Pages

Wednesday, December 09, 2020

Fixing financial data to assess systemic risk

 

God speaks to each of us as he makes us, then walks with us silently out of the night. These are the words we dimly hear: You, sent out beyond your recall, go to the limits of your longing. Embody me. Flare up like a flame and make big shadows I can move in. Let everything happen to you: beauty and terror. Just keep going. No feeling is final. Don't let yourself lose me. Nearby is the country they call life. You will know it by its seriousness. Give me your hand.
— Rainer Maria Rilke, born in 1875


Economic Studies at Brookings – Fixing financial data to assess systemic risk, Greg Feldberg, Research Scholar, Yale School of Management: “The COVID-19 market disruption again highlighted the flaws in the data that the public and the authorities use to assess risks in the financial system. We don’t have the right data, we can’t analyze the data we do have, and there are all sorts of holes. 


Amidst extreme uncertainty in times like this, market participants need better data to manage their risks, just as policymakers need better data to calibrate their crisis interventions. This paper argues that the new administration should make it a priority to fix financial regulatory data, starting during the transition. The incoming administration should, first, emphasize data when vetting candidates for top financial regulatory positions. 



Every agency head should recognize the problem and the roles they must play in the solution. They should recognize how the Evidence Act of 2018 and other recent legislation help define those roles. And every agency head should recognize the role of the Office of Financial Research (OFR) within the regulatory community. Only the OFR has the mandate and experience to provide the necessary leadership to address these problems. The incoming administration should empower the OFR to do its job and coordinate a systemwide financial data strategy, working with the regulators.


 That strategy should set a path for identifying key data gaps that impede risk analysis; setting data standards; sharing data securely, among authorities and with the public; and embracing new technologies that make it possible to manage data far more efficiently and securely than ever before. These are ambitious goals, but the administration may be able to accomplish them with vision and leadership.”



Public Provider vs. Big Brother explores the powerful potential of new technologies to better help governments understand the needs of citizens, but also the tensions between using data harvesting and monitoring, and technologies that can identify individuals, to serve the public interest, with the inevitable concerns and legitimate fears about “big brother” and risks of infringing on freedoms and rights. Innovation efforts in this area fall under two key themes: data harvesting and monitoring and biometric technologies and facial recognition. Both of these areas of innovation come with their benefits, but also risks. 


Joe Biden Has Problems. The World Has Solutions.

From the founding fathers to Silicon Valley, the U.S. has a long tradition of borrowing the best ideas from around the globe.Continue reading 


Privatized Regulators and Corrupt Corporations Caused Deadly Grenfell Tower Fire, Now Threaten Collapse of UK Housing Market through “Cladding Crisis”

Tne Grenfell Tower Inquiry digs up some whiffy corporate dealing, plus the UK’s property market could seize up





If you’ve ever wondered where your stolen credit card turns up, a cybersecurity firm is offering hard proof.

Your credit card data is typically stolen in two ways. One is after a data breach like the Capital One incident that affected 106 million customers. The other is e-skimming, where hackers inject JavaScript code into website payment processing pages in order to pilfer credit cards and account data from customers.

During the holiday season, cybercriminals turn to e-skimming, Greg Foss, Senior Cybersecurity Strategist at VMware Carbon Black, told Fox News. 

How stolen credit cards are sold on the dark web


 

Union takes Tax Office bosses to Federal Court in work from home row

The Australian Taxation Office’s top executives are being sued in the Federal Court, accused of abusing their public servants’ work from home rights during the height of the coronavirus pandemic.

The Australian Services Union says Commissioner of Taxation Chris Jordan and five of his most senior managers made up a new category of remote working – "working from home" – so they could bypass pre-existing rules for staff who were working at home.

 


The Australian
And every single ATO senior executive needs to read the Federal Court decision and ask themselves how could that have happened in 21st ...
The clock struck midnight on Friday, December 4. No High Court appeal had been announced in the infamous “gold case” but in fact a late appeal had been lodged and a new chapter is now about to open. Stunningly, the appeal was not about the detailed ATO refining case that was part of Australia's greatest cover-up.