FTC reveals a record $15.9 billion in consumer fraud losses in 2025 Detroit Free Press
Wealthsimple called me to warn me about a scam. Turns out that call was the scam — how to avoid fraud even as it becomes widespread Money
State of Antisemitism in America Report 2025
“According to the latest annual State of Antisemitism in America Report released by American Jewish Committee (AJC) on February 10, 2026, a majority of American Jews believe antisemitism has become a “very serious” problem at home. Protests like that one in November seem to illustrate some of the reasons why.
This year’s survey revealed roughly nine in 10 (91%) American Jews say they feel less safe as a Jewish person in the U.S. as a result of attacks on Jews in the past 12 months, including the arson attack on a Jewish governor’s home in Pennsylvania, the firebombing of Jews in Boulder, Colorado, and the murder of a young couple outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C.
The latest report also asked – for the first time – how the use of the phrase “Globalize the Intifada” may impact American Jews’ feelings of safety, whether they had felt uncomfortable or even excluded from groups or spaces because of their Jewish identity, and whether they are concerned that generative artificial intelligence will further the spread of antisemitism. Here are five stories that illustrate some of this year’s troubling findings…
More than seven in 10 Jewish adults report having experienced antisemitism online or on social media – including those who say they have been personally targeted and those who say they have seen or heard antisemitic incidents without being a target themselves. Jewish women are more likely to avoid posting content online out of fear of antisemitism than their male counterparts (50% vs. 30%). Jewish women are also more likely than their male counterparts to experience antisemitism on Facebook (62% vs. 49%) and Instagram (45% vs. 35%)…”
See also WSJ – Jews Begin to Wonder: Is Anywhere Safe? ‘It feels like the 1930s again.’ Hostility against Jews surges in Western countries where they felt safe in recent decades.
Earlier this month, Guy Wolf, the president of the Jewish Cultural Centre in Liège, Belgium [there are onlu 500 Jews in Liège], awoke to alarming news: overnight, an IED was detonated outside his local synagogue, blowing out the windows and setting the front doors and nearby cars alight.
The attack on the historic temple was the first such incident in the city since the Holocaust, according to local officials….
Closed Case: The Law Hegseth Triggered Never Expires
W.H. Lawrence: “Pete Hegseth just stepped into a sequence with no recorded escape. Every modern conviction, from Nuremberg to The Hague to Lyon, began the same way: a man in power, certain the rules did not apply. Every one of them was proven wrong. Nuremberg did not isolate liability to the officer who spoke the order. Prosecutors proved command creates exposure, and senior leadership stood trial because the system produced the conduct. The same framework applies here. Trump set the posture at the executive level, public authorization fixed the record, and military action completed the sequence.
Hegseth entered that record at the Pentagon podium. Trump remains within the same chain of exposure that has governed every modern prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 2441. History records a consistent limit: time may delay judgment and jurisdiction may shift, but accountability continues to accumulate across decades and borders, closing only when death ends prosecution while the record remains intact. When Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared before reporters on March 13, 2026, and declared “no quarter, no mercy for our enemies” during Operation Epic Fury, the declaration did not succeed in terrorizing Iranian military personnel.
What the statement accomplished, as a matter of operative law, was criminal liability for Hegseth under existing federal statute, and identical exposure for every service member who acted on that directive. The principle of “quarter,” mercy toward combatants seeking surrender, emerged from medieval chivalric codes in which captured nobility represented ransom value, and that economic calculus calcified into enforceable military convention.
The United States became the first sovereign nation to formally domesticate this principle into codified law. In 1863, at President Abraham Lincoln’s directive, the Lieber Code, formally designated General Orders No. 100, prohibited the execution of prisoners and the wounded, characterized orders to give no quarter as per se violations of the laws of war, and constituted the foundational instrument every subsequent international humanitarian law framework required as its predicate…”
