Saturday, December 06, 2025

Battle of wills rages in David Rofe circle

 Colin Friels: ‘We’re only here for a very brief time, so you may as well enjoy the living daylights out of it’


Battle of wills rages in David Rofe circle

KATHY Jackson and her partner landed a key role in the QC’s life.
February 28, 2015  - archive 
BRAD NORINGTON

KATHY Jackson likes to tell the story of how she met eminent Sydney barrister David Rofe QC for the first time in 2012.

He was listening to Alan Jones interview her on morning radio and heard her say that she had no legal representation for the courageous fight that shot her to prominence as a union corruption whistleblower.
Still practising at 80 despite having few clients, and perhaps yearning for the limelight once more after a high-profile career, Rofe called the Jones program and asked to be put in contact with Jackson. He wanted to offer his services pro bono.
Their meeting soon after was the beginning of an incredibly close relationship that would soon see Jackson and her fiance, Fair Work Commission vice-president Michael Lawler, assume a central role in the life of the elderly barrister and an ugly fight over his $30 million estate.
Jackson, personally, would become an executor of Rofe’s estate and significant beneficiary of his will within a short time of meeting him, not long after moving to Sydney and severing her connections in Melbourne, where she had lived all her life, possibly unaware of Rofe’s existence. 
Lawler would soon become a pivotal controlling figure in Rofe’s life as well, with an enduring power of attorney and responsibility as manager of his finances.
Lawler accompanied Jackson to meet Rofe in early June 2012 at Wardell Chambers. This was Rofe’s new workspace on the 15th floor at 39 Martin Place, in the hub of Sydney’s legal world, that had been arranged for him by loyal friends and former proteges John Agius SC and Anthony Tudehope, after Rofe’s 40-year association with the nearby prestigious Wentworth Selborne Chambers had been terminated amid doubts about his capacity to continue.
Rofe briefly represented Jackson as legal counsel in the Federal Court that month. He also briefly represented Lawler in the same proceedings. Rofe described his treatment by Justice Geoffrey Flick in court as “outrageous” — but he abruptly withdrew nonetheless as Jackson’s barrister in response to the judge testily challenging his apparent confusion and zero knowledge of the case. It was a sorry postscript to Rofe’s glory days when he was renowned for his incisive mind and brilliance as a leading barrister in fabled court battles such as the Greek conspiracy case, Sankey v Whitlam and the Heiner affair.
Rofe had been diagnosed with dementia almost two years before meeting Jackson. A highly respected neurologist at Sydney’s St Vincent’s Clinic, Ian Sutton, wrote on October 12, 2010, that he considered it “imperative” that Rofe cease his legal practice because of worsening cognitive impairment that he said was “irreversible”. Rofe chose to press on, moving chambers instead of being pressured into retirement.
While Jackson was a stranger and newcomer in Rofe’s life, Law­ler was not. Lawler had known Rofe well — more than a decade earlier. Before the Howard government appointed him as vice-president of the nation’s dispute-settling tribunal with the quasi-status of a Federal Court judge in 2002, Lawler had been a neighbour of Rofe as a barrister on the 12th floor of Wentworth Selborne Chambers in Phillip Street.
Lawler, who hails from an influential family as the son of Peter Lawler, a former head of the prime minister’s department, and the brother of John Lawler, who recently retired as boss of the Australian Crime Commission, is understood to have had a rocky friendship with Rofe in those days.
It included a falling out shortly before Lawler’s 2002 commission appointment — which came with a glowing tribute from Tony Abbott, then John Howard’s workplace ­relations minister and crucial in recommending Lawler.
Lawler had virtually no contact with Rofe from then on until June 2012, when Jackson, by now Law­ler’s partner after her marriage to former union official Jeff Jackson broke up, accepted help from the elderly barrister in her Federal Court battle to stop the Health Services Union being put in the hands of an administrator.
The trigger for Jackson and Lawler’s sudden, much deeper involvement in Rofe’s life was an approach four months later from Nick Llewellyn, who claims to have been Rofe’s “close friend”, “dependant” and “virtual son” since 2000. Llewellyn told Lawler that Rofe was desperately ill in Sydney’s St Vincent’s Hospital and claimed that a group of the elderly barrister’s old family and friends, whom he branded the “nasties”, was seeking to have Rofe locked up in a nursing home, with Llewellyn locked out of his life.
One morning in late September 2012, Rofe had been found in a confused state, wearing only boxer shorts, at his Martin Place chambers by colleague Tudehope.
Rushed to emergency at St Vincent’s, Rofe then spent weeks in hospital, suffering delirium. He was diagnosed with pneumonia, which aggravated his dementia. His condition worsened with a life-threatening golden staphylococcus infection that he contracted while in the ward.
Llewellyn left Sydney for a pre-paid holiday in Thailand with his partner Curtis Hodges, and returned on October 16 to find Rofe little improved. To his dismay, Llewellyn found that Tudehope had arranged for two of the old Rofe group, lawyer Bob McLaughlin and Rofe’s nephew Philip Rofe, who had invested his uncle’s fin­ances for years, to take charge of the seriously ill barrister’s affairs.
Llewellyn had an added motivation to seek Lawler’s help: the old Rofe group was trying to switch off his regular monthly payments of $10,000 and other financial support that David Rofe provided, to which he had become accustomed. Llewellyn also wanted Rofe to follow through on a promise to buy a $1.7m apartment in Sydney for him and Curtis.
As Llewellyn had put it to Rofe at an early stage of their relationship, in a letter on April 14, 2002, following an introduction from Sydney barrister and former Liberal MP Ross Freeman: “I guess this relates to you because you seem to want to spend some time with me, but you don’t seem to realize (sic) some true facts in life. 
“When a younger attractive man spends time with someone older, there has to be a trade-off. I’m a young man used to the finer things in life.”
By late October 2012, Lawler was fighting, boots and all, for Llew­ellyn as Rofe ailed in hospital. He brought in a commercial disputes lawyer, Rodney Kent from Kent Attorneys, to take on the old Rofe camp, which also included lawyer friends Agius, Tude­hope, Brendan Hull, Bob Cameron, Andrew Cameron and Tim Murphy.
When Rofe had sufficiently recovered, St Vincent’s suggested he be moved to a public nursing home in Sydney’s northwest. The old Rofe group proposed instead that he be shifted to Lulworth House, a private nursing home in Sydney’s eastern suburbs where famous residents have included Gough Whitlam and Neville Wran.
During a lot of wrangling, the power of attorney for Rofe briefly switched from McLaughlin and Philip Rofe to Law­ler-backed solicitor Kent, and then to barrister and David Rofe friend Hull. 
In one letter to the old Rofe group, Lawler declared that the medical opinion of Rofe’s doctor, specialist geriatrician Sandy Beveridge, was “so obviously flawed” because in Lawler’s opinion Rofe was lucid and sharp, and had “vigorously” maintained his instructions to Kent as his new solicitor.
The old Rofe group and Beveridge were especially dismayed when Rofe was persuaded at one point in the melee to accept Kent as power of attorney, with $50,000 swiftly shifted to Kent’s trust ­account. Lawler eventually won a fight to have Rofe returned to the familiar surroundings of his Woollahra home before Christmas 2012 with 24-hour nursing care. 
By June 2013, Lawler had successfully argued that, given his judicial standing and experience, he was absolutely the right person to be financial manager of Rofe’s $30m fortune with an enduring power of attorney.
A power of attorney is described in official government information as “an important and powerful legal document” that gives the attorney the authority to buy and sell real estate, shares and other assets, to operate bank accounts and to spend money on behalf of the protected person. The attorney must always act in the best interests of the person. Unless expressly authorised, the attorney cannot gain a benefit from being an attorney. 
The authority “cannot be used for health or lifestyle reasons”, and the attorney “must always act in the best interests of the principal”. 
Lawler’s power of attorney, arranged by Susanna Ford, a Lawler friend with a weekender near his home at Wombarra, south of Sydney, and a solicitor at law firm Arn­old Bloch Leibler, carried special provisions for Llewellyn’s upkeep: Llewellyn was to receive a payment of $150,000 to clear credit card debts; regular payments of $10,000 a month; and $1.45m to ­assist in buying him an apartment. 
The monthly payments were conditional on Llewellyn continuing to visit Rofe at least four times a week “for more than two hours on each occasion” and performing tasks “including providing companionship”. The payments were described as “loans” repayable on Rofe’s death or on request.
After Rofe’s arrival home, Jackson became particularly close to him and part of his daily life. She spent considerable daytime hours sitting with him in his living room as a companion, and they lunched regularly at Rofe’s favourite nearby restaurant, Zigolini’s. Rofe also accompanied Jackson to court hearings, albeit as an ardent supporter, not a barrister. 
He made semi-regular visits with his carer to Jackson’s Wombarra home, where she has lived with Lawler since buying the property in July 2012 for $1.3m. The property was found for Jackson by lawyer Ford’s partner, real estate buyer’s agent and Lawler friend Chris Curtis.
On June 28 last year, during Lawler’s period of authority to buy real estate for Rofe using Rofe’s money, a $1.35m property was purchased for Rofe next door to Jackson’s home at Wombarra.
With the ailing barrister’s dementia worsening, and the role in his life of Jackson and Lawler noticeably flourishing, Llewellyn became increasingly alarmed at the couple’s influence.
So alarmed, in fact, that he sent them an angry three-page letteron August 22, 2013 — only two months after Lawler took charge and well before the Wombarra property purchase.
Llewellyn started by calmly discussing a $10,000 birthday gift he had received from Rofe in addition to “my monthly payment of $10,000.00 for July” — but his letter quickly turned into a tirade. Addressing the couple mostly in the third person, Llewellyn accused Jackson of superseding his position in Rofe’s life.
“I am not playing games with the both of you. It is clear Kathy is working with Michael to eliminate and destroy my credibility with David,” he claimed. 
Llewellyn lamented that his close friend, self-described “accountant, estate executor and end-of-life specialist” Nick Illek, had also been shut out of deliberations on Rofe’s will by Lawler. In 2010 Illek had a power of attorney for Rofe and was the executor of several of his many wills. Illek had penned an unsolicited eulogy for Rofe’s approval in 2011 that called him “the Quentin Crisp of law in this state”, and asked for Rofe’s “desires and preferences with regards to the disposal of your remains on your demise”.
Illek would later describe his friend Llewellyn in official documents as a “parasite” and as having a “parasitic relationship” with Rofe, while stressing that such a relationship “can be mutually beneficial” and in this case was particularly “very beneficial” to Rofe. 
In his letter to Jackson and Lawler, Llewellyn accused the couple of re-doing Rofe’s will “behind my back”, and alleged that Lawler was to benefit from the latest of many wills. Under the sub-heading “Michael”, Llewellyn alleged: “David told me that Kathy deliberately put the new Will figure up for you from $40,000.00 $60,000.00. I wonder how money affects us all …”
Twelve months later, on Aug­ust 24 last year, Llewellyn vented his anger in a formal written submission about Jackson and Lawler to the Royal Commission into Trade Union Governance and Corruption in the hope that its counsel assisting, Jeremy Stoljar SC, might take into account the couple’s financial dealings with Rofe while he investigated Jackson’s separate alleged misuse of more than $1m of HSU funds.
The 40-year-old Llewellyn, who was born Nicholas Herceg and now calls himself “Lord Nicholas Alexander Llewellyn, Lord of Glencoe”, told Stoljar in his submission about his bitter falling out with Jackson and Lawler within months of Lawler gaining control of the Rofe estate in June 2013.
He detailed how the couple had allegedly tried to shut him out as Jackson sought to replace him as the closest person in Rofe’s life. Llewellyn, who has a law degree from Bond University and once worked for the openly gay Sydney lawyer John Marsden, with whom he had a brief and ultimately fractious relationship, claimed in his submission that between July 2013 and March last year, Lawler and “especially” Jackson exerted influence on Rofe to the point that Rofe agreed to finalise a will that made Jackson “co-executor” and bequeathed her “a sum between $2m and $2.5m” on Rofe’s death. 
Rofe was referred to repeatedly in Llewellyn’s written complaint as “the protected person”, considering Lawler’s activated power-of-attorney role. Llewellyn claimed in the document, which has not been publicly released: “After that will was executed, Jackson was not to be seen as often.”
Llewellyn also referred in his written submission to the $1.3m purchase of the Wombarra house for Rofe in June last year, making the extraordinary allegation that Lawler “bought the protected person a house with the protected person’s money next door to Law­ler and Jackson in Wombarra with the obvious intention of moving that person there (I suspect to control and further extract more money out of his estate)”.
According to Llewellyn, Rofe reacted “very badly” when he learned about the Wombarra purchase and wanted Lawler’s power of attorney revoked.
The trigger for Rofe’s “expressed outrage”, according to Llew­ellyn friend Illek in other official documents, was Rofe allegedly discovering that Lawler had made a $160,000 withdrawal from his bank account that “appeared to be a deposit on some property”.
Llewellyn claimed in his submission to Stoljar that after the Wombarra purchase, Rofe exec­uted a codicil to his most recent will of March 2014 that significantly reduced Jackson’s inheritance to $50,000 and removed her as an executor.
Llewellyn claimed that Lawler and Jackson had then engaged in “a hate campaign” against him, accusing him of being “a despicable person, a liar and even a thief”.
A solicitor for Lawler said that Lawler had acted at all times honourably, generously and in good faith in relation to Rofe. He said Lawler had become power of attorney at Rofe’s request, and Rofe had agreed in advance when Law­ler wanted to buy the Wombarra property for him. Lawler had “repeatedly requested Mr Rofe not to make him a beneficiary under Mr Rofe’s will”. 
Jackson did not respond to detailed questions about her role.
After it was briefly revoked, Lawler regained his power of attorney with Rofe’s signed blessing. He did, however, give it up altogether, including his role in managing Rofe’s financial affairs last year.
In Lawler’s place, to look after Rofe’s welfare, the tribunal revised the arrangements so that Ruth Coleman, the elderly barrister’s guardian since late 2012, would ­report monthly to the Public Trustee. Robert Horder, Rofe’s longtime accountant, was installed as administrator on $280 an hour to manage Rofe’s finances and pay his bills out of the estate.
During the conflict over who should handle his estate, numerous wills have been drawn up for, and signed by, Rofe over the past two years.
They have included varied proposed inheritances for Jackson, Llewellyn and others as the battle has raged about how the estate eventually should be split up. 
According to one Rofe insider: “There have been hundreds of emails and tape recordings … wills have come out more often than the Telegraph.”
In one of the wills drawn up last year, Jackson was inserted as a co-executor and as the beneficiary of a one-tenth share — or close to $3m, based on current estimates of Rofe’s $30m wealth, which is invested in an extensive shares and property portfolio.
The other executors of this will are understood to be the accountant, Horder, and Jonathon Rofe, a nephew and one of few in the old Rofe group still on good terms with Jackson and Lawler.
Llewellyn is understood to remain a beneficiary in Rofe’s latest will, but much of his inheritance has allegedly been cancelled out: the will is understood to make clear that he will inherit one-tenth — the same as Jackson — but must repay about $2.4m, according to an accountant’s spreadsheet, that he has received from Rofe since 2002.
Considering the acceleration of Rofe’s dementia since his diagnosis in 2010, it is not clear what legal standing last year’s wills — or other wills from the past few years — would have in the event of his death. An epic battle is expected in the probate court.
Insiders claim that during the period Lawler held power of attorney, and on at least one occasion since then, Lawler has taped Rofe in conversations using a digital recorder and even filmed him talking. 
Allegedly the reason for such recordings has been to verify whether Rofe could be considered capable of signing legal documents despite his obvious decline.
A range of medical specialists also has been brought in at times to examine Rofe and give expert advice on his state of mind — a practice attacked by some close to Rofe as “doctor shopping” to allegedly challenge the conclusions in the original “irreversible” cognitive impairment diagnosis made by Sutton in 2010.
One family member tells The Weekend Australian that Rofe’s sharp, incisive mind and brilliance as a barrister during his prime have been lost. He says: “These people talk about David’s money as if he’s dead — ‘Look we’ll put money here and money there’ — and he’s sitting next to them.”
Rofe continues to live at his Woollahra home. From time to time he is driven to see Jackson at Wombarra. He visits his Wombarra house next door, which is ill-equipped for a disabled person. He prefers to return to Woollahra in the evening.
Jackson faces a further Federal Court hearing in June when her next big legal battle starts: a fight to beat off allegations that she used $1.4m of union members’ dues to fund an expensive lifestyle over a decade that included international holidays and personal luxuries, as well as divorce payments for her former husband.
Lawler returned to work last month after “long leave” to look after Jackson. He continues to receive his salary package of $435,200 a year, although he has been largely frozen out of the leadership at the Fair Work Commission after a decision in the dying days of the Gillard government by then workplace relations minister Bill Shorten to install two new deputy presidents above Lawler in the tribunal’s pecking order.
Llewellyn continues to receive his $10,000 monthly payments but is on the periphery of Rofe’s life. He lives in a luxury apartment in the Q1 building on Queensland’s Gold Coast that was bought for him last year in Rofe’s name with $1.2m of Rofe’s money.

Winners of the 2025 International Landscape Photographer of the Year

 ‘Wouldn’t it be fun not to be famous?

Wouldn’t it be fun not to be rich?

Wouldn’t it be pleasant to be a 

simple peasant

And spend a happy day digging 

a ditch?’


Only in dreams, in poetry, in play do we sometimes arrive at what we were before we were this thing that, who knows, we are.

— Julio Cortázar, born  in 1914


56 million years ago, the Earth suddenly heated up – and many plants stopped working properly The Conversation


The Landscape Is The Main Character Of This Rosebery Renovation


A tour of author Bri Lee's cosy bookish sanctuary in Kings Cross


When Oprah Picks An Argument With You Even As She Picks Your Book

Novelist Ann Packer is OK with that. “As any veteran author knows, books that get people talking have a better chance of bubbling up on the best-seller list, even without celebrity endorsement.” - The New York Times

The Man Who Helped Determine The American Literary Canon

Determining what the nation did and did not read was the through line of Malcolm Cowley’s career. He was a great discoverer and nurturer of talent: Jack Kerouac, John Cheever, and Ken Kesey were among the writers he championed, and, of the critics he commissioned to produce reviews at The New Republic. - The New Yorker

What Possesses People To Want To Own More Books Than They Can Possible Read?

Bibliomania, the only hobby which is also a mental health affliction. The person with piles of titles on their nightstand, in their closet, in the trunk of their car. Books in front of books on their bookshelf. “With thought, patience, and discrimination, book passion becomes the signature of a person’s character.”  - LitHub

Winners of the 2025 International Landscape Photographer of the Year

The Atlantic no paywall – “A collection of winners and selected images from the competition’s “Top 101” group, chosen from more than 3,600 entries by professional and amateur photographers around the world…”

2025 ILPOTY Awards – The Results – To see the flipbook with the Top 101 entries, see the bottom of this article. To see the Top 202+, click on the Archive link above and select 2025 Top 202+ Entries. For the past 12 years, we’ve been putting together an authoritative book full of amazing landscape photographs. 

There’s no doubt that each of the 101 photographs in each of the 12 books is a masterpiece, a study in the art and craft of landscape photography, but we should also spare a thought for the hundreds of images that we couldn’t include in the books. Photography is subjective. While there are preferences and popular styles, there really is no right or wrong – these are not useful words for photographers or for artists. 

So as we present the Top 101 landscape photographs for 2025, we’d like also to acknowledge the amazing work that we didn’t publish – and recognise another 100 or so that were literally one point away – see our Top 202+ on this website..”



Literally a Map Showing All the Buildings in the World

Gizmodo: “The world has a lot of buildings. Now you can see them all with a single glance. A research team at the Technical University of Munich (TUM) in Germany published the GlobalBuildingAtlas, a high-resolution 3D map of all buildings worldwide. 

The map consists of 2.75 billion building models, which the team gathered from satellite images taken since 2019. 

This is a huge leap from the previous global dataset, which contained about 1.7 billion buildings, and offers much better resolution, which is about 30 times finer than comparable databases, according to the researchers in a statement. A detailed account of how the map was created was also published in the journal Earth System Science Data on December 1…”

St Nicholas Mikulaš

Try as much as possible to be wholly alive, with all your might, and when you laugh, laugh like hell and when you get angry, get good and angry. Try to be alive. You will be dead soon enough.

— William Saroyan, born in 1908


Husbands: 17 Things They Are Good For Babylon Bee


“Not everything can be said in a few words, but nothing can always be said in many words.”


In the prologue to Joe Wilkins’s new memoir-in-fragments, The Mountains and the Fathers, Wilkins writes, “In story we learn to live like human beings in the dark houses of our bodies.” That is exactly what The Mountains and the Fathers does. It creates a story for how an intelligent and awkward boy grows up in the tough and barren Big Dry of eastern Montana.

 It’s a story of how a boy can find a home in a fatherless landscape, how a boy can become a new sort of man in the ranchlands of Montana. And that narrative is what makes this memoir stand out as a new Western memoir that creates new and much-needed myths about manhood in the West.

… Memoir: The Mountains and the Fathers — BREVITY's Nonfiction Blog.


 Paul Davis On Crime: Authors Behaving Badly: The Amoral Ways of Rumpole's Creator John Mortimer, Graham Greene and Other Beloved Writers.


A mural with a classic Aussie Christmas scene popped up at a Sydney train station. Then people looked closer


100 Notable Books of 2025

The New York Times Gift Article – If you read only one best books list each year, make it the one from the Times. Always insightful, and full of a vast array of gems. And remember to buy your books from indie book shopsbrick and mortar or online, and used is always best. Then share…print books are always at hand, can go anywhere with you, and are so much easier and more comforting to read than e-books, and they are yours!

Friday, December 05, 2025

Beware angering the goddess

 “Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.” as old Albert Einstein apparently said.


Really interesting take on Wake Up Dead Man and the other Knives Out films. Benoit Blanc’s primary motivation is not solving the murder but protecting the innocent from the rich and powerful.


Our gorgeous #WakeUpDeadMan end credit portraits, painted from life by Isabella Watling.


“People had all sorts of reactions to being asked to do the right thing” — the moral psychology behind not returning your shopping cart when you’re done with it



‘Slop Evader’ Lets You Surf the Web Like It’s 2022

404 Media: “It’s hard to believe it’s only been a few years since generative AI tools started flooding the internet with low quality content-slop.


New Public Database Brings Transparency to AI Tools Used in Hiring

“Artificial intelligence is increasingly shaping how people are hired, yet few understand how these systems actually work. A new project from Sloane Lab at the University of Virginia School of Data Science and College of Arts and Sciences aims to change that. 

On November 6, the Talent Acquisition and Recruiting AI (TARAI) Index—a first-of-its-kind, public, interactive database—will officially launch, offering unprecedented transparency about AI tools that are used across the hiring process. 

The project was developed by Mona Sloane, assistant professor of data science and media studies and Ellen Simpson, her former postdoctoral researcher at the University of Virginia School of Data Science and now a faculty member at the University of Alaska. 

The TARAI Index maps more than 100 HR and recruiting technologies that use artificial intelligence to filter, rank, and evaluate job candidates. “The TARAI Index provides a new level of transparency in the tools shaping how recruiters find and assess job candidates,” said Sloane.

 “By making this information public, we hope to empower recruiters, HR leaders, and policymakers to make more informed decisions about the technologies used across the hiring funnel.”

  • The TARAI Index is available at www.tarai.org, providing open access to one of the most comprehensive resources yet for understanding how AI is shaping talent acquisition.

These are the agencies that like their bosses the most

Katy Gallagher faced a barrage of questions in Senate estimates about the government response to the scathing Briggs review.


These are the agencies that like their bosses the most

Bosses at the Museum of Australian Democracy and a host of other public service workplaces may now be reviewing their interactions with staff, following damning figures in this year's census.


Home Affairs to unleash AI on sensitive government data


Secret Liberal probe blames Trump for ruining Dutton’s election


US regulators ‘taking seriously’ allegations of bankers’ support for Epstein The Guardian


Billions Down The Toilet As Private Equity Firms Take Bath On Hot New ‘Continuation Vehicle’ StrategyBenzinga


Costco sues Trump admin seeking tariff refunds before Supreme Court rules if they’re illegal

CNBC: “Costco sued the Trump administration to get a full refund of new tariffs it paid so far this year, and to block those import dutiesfrom continuing to be collected from the retail warehouse club giant as a Supreme Court case plays out. 


In the suit filed Friday, Costco said that it risks losing the money it has already paid to satisfy the tariffs even if the Supreme Court eventually upholds earlier lower court rulings that found President Donald Trump did not have the legal power to impose those duties. The company noted a looming Dec. 15 deadline that could prevent the tariffs that it has already paid on an estimated basis from being refunded. Costco did not say how much money it believes should be refunded to the company. 


Costco’s suit, filed in the U.S Court of International Trade, said that U.S. Customs and Border Protection denied the company’s request to extend the Dec. 15 date of so-called liquidation, the final computation of tariffs assessed on imported items. While an importer has six months to file a protest contesting liquidation, “not all liquidations are protestable,” the suit said.


 Dozens of other companies have filed similar lawsuits to protect their right to potential refunds in case the Supreme Court rules against the so-called reciprocal tariffs that Trump imposed on imports from many U.S. trading partners and his so-called fentanyl tariffs on products fromCanada, China, and Mexico. 


Trump invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Actto impose those often high tariffs. In August, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a 7-4 ruling, upheld a prior decision by the Court of International Trade that found Trump did not have that power…”