Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Walkouts, accusations and a blacked-out agenda

 

Walkouts, accusations and a blacked-out agenda: The council meeting where everything went wrong

Walkouts, accusations and a blacked-out agenda: The council meeting where everything went wrong 

Anthony Segaert September 22, 2026 


As if resigned to what was about to take place under his watch, Liverpool City Council chief executive Jason Breton stuck his hand in his personal lolly bowl and sat back as councillor Peter Ristevski launched a verbal attack on the mayor.

“Mate, no wonder people call you a dirty individual. You are very dirty,” Ristevski, a former accountant who lost his registration over serious misconduct and new member of Lyle Shelton’s conservative Family First party, sneered at Liberal Mayor Ned Mannoun. “You are a very dirty individual. You are a despicable human being.”

The council meeting ended shortly after Labor councillors and an independent walked out.LIVERPOOL COUNCIL
Then he called the mayor a criminal, raising unsubstantiated (and denied) allegations from 11 years ago that the mayor had been fired from a job at the Mounties club for stealing gym vouchers.
This was an extraordinary council meeting, by name and by nature.
It was, in the administrative sense, an extraordinary meeting: the regular monthly meeting, when councillors were set to vote on who would be deputy mayor for the next year, had to be rescheduled because Mannoun and Breton will be on a council-funded trip to London for a conference about British-Australian infrastructure.
Joyfully for Breton, who so enjoys soccer that he is writing a book called The Football of Business, the conference includes an early morning tour of Everton Stadium.
But even by Liverpool Council’s low standards, the meeting was extraordinary in the ordinary sense of the word too. There were mass walkouts, accusations of criminal behaviour and last-minute redactions of reams of pages of the council agenda.
The redacted meeting agenda.LIVERPOOL COUNCIL
If the look was bad, the timing is worse. It’s a few weeks until the opening of what promises to be the most transformative piece of infrastructure the area will ever get, the new Western Sydney Airport, and the council is waiting for the findings of a public inquiry which is set to recommend Mannoun and Ristevski undergo mediation – yet here were community leaders so engulfed by infighting they could not elect a deputy leader.

The chaos began about two hours in, when Ristevski attempted to raise allegations about a former Liberal councillor who he claimed had been employed as a planner and is now taking the council to the Land and Environment Court.
Despite the motion being published in public meeting minutes, Mannoun explained that he thought airing the allegations was “unlawful in the most heinous terms”. So he had emailed his chief executive, who, after investigating, also decided it was against council rules. It resulted in pages of blacked-out words. 
Mannoun’s colleague, Liberal Richard Ammoun, then raised an urgent motion to discuss findings handed down last month from the Tax Practitioners Board about Ristevski: that he had provided and advertised his tax agent services without registration, and that he had been acting as a “shadow director” for his daughter’s accounting firm.
It took exactly 30 seconds for Ristevski to interrupt the motion with claims that this, too, was “illegal”. As before, it was less a matter of legality than strategy. It didn’t matter if the motion didn’t get up: the Liberals knew the mere mention of the allegations would rile up the man who, whenever he’s found out, goes on the attack.
As councillors sipped on full-strength Coca-Colas and Solos, Ristevski unloaded with insults offensive enough to have him expelled from the chamber and barred from putting up his hand to be deputy mayor.
That changed the numbers. Incumbent independent Deputy Mayor Peter Harle – who has a principle of only accepting nominations if votes are unanimous – was due for re-election. Ammoun walked to the chief executive’s table and dropped his nomination form for the position, abandoning a deal made beforehand.
The act of alleged political treachery triggered a walkout: Harle, along with all Labor councillors, picked up their belongings and left, leaving the meeting without enough councillors to meet quorum.
“Oh!” Breton said as he looked up from his prepared script for the running of the votes to see an almost empty chamber. Where did everyone go? And, er, who becomes deputy mayor? It was 9.45pm by this point. Rubbing his eyes and letting out a deep sigh, Mannoun called for a break. The meeting returned only to be ended. After all the fuss, nothing, not even the position of deputy mayor, had changed.
Who is to blame for the chaos engulfing the council? At all levels, there is almost no accountability. The very thing which was meant to bring real accountability – a months-long Office of Local Government public inquiry into the council – looks set to only recommend that Ristevski and Mannoun go to mediation over their differences.
After Monday’s horror show, one thing is clear: mediation isn’t going to fix much.
Anthony SegaertAnthony Segaert is the Parramatta bureau chief at The Sydney Morning Herald. He was previously an urban affairs reporter.Connect via X or email.

ATO staff offered pay cut in APSC push to increase work hours

 Cassaniti saga: Coloured pens, allegedly rushed consent: ATO record keeper ordered to appear in court


Nine extra minutes per day are proposed for agencies below the current standard threshold. One set of ordinary hours to rule them all.

Tens of thousands of public servants at the Australian Taxation Office and several other federal agencies could be required to work longer hours without specific compensation under a bid by the Australian Public Service Commission to standardise the length of the public service working day.

In the most audacious move by the APSC in the current bargaining round so far, the public service’s workplace enforcer has lobbed a new “common condition” across the entire public service that proposes to extend the working days of employees of agencies who now have daily hours below the majority threshold of seven hours and 30 minutes.

“Currently, around 80% of agencies have ordinary working hours of seven hours, 30 minutes per day,” the APSC’s preliminary Commonwealth position on APS working hours, released on Monday and obtained by The Mandarin, states.

“The chief negotiator is proposing to make seven hours and 30 minutes the standard working hours for all agencies, impacting approximately 20% of agencies. These proposed changes will impact each agency differently.

“Agencies currently with working hours above or below seven hours and 30 minutes will be required to adjust to the new common standard in their next enterprise agreement.”

While most of the APS uses the 7.5-hour working day definition, the Australian Taxation Office retains a seven-hour, 21-minute workday. So do the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, Geoscience Australia, the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority and the Australian Skills Quality Authority.

The ATO will easily be the biggest and hardest battleground for the APSC to try and get any increase in working hours from public servants without commensurate compensation, especially with the Australian Services Union Taxation Officer’s Branch bringing an audit lens and hard numbers to any fuzzy language.

“The APSC is proposing a common condition of a seven-hour, 30-minute day across the APS, with no exceptions. The ATO has a seven-hour, 21-minute day. This is equivalent to taking one week of leave for all ATO staff,” branch secretary Jeff Lapidos told The Mandarin.

“The ATO also wants to prevent any early shutdown by any APS agency on the last business day before Christmas. The ATO closes at 12.00 on the last business day before Christmas.”

The proposed increase in hours at the ATO could also sink a ‘yes’ vote for any new EBA, potentially excluding agency-specific wage talks if they are declared intractable and sent to arbitration.

Part of the problem APS leaders and the APSC face is that the combined front to achieve uniform, service-wide agreements and wage deals suits some APS employees and unions far better than others, especially where there is a market premium on specialist rather than generalist skills.

However, smaller unions within the APS have little or no hesitation in decoupling from a broader uniform push and taking their chances at arbitration, because of the often large discount compared with labour-discount specialists like lawyers, auditors, scientists, and technology professionals who opt to become public servants.

The Commonwealth’s initial wage offer to its public servants is slated to hit the table on October 13, with offers to agencies bound by determinations, rather than bargaining, already coming in at just 3% a year.

Coloured pens, allegedly rushed consent: ATO record keeper ordered to appear in court

 

Coloured pens, allegedly rushed consent: ATO record keeper ordered to appear in court

TAX 

Questions of alleged coercion and inaccurate records have been raised during a Federal Court hearing against the Commissioner of Taxation. 

21 September 2026 • By  Carlos Tse  
Share this article on:

A director’s release of documents to the Commissioner of Taxation also raised the question of consent at an interlocutory hearing on Thursday, 18 September 2026. 

Justice Cameron Moore ordered a member of the ATO staff to appear for cross-examination to determine whether his record of events was contemporaneous and accurate. 

During the hearing, it emerged that the applicant, Marginata Securities director Thi Linh Trinh, signed a consent form to release documents on 9 September. The court heard this consent form may have been signed under alleged coercion. 

Justice Moore heard that Trinh was given the option to supply certain documents to the commissioner either through an “image option” or a “search option” and was given an opportunity to seek legal representation.

Justice Moore said that Trinh was told words to the effect of: “If you don’t consent to it being imaged, we will be here for days.” 

She was also told words to the effect of: “You can get legal advice… would you like to give [your husband] a call now.” 

Her husband and director of accounting firm Capital Financial Advisory, Sam Peter Cassaniti, was allegedly on his way to the premises at the time.

The applicants’ barrister, David McGovern SC, alleged that Trinh was rushed to sign the consent form before Cassaniti arrived.

The Commissioner of Taxation submitted the notes taken by the ATO employee at the time, which were time-stamped, allegedly provided a play-by-play record of events.

The barrister for the commissioner, Luke Livingston SC, stressed that the employee provided a “precise, comprehensive, and detailed” note of the events.

Despite this, Justice Moore said it was “not a very expansive note”. 

According to the timestamps, Trinh provided consent within 12 minutes, and the employeemerely noted that she was “happy” to sign the consent form.

Different coloured pens

McGovern submitted that in the notes, some further timestamps appeared to have been inserted with a different coloured pen, and questioned the contemporaneousness of the notes due to the use of different pens.

In response, Livingston called McGovern’s claim “tenuous”, asserting that the concept of reasonable doubt should apply to the contemporaneity of the notes.

“It may not be a different pen [colour]; it could be a different pressure,” Livingston said.

The judge found a substantial factual dispute over whether Trinh consented on the day of signing, and because the employee was the only one with a written record of events, the judge ordered that they be cross-examined so the court could determine the notes’ contemporaneity.

Justice Moore listed the next hearing for 30 September 2026, with the employee and five other witnesses set to appear.

The case citation: NSD2344/2025 - Kerrigan Law Pty Ltd (ACN 620 231 432) (Formerly Known as McEvoy Legal Pty Ltd) & Ors v Commissioner of Taxation & Anor 

Kevin Burrowes - Australia’s five most powerful people in consulting for 2026

 

Australia’s five most powerful people in consulting for 2026

AFR Magazine’s hotly anticipated Power issue, out on September 25, includes lists of the key players across five industry sectors. Here are the year’s leading consultants.



What a difference a year makes. Last year, KPMG chief executive Andrew Yates topped The Australian Financial Review Magazine’s consulting power list. Yates had helped the firm win a series of big audits and managed cost well enough to give partners a pay bump.

And then on the evening of March 24, Labor senator Deborah O’Neill stood up in the Senate and, using parliamentary privilege, quoted a whistleblowerwho claimed KPMG audit partners had misused confidential client data and leveraged conflicted relationships to win audit work.

The fallout, and the firm’s botched handling of the matter, has been severe and is ongoing. Yates, along with most of the local leadership, has retired early, new work is proving hard to win, and dozens of partners and hundreds of staff have been cut.

This latest consulting scandal, along with the mixed effect of artificial intelligence on demand, has particularly hit the advisory arms of the big four firms (KPMG, PwC, Deloitte and EY). They are all using the technology to cut costs and create new service offerings, and advising clients on how to do the same. In turn, AI is helping smaller and newly formed firms carry out work that previously could only be done by larger firms. Some clients are using AI in place of consultants.

This year’s most-powerful list is made up of those who have helped their firms thrive in the challenging environment.

1. Peter Burns

The Accenture Australia and New Zealand head has been getting the jump on his consulting rivals by signing up large clients to multi-year outsourcing deals. Burns’ pitch is that Accenture will run back-office operations offshore – marketing, finance, human resources and IT – at a lower cost, allowing the client to cut staff. Accenture profits by using lower-cost offshore staff and improving the client’s business processes.
The firm now runs parts of the back-office operations of household names such as Origin Energy and Coles. The Coles deal, worth an estimated $500 million over five years, involves moving up to 1000 roles offshore. Burns is negotiating a similar deal with Qantas. These deals, along with a flourishing public sector business, helped boost the firm’s most recent local results, for 2024-25. Revenue was up to almost $3 billion and post-tax profit up by 20 per cent to $124  million. That’s a good result in a year when the big four advisory arms all struggled.

2. Said Jahani

Jahani has spent much of his time since being appointed in 2025 as CEO of Grant Thornton Australia negotiating with various private equity outfits vying to buy the local firm. The winning bidder, New Mountain Capital, is already the majority owner of the US-headquartered Grant Thornton Advisors and will add the Australian firm to a global network spanning the Americas, Europe, the Middle East and Asia-Pacific.
The closely watched transaction – the largest ever in the Australian accounting sector – is a coup for Jahani, who has worked at the firm since 2007. Local Grant Thornton partners will receive a lucrative payday from the deal and the firm’s leaders have a war chest worth hundreds of millions of dollars to buy smaller firms and hire. Jahani has so impressed the firm’s global leaders that he was given the additional role of head of Grant Thornton in the Asia-Pacific region in late August.

3. Kevin Burrowes

Burrowes was originally planning to retire as PwC Australia CEO this year, having completed his epic turnaround job of the once-embattled firm. Then the KPMG audit leaks scandal blew up. PwC’s board looked at the KPMG allegations and quickly realised that it would lead to the government revisiting shelved laws to give ASIC more power to police the mostly unregulated big four. They asked Burrowes to stick around for two more years and partners voted in favour of the move in August.
Burrowes, originally from the United Kingdom, was parachuted in by PwC global from a Singapore-based role to take control of the Australian firm in 2023 after a tax partner was found to have shared confidential government data to win tax work. Initially, he was greeted with fear and loathing by parts of the partnership. But his willingness to move quickly to cut personnel and push through unpopular reforms helped speed up the firm’s recovery. Revenue at the firm is increasing for the first time since the 2023 scandal hit, up more than 6 per cent in the first half of the year.

4. Joanne Gorton

Gorton, the CEO of Deloitte Australia, is another big-four leader who has returned her firm to growth amid difficult market conditions. Revenue at the firm is up slightly to $2.55 billion in 2025-26; the downturn in strategy and risk and deals advisory offset by increased revenue in tax and tech consulting. Her 2030 plan for Deloitte is to emulate Accenture by going big into offshored services and to lower internal costs using AI.
She wants to triple the firm’s managed services arm into a $1 billion business by 2030, offsetting the threat from AI to the advisory business. The thinking is AI will automate one-third of routine consulting tasks, forcing the firm to cut fees by up to 40 per cent. She wants to redeploy, not cut, that 30 per cent of capacity, hence the aim to triple its managed services arm. Under Gorton, an auditor, the firm has also brandished its auditing chops by correctly raising the alarm about the financial accounts of new audit client Corporate Travel Management.

5. Igor Sadimenko

Sadimenko is a driving force behind the hyper-aggressive local expansion of the US-headquartered consulting and turnaround firm Alvarez & Marsal. As head of the firm’s performance improvement service in Australia and New Zealand, he has been busily recruiting and poaching partners from the big four who can sell advisory work and then roll up their sleeves and actually do the work.
The firm has so far recruited more than 70 managing directors with this rare combo of skills, mostly from the big four accounting firms. It also expects to have more than 500 staff by the end of the year. The firm’s quick growth – it only set up locally in 2023 – means Alvarez & Marsal has become a force in the local advisory market. Revenue is expected to hit $180 million when its financial year ends in October as it picks up work once done by the big four and even the strategy firms. The firm is now quickly expanding its service offerings beyond its traditional services of consulting, tax advice and transaction advice.
The AFR Magazine annual Power issue is out on Friday, September 25, inside The Australian Financial Review. Follow AFR Mag on Instagram.

The ten best philosophy articles of the year?

 How different are philosophers?


The ten best philosophy articles of the year?


CBO analysis found the Iran war has cost $38 billion


“We have been too quiet for too long. There comes a time when you have to say something. You have to make a little noise. You have to move your feet. This is the time.” — John Lewis (1940-2020)




A.I. Queries From Abroad Raise Fears of a Biological Weapons Race

Bloomberg (Gift Article): Anthropic Says Yemeni Cell Used Claude in Missile Development. And from Carl Zimmer in the New York Times (Gift Article): A.I. Queries From Abroad Raise Fears of a Biological Weapons Race.


CBO analysis found the Iran war has cost $38 billion

DoD Inspector General, LEAD IG REPORT TO THE U.S. CONGRESS. APRIL 1, 2026–JUNE 30, 2026. U.S. forces launched Operation Epic Fury (OEF) on February 28 to dismantle the Iranian regime’s security apparatus, including its missile production and naval capabilities, and to ensure that Iran never acquires nuclear weapons.

  • The DoW [“Dept. of War”] estimated the cost of OEF [Operation Epic Fury] to be $33.4 billion as of June 29. The estimate includes $7.4 billion of cumulative obligations (incremental costs) for OEF, $22.3 billion for expended munitions, and $3.7 billion in equipment losses, but does not include costs for infrastructure repairs.