Thursday, August 11, 2022

Chinese ambassador to Australia - Sri Lanka arrests protest leader Joseph Stalin

Xiao Qian says reset of China-Australia relationship is possible and suggests Washington had turned Canberra against Beijing


 Unexplained Wealth NSW


TikTok: No 10 should follow parliament and ditch TikTok, says Tory MP


In Friday’s Kafkaesque twist, the ATO and Commonwealth prosecutors have sought suppression orders to prevent media reporting of Boyle’s efforts to assert that defence, in case it prejudices the trial. (Delays have already pushed the trial itself back to October 2023.) It’s the ultimate illustration of how current public interest disclosure laws can end up undermining their own primary purpose.

Last Friday’s twist in the long prosecution of Australian Taxation Office whistleblower Richard Boyle – now headed for its fifth year – brings into relief the serious flaws in our nation’s whistleblowing laws.

Boyle aired his concerns about oppressive debt collection by the ATO in a joint ABC–Fairfax media investigation released in 2018. But he went public only after raising his concerns within the ATO and later with the inspector-general of taxation (IGT).

Various reviews confirmed his complaints under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 – the whistleblower protection law for federal public servants – were reasonable. Despite dismissing his original complaint, the ATO ensured the suspect practices, which it claimed resulted from “miscommunication” and “misunderstanding”, were fixed.

Senate committee labelled the ATO’s initial investigation into Boyle’s complaint as “superficial”. The IGT found merit in the matters Boyle raised but had no jurisdiction to intervene because it is not a “disclosure recipient” under the 2013 Act.

Tax office whistleblowing saga points to reforms needed in three vital areas


FBI executes search warrant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago CNN


Live: Agents broke into safe during Mar-a-Lago search – Trump BBC. Live blog is very unusual for BBC. Lambert says this smacks of coordination, yet the subheads don’t sound very good for the officialdom: “FBI ‘left with very little’ – anonymous Trump source tells CBS” and “No FBI search like this in US history – state attorney”


Former US president Donald Trump has invoked his Fifth Amendment rights and declined to answer questions from the New York attorney-general at a scheduled deposition.


Sri Lanka arrests protest leader Joseph Stalin


Big banks fund the heavy machinery used for Amazon deforestation, report says




Scammers took £20,000 of my wedding savings but Revolut won’t pay me back

Brockman, Defendant in Pending Major Tax Crimes Case, Dies 


SMH Nick Petroulias

A WeWork for the .01% is Coming to New YorkBloomberg


‘American Cartel’ authors go inside the opioid industry NPR


MOVE ALONG, NOTHING TO SEE HERE: Report: Judge who signed off the FBI raid on Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago mansion donated $2,000 to Barack Obama’s campaign and represented Jeffrey Epstein’s Lolita Express pilots, his scheduler and ‘Yugoslavian sex slave.’


Federal News Network – “Salaries for federal employees fall significantly behind the private sector, the Federal Salary Council reported [August 5, 2022]. The council reported the pay disparity between public and private sector employees, on average, was 22.47%.