Thursday, March 12, 2026

Dare to Act Differently and Be Happier

 

Dare to Act Differently and Be Happier 


In financial circles, the investment strategy many people pursue during chaotic times is known as the “flight to safety.” That means dumping risky assets such as stocks and buying safer ones such as government bonds. This is not just a financial strategy, but a human one. When things get chaotic, eliminate your exposure to risk and hunker down. That’s the safe bet.

What seems the safe option is not necessarily the best one in challenging times.


Or is it? In 1932, when economic circumstances were far scarier than anything we face today—unemployment had soared to 23.6 percent and economic growth was negative 12.9 percent—Franklin D. Roosevelt, who was running for president that year, gave a speech at Oglethorpe University, in Atlanta, in which he proposedexperimenting and risk-taking as a response to trouble. “It is common sense to take a method and try it,” he told the students. “If it fails, admit it frankly and try another. But above all, try something.” He won, and he did try something—launching the New Deal, which permanently changed the role of the federal government in American life.

Just as the flight to safety has a human dimension beyond financial advice, Roosevelt’s exhortation to adopt an experimental mindset holds a daring bit of advice for all of us—one that applies not just to our economic choices but to our life more generally. Are you in a period of particular personal turbulence, feeling like a cork tossed about in currents beyond your control? Is your well-being showing red numbers as the American economy was in 1932? Consider what FDR famously went on to say at his inauguration in 1933: “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” Forget flying to safety in your old routines and familiar habits. Instead, go experiment with your happiness.

Read: The United States of fear

So what might a happiness experiment be? In effect, the academic literature that I cite almost every week in this column is loaded with examples. Such studies are behavioral interventions that, in their scientific methodology, are designed to mimic the sort of clinical trials used in testing new drugs; these tests are considered the gold standard for establishing causality.

Take, for example, a 2022 experiment about gratitude that was published in the journal Affective Science. College students recruited to this psychological study were randomly given one of four assignments: write a letter expressing gratitude to someone (without sending it), text someone a gratitude message, share a post about gratitude on social media, or make a list of ordinary daily activities. (In this experiment, the last group is the control, meaning no gratitude intervention is involved.) All three of the gratitude-sharing methods led to higher feelings of life satisfaction for the assigned participants compared with those in the control group.

This finding offers information that should be extremely useful for ordinary life: If you want to get happier, simply adopt a protocol of regularly thinking about someone for whom you feel grateful and telling them so. Maybe so, but we need to bear in mind an important proviso: This is an excellent study, but there are no absolute guarantees that you will see the same effect in your life—because either you or your benefactor for whom you’re grateful might be an outlier or have some special circumstance that creates an exception. In fact, no experiment, however perfectly designed, can guarantee a constant result.

Still, that 2022 paper is good evidence that this approach to gratitude is worth trying in your own, private experiment. You might not think of it in these terms, but you probably already conduct experiments in many areas of your life. For example, if all of your friends are following a particular TV show and rave about it, you are unlikely to say to yourself, My tastes might be different, so I’m not going to bother watching it. You’ll probably try it yourself to see. After watching an episode, you’ll see how you feel—or, to put it in more formal language, you will gauge your well-being level to see if the intervention had a positive effect. If you think it has, you keep watching; if not, you don’t.

This isn’t a perfect method—there’s no control group, and you are a sample of one!—but if you reconceive this process as your own experimental practice, it can yield many new ideas and habits for your life. This mindset can be really productive, especially when times are rough and you need to get out of a rut.

When measuring happiness, researchers have generally found the strongest positive results after focusing their experiments in a few specific areas. One 2023 literature review, in the journal Nature Human Behaviour, looked at 57 recent happiness studies and found that the most common happiness interventions were in the areas of gratitude, social interaction, mindfulness, exercise, and exposure to nature. (One job of such a systematic review is to assess the quality of available research; in this case, the study found that the gratitude experiment I cited above was among the most flawlessly executed.) An important common feature of the interventions involved in these studies is that they aim to disrupt the behavioral routines and habits that reduce people’s well-being. I mention this trait because it’s exactly why you might need the experimental mindset in your life.

If you feel you could do with a happiness boost, and are willing to do something different, try out these protocols for each of Nature Human Behaviour’s five buckets:

Week one: gratitude 
Each day for a week, start your morning by thinking for five minutes about someone who has improved your life. If that person is no longer alive, write them a note and keep it for yourself. If the individual is still living, send them a quick text or email.

Week two: social interaction 
Each day when you are in public, make a point of speaking in a friendly way with a stranger for just a few minutes. This could be the person sitting next to you on the bus or subway, or it might be someone walking their dog in your neighborhood.

Week three: mindfulness 
For 10 minutes first thing in the morning, put away your phone, sit quietly in a comfortable place, and simply pay attention to what is happening around you. Make a nonjudgmental note of what you see and what you happen to hear, and be aware of your other sensations, such as sunlight, temperature, and odors.

Week four: exercise 
Try to fit in a workout for at least half an hour each morning. If you haven’t done so in a long time—or ever—get up early every day and just walk outside for an hour, or run if you like. Whatever the activity, do it without a device so you are fully present in the experience.

Week five: nature 
Find a green space in your environment, and visit it each day for half an hour, weather permitting. If doing so is possible, sit on the grass and touch it with your hands.

To get the full benefit of making each activity your own personal experiment, write down the results. Every day, you should track a few metrics by rating variables such as positive and negative mood levels, overall life satisfaction, and your sense of connectedness with others. When each week’s experiment is complete, keep collecting your data to see whether the positive effects you recorded during the test endure or evaporate. If you follow this approach, I can virtually guarantee that you will end up with fewer negative habits and more positive ones. The ultimate success of your home-laboratory testing will be a measurable rise in your well-being.

Especially when chaos strikes, pursuing this experimental philosophy will feel neither comfortable nor natural at first. This is what Roosevelt told his young audience about that challenge in his 1932 commencement address:

Probably few will disagree that the goal is desirable. Yet many, of faint heart, fearful of change, sitting tightly on the roof-tops in the flood, will sternly resist striking out for it, lest they fail to attain it. Even among those who are ready to attempt the journey there will be violent differences of opinion as to how it should be made.

Experimenting will get easier as you experience greater success and have fun doing it. Furthermore, your experiments will spark curiosity and imitation in others, as they see you changing yourself for the better, even in a difficult outside world. They might even try it themselves—in which case your own progress will be a gift to others. As FDR concluded, “May every one of us be granted the courage, the faith and the vision to give the best that is in 

The weekly ritual that will make your home feel instantly more luxurious

 The weekly ritual that will make your home feel instantly more luxurious


Two female creatives have filled their home with eclectic finds and artefacts from their travels.

Nicole Williams (left) and Reinette Roux in their lounge room. The glass and lucite coffee table was purchased from a friend.
Nicole Williams (left) and Reinette Roux in their lounge room. The glass and lucite coffee table was purchased from a friend.ARMELLE HABIB

The home
A top-floor apartment in Melbourne’s inner east in a 1923 building designed by architect Howard Lawson.

Who lives here
Lifestyle photographer Nicole Williams and Reinette Roux, founder of creative agency Studio Roux.

What we did
“Our combined decorating style is very much inspired by European apartment living,” says Williams. “We share a love of eclectic, small spaces.” Their flat is home to “a collection of found objects and artefacts we’ve come across on our travels and in local expeditions”.

Our favourite room
“The living room is a space where our collective favourite things reside,” says Williams. “It’s a place for art, books, a weekly selection of flowers and whatever is speaking to us at that moment.”

The ’hood
“We love it for the leafy streets, the architecture, the beautiful walk along the river into the city and dining at France-Soir,” says Williams.


Future plans
“We both have creative careers so we’re planning a shared studio in the sunroom,” says Roux.

Best advice
“Don’t rush the process and don’t follow trends,” says Roux. “Rather, instinctively collect objects that draw you in.”

“We love our small kitchen,” says Williams. “It makes hosting more intimate and feels quite Parisian. The Atomic cappuccino maker was a gift from a dear friend.”
“We love our small kitchen,” says Williams. “It makes hosting more intimate and feels quite Parisian. The Atomic cappuccino maker was a gift from a dear friend.”ARMELLE HABIB
“We’re lucky our styles blend seamlessly,” says Williams. “In a way, it’s what sparked our friendship.” The “Femme Brutale” sculptural light is by Helen Claire Davies.
“We’re lucky our styles blend seamlessly,” says Williams. “In a way, it’s what sparked our friendship.” The “Femme Brutale” sculptural light is by Helen Claire Davies.ARMELLE HABIB
Williams and Roux have hung their combined art collection gallery-style in the lounge room. “We’re drawn to pieces that speak to our creative sides and the way we approach our respective practices,” says Roux. Adds Williams, “The blue velvet sofa was bought at IKEA years ago.”
Williams and Roux have hung their combined art collection gallery-style in the lounge room. “We’re drawn to pieces that speak to our creative sides and the way we approach our respective practices,” says Roux. Adds Williams, “The blue velvet sofa was bought at IKEA years ago.”ARMELLE HABIB
“I’m inspired by life’s everyday moments and creating small vignettes in every corner of the home,” says Williams.
“I’m inspired by life’s everyday moments and creating small vignettes in every corner of the home,” says Williams. ARMELLE HABIB
“Hosting, cooking and sharing meals is one of my favourite pastimes – it’s a hook to hang your day on,” says Roux. “We both love entertaining, so combining forces has been a treat.”
“Hosting, cooking and sharing meals is one of my favourite pastimes – it’s a hook to hang your day on,” says Roux. “We both love entertaining, so combining forces has been a treat.”ARMELLE HABIB

“My wardrobe, which I found second-hand, is such a special piece,” says Williams. 
“The dress is by Melbourne designer Ruby Farley-Steere of Kateri.”
“My wardrobe, which I found second-hand, is such a special piece,” says Williams. “The dress is by Melbourne designer Ruby Farley-Steere of Kateri.”ARMELLE HABIB
The 1920s fireplace now acts as Williams’ bedhead, and the artwork, titled xxxoxooxxoxox, is by Melbourne artist Hannah Atherton. The replica “Wassily” chair is a second-hand find.
The 1920s fireplace now acts as Williams’ bedhead, and the artwork, titled xxxoxooxxoxox, is by Melbourne artist Hannah Atherton. The replica “Wassily” chair is a second-hand find.ARMELLE HABIB
“The garden’s magic lies in its ability to make you feel like you’re elsewhere, belying its proximity to the city and a bustling road,” says Williams. “It has seen its fair share of parties.”
“The garden’s magic lies in its ability to make you feel like you’re elsewhere, belying its proximity to the city and a bustling road,” says Williams. “It has seen its fair share of parties.”ARMELLE HABIB


 

NACDL Launches National ‘Criminal Case Tracker’ as Federal Grand Juries, Trial Juries Rebel Against Prosecutorial Overreach

“Amid growing concerns about federal charging practices, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) has launched its new Criminal Case Tracker. This new digital resource, available at www.nacdl.org/casetracker, provides defense counsel and the public with a structured, continually updated view of select federal prosecutions that reflect emerging enforcement theories, novel legal applications, and departures from historic charging practices. 

For decades, the legal adage held that a prosecutor could “indict a ham sandwich.” However, data curated by NACDL reveals that since early 2025, federal grand juries—traditionally a “rubber stamp” for the government—are increasingly issuing “no bills,” or refusals to indict. Simultaneously, trial juries are returning not guilty verdicts at a remarkable pace, signaling a deep-seated public exhaustion with federal overreach.

 “The Bill of Rights wasn’t written to be a polite suggestion; it was written to be a shield against tyranny,” said NACDL President Andrew Birrell of Minneapolis. “What we are seeing in courtrooms from the Midwest to the coasts is a fundamental, righteous rejection of the idea that criminal law can be used as a tool for political retribution. 

Jurors are seeing through these ‘novel’ and transparently thin theories. They are reminding this government that the people—not the prosecutors—hold the ultimate power in our justice system.”

The banality of surveillance Benn Stancil

The banality of surveillance Benn Stancil


Anti-corruption watchdog makes adverse findings against two former public servants but clears four other individuals


What would happen if more of us spoke up?


From ProPublica, a database of financial disclosures from the Trump regime’s political appointees. “Use this database to explore potential conflicts of interest for President Donald Trump and his team.”


This is kind of amazing: World Monitor is a real-time global intelligence dashboard. Includes military activity, climate anomalies, live webcam feeds in warzones, internet outages, active fires, and even the Pentagon Pizza Index


Pam Bondi’s in trouble with Republicans on Capitol Hill Politico

 

Iran Is Revealing The American Empire’s End Ian Welsh


America at the End of Empire? Dennis Kucinich Warns Iran Could Be the Graveyard of U.S. PowerScheerpost


Fines


Above the Law: “Law school tells students that prestigious jobs are open if they’re loyal to Trump, and that GPA isn’t much of a factor.” 


Does Netanyahu Have Spies in the White House? Thomas Neuburger. Of course they do. John Kirakou says the CIA would meet Mossad in rented space because they’d try to plant bugs every time they were given entry to CIA premises. 


50 Years of Secrets: Why You Should Care About the FBI’s ‘Prohibited Access’ Files Matt Taibb. Important.

Former spy chief quits Bondi royal commission

Former spy chief quits Bondi royal commission 

 Phillip Coorey Political editor 
Mar 11, 2026 – 8.59pm
The Albanese government’s Royal Commission into Antisemitism and Social Cohesion has suffered a major setback with the resignation of Dennis Richardson whose role was to probe whether intelligence failures were a factor in last year’s Bondi massacre.
Richardson declined to comment on why he walked away from his special advisory role, but it is understood he had become increasingly frustrated with the legal processes and felt he was wasting his time.
Former director-general of ASIO and defence secretary Dennis Richardson. Andrew Meares
Initially, when the government refused to hold a royal commission into antisemitism following the December 14 massacre, it appointed Richardson, a former ASIO boss, Defence department secretary and US ambassador, to inquire into whether the intelligence agencies could have done better.
On December 14 last year, two adherents of Islamic State murdered 15 people and wounded 44 more when they opened fire during a public event to mark the Jewish holiday of Hanukkah at Bondi Beach.
When Prime Minister Anthony Albanese subsequently caved to pressure from the federal opposition and the public, he called a royal commission to be led by Virginia Bell, and said Richardson’s inquiry would be folded into the commission process.


However, in a statement released Wednesday night, Bell said Richardson had resigned from his role as Special Advisor.

“As I noted at the Commission’s initial hearing, Mr Richardson was uniquely well-placed to advise on the material to be sought from our intelligence and security agencies in order to assess the effectiveness of their preparedness for, and response to, a terrorist attack,” she said in a statement.
“Thanks to Mr Richardson and the senior members of his team, Tony Sheehan, the former Commonwealth Counter-Terrorism co-ordinator and deputy director-general of ASIO, and Peter Baxter, a former deputy secretary at the Department of Defence and Director-General of AusAID, work on the interim report is well advanced.
“Mr Sheehan and Mr Baxter will remain with the Commission to support preparation of the interim report, which I am confident will be delivered in accord with the Letters Patent.”
Federal Attorney-General Michelle Rowland thanked Richardson for his work and said the commission’s interim report would be handed down on April 30 as scheduled.
“The government will continue to support the Royal Commission to deliver its important work, including the delivery of the interim report by 30 April,” she said in a statement.
“The Royal Commission, which is independent of government, will provide further updates in due course.”
Bell will receive $1.3 million for the year-long inquiry, in addition to her judicial pension of $330,000, while Richardson was being paid $5500 a day.