Tuesday, October 27, 2026

Centrelink 'hounding' Australians - Tax complaints almost triple in just two years

The consultation on tackling fraud and financial abuse was released by the federal government on 14 October in response to the parliamentary joint committee on corporations and financial services inquiry into financial abuse, with one accountant stressing the importance of the frontline being considered.

 

Centrelink 'hounding' Australians to pay back billions in debt calculated by 'unlawful' method



 Tax complaints almost triple in just two years by Shane Wright

Complaints to the tax office watchdog have soared by 74 per cent over the past year as ordinary workers and small businesses struggle with the ATO’s crackdown on outstanding tax bills and penalties.

Tax Ombudsman Ruth Owen, in a report released today, said there had been sharp increases in grievances from taxpayers over the financial hardship caused by the ATO’s calculation of debts and its actions to recover outstanding payments.

Taxation Ombudsman Ruth Owen has revealed a surge in complaints to her office.STEVEN SIEWERT

In the period between April and September, the ombudsman received 2376 complaints, compared to 1362 for the same period last year. The 2026 numbers were 180 per cent up 2024 levels.

In one case noted by Owen, a woman left with paraplegia after an accident was caught in a dispute with the ATO over an outstanding $160,000 tax debt. After an ombudsman investigation which found the tax office had failed to take into account the woman’s dire health and financial circumstances, the debt was waived.


According to Owen, it was clear many taxpayers were under pressure which was exacerbated by the tax office’s actions.

“We continue to see an unprecedented demand for our services. Our latest complaint data shows more people are struggling due to the ATO’s debt collection activity or interest charges,” she said.

“At a time when many Australians are facing financial distress, we are seeing increased complaints about how the ATO is collecting tax debt owed and how interest is applied to the debt, often making the amount due impossible to pay back.”

A ban on credit card use for tax bills has been delayed by the ATO after a small business revolt.

Of the issues raised with the ombudsman, debt collection and payments to taxpayers accounted for 19 per cent each. Another 18 per cent related to penalties including the interest penalties on outstanding tax.


Unpaid superannuation was one of the fastest growing areas of concern with an 8 per cent lift on 2025 levels. Super accounted for 56 per cent of all payment complaints, while another 37 per cent related to the status of tax refunds.

In a sign of the economic pressure on taxpayers, the number of complaints from people wanting to be released from a tax debt because of serious financial hardship climbed 5 per cent on last year.

There was also a sharp increase in the proportion of complaints about how tax debts had been calculated and in re-raising debts that had previously not been pursued by the ATO.

There was a 9 per cent drop in the number of complaints where the ombudsman confirmed the ATO’s actions were reasonable and a 6 percentage point lift in cases where concerns about the tax office’s communications had been raised.


More than 80 per cent of complaints came from individuals, which included people operating as a business. While 12 per cent of complaints were from organisations, small businesses accounted for 29 per cent of the ombudsman’s complex cases.

Last week, credit bureau CreditorWatch noted a surge in the number of businesses falling behind on their payments to the ATO.

Tax debt defaults reached more than 37,500 in September, a 20.7 per cent jump over the year.

Owen said the increase in complaints was being partly driven by the financial pressure on individuals and businesses.


“The concentration of complaints we’re seeing around tax debt, interest, missing superannuation and delayed refunds indicates people are doing it tough at the moment. But they’re still trying to do the right thing and engage with the tax system.”



Tax office complaints surge during crack down on debts

By Derek Rose and Jacob Shteyman
October 27 2026 
The nation's tax office is ramping up its bid to extract payments of debts owed. Photo: Lukas Coch/AAP PHOTOS
The nation's tax office is ramping up its bid to extract payments of debts owed. Photo: Lukas Coch/AAP PHOTOS

The number of Australians complaining about the tax office has surged as it ramps up debt collections at the same time as taxpayers struggle with rising cost pressures.

The Tax Ombudsman fielded 2376 complaints against the Australian Taxation Office in the six months to September, up 74 per cent from the same period in 2025 and 180 per cent above the same period two years ago.

Debt collection and payment-related matters each accounted for 19 per cent of complaint investigations from April to September, the agency said.

"Our latest complaint data shows more people are struggling due to the ATO's debt collection activity or interest charges or simply need to resolve delays to payments they are due,'' Tax Ombudsman Ruth Owen said.

The ATO is owed billions in outstanding tax debt, and is making moves to get it back. (April Fonti/AAP PHOTOS)
The ATO is owed billions in outstanding tax debt, and is making moves to get it back. (April Fonti/AAP PHOTOS)

"At a time when many Australians are facing financial distress, we are seeing increased complaints about how the ATO is collecting tax debt owed and how interest is applied to the debt, often making the amount due impossible to pay back."

In response, an ATO spokesperson said the tax office had only received 1358 complaints over the same period, as the ombudsman's figures included cases that were resolved without any ATO involvement or that related to the Tax Practitioners Board or state tax issues.

The ombudsman only investigated 501 complaints out of 2376 it received and found in most cases, the ATO had acted appropriately.

In 63 per cent of debt collection-related complaints, the agency found the ATO acted reasonably, down nine per cent from the same period last year.

Complaints about penalties and interest made up 18 per cent of grievances, up from 13 per cent a year ago.

Amid rising inflation and interest rates, tax liabilities were adding to mounting debts owed by taxpayers and small businesses, the ombudsman said.

Taxpayers also relied on tax refunds to maintain liquidity or pay other bills. 

"This is likely to partially explain why we have seen an increase in complaints, alongside the fact that the ATO has had to ramp up its debt collection activity to reduce the size of its collectable debt book," the report said.

The ATO was owed $54.2 billion in outstanding tax debt in 2024/25, according to the Australian National Audit Office.

Andrew McKellar says Australian businesses are struggling on a range of fronts. (Mick Tsikas/AAP PHOTOS)
Andrew McKellar says Australian businesses are struggling on a range of fronts. (Mick Tsikas/AAP PHOTOS)

Debts owed by small businesses amounted to $35.9 billion, an increase of $19.4 billion from 2018/29.

Following a backlash to proposed tax hikes for discretionary trusts, the ATO's announcement that it would ban credit card payments has further dented relations between the government and the business community.

"When we get feedback from businesses around the country, I think they are feeling under pressure," Andrew McKellar, chief executive of the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, told Politico's Canberra Playbook podcast.

"They're feeling that they're really struggling on a range of fronts, and they just see a range of decisions from government that feel disconnected from the objectives that they're trying to achieve."

Australian Associated Press



ATO complaints surge amid tax collection crackdown

Complaints over ATO debt collection have surged as it takes a tougher approach on collections in an attempt to claw back $115bn in outstanding debt.Thomas HenryThomas Henry
Complaints from Australians being pursued by the ATO have skyrocketed in recent months.
Complaints from Australians being pursued by the tax office have skyrocketed in recent months as the ATO takes a tougher approach on collections in an attempt to wrangle $115bn in outstanding debt, according to fresh figures from the Tax Ombudsman.
In her biannual report card for the Australian Taxation Office, the ombudsman noted a 74 per cent increase in complaints in April through to September when compared to the same period last year, and a whopping 180 per cent over two years.
The figures come after The Australian revealed the ATO is ramping up collections on trust-holdersunaware they had breached obscure tax rule from the 1990s, while bracing for billions of dollars in advice and restructuring costs thanks to Jim Chalmers’ budget tax changes.
Trust-holders that broke “family trust distribution tax” rules, many doing so unknowingly, are facing an explosion in historic debts, with examples of a historic $47,000 liability in the 1990s ballooning to a bill of $890,000 today.
“We continue to see an unprecedented demand for our services. Our latest complaint data shows more people are struggling due to the ATO’s debt collection activity or interest charges or simply need to resolve delays to payments they are due,” Tax Ombudsman Ruth Owen said.
“At a time when many Australians are facing financial distress, we are seeing increased complaints about how the ATO is collecting tax debt owed and how interest is applied to the debt, often making the amount due impossible to pay back.”
Around half of debt-related complaints received by the ombudsman related to applications for release of debt due to hardship and director penalty notices, while 77 per cent of penalty related inquires related to general interest charges. 
In only 5 per cent of cases were penalties or interest reduced or remitted, down 17 per cent on the same period last year, which the ombudsman said indicated the “ATO’s tougher approach to debt collection”.
Tax Ombudsman Ruth Owen.
“The concentration of complaints we’re seeing around tax debt, interest, missing superannuation, and delayed refunds indicates people are doing it tough at the moment but they’re still trying to do the right thing and engage with the tax system,” Ms Owen said“Whilst we cannot always change an ATO decision, we can provide independent assurance that the ATO acted reasonably and help people understand what happened on their particular  matter and why. The latest figures show a 9 per cent decrease in the number of complaints where the ATO was found by the ombudsman to have “acted reasonably” in relation to debt collection. With looming changes to the taxation of negative gearing, capital gains and trusts, concerns have been raised by a number of bodies over historic family trust distribution rules (FTDT) pointing to an example of a historic $47,000 liability ballooning to a $890,000 bill today.  FTDT is levied at 47 per cent of the gross amount distributed, and general interest charges start compounding 81 days later ­without any assessment ever being issued. Interest then compounds daily at seven percentage points above the bank bill rate, so at current rates an unnoticed liability roughly doubles every six to seven years.
Thomas Henry
Thomas HenryReporter
Thomas Henry is a reporter for The Australian's Canberra press gallery bureau. He joined the masthead after graduating from the 2025 cadet program and holds a Bachelor of Economics from Sydney University.

1 in 5 borrowers use AI to fake mortgage documents 

Bank statements, payslips manipulated to secure home loans…


Should the ATO share more data?

Soltani said the findings strengthened the case for secure data sharing between the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) and banks, provided borrowers gave their consent.

“That would let lenders verify declared income against an independent government source, rather than relying on a PDF that can be altered in seconds with AI,” said Soltani.

Zhong cautioned, however, that making access to tax information a condition of obtaining a mortgage would undermine the idea that data sharing was voluntary.

She also raised concerns about how the information might be used beyond income verification.

“The second [question] is scope creep: data collected to verify income shouldn’t be used for marketing, pricing or other purposes,” Zhong.

“The third is security, because any new pipeline for sensitive government data becomes a target.”

Zhong said a better approach would be a 'verify, don't share' model, in which lenders could confirm whether a borrower's declared income broadly matched ATO records without receiving their full tax information.

Banks uncover major mortgage fraud

The findings come amid growing concerns about mortgage fraud in Australia and the role AI is playing in making it easier to falsify financial documents.

In February, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia alerted authorities to a possible fraud racket that obtained approximately $1 billion in illegitimate home loans, including through the use of AI.

In August, Australia’s financial crimes watchdog AUSTRAC revealed that an analysis of data from 10 major Australian banks identified potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in suspected fraudulent loans, mostly linked to properties in Sydney.

AUSTRAC said the suspected mortgage fraud involved inflated incomes, misrepresented employment, and fabricated or unverifiable business activity used to support loan applications.

AUSTRAC chief executive Brendan Thomas said generative AI was now “widely used” to create or alter fraudulent documents, making them easier and potentially more convincing to produce.

“The banks see fraud regularly — the risk is not new, but advances in AI technology are making it easier to commit fraud at scale,” Thomas told Information Age.

“While AI may make it easier to generate false or misleading documentation, our focus remains on behaviours, risk indicators and vulnerabilities rather than the specific tools used to facilitate them.

“People applying for home loans must provide accurate and truthful information, whether they use AI or not.”


Russian military intelligence reportedly hacked Jared Kushner’s iPhone during Trump’s first term

 

The tech trillionaire lashed on X following reports of potential investigations by Democrats following the upcoming midterms.


Trump sued the BBC. Now he has to answer its questions.

A federal judge ordered the president to sit for a deposition by Dec. 11 or risk sanctions, including dismissal of his $10 billion lawsuit



Russian military intelligence reportedly hacked Jared Kushner’s iPhone during Trump’s first term

Vanity Fair – The Art of the Deal: Jared Kushner’s Hacked Phone Revealed His Secret Negotiations—Including More Than $700 Million in Transfers – An exclusive excerpt from Princes and Thieves: Jared Kushner and Mohamed bin Zayed’s Secret Plot to Remake the Middle East examines how bank accounts linked the president’s son-in-law—and former senior adviser—to Israel, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia. [no paywall] 

In late spring 2020, a source I knew to be reliable called me with a story. The Dutch government had hacked into Jared Kushner’s phone and monitored him as he accessed a Dubai-based bank account. What was odd, the source said, was that the money in the account—hundreds of millions of dollars—had come from a bank in Azerbaijan. 

Most importantly, Kushner appeared to have transferred significant amounts of money from the Dubai account to other individuals, including a warlord, a mercenary and a one-time hit man. The story sounded preposterous, I told my source. And yet. Six months later, I found myself speaking with someone else about the UAE government and their use of mercenaries in conflicts around the Middle East and Africa when I asked, on a whim, whether they knew anything about Kushner and bank transfers from a UAE account. My acquaintance grew quiet. Then they replied, “Yes.” 

Over the next four years, I came to learn that, sometime in late 2017, the Netherlands Defense Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD) made a startling discovery. A General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation (GRU) operative, a dark web hacker specializing in stolen bank data, was traveling to the UK for an espionage mission. They reached out to the British government for permission to apprehend him when he arrived. The British agreed. When the Russian national arrived in England, the Dutch informed him that he had two options: he could work for them against the GRU, or the British would arrest him. 

Once in UK government custody, the operative would be charged with espionage. If convicted, he would spend years in a British prison. The Russian chose to change his employer. Later that year, the Russian operative gave the Dutch spies access to one of the GRU’s most sensitive assets. Located in Rostov, Russia, the GRU’s hacking and cyber team operated a remote server on which they stored some of their bounty. 

During their search through these secret files, the Dutch found something astonishing: screenshots of Jared Kushner’s iPhone…As they monitored Kushner’s phone, they discovered he used it to log in to a UAE bank account. By the time the Dutch spies had visibility into the phone, the account had received hundreds of millions of dollars from a bank in Azerbaijan. Their initial assessment was that the bank account was affiliated with the government there…”



Don’t be fooled. The AI that was supposed to save us time is doing just the opposite

The Guardian: “The government says it can transform the state with AI, but it is no match for the resulting stream of machine-generated slop. And we all pay the cost. Another morning, another avalanche of emails. Even after a guilty cull, my inbox is sitting at well over 7,000, but lately I’ve started subscribing to the Quentin Crisp theory of housework: why bother, when after four years or so you stop noticing the accumulating dust? Empty inboxes just fill up again anyway. 

In theory, email was supposed to save hours of meetings, phone calls and standing over photocopiers. Instead, we just spend hours deleting stuff people wouldn’t have bothered telling us if it had meant picking up the phone, but which they can now spam to their entire database at the click of a button. The glorious ease and convenience of being able to reach the world in seconds came, we now know, with the inconvenience of them being able to reach you right back. 

And therein lies the challenge to the government’s hopes of AI helping to transform the machinery of the state on the cheap, saving not only time but billions of pounds in public money. It’s early days, but AI seems not so much to be streamlining public service delivery as gumming it up – partly because, as was once the case with email, the public is using it right back at them.

In a Substack post last week, the former civil servant Sam Freedman noted that governments around the world seem to be experiencing unusual surges in complaints, requests and responses to regulatory and official bodies since the adoption of ChatGPT. It’s the same story in the courts, with employment tribunal cases in England, Scotland and Wales reportedly rising by 39% in a year thanks in part to claimants using AI to draft claims, while magistrates and judges face a wave of people who can’t afford lawyers using ChatGPT to build cases that often don’t make sense. And all of this needs patient disentangling by a human, on the grounds that just because a defendant is citing precedents that don’t exist, it doesn’t mean there isn’t a genuine grievance buried in there somewhere…”