well-funded military in the world, right between Ukraine and Israel.   There are many different agencies under U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that deal with immigration, as well as non-immigration related agencies such as Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

ICE is specifically the enforcement arm of the U.S. immigration apparatus. Their stated mission is to “[p]rotect America through criminal investigations and enforcing immigration laws to preserve national security and public safety.”  

Of course, ICE doesn’t just end up targeting, surveillingharassingassaultingdetaining, and torturingpeople who are undocumented immigrants. They have targeted people on work permitsasylum seekerspermanent residents (people holding “green cards”), naturalized citizens, and even citizens by birth.  

While the NSA and FBI might be the first agencies that come to mind when thinking about surveillance in the U.S., ICE should not be discounted. ICE has always engaged in surveillance and intelligence-gathering as part of their mission. A 2022 report by Georgetown Law’s Center for Privacy and Technology found the following:

  • ICE had scanned the driver’s license photos of 1 in 3 adults.
  • ICE had access to the driver’s license data of 3 in 4 adults.
  • ICE was tracking the movements of drivers in cities home to 3 in 4 adults.
  • ICE could locate 3 in 4 adults through their utility records.
  • ​​ICE built its surveillance dragnet by tapping data from private companies and state and local bureaucracies.
  • ICE spent approximately $2.8 billion between 2008 and 2021 on new surveillance, data collection and data-sharing programs.

With a budget for 2025 that is 10 times the size of the agency’s total surveillance spending over the last 13 years, ICE is going on a shopping spree, creating one of the largest, most comprehensive domestic surveillance machines in history…”



ICE boosts weapons spending 600%

A Popular Information investigation reveals tens of millions in new ICE spending on guns, chemical weapons, and explosives. “U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has sharply increased its spending on weapons in 2025, according to an analysis of federal government contracting data by Popular Information. 

Records from the Federal Procurement Data System reveal that ICE has increased spending on “small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories manufacturing” by more than 600% compared to 2024 levels. New spending in the small arms category from January 20, 2025, the day Trump was inaugurated, through October 18, totaled $71,515,762. 

Most of the spending was on guns and armor, but there have also been significant purchases of chemical weapons and one purchase that was categorized as “guided missile warheads and explosive components.” After the initial publication of this article, the Department of Homeland Security issued a statement clarifying that ICE had not purchased guided missle components. The database says the purchase was for “distraction devices.” On September 29, 2025, ICE made a $9,098,590 purchase from Geissele Automatics, which sells semi-automatic and automatic rifles. The total spending by ICE in the small arms category between January 20 and October 18, 2024, was $9,715,843. 

Spending by ICE on guns and other weapons this year not only dwarfs spending during the Biden administration but also during Trump’s first term. In 2019, for example, ICE spent $5.7 million on small arms through October 18. Average ICE spending on small arms during Trump’s first four years was about $8.4 million…”


Monday, January 12, 2026

MTV Rewind: How Did We Map the World Before Satellites?

 A group of students at a New Mexico college (mostly) gave up their phones & computers for a week. What did they learn? “Most students said they had gotten to know themselves better without their phones butting in all day long.”




In 1375, a Spanish mapmaker made a world map we now refer to as the Catalan Atlas. For its time, the atlas was remarkably accurate and comprehensive. This video explains how such a map was made in medieval times. From Open Culture


South Korea imports more kimchi than it exports, and the gap has widened as cheaper Chinese-made products take hold in the domestic market.”


WikiFlix is a streaming site for movies in the public domain, including Metropolis, It’s a Wonderful Life, All Quiet on the Western Front, and Charade.


MTV Rewind is an interface through which you can watch music videos from the 70s to the 20s, organized by decade. There are also “channels” for 120 Minutes, MTV Unplugged, Yo! MTV Raps, Headbangers Ball, and the first full day of MTV programming.

All of the music videos, more than 33,000 of them, are hosted on YouTube and the lists of videos come from The Internet Music Video Database. Great idea and execution…this is the closest you’ll get to watching MTV back in the 80s.



Identity — The Story of Czech Graphic Design is a seven-part series available on YouTube.

In seven parts, the Identita series introduces viewers to the history of Czech graphic design. We will not only explore together the development of the visual face of the Czechoslovak Republic, we will also reveal what is hidden behind the symbols, signs and colors that represent 

 

The proliferation of hummingbird feeders has become a “major evolutionary force” for the Anna’s hummingbird species in the western US. “Over just a few generations, their beaks have dramatically changed in size and shape.”



Pew Research – Striking findings from 2025

 How to Protest Safely in the Age of Surveillance



Britain has been threatened with sanctions if Sir Keir Starmer attempts to block Elon Musk’s X over its AI tool undressing women and children. The Telegraph has more.

Anna Paulina Luna, a US Republican congresswoman and ally of Donald Trump, warned she would bring forward legislation to “sanction not only Starmer, but Britain as a whole” if it moved to ban the social media platform.

UK Threatened With Sanctions if Starmer Bans X


An Interview With the President Four New York Times reporters sat down with President Trump for a nearly two-hour interview.


Not Satire: UAE Cuts Funding For Students In UK Because They May Encounter Radical Islam.


Best of 2025 - More Boomers are choosing not to retire. Why? They don’t want to


Taxation in a strong AI world

Here is Dwarkesh’s tweet, based on his recent paper with Trammell, raising the issue of whether wealth taxes will become desirable in the future. 


NBER – Ruling for the Rich: the Supreme Court over Time. Andrea Prat, Fiona Scott Morton & Jacob Spitz Working Paper 34643. DOI 10.3386/w34643. Issue Date. To investigate the emergence of a pro-wealthy bias in the US Supreme Court, we develop a protocol to identify and analyze all cases involving economic issues from 1953 to the present. 

We categorize the parties in these cases as “rich” or “poor” according to their likelihood of being wealthy. A vote is pro-rich if that outcome would directly shift resources to the party that is more likely to be wealthy. Using this dataset, we estimate case-specific intercepts, justice-specific latent ideal points, and party-level time trends using the Bayesian methods pioneered by Martin and Quinn (2002). 

In the 1950s, justices appointed by the two parties appear similar in their propensity to cast pro-rich votes. Over the sample period, we estimate a steady increase in polarization, culminating in an implied party gap of 47 percentage points by 2022. The magnitude of the gap suggests the usefulness of an economic metric for prediction relative to ideologies such as originalism or textualism.

The New York Times unlocked. Supreme Court Increasingly Favors the Rich, Economists Say. A new study found that the court’s Republican appointees voted for the wealthier side in cases 70 percent of the time in 2022, up from 45 percent in 1953. “Supreme Court justices take two oaths. The first, required of all federal officials, is a promise to support the Constitution. 

The second, a judicial oath, is more specific. It requires them, among other things, to “do equal right to the poor and to the rich.” A new study being released on Monday from economists at Yale and Columbia contends that the Supreme Court has in recent decades fallen short of that vow. 

The study, called “Ruling for the Rich,” concludes that the wealthy have the wind at their backs before the justices and that a good way to guess the outcome of a case is to follow the money. The study adds to what Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a dissent in June, called “the unfortunate perception that moneyed interests enjoy an easier road to relief in this court than ordinary citizens.” 

The study found that the Supreme Court has become deeply polarized in cases pitting the rich against the poor, with Republican appointees far more likely than Democratic ones to side with the wealthy. 

That is starkly different from the middle of the last century, when appointees of the two parties were statistically indistinguishable on this measure. The general critique is not new, and it may figure in the drop in public confidence in the court in recent years, as opinion polls show. 

In a 2021 book, “Supreme Inequality,” Adam Cohen, an author and former member of The New York Times’s editorial board, argued that “the court’s decisions have lifted up those who are already high and brought down those who are already low.” 

In an interview, Mr. Cohen said the new study from the economists covered ground that “some of us have been observing for a long time.” He pointed to Supreme Court decisions amplifying the role of money in politicsweakening public sector labor unions and curtailing federal regulators. “But it is great to see,” he added, “respected academics crunching the numbers and producing the data to show that this is exactly what has been going on.”…

  • In Supreme Inequality, bestselling author Adam Cohen surveys the most significant Supreme Court rulings since the Nixon era and exposes how, contrary to what Americans like to believe, the Supreme Court does little to protect the rights of the poor and disadvantaged; in fact, it has not been on their side for fifty years. Cohen proves beyond doubt that the modern Court has been one of the leading forces behind the nation’s soaring level of economic inequality, and that an institution revered as a source of fairness has been systematically making America less fair.

The Pew Research Centre’s yearly wrap-up: “As we do every year, we’ve gathered data around some of the most pivotal news stories of 2025, including President Donald Trump’s return to the White House, the changing U.S. immigration landscape and the rapid rise of artificial intelligence worldwide. Here’s a look back at 2025 through 12 of Pew Research Center’s most striking research findings. This is just a small slice of the Center’s research publications this year…”



CHINESE NATIONAL CHARGED WITH UNLAWFULLY PHOTOGRAPHING HOME OF U.S. B-2 FLEET IN MISSOURI.


Sunday, January 11, 2026

You’ve Got ‘The Ick.’ Is Your Relationship Doomed?

 We Emit a Visible Light That Vanishes When We Die, Surprising Study Says


Noisy eating, clapping when a plane lands — experts explain how to handle sudden feelings of disgust.




He was charming. He spoke several languages. Things were going well until Ann Parker, a retired public relations consultant, noticed something strange about her date’s driving style.

“Every now and then, he’d release the steering wheel and quickly lick his hands,” she said.

The relationship did not last much longer.

Ms. Parker was experiencing the immediate turnoff known to daters as “the ick,” a sudden pang of aversion, usually prompted by someone’s behavior, appearance or personality trait.


Although the term isn’t new — by some estimates, it was first used in the 1990s on the series “Ally McBeal” — “the ick” often crops up in popular culture and gets frequent mention online. #Theick racked up nearly 225,000 TikTok posts in the past year, according to a representative for the company.

The term even prompted psychology researchers from Azusa Pacific University to do a study, published in May, which found that over a quarter of surveyed singles who had experienced “the ick” found it worrisome enough that they reported ending the relationship immediately. “The Ick” may have a catchy name, but it captures something significant about the uncertainty of dating: the sneaking realization that a person might not be right for you.

It can be tricky to figure out how much weight to give an “ick,” said Brian Collisson, a professor of psychology at Azusa Pacific University who coauthored the study. “You could reject a really great person over a superficial trait, or you could be tapping into something that could be a problem later on,” he said. The New York Times asked readers to share instances where they’ve experienced “the ick” and received nearly 500 wide-ranging responses.

Leigh Mulready of Sunnyvale, Calif., was grossed out when a guy she was newly dating phoned her from the toilet. Kathleen McCue of Bethesda, Md., was turned off by the unprompted karate moves her date started doing after dinner. And Juan Pablo of Mexico City was repelled when he learned that someone he was interested in bought fake books to decorate her home: “They were basically empty cardboard boxes with the cover printed on them,” he explained. But romantic attraction is subjective, said Isabelle Morley, a clinical psychologist and author of “They’re Not Gaslighting You,” and what may turn off one person is appealing to another.

“Some people think it’s disgusting to burp in public,” Dr. Morley explained. “Some people think that’s hilarious.”

That uneasy feeling

Researchers don’t really know what’s happening in our brains when we get the “ick.”But when we’re turned off by something, it isn’t an automatic sign that “there’s something wrong with us, or wrong with the other person,” said Kesia Constantine, an adjunct clinical supervisor in applied psychology at New York University.

Not everyone is put off by someone

awkwardly chasing an errant ping pong ball (an example from Dr. Collisson’s study) or “playing nonstop Jimmy Buffett” (a reader’s “ick”). So, if you find yourself repulsed by some innocuous quirk, Dr. Morley said, “the ick” can be an invitation to get curious about your reaction.
Martin Blagdurn of Douglas, Mich., wrote that “unkempt nose hair” turns him off. (Luxuriant ear hair was also mentioned by several readers.) But nose hair can be trimmed, Dr. Morley said.

She encourages people to ask themselves why, specifically, they’re bothered, and to reflect on their dating history. Do you have a tendency to bolt after the first sign of uneasiness? Does this “ick” signal incompatibility, or is it just annoying? “That will start to rule out whether you’re getting in your own way or being too hard on people,” she said.

If the person’s appealing qualities outweigh the “ick,” Dr. Morley added, consider talking to the person about your reaction. “Because that’s a lot of what relationships require — communication and flexibility and adjustments,” she said. When, for instance, a date pulls out a guitar and offers an unwanted serenade — which several readers mentioned as an “ick” — “it’s OK to say, ‘That was so sweet, but it makes me embarrassed to have someone sing to me,’” Dr. Morley said.

Dr. Collisson suggested discussing concerns with your potential partner instead of your friends — as awkward as that conversation may be. Through his research he has learned that “the vast majority of people are talking about their ‘icks’ to everybody except for the person eliciting the ick.”

When ‘icks’ become deal breakers

Things like road rage and being rude to a waiter were mentioned by several readers. And “icks” like these “could be a little snapshot of how this person handles potentially stressful situations,” Dr. Collisson said.

In those cases “you can 100 percent just trust your ick,” Dr. Constantine said. “Our instincts are powerful, and in those moments, the most powerful message is ‘This does not feel right or good for me.’”
Other situations, however, might not be as clear. Susannah Harris of Richmond, Va., said that she once dated someone who “for some reason, really smelled like pleather — specifically, ’90s pleather.”
It’s not a red flag, but some subjects are hard to broach, Dr. Constantine said. And, if you don’t feel comfortable (or simply don’t care enough) to work through what you’re feeling, it’s OK to let the relationship go, she said.
“It feels insulting to say, ‘I don’t like the way you smell,’” she said. If he worked in a pleather factory, she added, you could suggest showering before dates. But if the smell is actually part of his natural scent, she said, “then it might be the very primitive way of our system saying that this is not a match.”

Getting over it

Jennifer M. of Syracuse, N.Y., who asked that we only use her last initial, was shocked when an otherwise-promising date kept wiping his tongue on his napkin while eating, she said

“Yuck,” she remembers thinking. “I really don’t want to see that.”

While it’s helpful to know what you like or dislike, a relationship is more than the sum of its parts, said Samantha Joel, an associate professor of psychology at Western University, who studies how people make decisions in romantic relationships. You don’t have to work through an “ick,” but if you want to, she recommends putting the “ick” in context, and reflecting on how you feel when you’re with this person: assessing whether you feel good about yourself or whether they’re easy to talk to.

And if a minor habit gives you the “ick” in an otherwise healthy relationship, Dr. Constantine added, consider whether you can build a tolerance for it. If a person you’re into puts ketchup on their eggs, you can avert your eyes, she suggested. Because who among us, she asks, hasn’t made someone else cringe?

And even though some people in Dr. Collisson’s study of “icks” bailed quickly, 32 percent continued dating, he said. Jennifer M., who was alarmed when the man she was dating wiped his tongue on his napkin, said he still has the habit. She would know: They’ve been married for 35 years.

Jancee Dunn, who writes the weekly Well newsletter for The Times, has covered health and science for more than 20 years.

A Guide to Better Romantic Relationships

Looking to build a long-lasting partnership? We can help.