Wednesday, August 26, 2026

KPMG Saga: Robodebt on Steroids. Palantir eyes NDIS


KPMG boss confirms major job cuts and pay slash amid revenue slide

KPMG Australia has confirmed job cuts and a 13 per cent partner pay reduction, with more roles under review.
DAVID ROSS
August 24, 2026 
    KPMG Australia partner remuneration will be reduced by 13 per cent, as it confirmed reports it would cull 5 per cent of staff citing a soft outlook that saw a 1 per cent slide.
    As revealed in The Australian last week, the audit and consulting firm on Monday announced a raft of job cuts on Monday, with 360 staff and 27 partners to exit.
    The firm said these would not be the last, noting it was starting consultation “on a small number of award-based roles”. 
    At least 80 partners have left KPMG since July 1.
    The firm has faced continued pressure since allegations emerged it had engaged in a deliberate breach of audit client confidentiality.
    The job cuts are the latest hit to the firm, with a government squeeze on consulting spending also hammering revenues in KPMG’s consulting arm which were down 17 per cent. 
    KPMG chief executive John Sams said the job cuts had “not been taken lightly, and we know it will have a very real impact on people”.
    “With demand for consulting remaining weaker, most of the roles affected will be in our consulting business,” he said. 
    “Changes to our business and the professional services landscape have also reduced the need for some roles in business services.”
    KPMG declined to make Mr Sams available for an interview on Monday. 
    KPMG Australia chief John Sams said revenue was below expectations. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman
    KPMG Australia chief John Sams said revenue was below expectations. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman
    The firm also said it will combine its mid-market and private deals teams with its deal advisory and infrastructure divisions. 
    The advisory arm will join KPMG’s consulting operation. 
    KPMG said this was “not a change in the firm’s commitment to mid-market and private clients”.
    Despite the fall in consulting revenue, which dragged down total earnings by the firm to $2.25bn, KPMG’s audit and assurance and tax and legal arms both saw double digit growth up 11 per cent each. 
    Mr Sams said the results showed “the resilience of our business and, above all, the commitment of our people in a very challenging year”. 
    Mr Sams was elevated to the CEO role in late July, in the wake of the exit of KPMG’s former boss Andrew Yates. 
    “Our total revenue was slightly lower than last year, and below our expectations,” Mr Sams said. 
    “We need to be clear about the outlook. We expect difficult market conditions to continue in FY27 and beyond.”
    He said he expected economic growth to remain sluggish until at least 2028, warning this would affect client investment expectations. 
    “The professional services sector is also changing rapidly as client expectations evolve, AI reshapes the way services are delivered and government spending on consultants remains lower,” Mr Sams said. 
    “We also recognise the challenges created by our own failings, and the work we must continue to do to rebuild trust.”
    KPMG has several internal and external reviews underway into the firm’s audit failures and cultural problems. 
    Mr Sams said their findings would guide “all necessary action”.
    “While these conditions are likely to persist, we remain focused on what we can control,” he said. 
    “We will continue to monitor performance closely, act when needed and consider carefully how the firm needs to be set up for the future.”



    Michelle Sams Assistant Commissioner, Top 100 Program, Adviser Strategy and Staff Experience Australian Taxation Office Michelle is is Assistant Commissioner Top 100 Program, Adviser Strategy and Staff Experience in the Public Groups and International business line at the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). Michelle has 18 years corporate tax experience. Prior to joining the ATO in 2017 Michelle was a Director in KPMG’s Deal Advisory Tax Team.


    KPMG looks internally for salvation

    There’s a back to the future vibe to KPMG’s new CEO pick.
    Columnist
    For a firm desperate to move towards the future, KPMG certainly seems wedded to its past. On Tuesday, it granted John Sams the dubious honour of trying to lead it out of its audit leaks scandal.
    Sams is a KPMG “lifer” (you qualify after 20-plus years at an employer), joining the firm as a graduate in 2003. He’s been a partner for a decade and on its national executive committee since September. He’s also its chief financial officer and chief operating officer.
    John Sams is finally at the top of the KPMG tree. Dominic Lorrimer
    It’s quite the resume for someone who is supposed to be leading KPMG into the new world. Which is a fact that hasn’t been lost on politicians, and certainly not on staff either.
    There are positives. Internally, Sams is well-liked and respected. He is viewed as competent and a safe pair of hands, and has taken a more open approach to discussing the management of the scandal than other leaders.
    But then there’s the fact he’s been involved in managing the current fallout. That’s included accompanying embattled chair-in-waiting Michael Ebeid on a national listening tour of KPMG’s offices this month, which hasn’t gone down particularly well. Ebeid himself is the main issue. Many partners view his appointment as chair as illegitimate, given he has not yet been voted in, and inappropriate, in light of his role overseeing the board’s botched investigations.
    But Sams has also raised eyebrows at these meetings for his comments about KPMG’s disastrous decision to claim legal professional privilege over a slew of documents requested by the parliamentary committee investigating the firm’s misconduct.
    To recap: KPMG refused to hand over reports by Allensand Ashurst, but still tried to rely on them to dismiss a whistleblower’s allegations of misconduct. Politicians slammed the decision, as did several of the firm’s independent directors and governance experts. It eventually caved, but the attempt played a major role in then-chair Martin Sheppard’s resignation.
    It turns out Sams was part of that decision. He told partners as much as he toured the country, as questions about it repeatedly came up given how red hot anger was over that call. He has also pointed out it was the wrong decision in retrospect. But the fact he even backed it is telling.
    Some Sydney partners have also been restless about who is calling the shots at the firm, with a sense a small group in Melbourne led by Sams has been doing so.
    Then there’s the mechanics of his appointment. Under the firm’s partnership agreement, which governs its operations, only the chairman of its national board can recommend a chief executive for appointment. That role has been empty, however, since Sheppard’s resignation in June.
    The board announced Ebeid as its pick to lead it in July, but he won’t be elected until the agreement is modified to allow for an independent chair. Some partners have even been looking at their legal options should a chief executive be appointed outside this process. Unsurprisingly, partners did not rate Ebeid’s performance on the call announcing Sams’ appointment on Tuesday well.
    The word “lifer” was thrown around by multiple KPMG staffers this column spoke to, and not as a compliment either. Many questioned why KPMG hadn’t gone for an international partner as the new CEO.
    Technically, Sams does come from its global network. His first three years at KPMG were in its UK tax practice. At least according to an earlier version of his LinkedIn profile, which disappeared from the site on Tuesday afternoon right as he was promising transparency would be a focus of his leadership.
    Apparently, it’s getting a glow-up. How many ways are there to describe 23 years at one firm?


    Robodebt on Steroids. Palantir eyes NDIS 


    Thiel-linked ‘race science’ network penetrated Cambridge, targeted Jason Arday


     Natalie Harp’s taxpayer-funded salary under fire as it’s compared to pay of USS Lincoln sailors The Mirror 


    KPMG shows the big four rot is not just a few bad apples

    KPMG shows the big four rot is not just a few bad apples

    Focusing on individual actions ignores the systemic architecture that makes such behaviour not just possible, but entirely rational.

    Professor Stephen Taylor recently argued that the recurring scandals at KPMG and, by extension, the broader big four – Deloitte, PwC, EY, and KPMG – result from a syndrome among the firms’ partners he calls GSA, or greed, stupidity and arrogance.

    While GSA is undoubtedly present, Taylor’s diagnosis is dangerously incomplete.

    The scandals at KPMG reflect a culture that knows it’s too big to fail and too protected to care. Getty

    By focusing on people behaving badly, he ignores the systemic architecture that makes such behaviour not just possible, but entirely rational.

    The ongoing legal battle of former KPMG partner-turned-whistleblower Brendan Lyonreveals that the true crisis is one of structural accountability, where professional bodies and liability shields have created a class of protected partners who are immune to the consequences of their own advice.

    Taylor suggests that artificial structural distinctions, like separating audit firms from consulting firms, will not address the GSA problem.

    Advertisement

    In fact, he maintains that even an audit-only firm could succumb to greed.

    However, this perspective overlooks how the big four’s current integrated business model prioritises profit and partner return over ethical considerations.

    “If a firm’s liability is capped, but its profit potential is not, greed is not a character flaw; it is a business strategy.”

    What were once corporate watchdogs are now commercial juggernauts in which partners are incentivised to adopt a marketing mindset that prioritises lucrative consulting fees over technical excellence.

    When 80 per cent of the $9.2 billion in 2025 revenue comes from category 3 non-accounting services, the audit function becomes little more than a loss-leader – a foot in the door for more profitable advisory work.

    This is not merely a few bad apples behaving indecently; it is a systemic incentive structure designed to maximise partner wealth through institutional capture of public and private organisations.

    Advertisement

    The secretive partner shield

    The most damning evidence against the individual behaviour argument is the secretive partner shield, which Lyon is currently challenging in the NSW Supreme Court.

    Under today’s professional standards schemes, the big four’s liability is generally capped at about $1 million after insurance, regardless of the scale of the disaster they may have caused.

    As Lyon argues, it is entirely rational for a partner to accept massive fees for risky tax advice or overstating asset values when the financial consequences for that partner are capped at some insignificant amount.

    To put it bluntly, if a firm’s liability is capped but its profit potential is not, greed is not a character flaw; it is a business strategy.

    The current system ensures that the true cost of bad advice, which can run into the hundreds of millions for clients like Lendlease or Commonwealth Bank, is never actually borne by the partnership firms themselves.

    Advertisement

    Protectors of the public or the partners?

    The role of Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand in this saga raises a profound question of accountability: whose interests do the professional bodies serve?

    Lyon’s case alleges that the Professional Standards Council unlawfully extended liability caps to non-accountant personnel who were providing non-accounting services. CAANZ maintains that the inclusion of consultants improves standards, consumer protection and access to compensation through mandatory indemnity insurance.

    CAANZ’s response has been telling. Rather than welcoming a review of standards to restore public trust, the body fought Lyon’s attempt to proceed, with estimated recoverable costs reaching $460,000.

    NSW Supreme Court Justice Tim Faulkner’s recent landmark ruling granted Lyon a protective costs order, capping his exposure at $25,000 and allowing the trial to proceed.

    This reflects a deeper structural issue. All big four members are automatic members of CAANZ, and the firms themselves may pay the membership fees. This creates the perception of a conflict of interest where the professional association regulator is financially and structurally beholden to the very entities and members it is supposed to discipline.

    Advertisement

    When a professional body potentially spends almost half a million dollars to prevent a whistleblower from challenging a liability shield, it is no longer defending the public interest or the integrity of the auditing profession; it is acting as a defence shield for the big four’s partners.

    Taylor’s dismissal of a structural split ignores the sheer scale of the non-audit business. Non-accounting services now account for approximately 80 per cent of big four revenue.

    These firms are no longer accounting partnerships in any traditional sense. They are global consulting behemoths that use their historical status as auditors to shield their consulting arms from litigation costs.

    Therefore, Lyon’s litigation aims to prove that the current liability scheme unlawfully covers these category 3 services. If he succeeds, firms like KPMG and PwC could face uncapped costs for their advice.

    Only then will GSA be curtailed.

    This will not happen through yet another ethics seminar, CAANZ training module or a hollow apology, but through the cold, hard reality of legal consequences and financial accountability.

    Advertisement

    The need for radical reform

    The “big con” of the consulting industry has hollowed out public and private sector capacity and allowed a tiny elite to accumulate wealth, even when they leave a partnership for GSA behaviour – all while operating under a veil of secrecy.

    The scandals at KPMG, where partners allegedly lied in internal investigations and previously cheated on ethics exams, reflect a culture that knows it’s too big to fail and too protected to care.

    Taylor is right that we should not kid ourselves into thinking that simple tweaks will work. Nevertheless, he is wrong to suggest that the problem is merely individual.

    We must move beyond the ‘bad apple’ narrative and address the structural rot. Individual greed, stupidity and arrogance can only flourish when the system permits it.

    Until we dismantle the secretive partner shield and force these partnership firms to operate with the same transparency and liability as the public they serve, the scandals will continue.

    Advertisement

    The parliamentary committees should be applauded as they pursue the GSA of partners. This is democracy at work. The Lyon case is not just a legal technicality; it is a battle for the very soul of professional auditors’ accountability in Australia.

    Dolly Parton, American hero and icon of inclusion, dies at 80

    "Where you see wrong or inequality or injustice, speak out, because this is your country. This is your democracy. Make it. Protect it. Pass it on."

    - Thurgood Marshall


    Social media explodes in grief at passing of singer-songwriter, actor, philanthropist and absolute legend


    The setting sun was shining bright on Dolly’s mural here in Asheville tonight. Dolly Parton is a local hero here in the Appalachian mountains, and my kids were among the many to benefit from her Imagination Library program. The world feels dimmer without her in it, but her legacy of love lives on. 💖

    Black-and-white photo of Dolly Parton singing into a handheld microphone

    RIP Dolly Parton, a gem and a hero. She died today at the age of 80.



    Dolly Parton smiling as Lily Tomlin blasted Trump as “a sexist, egotistical, lying, hypocritical bigot.”


    In lieu of flowers, Dolly Parton’s family is asking for 
    donations to her Imagination Library, which has distributed over 330 million books to kids.

    Here’s What Dolly Parton Did When Someone Left a Baby on Her Doorstep


    Today I've learned that Dolly Parton gave Black high schools band uniforms and wrote Eminem a nice letter when he was inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame



    “In a world rewarding the hoarding of wealth, Dolly gave freely and openly. Dolly kept her heart open, even when she became so rich and powerful that she could have chosen otherwise.”



    Jodi Ettenberg on living grief and a serendipitous discovery. “Living grief lacks the tapestry of rituals, language, and social permissions around grieving that a person is offered with death.”