On a Scale of 1 to Al Capone, How Bad Is It if I Forget to Lodge My Tax Return?
Labor pushed to deliver ATO data access to advisers, administrators
We Clerked for Justices Scalia and Stevens. America Is Getting Heller Wrong.
The New York Times: “…Justices Scalia and Stevens clashed over the meaning of the Second Amendment. Justice Scalia’s majority opinion held that the amendment protected an individual right to keep a usable handgun at home, which meant the District of Columbia law prohibiting such possession was unconstitutional. Justice Stevens arguedthat those protections extended only to firearm ownership in conjunction with service in a “well-regulated militia,” in the words of the Second Amendment. We each assisted a boss we revered in drafting his opinion, and we’re able to acknowledge that work without breaching any confidences.
Justice Scalia had a practice of signing one opinion for a clerk each term, which permitted the clerk to disclose having worked on that case, and for John, that was Heller; Justice Stevens noted in his 2019 autobiography, “The Making of a Justice,” that Kate was the Heller clerk in his chambers…But despite our fundamental disagreements, we are both concerned that Heller has been misused in important policy debates about our nation’s gun laws. In the 14 years since the Heller decision, Congress has not enacted significant new lawsregulating firearms, despite progressives’ calls for such measures in the wake of mass shootings.
Many politicians cite Heller as the reason. But they are wrong….The closest we’ve come to major new federal gun regulation in recent years came in the post-Sandy Hook effort to create expanded background checks. The most common reason offered by opponents of that legislation? That it would violate the Second Amendment.
But that’s just not supported by the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the amendment in Heller. If opponents of background checks for firearm sales believe that such requirements are unlikely to reduce violence while imposing unwarranted burdens on lawful gun owners, they should make that case openly, not rest on a mistaken view of Heller…”
