Oliver Wendell Holmes Nailed it
“The mind of the bigot is like the pupil of the eye; the more light you pour upon it, the more it will contract.”
Elon Musk hits out at Sydney Morning Herald for ‘boring audiences to death’
A Poynter Report special: the 2024 year in media
Even laypeople use legalese MIT News – “MIT study explains why laws are written in an incomprehensible style. Legal documents are notoriously difficult to understand, even for lawyers. This raises the question: Why are these documents written in a style that makes them so impenetrable? MIT cognitive scientists believe they have uncovered the answer to that question.
Just as “magic spells” use special rhymes and archaic terms to signal their power, the convoluted language of legalese acts to convey a sense of authority, they conclude. In a study appearing this week in the journal of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the researchers found that even non-lawyers use this type of language when asked to write laws.
“People seem to understand that there’s an implicit rule that this is how laws should sound, and they write them that way,” says Edward Gibson, an MIT professor of brain and cognitive sciences and the senior author of the study. Eric Martinez PhD ’24 is the lead author of the study. Francis Mollica, a lecturer at the University of Melbourne, is also an author of the paper – Even laypeople use legalese. Casting a legal spell. Gibson’s research group has been studying the unique characteristics of legalese since 2020, when Martinez came to MIT after earning a law degree from Harvard Law School.
In a 2022 study, Gibson, Martinez, and Mollica analyzed legal contracts totaling about 3.5 million words, comparing them with other types of writing, including movie scripts, newspaper articles, and academic papers. That analysis revealed that legal documents frequently have long definitions inserted in the middle of sentences — a feature known as “center-embedding.” Linguists have previously found that this kind of structure can make text much more difficult to understand.
“Legalese somehow has developed this tendency to put structures inside other structures, in a way which is not typical of human languages,” Gibson says. In a follow-up study published in 2023, the researchers found that legalese also makes documents more difficult for lawyers to understand. Lawyers tended to prefer plain English versions of documents, and they rated those versions to be just as enforceable as traditional legal documents.
“Lawyers also find legalese to be unwieldy and complicated,” Gibson says. “Lawyers don’t like it, laypeople don’t like it, so the point of this current paper was to try and figure out why they write documents this way.”
Feds Warn SMS Authentication Is Unsafe After ‘Worst Hack in Our Nation’s History’
Gizmodo: “Do you use text messages for multi-factor authentication? You should probably switch to a different method, especially with everything we’re learning about a recent hack that’s been dubbed the “worst in our nation’s history.”
Even the federal government is putting out warnings now, including a call for government officials to only use encrypted apps for communication. Hackers aligned with the Chinese government have infiltrated U.S. telecommunications infrastructure so deeply that it allowed the interception of unencrypted communications on a number of people, according to reports that first emerged in October. The operation, dubbed Salt Typhoon, apparently allowed hackers to listen to phone calls and nab text messages, and the penetration has been so extensive they haven’t even been booted from the telecom networks yet.
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued guidance this week on best practices for protecting “highly targeted individuals,” which includes a new warning about text messages. “Do not use SMS as a second factor for authentication. SMS messages are not encrypted—a threat actor with access to a telecommunication provider’s network who intercepts these messages can read them.
SMS MFA is not phishing-resistant and is therefore not strong authentication for accounts of highly targeted individuals,” the guidance, which has been posted online, reads. Not every service even allows for multi-factor authentication and sometimes text messages are the only option.
But when you have a choice, it’s better to use phishing-resistant methods like passkeys or authenticator apps. CISA prefaces its guidance by insisting it’s only really speaking about high-value targets…”
