Wednesday, October 14, 2026

AI could upend food delivery

 

AI could upend food delivery

The Verge – no paywall: “Delivery apps like DoorDash and Uber Eats have changed how diners eat and how restaurants operate. AI could force a new kind of reckoning for the industry. DoorDash, the leading food delivery app, processed 970 million orders in its second quarter this year and generated $4.5 billion in revenue. A 10-person startup called Bites is a blip in comparison: It has just around 300 restaurants signed up in the Bay Area, where it’s operating as a pre-seed startup. 

But this summer, Bites caught DoorDash’s attention. In August, a slew of restaurants in the Bay Area received a strange email from DoorDash, warning businesses that they may be listed without their consent on Bites. The form letter, copies of which were seen by The Verge, said that DoorDash had heard from “several partners” that were added to the third-party platform without their knowledge. 

DoorDash warned restaurants that they may not have agreed to Bites’ “terms, pricing structures, or service standards”; that they may not have control over the accuracy of their menu or hours of operation on Bites; and that, depending on the state, “such practices could be illegal.” The email included instructions on how to contact Bites to request removal. One way to look at the warning is DoorDash proactively alerting its restaurant partners. But DoorDash going on the offense over a relatively small peer hints at a battle taking shape between established apps and newer, leaner startups looking to upend business in the age of AI.

Tech companies have promised that the future of AI is that ordinary people will have “agents” completing tasks: scheduling meetings, looking for deals on socks, sifting through their inbox and replying to emails, and yes, ordering food on their behalf. If this really does come to bear — if billions of people shift to interact with the internet not through search engines, webpages, and apps, but through large language models — those websites and services will lose control of the relationship with consumers as they stop visiting webpages and apps. What happens to Amazon when it can’t show shoppers boosted item listings because they don’t come to the site? What happens when Uber can’t entice riders with a free subscription trial? What happens when a food delivery service can upsell you to throw in a bottle of wine with dinner? The Verge has coined this brewing fight “the DoorDash problem.” Bites is now the literal embodiment of the term…”


SPRINGTIME FOR TUCKER: Tucker Carlson Is Now a World War II Revisionist.

Tucker Carlson makes a great deal of Hitler’s insistence that he “did not want to go to war with the U.K.” But Carlson steadfastly ignores that not wanting to go to war was the pose that Hitler struck at every step of his journey across Europe. In September 1938, he promised in writing that acquiring the Sudetenland would satisfy Germany’s territorial ambitions in Europe and then made a speech in which he declared that once that issue was settled — an issue, you will note, that was only an issue because he had made it one — “there will be no more territorial problems for Germany in Europe.” Six months later, in flagrant violation of his vow, he invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia. Six months after that, Hitler invaded Poland — a country with which he had until recently had a peace deal. This was a pattern. Nine days before his invasion of Poland, Hitler had struck a ten-year non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union — a pact that, like all the others, was broken just two years later when, to the great surprise of Joseph Stalin, he invaded the Soviet Union with 3.8 million troops. Narrowly, it is accurate to suppose that, during this period, Hitler did “not want to go to war with the U.K.” But it was also true that, at various points in the past, Hitler had not wanted to go to war with Czechoslovakia, Poland, or Russia — or, for that matter, with Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, Yugoslavia, and Greece. It is fair to say, I’d venture, that in the realm of not wanting to go to war, Hitler lacked aptitude.

And apparently, lacked skill in planning as well. Darryl Cooper, Tucker’s favorite “historian,” who kicked off Tucker’s then-newly pro-Axis worldview claimed in September of 2024. Or as Steve asked back then:  Seriously, What the Hell Is Wrong With Tucker Carlson?

“We can’t feed these people, we don’t have the food to feed these people,” Cooper imagined the Germans thinking after fighting on the Eastern Front accidentallycreated more prisoners and refugees than Germany could cope with. “And one of them actually says, ‘Rather than wait for them all to slowly starve this winter, wouldn’t it be more humane to just finish them off quickly now?’”

At the Daily Wire today, James Price explains: How Tucker Carlson Was Rees-Mogged By Conservatism.

Carlson conservatism seems to share the same outlook regardless of where it goes, a habit of the Left. Socialism is the same in every country, because it is an internationalist credo. But classical conservatives are trying to conserve different things in different places: an American his written Constitution, an Englishman his King.

In the end, Carlson conservatism doesn’t seem interested in conserving very much, which leaves American conservatives with a choice about who will speak for them. They could do worse than the Honorable Member for the 18th century. America has taken its conservatism from 18th-century Englishmen before, and it worked out rather well, gifting the world the likes of Jefferson and Madison.

It is not just a theoretical question. There is a time for choosing, to paraphrase another classical American conservative, and that will be asked more earnestly after the U.S. midterms. Will they embrace Carlson conservatism, or is there life in the time-honored traditions of old?

Defending Putin, attacking Churchill, defending radical Islam, and defending the fella with the tiny toothbrush mustache – that doesn’t sound like any recognizable form of conservatism to me.

Building certifiers pinned for multiple breaches by NSW Fair Trading

 There will always be at least a potential risk that whoever ‘pays the piper’ can at least suggest the tune. As the ADT observed, the potential conflict arises because the developer pays the accredited certifier performing the private certification function.

Ombudsman


WHO PAYS THE PIPER CALLS THE TUNE: BUILDING CERTIFICATION AND THE PERILS OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST


Building certifiers pinned for multiple breaches by NSW Fair Trading

The are the private building certifiers that have transgressed on multiple occasions with a number of them now banned for a total of five years or more
New details have emerged of the lengths private certifiers will go to in order to keep working. 
In a submission to the NSW Upper House Inquiry into the Regulation of Building Standards, the Hills Shire Council said the system remains flawed. 
Advertisement
“There is a lack of willingness to act impartially, ethically and in the public interest due to an inherent conflict of interest in private certifiers undertaking the dual role of acting as a public official whilst conducting a private business,” the submission said. 
“Council staff has met with multiple private certifiers that have issued occupation
certificates for new apartment buildings that contained significant fire safety noncompliances and required fire safety orders. 
“The common responses were ‘If I don’t approve it, someone else will and I will be out of work’ and ‘I know it doesn’t comply but that is industry standard’.” 
The Saturday Telegraph has gathered a list of eight private certifiers pinned for multiple breaches by the regulator, according to the NSW Fair Trading disciplinary register. 
Jason Storer 
Advertisement
Former director of AED Consulting (he is still employed by the company)
Fair Trading disciplinary actions: Two
Private certifier Jason Storer is a former director of AED Group.
Private certifier Jason Storer is a former director of AED Group.
Mr Storer raised the ire of NSW Fair Trading when he issued an occupation certificate for an
Auburn high rise building that NSW Building Commissioner David Chandler described as “one of the worst that I’ve seen”.
“I was called into that project after it had been settled and occupied by some 190 people out of 240 and was minded to actually evacuate the building, that is how bad it was,” Mr Chandler told a Business Western Sydney event last year. 
“It was an absolute disgrace and I’m trying to get that resolved still.”
In November last year Mr Storer had his registration cancelled. He was also disqualified for 12 months because he “issued three interim occupation certificates which authorised the occupation and use of a building when lifts in two towers of the building were incomplete and posed a significant hazard to the health and safety of the occupants of the building”.
Mr Storer told an NCAT hearing in November last year “the penalty is excessive”.
He also told The Sunday Telegraph: “The legislation permits a developer to change certifier, however in my opinion it would be beneficial if the legislation was tightened to restrict how this occurs”. 
Stanly Spyrou 
Former director of Dix Gardner Group, ARAK and Redcall Development Services
Fines: $30,000 
Fair Trading reprimands: Three 
Status: Struck off as a certifier for five years from August 2019 
Stanly Spyrou
Stanly Spyrou
Mr Spyrou has been reprimanded by NSWFT for approving works that were not actually in the building and signing off on buildings despite them being “not suitable for occupation or use”. 
NSWFT found he signed off on one apartment development “that could not be found to not constitute a hazard to the health or safety”.
The NSW Land and Environment Court found he “disregarded the obvious failures of the development” at a Strathfield project site. 
Valerio “Vic” Lilli 
Director of DLM Certification and 21 other companies
Fines: $49,000 
Fair Trading reprimands/cautions: Seven 
Status: Struck off as a certifier for five years from February 2020 (but remains a director) 
Building certifier Vlerio 'Vic' Lilli's.
Building certifier Vlerio 'Vic' Lilli's.
Vic Lilli previously certified developments done by major companies including Toplace and Holdmark. Among a litany of breaches included Mr Lilli approving partial use of a 378-unit mixed use building in Castle Hill “ that he could not reasonably determine was suitable for use”.
In 2019 NCAT found him guilty of professional misconduct over the certification of a Summer Hill boarding house. 
Maurice Freixas 
Director of Freixas Development Group and Dix Gardner employee
Fines: $40,000 
Fair Trading reprimands: Four 
Status: Permanently banned from working as a private certifier — copping the heaviest ­sentence handed out to a private ­certifier in 20 years
'Maurice Freixas'. Picture: Facebook
'Maurice Freixas'. Picture: Facebook
Mr Frexias approved the fast tracking of internal alterations on a multimillion dollar waterfront house on a site in Woolwich that was identified as a heritage conservation area and was not compliant. NSWFT also found he overlooked problems with structural design, emergency egress, access for people with a disability, firefighting equipment and emergency lighting for a building in Glendenning. 
In a decision handed down March 30, 2022, NSWFT said the Dix Gardner Group employee ­“engaged in unsatisfactory professional conduct”.
“Mr Freixas issued a construction certificate and an occupation certificate for a large apartment complex in contravention of various provisions of (NSW planning laws),” the decision said.
“Mr Freixas issued the five construction certificates for four different ­developments when the proposed buildings did not comply with relevant requirements of the Building Code of Australia, specifically the requirements in relation to automatic fire sprinklers.”
In April NSW Fair Trading Minister Eleni Petinos revealed he claimed to have completed a building inspection on a Mascot apartment block – and subsequently issued an occupation certificate – despite being in China at the time. 
Lyall Dix 
Director of Dix Gardner 
Fines: $88,500 
Fair Trading reprimands/cautions: 10
Status: He was banned for five years (2012-2017) but remains a company director 
Lyall Dix is the state’s most fined certifier. In 2012, according to NSW Fair Trading, he issued a construction certificate for a residential flat building in Allawah which was inconsistent with the development consent because it has an additional residential apartment, lift shaft and carparking area and driveway. In 2012 Mr Dix issued a final occupation certificate when the Blacktown building had not been fitted with a compliant fire hydrant system. NSW Fair Trading said Dix Gardner can no longer offer certification services in NSW.
Glenn Levick 
BCA Certifiers building certifier 
Fines: $55,000 
Fair Trading reprimands/cautions: Eight 
Status: Still on the job
Glenn Levick. Picture: Supplied
Glenn Levick. Picture: Supplied
One of Mr Levick’s failures, according to NSWFT, was issuing a construction certificate for a seniors living complex despite there being 25 differences between the council approved application and Mr Levick’s construction certificate. 
These differences included additional rooms, removal of doors and windows, relocation of lifts, and an increase in building height.
Bernard Cohen
Director of Essential Certifiers, Essential Food and Health Inspections and 11 other companies 
Fines: $37,000
Reprimands/cautions: 28 
Status: Manages his company “ensuring work methods are adhered to”, according to his LinkedIn profile.
Picture: Bernard Cohen
Picture: Bernard Cohen
Mr Cohen was banned from being a certifier for five years in 2010 for what Judge O’Connor described as “basic errors of judgement”. Despite his record he is still able to run his certifying company. 
His last reprimand, in 2011, was “issuing a final occupation certificate for a
building when it was not suitable for occupation or use in accordance with its classification under the Building Code of Australia”.
Brendan Bennett 
Managing director of City Plan Services, Seillans Properties and 28 other companies 
Fines: $33,000 
Fair Trading cautions/reprimands: Five 
Status: Active in the industry 
Private certifier Brendan Bennett.
Private certifier Brendan Bennett.
In 2018 Fair Trading said Mr Bennett issued a construction certificate for proposed alterations to a hotel in Glebe with endorsed plans that were “not consistent with the development consent, that failed to accurately depict the layout of the existing building and that showed additional/unauthorised works”. 
He was also fined for issuing a complying development certificate for a proposed two-storey dwelling in Clontarf “that did not comply with the Codes SEPP (the dwelling in part contained three storeys)”.
Glenn Fitzgibbon 
Director of Southern Certifiers 
Fines: $33,500
Fair Trading reprimands/cautions: 29 
Status: Remains a company director despite being banned for five years
Mr Fitzgibbon has been disciplined by NSWFT for failings in relation to fire safety, ignoring clients and their inquiries about issuing occupation certificates, disability access and approving defective stormwater work. In relation to a property in Albion Park, NSWFT said he “issued a final occupation certificate for dwelling when the building (was) not suitable for occupation”.

Hegseth – potential 2028 candidate, installs Musk as key Pentagon advisor

Treasurer pushes back on claims PM alone made calls on ATO credit card drama

Jim Chalmers isn’t letting the Prime Minister take sole credit for the ATO about-face after a late-night boast about the decision.


Hundreds of Intermarché shops and Coopérative U outlets in France hit, with fears Dutch chains also affected


Stalin Boys is a short documentary about a Joseph Stalin-obsessed middle-schooler from a tiny Texas town who writes a play about the Soviet dictator and enlists his three friends to stage it for the Texas State History Fair. Free to watch online.


Watch Footage of the Flock Search a Judge Ruled Unconstitutional

404 Media: “Body camera footage obtained by 404 Media reveals the first Flock camera searches ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge, and highlights how the system has turned otherwise mundane traffic stops into interrogations for drivers. 

On Friday, we reported that a federal judge ruled the use of license plate reader systems in the arrest of a woman named Melissa Kyle to be an “unconstitutional warrantless search,” “indiscriminate mass surveillance,” and a violation of the driver’s Fourth Amendment rights. 

The judge in that case ruled that, even though Kyle had more than 91 pounds of meth in her vehicle, the police had no justifiable reason to search Flock for her license plate and no reason to suspect that her travel as shown on Flock’s system was suspicious. Therefore, all of the evidence from Flock and the search of her vehicle must be thrown out…”



Elon Musk’s America PAC Is Spending Big on the Midterms. We’re Tracking It Daily

Wired: “To follow Elon Musk’s America PAC money, WIRED created a live-updating tracker that highlights the trillionaire’s overall influence on November’s elections. ​Elon Musk’s political operation is focused on the most consequential races of the midterm elections, according to a WIRED analysis of federal campaign finance data. As of October 6, America PAC, the main Musk-affiliated super PAC, had deployed $21 million of the $26.7 million it has spent on this year’s races into seven key US Senate contests that are widely seen as close—if not toss-ups—and represent a path for Democrats to take control of the chamber this November.  

To monitor America PAC’s spending in the midterms, WIRED has created a live tracker that updates daily and highlights where America PAC is putting money into the midterms, from individual races to Musk’s overall influence on the election season. It draws on America PAC’s filings with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), which the agency processes daily and which lists all the payments America PAC has made for ads, mailers, and texts…”

Hegseth – potential 2028 candidate, installs Musk as key Pentagon advisor

Oligarch Watch: “By choosing Elon Musk to co-lead the Pentagon’s “Future of Warfare” project, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a potential 2028 Republican presidential candidate, has secured a close working relationship with his party’s single largest political donor. 

Last week, with Musk seated in the audience, Hegseth called the SpaceX and Tesla CEO one of “our nation’s best minds” while announcing the creation of “Project Meridian” at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia. “Project Meridian will ruthlessly map the trajectory of war’s domains and technologies to ensure this War Department, your War Department, dominates the future,” he said during a speech that he described as the first of many “State of the Force” addresses. 

Hegseth added that Musk and the project’s other co-leaders — Palmer Luckey, who leads the killer drone company Anduril, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich — will help the Pentagon choose “the weapons and systems that our children and our grandchildren will need in their lifetimes, without any creative limitations or restrictions.” Whatever recommendations they decide on will be released by late January via a public report and “a classified annex,” per Hegseth. As Musk returns to an official role within the federal government, the appointment raises fresh conflict-of-interest concerns regarding his relationship with the Trump administration.

 SpaceX, his rocket, satellite, and AI company, has billions of dollars’ worth of military contracts alone. Last year, Musk and his companies benefited in numerous ways as he led the White House’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) austerity project — a period that concluded with his bitter but temporary feud with President Trump…”

Tuesday, October 13, 2026

Trump’s Message to Ukraine Is Now Crystal Clear

Trump, aka Krasnov, is trying to force Ukraine to surrender

"In the past 72 hours, Donald Trump has dropped all pretense, torched a couple decades of American policy, and undermined 18 months of his own diplomacy

 

Exclusive: Top Trump Adviser Sergio Gor Was Born in the Soviet Union


The president’s actions over the past 72 hours look like an effort to force Kyiv to surrender.


In the past 72 hours, Donald Trump has dropped all pretense, torched a couple decades of American policy, and undermined 18 months of his own diplomacy. He lifted sanctions on the import of Russian diesel fuel, in violation of the letter and spirit of laws that he himself signed. He has threatened to stop sharing intelligence with Ukraine, unless Ukraine agrees not to target Russian refineries, thus demanding that Kyiv give up its most effective weapon while asking nothing from Russia in exchange. He has not criticized Russian attacks on Ukrainian power plants or factories, even those owned by American companies. He has offered no condolences for the recent deaths of Ukrainian children in Russian bombing raids.



He has lied repeatedly. He declared that Ukraine and Russia had agreed to an “energy cease-fire,” an announcement that surprised the Ukrainians and that in any case the Russians immediately broke, hitting a power plant in Kharkiv only hours later. He accused Ukraine of blocking negotiations, when in reality the Ukrainians have repeatedly proposed cease-fires and Russia has never agreed to a cease-fire or any meaningful negotiation at all.

He has described Ukraine’s democratically elected president as an obstacle to negotiations and told him to leave office. But on Friday, before making these new decisions, he held yet another long, friendly telephone conversation with the Russian dictator, who really could end the war today. All Vladimir Putin has to do is tell his soldiers to stop fighting, and then the war is over. The Ukrainians cannot stop fighting because, if they do, their country will be conquered and they will suffer the fate of their occupied territories: leaders murdered, children kidnapped, repression and concentration camps for everyone else. If Trump knows this, then he does not care.

The president has implied that the point of his new policy is to lower fuel prices for Americans. Perhaps he wants to convince voters that the cause of high prices is Ukraine and not his own war of choice in Iran. But this is not a sufficient explanation or justification for these dramatic actions. The amount of fuel that Russia could export is too small, the impact on pricing too slight, the narrative too late to shape electoral outcomes.

This looks, instead, like something very different: an abrupt, Hail Mary attempt to force Ukraine to surrender and to save the Russian economy, perhaps in order to finally complete the multiple business deals that the Russians are known to have discussed with American negotiators and others in Trump’s orbit. These include deals involving the Nord Stream gas pipelines, mineral mining in the Arctic, the Russian assets frozen in European banks, and more.

Since the beginning of Trump’s second term, American allies in Europe and elsewhere have tried to explain to the president the significance of the war and the threat that Russia poses to peace and prosperity in Europe, in the Middle East, in Africa. Now it looks as if they have failed, and Trump has followed his oldest instincts to side with Putin. What lessons will they draw?

The first and most obvious is: Don’t rely on the United States. America is now a capricious, unpredictable power, one whose long-standing foreign policies can be impulsively reversed, from one day to the next. The U.S. has been sanctioning Russia for many years, and now suddenly, at the whim of the president, it is not. Also: Dictators receive better treatment in Trump’s Washington than elected leaders. Canada is a far more reliable energy partner for the U.S. than Russia, and yet Trump has not sought to improve relations with the Canadian government. European security will be directly at risk in the case of a Ukrainian collapse or surrender, and yet Trump listens to Moscow, not Berlin or London.

Another lesson: This administration is for sale. A few days ago, The New York Timesreported that, as part of peace negotiations between the U.S. and Russia, the property of Lukoil, a Russian company, may soon be acquired by a business consortium that includes Middle Eastern partners of Trump’s two lead negotiators in Ukraine, Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, as well as Trump’s daughter Ivanka and Witkoff’s son. (An administration official confirmed to the Times that Kushner and Witkoff were involved in the Lukoil discussions, though there is no evidence that they will personally benefit.) The proposed deals on pipelines, minerals, and frozen assets are also still on the table. Even if none of them is ever completed, the mere fact that Trump’s negotiators discuss them gives the Russian regime reason to believe that it can continue the war with impunity.

However, democracies can cooperate without the American president. Ukraine will continue fighting, and will probably continue striking Russian refineries, thanks to its friends in Europe and beyond. French intelligence, German weaponry, and broad packages of aid from Scandinavia, Poland, and elsewhere will help. Everyone else should take note. For the past couple years, Europeans, Canadians, and the Pacific democracies have been building deeper commercial and security links with one another, as well as with India and Latin America. They’ve just been given another reason to make those links stronger.

The Trump-Russia relationship remains intense, important, and very weird. In the end, Trump always adopts Russia’s perspective, whoever the leader. Since his first trip to Moscow in 1987, when it was still the Soviet Union, he has loudly repeated Russian propaganda and reflected Russian views. Upon returning from that trip, he took out full-page advertisements in three newspapers, attacking American alliances in Europe and Asia. For nearly 40 years, he has been saying much the same thing. He has changed his mind about abortion and crypto, he has supported different political parties at different times, but his dislike of America’s democratic allies and his preference for Russia have remained remarkably consistent.

He continues to hold these views in defiance of the American military and American intelligence, as well as majorities in the country and in Congress. Immediately after his statement on diesel and his comments about Volodymyr Zelensky, a bipartisan cohort of U.S. representatives and senators attacked the deal and vowed to reverse it. Earlier today, U.S. Air Force General Alexus Grynkewich, America’s highest-ranking soldier in Europe and the top NATO commander—a job always held by an American—delivered a very different message to Russia. Speaking at a security conference in Warsaw, Grynkewich said that any attack on NATO, something many now genuinely fear, would be met with overwhelming force: “We will stop the attack and deny them the ability to achieve their ​objectives, whatever those ​might be. We will, ⁠in short, ensure any attack, against any ally, proves utterly futile.” He implied that there would be massive retaliation targeting “anything and everything that supports, sustains, and controls” an aggressive force.

This is the kind of language that, if it also came from the White House, might deter Russia from expanding its current campaign of sabotage and cyberattacks in Europe, from continuing to aid Iran, or from committing war crimes in Ukraine. But this president absolutely refuses to use it, and at this point, we have to assume he never will.


Why is Donald Trump being called ‘Krasnov’ after his latest deal with Putin? The truth behind the KGB claim