Monday, September 02, 2024

Ex-PwC partner Paul McNab is totally back in busines

 KPMG are the very last people to train civil servants – but that’s what they’re going to do


Ex-PwC partner Paul McNab is totally back in business Rear Window

The collective shrug by the profession appears well in progress. Not least as regards this tax lawyer.

Myriam Robin Rear Window editor

Sep 1, 2024 – 6.36pm

The players in PwC’s tax leaks saga require two things to get on with their lives.

The first is for everyone to stop talking about it. The second is the renewed embrace of their peers.

While the PwC bonfire retains interest to parliamentarians and journalists, the collective shrug by the profession appears well in progress. Not least as regards tax lawyer Paul McNab.



One of the first four partners named as having appeared on emails discussing the firm’s lead on the ATO, the scandal in effect forced him out of his job at DLA Piper, where he’d landed after moving on from PwC three years earlier. Later, he would sue PwC for withholding his retirement benefits (the suit is ongoing), while denying all wrongdoing and starting his own firm to service the clients who’d stuck by him.

Said clients aren’t the only ones letting bygones be bygones.

At the Tax Institute’s annual tax summit later this month, McNab has been invited to present an educational session on Australia’s double-taxation agreements, covering developments in international tax law.

Also appearing over the three-day event is Tax Practitioners Board chairman Peter de Cure, head of the regulatory body that deregistered ex-PwC partner Peter Collins and kicked this whole saga off, and new Australian Taxation Office commissioner Robert Heferen, whose own organisation spent years feuding with PwC. Hey: that won’t be awkward at all!

While denying wrongdoing, McNab had at least two fateful cameos in the development of the PwC saga.

The first was his meeting with then-ATO deputy commissioner Mark Konza to outline how the PwC-advised Uber had cleverly sidestepped new government tax laws to force it to pay more Australian tax. The discovery of this so enraged Konza that “as soon as I got back to the office I started an audit on that company and others that have been using that scheme”, marking another escalation in the ATO’s war with PwC.

McNab’s other known role was a rather revealing email he sent to then-PwC chief Tom Seymour in which McNab both lauded the “accuracy of the intelligence Peter Collins was able to supply us” and his division’s proactive work in courting the US tech giants likely to be affected.

Apparently, McNab was just angling for a big bonus, which didn’t work. But the email became a vivid suggestion of how some within PwC knew and thought nothing of Collins’ uncanny insights.

Seymour, for one, received McNab’s email, but told a parliamentary hearing last month he’d barely taken it in. Alas. At least being ignored isn’t a fate likely to befall McNab now. Including at the upcoming tax summit.


https://www.afr.com/rear-window/luke-sayers-lands-and-expands-in-the-capital-20240826-p5k5f7

Opinion

Mark Di Stefano

Luke Sayers lands and expands in the capital

Unburdened by the PwC fallout, Sayers is hiring in Canberra. A look at the federal tenders won by his firm helps explains why.

Mark Di StefanoColumnist

Aug 26, 2024 – 5.59pm

When St Kilda’s Jack Higgins snapped a goal in the final seconds on Sunday, Carlton’s finals dreams looked headed for hilarious disaster. But a result going their way in Perth a few hours later meant the Blues limp into the finals and, more importantly, that Luke Sayers’ impossible dream of a flag as club president lives to fight another day. Did you ever doubt him?

The man’s insane luck continues to spark wonder, after his old PwC colleagues watched their firm disintegrate. Repercussions for the former CEO? Not in these parts. Especially, not in Canberra.


As mentioned last week, Sayers’ eponymous consulting firm appears to be doing so well at gobbling up work from Canberra’s departments and agencies that he’s hiring new staff. A closer look at the public tenders that Sayers Group has won helps explains why.

Since 2020 (mere months after “hospital-passing” PwC onto Tom Seymour) Sayers Group has been given 28 contracts with the federal government and its agencies, according to the tender portal. In total, his firm has squelched more than $13.3 million for that work.

Most of it seems unremarkable: lots worth a few hundred thousand dollars to out-source reviews and procurement. But in several instances, contracts began at one price, then amended up considerably.

Take the Sayers Group computer services contract with the climate change department, which started in December last year and was due to last 11 months. By April, the contract had blown out by an extra $1.6 million, amended to be worth almost $3.3 million.

It is such a common practice in professional services that it’s referred to as “land and expand”. You go into Myer looking to buy a suit, suddenly, you’ve bought a tie, a new belt. Cufflinks? The shirt doesn’t even have the holes. Best take them, anyway!

Clients of the big four firms know it well and there are often legitimate reasons for revising up the work. Although where does that leave the public tender process, wholly created to ensure taxpayers only pay for the firm with the cheapest bid?

On four occasions, Sayers Group’s contracts have been marked up by between 60 and 246 per cent after they’ve begun. The total of the contract increases comes to $4.2 million. That is, a near-third of the Sayers government take from the feds. No wonder he’s hiring!

Management, IT and consulting firms have jammed their cost centres into Canberra for years, and departments have green-lit all this siphoning of public money into the private sector. It’s the unwinding of PwC that puts manoeuvres like landing and expanding under scrutiny.

Remember: PwC was shut out from bidding for government work after its tax shenanigans came to light. The former CEO who oversaw the mess, however, is doing just fine. More than fine. You’ll have to find out how fine at the end of the contract.

Related

The power player who sparked a Melbourne Club feud

Related

Andrew Pridham finds SA uni merger too gamey to chew

The country’s most expert opinion and analysis. Sign up to our weekly Opinion newsletter.

Mark Di Stefano is Rear Window columnist, based in the Sydney newsroom. He previously worked at BuzzFeed, the Financial Times and The Information before joining the Financial Review as a media and tech correspondent. Connect with Mark on Twitter. Email Mark at mark.distefano@afr.com