Tuesday, May 21, 2024

Sometthing. to think on … Anything you can do, I can do meta

 

Sometthing. to think on …

Anything you can do, I can do meta
— Rudolf Carnap, born in May 1891

"All I really want to do is go to the book store , drink coffee and read." Jean Paul Sartre


Water Becomes Water

Water becomes water’s shape in the water, inside the machine we become
the image of the machine, the dusk becomes the machine’s dusk,
in piercing we are pierced by the machine, we must use
a defective good to prove we are defective goods, use movement to complete


the machine’s deficient movement, use the reality of words and screws
to realize our own reality, become phantoms of order forms or profit
to transcend defective goods, and the summer rolls up its black tongue: from inside the machine
peel away the machine as it revolves, from the assembly line separate out
the finger as it returns to my body,

 
from the midst of pain return
to the womb as it gives birth, from dreaming return to the dream, the machine lives in
the sight of iron nails, as we face ourselves in the mirror
all that’s left in the sky is a pure orphaned moon, and the Henan wheat
recognizes Anhui flavors, Dongguan videotapes search
for Tokyo tastes, plastic tears drip into a basket,


the wind unfurls the fall, the women workers start the long climb up the screws’ ladder

—  Translated from the Chinese by Eleanor Goodman
By Zheng Xiaoqiong

If You Read a Lot of Fiction, Scientists Have Very Good News About Your Brain

 Regarding the NATO spokesperson’s response, former California Assemblyman Chuck DeVore put it into sharp perspective:

Our condolences to the people of #Iran for the death of President Raisi, Foreign Minister Amir-Abdollahian, and others who perished in the helicopter crash.

Our condolences to the people of Germany for the death of Deputy Protector of Bohemia and Moravia, President of Interpol, and Director of the Reich Security Main Office Heydrich, who perished in the car crash.


A Live Conversation with Esther Perel and Trevor Noah: Where Should We Begin? | SXSW 2024


If You Read a Lot of Fiction, Scientists Have Very Good News About Your Brain Futurism: “It’s a big day for bookworms: scientists studying how reading fiction affects your brain say the news is very good. In an interview with PsyPost, Lena Wimmer, a postdoctoral researcher at Germany’s Maximilian University, explained that she and her colleagues wanted to lay the groundwork for quantitative studies about fiction’s effect on thinking — and found, to their delight, that reading it is better for you than some detractors suggest.


 “Over the last decades, scholars from several disciplines have claimed far-reaching benefits — but also potential disadvantages — of reading fiction for cognition in the real world,” she told the website. “I wanted to get an objective, quantitative overview of the relevant empirical evidence in order to decide whether any of these assumptions is supported by empirical studies.” To figure out how reading fiction affects the brain, Wimmer and her co-researchers conducted two meta-analyses.
 The first, as the German psychological researchers explain in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, looked into the results of a study that measured cognitive function for people who read various types of fiction. The other took data from a longitudinal study that correlated lifelong fiction readership with cognitive outcomes ranging from abstract thinking and reasoning skills to the ability to empathize with others. In the first meta-analysis, which included data from 70 studies and more than 11,000 participants, the researchers found that reading fiction had a small but “statistically significant” positive effect on subjects’ cognition.
 In particular, the people in that cohort who read more fiction seemed to better empathize with others and understand the way they thought, PsyPostexplains…”

Decode ingredient lists like a pro inCIDecoder is a tool to help you to understand ingredient lists at a press of a button. Not just giving you some numbers or colorings (though we do that too, if you are in a hurry, but having science-based and easy-to-understand explanations about more and more ingredients, so that you can truly understand ingredient lists, kinda like a cosmetic chemist does. The site is definitely a work in progress. If you see any errors or missing info, please do use our report error buttons or send us an email at hello@incidecoder.com and we will do our best to continuously improve. If you want to test what INCIDecoder does, head to our Decode INCI page. We can analyze ingredient lists even from a photo.”


Craig Mod – scroll down the page to this section – Digital Reading in 2024 – “A long time ago, in a universe far, far away, I used to write about / really care about digital reading. 
A whole chapter of my life / career pivoted around digital reading and books, what could be, and I travelled the world (?!) talking about this stuff. I lectured at Yale for nine years about this stuff! (“Margins”!!) But I haven’t really talked about reading on a screen in a long time. Mainly because: It’s been boring / depressing. Not much has happened. Patents and monopolies chopped the feet off digital books. Well, I’m happy to report that I think — I THINK — something is once again maybe — just maybe — happening: 
This little device pictured above — the BOOX Palma (Amazon affiliate link which will make me literally tens of dollars in aggregate) — has transformed my digital reading habits for the better. 
But before we get into why and how and why now, a little background might be instructive: 
I love reading. (Perhaps you do, too!) Now, there are many forms of “reading,” and you can spend your whole day doing “reading” and not actually do the kind of reading we love. The kind we love is focused, challenging, sustained, with a pen in hand, making note of new turns of phrase and peculiar, precise words, and feeling our brains get ever-so-slightly reconfigured by the text. 
The kind of reading we love requires a piece of text be worked over so many times that the author probably never wants to see it again. The kind of text that has been squeezed through a dozen gates of betterness and its darlings have been serial killed and it has benefited from the acute eye of a shrewd editor…
Once you hold a Palma, you realize that for most situations it’s an ideal reading container. On the train? In line? In the waiting room at the doctor’s office? I’ve carried my Palma with me every day for the past three or so months with the goal of reaching for it rather than my iPhone. 
I call it the Gentle Librarian. Soft screen, clean interface, no SIM card and so mostly no internet (it loads up with new articles while at home on Wi-Fi; I can always tether to my phone to update or add something new to read on the go), a refresh rate that is plausible enough on which to watch movies (!! hypnotizing, actually, like watching a magic trick, like what Victorians may have imagined “computer screens” to look like) but not really responsive enough to seduce you into installing social media apps. There’s a lot of friction in this little bugger, and it turns out a bit of friction is a good friend of the kind of reading we love…”


MATTHEW SCHMITZ: The New Midlife Crisis.

Works of popular art have begun to document the new crisis. Barbie, the 2023 blockbuster directed by Greta Gerwig, is a modern Pinocchio story. Initially, Barbie is a deathless, sexless being—unconcerned with men or children, immune to thoughts of mortality. No mere doll, she is the model career woman. “She has her own money, her own house, her own car, her own career. Because Barbie can be anything, women can be anything.” She is living Betty Friedan’s dream. But when Barbie becomes human, she must come to terms with biological realities. The film ends with her visit to an ob-gyn. In real life, the visits are to IVF clinics.

Men have much more time on their clocks, a fact that allows millennial males now entering middle age to defer any deliberation about what they want out of life. Instead of a second adolescence, they seem determined to enjoy perpetual adolescence. (Is it any wonder that female millennial professionals are desperate when they wake up at age thirty-five and realize they want a husband?) But how long can men defer the reckoning? The Worst Person in the World, a 2021 film by the Norwegian director Joachim Trier, offers an answer. It features a man who suddenly learns he has cancer. He is the paragon of creative-class success, an underground comic-book artist whose most famous creation has been turned into a movie. But he never managed to have the children he wanted. He lost the woman he loved. All he has left are his collections of comic books and records.

Baby Boomers got married, owned homes, and had kids. The price was conformity. No doubt it could be stultifying. But for most people, the crisis was mild. You could waste money on a sports car and still have grandchildren someday. That was true even if your affairs led to a messy divorce. What of my generation?

They threw the baby out with the bathwater.



You can't have success without some failure.

 A man's first duty, a young man's at any rate, is to be ambitious.

- G. H. Hardy (1877-1947)

Promoter penalties, whistleblower, TPB reforms pass Parliament




  Mystery in the Alps: A Chinese Family, a Swiss Inn and the World’s Most Expensive Weapon: Switzerland agreed to buy F-35 jet fighters to park on a remote runway. Then the U.S. zeroed in on the Wangs, who owned the rustic hotel next door. “The truth of whether the Wangs were small-time innkeepers or a secret weapon in Beijing’s decadelong effort to capture one of America’s most closely protected military secrets may never be known. The case boils down to whether the family was interested in the view from the hotel’s front, or its back.”

“Cyberattacks have more than doubled since the pandemic. While companies have historically suffered relatively modest direct losses from cyberattacks, some have experienced a much heavier toll. US credit reporting agency Equifax, for example, paid more than $1 billion in penalties after a major data breach in 2017 that affected about 150 million consumers. As we show in a chapter of the April 2024 Global Financial Stability Report, the risk of extreme losses from cyber incidents is increasing. Such losses could potentially cause funding problems for companies and even jeopardize their solvency. 
The size of these extreme losses has more than quadrupled since 2017 to $2.5 billion. And indirect losses like reputational damage or security upgrades are substantially higher. The financial sector is uniquely exposed to cyber risk. Financial firms—given the large amounts of sensitive data and transactions they handle—are often targeted by criminals seeking to steal money or disrupt economic activity. Attacks on financial firms account for nearly one-fifth of the total, of which banks are the most exposed…”


Democracy Corrupted: Apex Corruption and the Erosion of Democratic Values (PDF) Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 4166. From the Abstract: “The undermining of democratic values produces latent effects that even cumulate four months later. Seeking solutions, priming national identity proved an unsuccessful antidote, but providing exposure to national stock index funds holds some promise.” Oh


Thursday, May 16, 2024

Fourth Circuit Affirms Criminal Tax Sentences in Unpublished Opinion that Is Good for Teaching (5/162/24)

In United States v. Rice, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 11329, 2024 WL 2078454 (4th Cir. 5/9/24), CA4 here and GS here, an unpublished opinion, the Court affirmed the Rices’ convictions and sentencing. Normally, I don’t write on unpublished opinions, but I thought this opinion had some interesting facets which are good teaching opportunities for students or relatively new tax crimes practitioners.

First, the opinion says at the opening (slip op. 3):

James and Susan Rice (collectively, Appellants) appeal their conviction and sentence on ten counts relating to their failure to file tax returns and failure to pay employment taxes to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Finding no error, we affirm.

Second, the Court provides a short summary of the facts, among which was the following (slip op. 4):

Appellants were jointly represented by trial counsel.




Monday, May 20, 2024

Promoter penalties, whistleblower, TPB reforms pass Parliament

 David McBride Starting to Wish He’d Just Leaked Confidential Tax Information for PwC Instead


Promoter penalties, whistleblower, TPB reforms pass Parliament 

BUSINESS

Labor’s bill containing reforms that respond to the PwC scandal and PRRT amendments has finally passed both houses after a deal was struck with the Greens.  

By  Christine Chen     10 minute read

The government’s bill on tax adviser misconduct has passed both houses of Parliament, introducing tax promoter penalties of up to $780 million and stronger protections for whistleblowers in the wake of the PwC scandal.

A deal between Labor and the Greens on Thursday secured the bill’s passage along with changes to the Petroleum Resources Rent Tax and fuel efficiency standards.

It comes over one year since news broke of PwC using confidential government tax briefings for its own gain.

In response to the news, the government committed to overseeing “the biggest crackdown on tax adviser misconduct in Australian history”.

The government released draft legislation reforming the Tax Agent Services Act and Taxation Administration Act in September and introduced it in the lower house the following month.

Its passage was recommended by a senate economics committee on May 10, despite pushback over the fact it also contained unrelated changes to the PRRT.

The PwC reforms, found in schedules 1-4 of the bill, would scale up maximum penalties for advisers and firms that promoted tax avoidance schemes by 100-fold (from $7.8 million to over $780 million).

Tax whistleblower protections would be extended under schedule 2, reversing the burden of proof for certain claims of protection to ensure disclosures can be made without detrimental conduct such as termination or litigation. If detriment was suffered, it would allow whistleblowers to seek compensation.

Schedule 3 of the bill would give the TPB more powers, allowing it to publish more details of its investigations and decisions publicly and increasing investigation time frames from six months to two years, enabling it to investigate a wider scope of issues raised by a potential breach.

Schedule 4 would remove limitations on information sharing between government agencies. This would help prevent a PwC-like scandal from happening again, the senate committee said.

While schedules concerning PwC reforms received broad support, some MPs pushed back against its final schedule which amended the PRRT to limit the assessable income able to be offset by deductions to 90 per cent.

Independent Senator David Pocock, who wanted the rate of PRRT raised from 40 per cent up to 60 per cent, said the government was ramming through an omnibus bill that combined “important changes off the back of the PwC scandal and puts them with a dud deal when it comes to the export of our gas”.

Despite the pushback, the bill was passed along with amendments to fuel efficiency standards and offshore gas approvals through a deal with the Greens which involved removing more contentious parts of the offshore gas approvals bill.

The findings of Lendlease's tax audit are a win for the ATO, but it came at a huge cost to the whistleblower behind it


Lawyers and auditors should not work under same roof, inquiry hears 

A parliamentary hearing has heard testimony that abuse of legal professional privilege will continue so long as the big four accounting firms are allowed to own law firms.

user iconNick Wilson20 May 2024  BIG LAW


Editor’s note: This article originally appeared on Lawyers Weekly sister’ brand, Accounting Times. 

Asked how to avoid abuses of legal professional privilege (LPP) among the big four consulting giants, University of Wollongong associate professor Andrew Schmulow said the answer was an outright ban on allowing them to own law firms.

“They should never have been allowed to own law firms in the first place. In fact, lawyers and auditors will at times be on opposite sides of a conflict. I think of trading in insolvency. I think of faulty or defective financial statements,” he told a recent hearing of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services. 

“To have lawyers in the same firm as an audit firm is absolute lunacy; it should never have been allowed to happen, and it is very quick and easy to unwind.”

Schmulow’s solution may be more extreme than most, but his concerns echo those raised throughout the parliamentary inquiries triggered in response to the PwC tax leaks scandals.


Several witnesses have raised concerns that legal practices within advisory divisions of multidisciplinary firms may offer the cloak of privilege as a selling point for their non-legal services.

Legal Consolidated partner, Brett Davies, opposed Schmulow’s calls for a forced split of multidisciplinary firms.

“What are you going to do? You’ll allow a doctor’s surgery to own a law firm, but you won’t allow an accounting house to own a law firm?”

“I think it’s ridiculous … I think it’s discriminatory to suggest accountants have a lower standard than a financial planning group,” he said.

Asked whether the law should go further in protecting against abuses of LPP, Davies said the laws were already in place.

“Your right as a client to prepare information which may go to court is protected by [LPP] and whether it is or it isn’t is a question for a judge in a court of law to decide,” he said.

“So, what the judge will do is say, ‘OK, you’re claiming [LPP], show me the information in confidence and I’ll tell you whether it’s subject to LPP or not’ … Everyone does it.”

ATO second commissioner Jeremy Hirschhorn recently told the Senate the Tax Office had been “disappointed” by the test of legal professional privilege applied by in-house and independent law firms.

“We [the ATO] have been disappointed with the law firms, whether that is the law division of multidisciplinary firm or a law firm itself, in how they have gone about doing the test as to whether something truly is privileged,” he said.

“Instead, in some cases almost viewing it like a negotiating tactic by making a blanket claim and forcing us to go document-by-document.”

Hirschhorn said he had observed a strategic blurring of the lines between consulting and legal functions, with consultants claiming their services had been offered under the “aegis of a law firm.”

“When I read that, I worry that the exact same problem that we had with the big four accounting firms will be replicated in the big law firms,” he said.

Misuse of LPP among large consulting firms is not a new observation. Both reports of the Senate Finance and Public Administration Reference Committee on the integrity of consulting services featured detailed accounts of the issue.

Both referred to the findings of Justice Mark Moshinsky in the 2022 Federal Court decision of the Commissioner of Taxation v PricewaterhouseCoopers that PwC had incorrectly applied LPP to more than half of the 15,500 documents requested by the ATO.

The first report wrote that PwC’s approach to LPP was “striking,” adding that the Senate committee believed that approval for the privilege claims “must have” been approved from the “most senior levels” of the firm.

After reviewing its approach to LPP claims, PwC Australia said it had identified “certain engagements that were not being directed by legal practitioners as described in the engagement letters.”

It added that these incidents were contrary to the firm’s values and policies.


The furniture is the star

 The furniture is the star


Whether it’s the carpet from ‘The Shining’, Tom Ripley’s borrowed palazzi or Bridgerton’s Georgian pastels, TV and film provide our most immersive experience of interior design



How do we really see interior design? Where do we experience new trends, looks and vibes? How many of us actually spend time in top-end showrooms, visit the outrageously stylish apartments of friends or are invited to weekends at stately homes or Italian palazzi? Well, OK, this is the FT, so maybe some of us, but I’d suggest that for the most part, we encounter those interiors that most influence us — whether consciously or not — at the movies or on TV. We discover domestic design vicariously via the screen.



After all, these fictional interiors have been as carefully curated as any furniture showroom or professionally designed penthouse — because they play a crucial role in visual storytelling. Sets construct stories as well as physical spaces and rooms reveal facets of character before that character has even appeared on screen. 

The paintings, the books, the pictures on the wall, the kind of desk or the things placed on that desk all subtly build a back-story. 

The individual items and the designs of interiors situate us in time, in taste, in class, in money. 

Think of Holly Golightly’s apartment in Breakfast at Tiffany’s, a spare, modern interior with a cutaway bathtub for a sofa, with stacks of suitcases or boxes for furniture, as if to suggest it could all be moved in a moment — this is a woman with no roots, still struggling to define who she is.




Or take the shadowy interior of Vito Corleone’s study in the opening scene of The Godfather: the big desk, the film noir blinds, the darkness in the middle of a bright day, the blend of family and work, at home and in the office. 

I used to have a particular bugbear about Modernist interiors and furniture in the movies always used as a cipher for evil: sleazebags, crooked financiers or super-villains. 

Black leather Mies van der Rohe chairs, Le Corbusier loungers or LA modern houses all seem to augur something sinister. “Perhaps we all want a bit of Bond villain’s lair,” says Paula Benson, founder of Film and Furniture, which helps cinema buffs identify and buy the pieces they have seen on screen. “Those rooms just look so good.”


Like Benson, I also scan the movies obsessively for details. And, she admits, it can ruin a film when she’s constantly checking out the props. 

“People hate watching with me because I’m always pausing to look at some detail. I watch everything twice, first to look at the furniture, then to watch the film.” Those details are deeply considered, says Sonja Klaus, a London-based film and television designer.

 “What we do is not interior design,” she says. “When I’m designing a set for a character’s home I like to think I become that person.” More like Method acting — in design — then? “Yes, I suppose so. It’s not thinking where would he put his glasses down but where would I?”



Among Klaus’s projects was the dark BBC drama series Taboo, starring Tom Hardy. “This was a man who had returned and inherited his father’s house so he was living with things that were not his, that already had a character,” she says. “The best thing anyone can say to us is, ‘Where did you find that location?’ 

When actually we’d built it all in a studio. Hardy kept running his fingers over the surfaces asking if it was real.” Judy Ducker, a set decorator and production buyer who has worked on big productions including Martin Scorsese’s Hugo, says the hardest films to get right are the ones set in the recent past “because we remember what things looked like”.



“I worked on the Diana movie and we could get the decor right but the technology was difficult — to get the right mobile phones or those beige computers.” What she touches on is critical because most of us live with a mix of things, some old, some new; we rarely buy everything at once. 

As a result, interiors are rarely entirely of their time, they are hybrid. Wes Anderson’s production designer Adam Stockhausen captured this mix well with The Grand Budapest Hotel, an interior from a golden fin-de-siècle of somewhere-in-central Europe but one that was clearly added to in the 1970s with its oranges and browns. 

Stockhausen suggests that those distinctive colours were inspired by minor props such as metal ashtrays — the smallest items can define entire sets.


There's a real loyalty to Kubrick and people want to cement that love of his films

with something real

99 — Paula Benson, founder of Film

and Furniture



Nothing on a Stanley Kubrick set was random. “He wasn’t the kind of director who would just pick something from a prop store,” Benson says. “He wouldn’t have used something that had been used by another director.” If our most immersive experience of interior design comes from film and television, how does it affect us as viewers — and as consumers?



When Benson watched Kubrick’s The Shining, she became entranced by the geometric carpet that appears in the shots of young Danny (son of Jack Nicholson’s writer) playing in the corridor of the Overlook Hotel. After visiting the Kubrick archives, she eventually found the carpet had been designed by interior designer David Hicks. 

Hicks had been very much a part of the London scene in the 1970s, working for aristocrats, boutiques and bohemians, and Kubrick would have been well aware of his work. 

So the carpet might have been slightly out of place in the Rockies, where the exterior was set, but the interiors were shot at Elstree Studios at Borehamwood, just beyond the northern edge of London and near Kubrick’s home. People may recognise and admire the pieces from the movies, but do they really buy them? 

Who has a Kubrick carpet (the pattern of which is actually called Hicks’ Hexagon)? “Oh you’d be surprised,” says Benson, who sells the officially licensed version of the carpet. “People have it in their homes, in hotels, as a statement. Loads of them seem to go into home cinemas.” (A double homage, then.) Is it a kind of code, I suggest, a conversation piece? “Big time. There’s a real loyalty to Kubrick and people want to cement that love of his films with something real. 

They may not consciously be watching films for [interiors] inspiration, the link may be subconscious, but it is still there.” 

It is not just the carpet. Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey made an impact too, with Olivier Mourgue’s low-slung Djinn chairs, the still-futuristic-looking pieces that appear in the Hilton space station scene, and the Arne Jacobsen-designed cutlery, “which still looks amazing”, Benson says.


The movies, from historical dramas to sci-fi attempts at predicting a future, inevitably reflect and intensify the present. The industry has the resources to use the best and newest designs and the production designers, set dressers and prop consultants who are most keyed in to contemporary trends and the coolest new things. And those images then broadcast and amplify trends. But are set designers and prop buyers tastemakers themselves? 

Can they change the look of our lives? Benson says Mad Men had a huge impact. “Mid-century modern was already an interest but that series really pushed it forward — the Florence Knoll sofas, big table lamps . . . Nordic noir, Borgen and The Bridge were a big reminder of how beautiful Scandinavian design was, the Hans Wegner dining chairs and the Poulsen lamps.” 

She might also have pointed to the slightly darker version of the era portrayed so atmospherically by Tom Ford in A Single Man, in which a bereaved Colin Firth plans suicide in an exquisitely rendered world of Modernist shadows cast by the Schaffer Residence, the John Lautner-designed house in Los Angeles where the film was shot. Ducker says the long-running TV adaptation of Agatha Christie’s Poirot (1989-2013), on which she worked, “definitely made Art Deco more popular. Specialist dealers in Deco were saying to us that the series had done them a favour.”


“Sometimes you see the influences more in fashion, for instance Peaky Blinders had a real impact on menswear but I also think the success of Game of Thrones reintroduced the gothic,” she says. She also cites TV series Bridgerton: “It’s not for me but I do think that rather camp, over-the-top version of Georgian has had an impact. All those pastel wallpapers.” 

That colour-saturated aesthetic might also owe something to Wes Anderson, whose obsessive visual sense pervades his movies and has filtered outside. The candy shades of The Grand Budapest Hotel can now be seen in east London patisseries or Brooklyn gelaterias. 

Anderson and Stockhausen are a relatively rare example of direct influence; usually it is more subtle. 

Many architects are inspired by the movies, but largely it happens subconsciously. Architect Adam Richards is unusual in attributing elements of his own house, Nithurst Farm in Sussex, to specific films. Andrei Tarkovsky’s Stalker, a bleak, apocalyptic vision of a toxic landscape, might not seem the cosiest inspiration for a domestic interior.



Yet “our main kitchen space is quite closely modelled on an interior in Stalker,” Richards says, referring to a scene in which a hallucinatory, post-industrial space stands in for a kind of heaven. “The house embodies a journey — and this was a destination, a space about faith and doubt.” I paid a visit to the astonishing warehouse of one of the UK’s leading prop specialists in west London, which preferred not to be named here. These places are often described as Aladdin’s Caves but it was more than the kitsch cocktail suggested by that label. 

This was a museum, with rooms full of Renaissance pieces and Rococo furniture, oddly familiar pieces such as the bust Joaquin Phoenix strokes in Gladiator or a slightly dusty, fussy sofa that Marilyn Monroe reclines on in The Prince and the Showgirl. ‘Poirot’ definitely made Art Deco more popular. Specialist dealers were saying to us that the series had done them a favour Judy Ducker, a set decorator and production buyer


In this cornucopia you can see the designers’ dreams for Saltburn or Call Me by Your Name, the louche decadence embodied in collections of big, old and beautiful things, objets d’art that frame an idealised lifestyle in a palazzo or a mansion. They represent a kind of stasis, an inherited sense of grandeur which looks likely to come to a sticky end. Yet it is also the smaller things — the personal items, the artefacts employed in an intensely emotional scene — that matter arguably more than the grand gestures. 

Among the homewares for sale on Film and Furniture’s website is the whisky glass from Blade Runner: a square, slightly cinched glass designed by architect Cini Boeri in 1973 and used by Ridley Scott in what has become the ultimate dark sci-fi classic. Still manufactured by Arnolfo di Cambio, it has become a bestseller on Benson’s site. 

After all, why wouldn’t you want to drink from the same glass as a depressed dystopian AI assassin? As well as combing cinema classics for the designs that appeal to viewers for their own homes, Benson has to anticipate the next film or TV series that might shift our tastes in home decor. 

So which sets are we responding to now? She has her eye on Netflix’s recent adaptation, Ripley: “It’s quite slow, so there’s plenty of time to look at details but I did notice all those wonderful desk sets, the paraphernalia of writing, which is something we don’t do any more.” 

Perhaps next we will all be yearning for inkwells, fountains pens, blotters and leather-topped writing desks. Creating characters for ourselves, just like they do in the movies. Edwin Heathcote is the FT’s architecture and design critic